Is Paul Solotshi the pseudonymous Satoshi?

[Mpamaegbu]

There are incriminating evidences suggesting that Paul Solotshi is the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto in an article I just read this morning. It points clearly that one of the reasons that the Satoshi's one million Bitcoin hasn't moved is because the fellow has been in orison since 2002 till date. Below is the link and it makes for an interesting and convincing read. https://www.investinblockchain.com/new-evidence-suggests-satoshi-nakamoto-is-paul-solotshi-the-creator-of-encryption-software-e4m-and-truecrypt/

What are your thoughts?

[1714024068]

1714024068

[1714024068]

1714024068

[1714024068]

1714024068

[traderethereum]

It could be true, and we know that the possibility will always there as we don't know the truth.
We will see much other theory about who is the real Satoshi Nakamoto, but that will not make us to even closer to him because he still hiding in somewhere place that we don't know.
Anybody can be the real Satoshi Nakamoto, especially if there is any document that will support him as Satoshi Nakamoto.

[GreatArkansas]

I just read the article and just wowed . But we still don't have more evidence who is the real Satoshi Nakamoto.
Since Paul Solotshi Calder Le Roux is also a genius programmer and also has an interest in some encryption, these may be a key that he can consider to be Satoshi, especially the suspected wallet of Satoshi Nakamoto that has 1 million bitcoin that still untransferred could still possible evidence.

It would be more exciting if someone can interview Paul Solotshi so we can also hear his side.

[CryptoBry]

What are your thoughts?

My thought is that he can just be another claimant to the title but so far since he may not be able to move those bitcoin just because he is incarcerated but then again a person with a will can always find a way. So maybe we should just wait for the time when he can be released from the prison so he can finally prove to be the real guy. The search for the genuine Satoshi Nakamoto will not stop all because we continue to get fascinated by his whereabouts. And until we can see, meet and talk with the original, the space for speculations is always open. Enjoy! I am thinking of nominating myself to be Satoshi Nakamoto too.

[squatter]

There are incriminating evidences suggesting that Paul Solotshi is the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto in an article I just read this morning. It points clearly that one of the reasons that the Satoshi's one million Bitcoin hasn't moved is because the fellow has been in orison since 2002 till date. Below is the link and it makes for an interesting and convincing read. https://www.investinblockchain.com/new-evidence-suggests-satoshi-nakamoto-is-paul-solotshi-the-creator-of-encryption-software-e4m-and-truecrypt/

What are your thoughts?

Satoshi, a cartel boss? And then a law enforcement snitch? Sounds likely!

This was discussed a while back in another thread. The evidence is razor thin, just a bunch of weak circumstantial nothings. It doesn't seem convincing to me at all.

The "evidence" seems to boil down to this:

• The curious Satoshi/Solotshi monikers.
• Both were programmers familiar with C++.
• Both had a strong interest in cryptography and privacy.
• Both were wary of authority.
• Both had an interest in online gambling – Bitcoin’s initial code had a poker client included.
• Both were well aware of the difficulty with traditional payment systems, Le Roux on account of the illegal prescription drug racket he was running.
• Satoshi’s spelling and language – “analyse, colour, defence, bloody, hard” is consistent with Rhodesian Le Roux’s.
• Satoshi disappeared in early 2011 to “move on to other things” around the time that Le Roux was transitioning from software genius to cartel boss.
• With tens of millions of dollars in cash, Le Roux would have had no need to cash out his BTC once the price began rising.
• If anyone could have hidden wallets containing 1 million BTC, it would have been the creator of disk encryption software TrueCrypt.

[Genemind]

Honestly, I'm not really convinced by this article. As for me, it's just another Satoshi candidate. The good thing is Paul is not making noise so his name would sound appealing just like what Craig Wright did. However, the truth will still speak for itself in time and the truth about Satoshi will prevail if he, himself would open up about everything about his identity.

[Ailmand]

Well, it's possible but we can't deny the fact that no matter how many articles we read, we still got no assurance about the information that we're reading. It could be true but might also be a way to deceive us. There are still lots of things that we have to know about Paul Salotshi before we confirm and conclude that he's the real Satoshi.

