Faketoshi aka Craig Wright seems goes straight to jail :D

[clickoutsourcing]

Same old story, over and over again. How many times do we have to prove that Craig Wright is not the Satoshi Nakamoto.

[1714065578]

1714065578

[1714065578]

1714065578

[1714065578]

1714065578

[hv_]

Same old story, over and over again. How many times do we have to prove that Craig Wright is not the Satoshi Nakamoto.

I've not seen anywhere that 'we' have proven. So he is

 

[1Referee]

We have to stopped thinking about him, its not that worth to read. 

That's what I read pretty much everywhere, yet people secretly love to figure out what this con artist is doing. If people gave no shit then it wouldn't be as widely discussed as it is right now.

I just want to see the law that he praises so much will shut him up. Perhaps that would be the trigger for him to finally turn anti governments. The most logical step for him is to sue governments and whatnot.

[BeBlockTech]

Put that guy in a cell!!

If someone makes something like Bitcoin and wants to remain anonymous, why on earth would that same person start talking about it once his work is done?

[Johnzky]

Then this is a cause for celebration?Since we will get rid of this impersonator 😂

Put that guy in a cell!!

If someone makes something like Bitcoin and wants to remain anonymous, why on earth would that same person start talking about it once his work is done?

You got it right mate,exactly as you’ve mentioned,.this was created for anonymity and someone’s coming from nowhere will claim to be the creator?so irritating stupid person

[hv_]

Then this is a cause for celebration?Since we will get rid of this impersonator 😂

Put that guy in a cell!!

If someone makes something like Bitcoin and wants to remain anonymous, why on earth would that same person start talking about it once his work is done?

You got it right mate,exactly as you’ve mentioned,.this was created for anonymity and someone’s coming from nowhere will claim to be the creator?so irritating stupid person

Nope, the herd is getting it wrong  - as usual

https://www.yours.org/content/forensic-analysis-of-kleiman-vs-craig-s-wright-pdf-documents--fontgat-521e436954c1

[gentlemand]

https://blog.wizsec.jp/2019/07/kleiman-v-craig-wright-part-3.html?m=1

A summary here. What's bizarre is that he's accusing our very own Theymos of participating in setting up Silk Road, plus this 'Hydra'.

If I were Theymos I'd certainly take some pleasure in suing his loathsome, flabby arse into oblivion.

[hv_]

https://blog.wizsec.jp/2019/07/kleiman-v-craig-wright-part-3.html?m=1

A summary here. What's bizarre is that he's accusing our very own Theymos of participating in setting up Silk Road, plus this 'Hydra'.

If I were Theymos I'd certainly take some pleasure in suing his loathsome, flabby arse into oblivion.

He is pretty much going against all the 'old crypto establishment', so no wondered that he s getting into the biggest social media  crypto shitstorm ever.


I know from what to speak a bit, since I m kind of last big blocker and anti Segwit guy in that forum here.

[gentlemand]

He is pretty much going against all the 'old crypto establishment', so no wondered that he s getting into the biggest social media  crypto shitstorm ever.

The weirdest thing about this particular section is the naming of names. Why would he bother? No one else has ever made these accusations and there's certainly no proof of anything. All he's done is open himself up to a justified legal pounding.

If my name had been dragged into his fantasies I would certainly go after him with a vengeance.

[ubay]

First of all it is better to include the source of the news link so that all do not become confused with the thread that you created.

Whatever it is, what I know is Craight is an early adopter of bitcoin, he is not the creator especially Satoshi Nakamoto. Because Satoshi Nakamoto will always be a mysterious person.

[nutildah]

I just got finished reading the ENTIRE transcript of Craig's court case and wrote up a summary of it here for all who are interested:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149062.msg51728883#msg51728883

[jademaxsuy]

First of all it is better to include the source of the news link so that all do not become confused with the thread that you created.

Whatever it is, what I know is Craight is an early adopter of bitcoin, he is not the creator especially Satoshi Nakamoto. Because Satoshi Nakamoto will always be a mysterious person.