[Texacha]

It's impossible, because Craig Wright is. 

[acroman08]

we can all guess, assume or make an investigation of who really satoshi nakamoto is but at the end of the day there are still
no confirmation if it is really him. there have been a lot of claims that they found or they are satoshi nakamoto and it's kind of
getting annoying.  the article is interesting though.

[Haunebu]

there have been a lot of claims that they found or they are satoshi nakamoto and it's kind of
getting annoying.

Annoying indeed. None of these claims are mildly interesting in my opinion since 99.999% of them are wrong and no one will ever know who the real Satoshi actually was. He is like Jack the Ripper of this age which is amazing considering the technological advancements.

It's impossible, because Craig Wright is. 

You found him. Damn. I actually thought Trump was Satoshi all this time. If he could fool a big part of USA, why can't he fool the rest of the world?

[omone1]

The article is very interesting but I really don't believe the real Satoshi Nakamoto will be a cartel boss. It's just another article trying to unravel the original creator of bitcoin. Even from the prison one can give out a code to a trusted visitor to help out in real life affairs. Paul Solotshi is not the real Satoshi

[bL4nkcode]

Out of many theories and claims about who is satoshi, this one is the most interesting IMO.

But of course, until satoshi don't reveal himself by doing such—people will not be convinced anything written or read from such article(s).
So better don't expect satoshi will come back anymore, except to this paranoid who claim that he is and using legal sh*t to those people who are against him by saying frauds, while he himself is a fraud.

[1Referee]

I get it that figuring out who Satoshi potentially could be in the past was an interesting topic, but it's starting to become pretty annoying with how news outlets continue with this bs today. I really don't see any point in continuing this when the only valid bit of evidence is a signature from the address containing the genesis block reward.

I'm sure they eventually will find someone named Sato Naka and then again the whole media circus show starts from scratch.

I'm sure that if the real Satoshi is watching, he's rolling on the floor laughing at how stupid this space is. Must be happy to have left and never come back. His coins go up in value anyway, so what is there to come back for? No one of that level is going to waste time here.  

[xvids]

There are incriminating evidences suggesting that Paul Solotshi is the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto in an article I just read this morning. It points clearly that one of the reasons that the Satoshi's one million Bitcoin hasn't moved is because the fellow has been in orison since 2002 till date. Below is the link and it makes for an interesting and convincing read. https://www.investinblockchain.com/new-evidence-suggests-satoshi-nakamoto-is-paul-solotshi-the-creator-of-encryption-software-e4m-and-truecrypt/

What are your thoughts?

It could be true but we could never know unless he could proves it .
The fact that Paul was a smuggler and crypto or Bitcoin gives total anonymity to the users are very interesting.
Maybe it was the reason if Paul is the true Satoshi then Bitcoin was clearly created to be a way to smuggle or be used for illegal activity.
It would be his perfect get away or easy way to transact in the internet anonymously .

[klaaas]

So mcafee was going to reveal this person ? ; )    And here another person on the speculation list. 

[YuginKadoya]

I am unlikely to be a believer of this another candidate to be Satoshi just because of "Solotshi" Paul Le Roux would be the real Satoshi and a likely have a link with wright can be very deceiving indeed in my opinion, And even though he is familiar with C++ there are many well-known Programmers that are knowledgable enough, Even I am familiar with C++ as well, Maybe I can become a candidate myself, And I am not being biased with the thing that he is being a criminal but because if Paul would be Satoshi he would not think of any criminal acts and he would be brilliant with the things he will do.

[MakeMoneyBtc]

There is a good theory behind this article and we can see multiple reasons why Paul Solotshi could actually be Satoshi Nakamoto. The problem is it could all be a coincidence and even though there are many arguments sustaining  the theory behind all of this there isn't any notable proof. There have been many people trying to prove they are the the real Satoshi but so far none of them succeed and that's surely going to continue until the real Satoshi will reveal himself.

[BrewMaster]

if we start calling everyone who is named Satoshi or has a name that is similar looking or sounding like Satoshi then we will have to go through the list of names for at least another 10 years!

besides, the first thing you need to understand is that Satoshi Nakamoto is just a fake name so there is no way that the real personality was named anything remotely similar.
for example my name is not even close to my user name (BrewMaster)!

[Slow death]

is a very interesting theory, but without any proof. so far we have many suppositions of who is satoshi and we also have many faketoshis. Which makes me very intrigued is why someone would create something anonymous and after many years would want to leave the anonymity but could not present any proof that is the real creator of bitcoin? another point that makes me curious, I believe now if the real satoshi showed his face, he would not be arrested because he did not commit any crime, which leads me to my curiosity, why the real satoshi does not show his face? Is the real satoshi dead?

[smyslov]

There are incriminating evidences suggesting that Paul Solotshi is the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto in an article I just read this morning. It points clearly that one of the reasons that the Satoshi's one million Bitcoin hasn't moved is because the fellow has been in orison since 2002 till date. Below is the link and it makes for an interesting and convincing read. https://www.investinblockchain.com/new-evidence-suggests-satoshi-nakamoto-is-paul-solotshi-the-creator-of-encryption-software-e4m-and-truecrypt/

What are your thoughts?

It all adds up, the theory is well presented that points that we have finally found the real Satoshi Nakamoto, the writer explanations are very clear and he connected all the dots perfectly, this is a breakthrough article,let's see where it will lead us, the explanation that the 1 million Bitcoin cannot be move is because Satoshi is spending his time in jail, where access to computer is very limited to none, sounds credible.

[suzanne5223]

It could be true, and we know that the possibility will always there as we don't know the truth.
We will see much other theory about who is the real Satoshi Nakamoto, but that will not make us to even closer to him because he still hiding in somewhere place that we don't know.
Anybody can be the real Satoshi Nakamoto, especially if there is any document that will support him as Satoshi Nakamoto.

Like you said anybody can be Satoshi Nakamoto for there no genuine evidence provide to proof all the people mentioned all this while to be Satoshi. However, someone who wants to be anonymous will definitely not use a nick which is almost similar to his name.

In the meantime, let us give our fingers crossed.

[avikz]

There are incriminating evidences suggesting that Paul Solotshi is the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto in an article I just read this morning. It points clearly that one of the reasons that the Satoshi's one million Bitcoin hasn't moved is because the fellow has been in orison since 2002 till date. Below is the link and it makes for an interesting and convincing read. https://www.investinblockchain.com/new-evidence-suggests-satoshi-nakamoto-is-paul-solotshi-the-creator-of-encryption-software-e4m-and-truecrypt/

What are your thoughts?

Literally no one knows about the truth! What is going on in the market now, is pure speculation! However, personally I will not be happy if Paul Solotshi is proved as a creator of bitcoin! His existing linkage with criminality is making me worried because Bitcoin is generally taken very negatively by a lot of people. Now if it's proved that the creator of bitcoin is already serving prison term, it will make things worse!

I don't know the truth though! If he the rightful creator of bitcoin, he may get back his right! But criminal link with the creator of bitcoin is not a good thing for the community as well as for the bitcoin!

[uray]

There are incriminating evidences suggesting that Paul Solotshi is the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto in an article I just read this morning. It points clearly that one of the reasons that the Satoshi's one million Bitcoin hasn't moved is because the fellow has been in orison since 2002 till date.

Do we really care at this point who the real Satoshi is, there is no point in speculating over and over with the same topic and every day someone will be linking someone to something just to get the right amount of hits for their website and nothing else, it is better to leave him alone unless Satoshi wants to come out from his hibernation.

[Adriano2010]

Even if Paul is Satoshi i not have any problem who is and even if not found who is i will continue use bitcoin and i think is a good thing that he create bitcoin and help a lot of people to make some money.

[Vinalians]

It can be true you know. I see the article and some of it are very convincing that this person alias Solotshi is really sounds like satoshi. Nakamoto for me is still mystery because I don't see enough evidences for it. I suggest they interview this man.
Solotshi is also a genius programmer which can lead to the creation of bitcoin.