I think the court should prove first about the claim.by gathering needed documents but if the court or the other party could not prove it then it is easier for Craig to escape the case. But, FOR SURE ONE DAY THAT IF CRAIG WILL STILL CONTINUE TO TELL FRAUD THINGS AND OTHER ACTIVITIES THAT WILL FOR THERE IS NO REAL.AND SOLID LAW ABOUT THIS NETWORKING ABOUT THEIR FINANCIAL CAPABILITIES.

[Jhony_Jhony]

All the coments reply's show that all this is fake.. fake Satoshi, Fake news, No jail, and no stealing of bitcoin.. I Believe  that it look likes just fake things and nothing..

[bettercrypto]

What kind of Jail? lol
Even Craig Wright is claiming bitcoin and that is a crime if ever, we need to respect him. I think he will never boast his name and identity if there is no factual at all. Maybe he is really the Satoshi Nakamoto, we did not just see it as him. We tend to have prejudice because of the personality of people and for me, it is not good.

Anyway, I don`t care about him even he is Satoshi or not, as long as I can get money from his invention. I already satisfied.

[ene1980]

What kind of Jail? lol

If he lie in court and produces fake documents then he will be going to jail and it is a fact and not a fun thing  .

Even Craig Wright is claiming bitcoin and that is a crime if ever, we need to respect him. I think he will never boast his name and identity if there is no factual at all. Maybe he is really the Satoshi Nakamoto, we did not just see it as him. We tend to have prejudice because of the personality of people and for me, it is not good.

It is not about having a prejudice over his personality, some media published that he is the person behind the creation of bitcoin and then he came forward claiming that he is Satoshi and proclaimed that he will provide the evidence that could cryptographically prove his claim, but he chickened out and did not produce any evidence regarding that after years of that claim and so is the reason everyone is skeptical.

Anyway, I don`t care about him even he is Satoshi or not, as long as I can get money from his invention. I already satisfied.

Majority of the investors does not care who invented the platform as they look for profit and nothing else, people who are in this platform from the beginning who really care about bitcoin would dispute random claims without proof.

[peter0425]

For those who are looking for the full transcript, here is the link, https://static.magicaltux.net/documents/2019/06/kleiman_v_wright/06-28-19%2C%20BER%2C%20Kleiman.pdf.

Long read but it's worth, you can read how Craig dodge question. So you also be surprised to read our beloved Theymos name pop up in the transcript. Just search for it.  

[rodel caling]

I think he deserve for that decision of the court, he clainm he is satoshi but theirs nothing contrete proof and evindence they can show to court claiming real satoshi. He wasting time of the court and if not wrong claiming identity is have an corresponding penalty.

[fiulpro]

He needs to actually go to jail .

*He wasn't even able to produce a record in court
*He has been making fake claims , even went to the extent of changing the Satoshi Nakamato real name in the Wikipedia
*Giving the news reporters an interview stating his name as Satoshi Nakamato , didn't do any physical harm but it could have been bad for the real Satoshi.
*(Maybe keilman was the real Satoshi ? And he knew it ? )
*He is a scammer is all we could say

[Foxpup]

If I were Theymos I'd certainly take some pleasure in suing his loathsome, flabby arse into oblivion.

As much as I enjoy watching Faketoshi ignore the first rule of holes, I have to point out that court testimony is absolutely privileged against defamation. You can't sue witnesses for accusing other people of crimes, even if those accusations are blatantly false.

[gentlemand]

As much as I enjoy watching Faketoshi ignore the first rule of holes, I have to point out that court testimony is absolutely privileged against defamation. You can't sue witnesses for accusing other people of crimes, even if those accusations are blatantly false.

Fair enough. I know nothing of proper legalities.

The other person he dragged through the mud is not too impressed - https://twitter.com/marttimalmi/status/1147456264953352192

Presumably he's going to find a way to get some sort of retribution.