[rdbase]

From the republic of congo?
I highly doubt he is satoshi and why would this site virtually dox him by publishing his personal identification online for all to see without blurring anything?

[akamit]

It looks like these news platforms are not getting any new stories to publish. Just copying old stories to publish with just their own wordings.

So many topics about Satoshi Reveal thingy and it's getting boring. Let's wait for that day when Mr. Satoshi will move his 1m BTC, it's money and I believe one day someone will come for it.

[Easteregg69]

I will just "delete selected". Is that ok?

Some moderator on yogurt.

"yogurt" is your teeth done explain! (Attack dog 2019).

If you got family:

Addis Black Widow - Goes Around Comes Around
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVK4ayUKGG4

[BitFinnese]

What are your thoughts?

My thought is that he can just be another claimant to the title

The guy never claimed to be Satoshi, the article is just building some theory that the guy is possibly Satoshi because of the background and the name relevance. 

[oapieNL]

I also did my research. I did not search for bitcoin but for all the puzzles that have become bitcoin.
First interresting find.


First Find

Patent History
Patent number: 6681017
Type: Grant
Filed: Sep 3, 1997
Date of Patent: Jan 20, 2004
Assignee: Lucent Technologies Inc. (Murray Hill, NJ)
Inventors: Yossi Matias (Tel-Aviv), Alain Jules Mayer (New York, NY), Abraham Silberschatz (Summit, NJ)
Primary Examiner: Ayaz Sheikh
Assistant Examiner: Hosuk Song
Application Number: 08/922,492
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Key Management (380/277); Key Distribution (380/278); Having Key Exchange (713/171)
International Classification: H04L/900;


Simplified secure shared key establishment and data delivery protocols for electronic commerce
Sep 3, 1997 - Lucent Technologies Inc.
A number of protocols are disclosed for providing simplified security for a series of low-cost transactions carried out between a client and a server within an on-going client-server relationship. A key establishment protocol is used to generate a shared key which will be used by the client and server for the series of transactions. The client generates the shared key as a function of a client identifier, a server identifier and secret client information, encrypts the shared key using a public key of the server, and sends the encrypted shared key to the server. The server responds by incorporating server information into a response which is encrypted using the shared key and sent to the client. The client decrypts the response, verifies that the server has accepted the shared key, and then sends additional client information, such as a credit card number, to the server, using the shared key for encryption. The client may then use the shared key in a series of subsequent transactions with the server. The subsequent transactions may be in accordance with a data delivery protocol in which the client requests information, and the server supplies the information encrypted using the shared key. The server may require that the client demonstrate possession of the shared key before responding to a data delivery request. The generation and use of the shared key may be made substantially transparent to the client through the use of a client-side web proxy.

Lot more info Here https://patents.justia.com/patent/6681017

Who is Yossi Matias https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yossi_Matias.  Yossi Matias is an Israeli computer scientist, entrepreneur and Google executive.
More patents with his name  https://patents.justia.com/inventor/yossi-matias

Who is Abraham Silberschatz https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Silberschatz
2nd find.


Patent History
Publication number: 20020087501
Type: Application
Filed: Sep 9, 1999
Publication Date: Jul 4, 2002
Patent Grant number: 6502095
Inventors: YURI J. BREITBART (SCOTCH PLAINS, NJ), RAGHAVAN V. KOMONDOOR (MADISON, WI), RAJEEV RASTOGI (NEW PROVIDENCE, NJ), SRINIVASAN SESHADRI (BASKING RIDGE, NJ), ABRAHAM SILBERSCHATZ (WARREN, NJ)
Application Number: 09391988
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: 707/1
International Classification: G06F017/30;

TIMESTAMP-BASED SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SERIALIZING LAZY UPDATES IN A DISTRIBUTED DATABASE
A system for, and method of, ensuring serialization of lazy updates in a distributed database described by a directed acyclic copy graph. In one embodiment, the system includes: (1) a timestamp module that creates a unique timestamp for each of the lazy updates and (2) a propagation module, associated with the timestamp module, that employs edges of the directed acyclic copy graph to propagate the lazy updates among replicas in the distributed database according to said unique timestamp and ensure the serialization.

Lot more info Here https://patents.justia.com/patent/20040131182
Abraham Silberschatz Patents with his name https://patents.justia.com/search?q=Abraham+Silberschatz


Who is RAGHAVAN V. KOMONDOOR https://drona.csa.iisc.ac.in/~raghavan/

3TH FIND

Patent History
Patent number: 6381609
Type: Grant
Filed: Jul 2, 1999
Date of Patent: Apr 30, 2002
Assignee: Lucent Technologies Inc. (Murray Hill, NJ)
Inventors: Yuri J. Breitbart (Scotch Plains, NJ), Raghavan V. Komondoor (Madison, WI), Rajeev Rastogi (New Providence, NJ), Srinivasan Seshadri (Basking Ridge, NJ), Abraham Silberschatz (Warren, NJ)
Primary Examiner: Diane D. Mizrahi
Attorney, Agent or Law Firm: Hitt Gaines & Boisbrun, PC
Application Number: 09/346,798
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: 707/103; 707/10; 707/102; 707/104.1
International Classification: G06F/1730;

System and method for serializing updates to ancestor sites in a distributed database
Sep 9, 1999 - Lucent Technologies Inc.
A system for, and method of, ensuring serialization of updates from a replica site in a distributed database that is described by a copy graph and a distributed database incorporating the system or the method. In one embodiment, the system includes: (1) a directed acyclic copy graph (DAG) creation module that identifies backedges in, and removes the backedges from, the copy graph to yield a DAG and (2) a propagation module, associated with the DAG creation module, that initially employs eager updating to propagate the updates along the backedges and thereafter employs lazy updating to propagate the updates along edges of the directed acyclic copy graph to ensure the serialization.

more info here https://patents.justia.com/patent/6499037

more patents with Raghavan V. Komondoor name https://patents.justia.com/search?q=Raghavan+V.+Komondoor
who is Rajeev Rastogi, patents with his name https://patents.justia.com/search?q=Rajeev+Rastogi

If you hop between the patents and read well, then it becomes clear where you must look

Here maybe some other interresting
https://patents.justia.com/inventor/phillip-w-rogaway

i think for sure this people working on bitcoin
Raghavan V. Komondoor
Yossi Matias
Rajeev Rastogi

Rest you can find out yourself. i have more thing to do  



That bitcoin is their biggest project they work with, and we are test people, which is not wrong. With Global use you can test it optimally. That is positive for bitcoin.
They are also working on many other projects, saw patents come across storing videos in block chains where I think d.tube is used for that. and advertising systems. Brave browser using chrome, and if you look for the first patent here you see yossi.

You see floods of positives and negatives news spreading worldwide at the same time.
I think its pure testing how the blockchain react on all this things. because nobody knows what happend.


I see bright future in bitcoin.  

[figmentofmyass]

Out of many theories and claims about who is satoshi, this one is the most interesting IMO.

what is it specifically that makes you think so? i was yawning the whole way through reading this. there isn't any real proof or even proven associations that make it likely, just really general things that could apply to millions (or at least many thousands) of people.

[Mpamaegbu]

what is it specifically that makes you think so? i was yawning the whole way through reading this. there isn't any real proof or even proven associations that make it likely, just really general things that could apply to millions (or at least many thousands) of people.

You really think those details are mere coincidence? Honestly? Well, I don't think so. The details are too close to be ignored.

[sunsilk]

I forgot to share it here in the forum few days ago that I've also read that legendary post of him on some forums before on 2002. I was moved after reading that, I skipped all other evidence on that article but just read that forum post of him.

That post really is an idea near or exactly as bitcoin. But still it doesn't mean that he's the actual satoshi but the were ideas too identical to believe.

[oseikuf44]

I read the news in the morning and just told myself is one of the stories we keep hearing periodic on people that claim to be satoshi. If Paul is real Satoshi, then I think he should send some coins from the Satoshi account to prove t

[oapieNL]

Here some more of my research continued from above
I mentioned Rajeev Rastogi above in my last post. research >>>>>>>
https://dblp.org/pers/hd/r/Rastogi:Rajeev

Scroll to 2018 &Look read [c124]
now we scroll for the simply way more down
Scroll to 2008 [c100]   Look & read
Klick on that link https://dblp.org/db/conf/icde/icde2008.html
 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4497457
you can scrol down a lot more.

I think satoshi nakamoto are a combination of  initials from there names

[avikz]

Here some more of my research continued from above
I mentioned Rajeev Rastogi above in my last post. research >>>>>>>
https://dblp.org/pers/hd/r/Rastogi:Rajeev

Scroll to 2018 &Look read [c124]
now we scroll for the simply way more down
Scroll to 2008 [c100]   Look & read
Klick on that link https://dblp.org/db/conf/icde/icde2008.html
 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4497457
you can scrol down a lot more.

I think satoshi nakamoto are a combination of  initials from there names

If I have to go by your research, then I would have to mention that John Mcafee said the same thing few months back! Later he stepped back due to some legal reason though.

Read the news below,
https://www.ccn.com/bitcoins-creator-indians-john-fking-mcafee

Your research shows somewhat same thing and majority of the innovators are Indians living abroad. Since Craig was given the copyright of the original bitcoin white paper, a lot of new things are indeed coming up!

[pushups44]

There are incriminating evidences suggesting that Paul Solotshi is the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto in an article I just read this morning. It points clearly that one of the reasons that the Satoshi's one million Bitcoin hasn't moved is because the fellow has been in orison since 2002 till date. Below is the link and it makes for an interesting and convincing read. https://www.investinblockchain.com/new-evidence-suggests-satoshi-nakamoto-is-paul-solotshi-the-creator-of-encryption-software-e4m-and-truecrypt/

What are your thoughts?

I think this is the first time Satoshi has ever been outed as having sported a mullet in his youth. I tend to think Satoshi was Dave Kleiman, who is now deceased.

[jakelyson]

There is no other evidence needed but a signed message from a known satoshi bitcoin address. Anyone who does that is at least connected to Satoshi or he is Satoshi himself. One can present all evidence he wants but if he can't sign a message he is no Satoshi Nakamoto.

[maxreish]

Well, it could be possible. Honestly, I never heard the name Paul Solotshi and I tend to read the article and search more about him. I've heard he imprisoned because of illegal activities. In that case, it is more evident that he can't touch his hidden btc. But he has relatives and can give access to it. Why don't he pass on the private keys, etc. To his family members ? Or I was just thinking that he is some kind of  another fakesatoshi that is suspicious, too.

[CryptoGM]

Wright will never be Satoshi because he is fighting too much to prove he is and obviously there is greed in it if you check objectively he is after the stashed BTC, nothing else. So nobody else will ever come out to be S.N

[Kakmakr]

Indeed, there are several things in that article that points to him being a candidate for being Satoshi Nakamoto, but he would have had access to some kind of internet access, even if it was via a smuggled smart phone. He is a very talented programmer and he is also into Cryptography, so he could easily hack the prisons computer systems and get access to the internet.

In any way, we do not mind who Satoshi is anymore, because we do not judge the creator of the technology, based on who he/she is but rather on the creation of this excellent piece of work that he/she produced. 

[bhabygrim]

There is no way that we could know it if Satoshi want's to keep quite.
If Paul has been in prison starting on 2012 he could have moved some of it before he goes in prison.
We could never know who is the real Satoshi unless Satoshi reveal's his/her true identity .

[Pursuer]

when you loosen your criteria for chosen someone as Satoshi then you can end up with a very long list of people who are suddenly good candidates for being the real Satoshi Nakamoto and for years there has been dozens of good candidates but in the end all the theories lack in many places that make them not true. and also all of them have one thing in common, the real Satoshi may not even have been a public figure before. he might just have been a visionary but simple programmer.

[markstivn98]

According to Satoshi, in his P2P profile, he is a 39-year-old Japanese man. However, this information is uncertain and there are many hypotheses about this character as it is not sure whether this name is the real name of the inventor or just a pseudonym for this person used only to announce the new currency. It is also not known if the name was for a man or a woman or for a group of persons. On several occasions it has been announced that the identity of the inventor has been revealed but these ads have not been confirmed and the real character remains unknown to date.

[HashFace]

I didn't quite get the OP ... there is a typo ... should say he's been in prison since 2012, not 2002.  Didn't make sense otherwise.

[coin-investor]

There are incriminating evidences suggesting that Paul Solotshi is the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto in an article I just read this morning. It points clearly that one of the reasons that the Satoshi's one million Bitcoin hasn't moved is because the fellow has been in orison since 2002 till date. Below is the link and it makes for an interesting and convincing read. https://www.investinblockchain.com/new-evidence-suggests-satoshi-nakamoto-is-paul-solotshi-the-creator-of-encryption-software-e4m-and-truecrypt/

What are your thoughts?

Now we have another character added, and it seems this one looks more real than the past theories that we've had about Satoshi, suddenly everything is unfolding and the presentation seems real that this guy is the real Satoshi Nakamoto, but of course, we need more facts, it's hard to imagine that this Satoshi Nakamoto version has a criminal minds.

[Ucy]

I Googled the "orison" word on your post and it says "prayer".  Is that what you intended it to mean or is just a typo? Or  you mean prison? I actually think that's what might have happened to him. They probably gave him a light imprisonment (house arrest) or he is under serious surveillance but with freedom to move about.

[rdluffy]

if we start calling everyone who is named Satoshi or has a name that is similar looking or sounding like Satoshi then we will have to go through the list of names for at least another 10 years!

besides, the first thing you need to understand is that Satoshi Nakamoto is just a fake name so there is no way that the real personality was named anything remotely similar.
for example my name is not even close to my user name (BrewMaster)!

I believe it's a team that create Satoshi Nakamoto, not an unique person
The name looks like a Japanese name, but again, I believe the team who created BTC was not japaneses

[Mpamaegbu]

Indeed, there are several things in that article that points to him being a candidate for being Satoshi Nakamoto, but he would have had access to some kind of internet access, even if it was via a smuggled smart phone. He is a very talented programmer and he is also into Cryptography, so he could easily hack the prisons computer systems and get access to the internet.

In any way, we do not mind who Satoshi is anymore, because we do not judge the creator of the technology, based on who he/she is but rather on the creation of this excellent piece of work that he/she produced. 

I sincerely owe you a bottle of beer in addition (or whatever that you drink) for speaking my mind on the identity of Satoshi - Honestly, I don't think the Bitcoin community cares any more as finding him/she out won't influence the price of Bitcoin or its workability.

[Texacha]

I don't think the Bitcoin community cares any more as finding him/she out won't influence the price of Bitcoin or its workability.

Well, if you found out who has "trigger" on that 1 million BTC coins, depending of his identity you might care very much. 

[CARrency]

As long as that 1 million Bitcoin is still locked and untouched there means that we can't still really name Satoshi nakamoto. Despite that, this theory is one of my favorites and I say it is pretty convincing but still, it is a theory. The similarities of two is great but what about being a cartel boss? Does that mean he is using Bitcoin to transact at that time? Or not but I don't think he is alone doing that thing and there might be people that continue to use bitcoin in the cartel the reason it spread and used in the dark web.

[Texacha]

As long as that 1 million Bitcoin is still locked and untouched

It is untouched, but not locked.

[roosbit]

Something different from the likes of the Craigs...
I like this Satoshi, name sounds almost like the pseudonymous name and him being away for a long time makes some sense that he didn't want to prove himself because he was in prison but if he gets out and is really up to this challenge to claim the crypto seat, we are all waiting...this will change alot in crypto.

[rdbase]

An over 30 minute detailed piece by piece detailing on what he found about Paul solotshi a crypto encrypter.
"The REAL Satoshi Nakamoto - Cartel Kingpin Paul Solotshi "
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UPVWbkVZkuY

Enjoy your travel down the rabbit hole with crypto crow.

[TimeBits]

There are incriminating evidences suggesting that Paul Solotshi is the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto in an article I just read this morning. It points clearly that one of the reasons that the Satoshi's one million Bitcoin hasn't moved is because the fellow has been in orison since 2002 till date. Below is the link and it makes for an interesting and convincing read. https://www.investinblockchain.com/new-evidence-suggests-satoshi-nakamoto-is-paul-solotshi-the-creator-of-encryption-software-e4m-and-truecrypt/

What are your thoughts?

My thoughts are why the fuck would you go through all the trouble of remaining anon, than call your self satoshi when your name is Solotshi LOL. Lol this is going to end up like Dorian Nakamoto 2.0 when this guy gets out of jail.

[sunsilk]

According to Satoshi, in his P2P profile, he is a 39-year-old Japanese man. However, this information is uncertain and there are many hypotheses about this character as it is not sure whether this name is the real name of the inventor or just a pseudonym for this person used only to announce the new currency. It is also not known if the name was for a man or a woman or for a group of persons. On several occasions it has been announced that the identity of the inventor has been revealed but these ads have not been confirmed and the real character remains unknown to date.

Obviously, Satoshi Nakamoto won't reveal his/her true identity. Someone who just created to change the world in terms of finance and remittances will be sued by the gov't because it's against them.

SN is actually good the way he/she has hidden himself for a lot of years then suddenly appears without any notice. OP has been pointing out some of the near and something believable facts that can connect Solotshi as Satoshi but still we can't have that conclusion that Solotoshi = Satoshi.

[BitcoinFX]

Indeed, there are several things in that article that points to him being a candidate for being Satoshi Nakamoto, but he would have had access to some kind of internet access, even if it was via a smuggled smart phone. He is a very talented programmer and he is also into Cryptography, so he could easily hack the prisons computer systems and get access to the internet.

In any way, we do not mind who Satoshi is anymore, because we do not judge the creator of the technology, based on who he/she is but rather on the creation of this excellent piece of work that he/she produced. 

Close, but no cigar !?!

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_in_prisons

...

- https://youtu.be/eY-eyZuW_Uk

[Fredomago]

Something different from the likes of the Craigs...
I like this Satoshi, name sounds almost like the pseudonymous name and him being away for a long time makes some sense that he didn't want to prove himself because he was in prison but if he gets out and is really up to this challenge to claim the crypto seat, we are all waiting...this will change alot in crypto.

What changes it will imply? it should remain the same, anonymous as what Nakamoto like with his creations, revealing and proving himself will not follow the sense of being anonymous, let the time reveal itself as there's a lots of personalities who's claiming the person behind this coin.

[Ioann11]

Satoshi Nakamoto - everyone knows this name today. The creator of Bitcoin, a man of mystery. Surely no one knows what language Nakamoto speaks in childhood - in Japanese or in English. Unknown and the age of the founder of Bitcoin. Information about this person for eight years, painstakingly collected by researchers. But none of them could not bring the basic facts from the biography of Nakamoto.
Is it possible that this is still a fictional persona? But I would very much like to meet him and shake hands!

[Texacha]

Is it possible that this is still a fictional persona?

Did you really asked this?
Ofcourse it is fictional.

[Vaskiy]

Quite often we can see more such claims through articles, but none provides with the righteous proof for the same. Even if he is the real Satoshi it isn't possible to get it confirmed as no one has known Satoshi in the past. All the people knew about Satoshi is the forum discussion he has involved, the Whitepaper of bitcoin written by him.

[marinko9]

I think you should pay him a visit to prison to get more details.

[marcbitcoins]

So another person is claiming to be Mr.Nakamoto but this time looks like very close as the real one as he has plenty of talent to become a genius of computer world. Hopefully he is Mr. Nakamoto so that this identity issue will be closed as i believe that in reality there is no real Nakamoto in person but only the name that exist.