Stake.com Signature Campaign - A new kind of future

[logfiles]

This is nice move Steve  

I have just seen the new changes and everything seems Okay now. People won't have to over post in order to get more sats like it was before. The much more improved pay rate will be a good motivation to reduce spam among the participants.

As, for the equal pay on all participants... I think it's actually cool. Most people here think that lower ranked members are always shit posters but i have seen higher ranked members post garbage too. And the higher pay rate for low ranked members means that they will be encouraged to make even much better posts if they want to stay in the campaign.

The main issue was spamming and not pay rate, Those who feel that their higher ranked accounts can not get the same pay rates as lower rank Members could just opt out of the campaign. I mean it optional to participate or leave. Just do your thing  

[Quickseller]

I am glad you are making some positive changes to your campaign. Provided you can monitor your participants, your campaign shouldn’t generate too much spam (and harm to the forum).

I will withdraw my request to have your signatures banned. Although I will continue to allow anyone to continue posting in the thread for now.

[welovedcrypto]

I'm interested to hear some feedback from everyone on the recent changes to the Stake.com campaign!

I'm interested to hear some feedback from everyone on the recent changes to the Stake.com campaign!

This is not correct section. It will be better if you ask this question in your signature campaign thread, there you will find answers from those users who might interested in joining your campaign. (users can suggest you this on while applying).
Many people may find this as clickbait promotion.

Official campaign members list
 
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/127282xBJq5UtDH9vI8U96GNxBWN_3-3o-P6vTT44Fec/edit#gid=380619948

You should add this spreadsheet in your signature thread. New applicants can check how previous weeks were gone.
I saw only one member earned 0.005BTC+ with 105 posts and he is Hero member. There are many other campaigns which pays more than 0.01BTC for 30 Min post to Hero member.


It seems you focus on Quantity rather than Quality. You may think more posts can get you more users. This is not like that, if posts quality are good then it attracts more users towards the post and it provides attention to your signatures.


My suggestions (I prefer Quality)
Mini & Maximum paid post: 40 to 60
Weekly payment: 0.01 BTC for all member ( I am not against higher member, just because of merit all members are trying to post quality posts, so if posts of higher and lower members are having same quality then why we should pay less to lower member and high member) (Yeah, sometime HM are more useful)
Minimum Character: 70


I would like to join your camp but I am not eligible one, soon I will get my rank up.

[Vinalians]

This is a really good move of Stephen in this campaign, I admit that, and for sure many members of this forum will agree on this too.

I was part of this campaign since the first-day of June so I am 2 weeks in the signature campaign. It maybe sounded like early judgment but working with dose ( Stephen's assistant in the campaign ) and Stephen is a real deal to me.
When it comes in payment Stephen always gives us information about it, when to claim it and if we have a problem in it just contact him. For the past 2 weeks, I didn't see any complaints about it. Kudos to this campaign manager.
When it comes in posting I take it seriously, joining in their contests made me feel like I am helping the forum to grow more. I am not that so good poster but I believe I am not spamming the forum in the past 2 weeks or even when I am just starting to post in this forum. I just feel to say this to all of you with all my respect. I'm glad that I became part of this campaign and I would love to be a part of this campaign continuously.
I know it will take a time for other members of this forum to trust the campaign due to some spammers but I will continuously give all my best to prove myself that I am not a spammer of this forum, I just feel today that all of the posts that I did in the last 2 weeks were not valuable due to that fact that I am no longer in the campaign.

I just want y'all to know that I believe I deserve to be part of this campaign again, not just to make benefit from it but also to prove that I am not one of those spammers and to continuously provide information that I know for those who need.

Good day to all of you.  

[Harkorede]

I saw only one member earned 0.005BTC+ with 105 posts and he is Hero member. There are many other campaigns which pays more than 0.01BTC for 30 Min post to Hero member.

Each campaign get to make their decisions on what they want to pay and it's up to users to join if they find it good enough, not all campaigns can afford what other big campaigns pay, I was in a campaign as a Member ranked users and earned 0.006 BTC on a weekly basis, meanwhile there are other several campaigns that doesn't even pay Legendary members that much.

The only feedback I can give as well would be that there should be some differences between the pay rates across ranks, and there should be a minimum number of post required weekly so that you don't keep inactive users in the campaign.

[TryNinja]

My suggestions (I prefer Quality)
Mini & Maximum paid post: 40 to 60

If you prefer quality, then why are you suggesting him to put a minimum amount of posts per week? 40/week is a pretty big number for many people, and this will only incentive them to spam up to the minimum so they can get paid.

[logfiles]

Weekly payment: 0.01 BTC for all member ( I am not against higher member, just because of merit all members are trying to post quality posts, so if posts of higher and lower members are having same quality then why we should pay less to lower member and high member)

You are suggesting  0.01 BTC per participating member yet according to last week's total payment for all members, it was just roughly 0.07 BTC 

If their budget is within the range of 0.07 to 0.1 BTC as total pay out per week, then they will have to only accept very few participants(between 7 and 10 chaps) which we all know won't be fair to them and other people looking to join their campaign including you 

[mirakal]

Good improvement for the rules, hopefully this will minimize the spam problem in the forum.

I can say that it's the most generous pay for the lower rank, and also hopefully this lower ranks will be inspired to make good post as this opportunity is not present all the time, good posts can also help them as they might be awarded with merits which would help them to rank up. It's a win-win.

Seems like Steve will be more strict in monitoring the participants performance in this campaign.

Yeah... let's make good posts for the good for the forum.

[feryjhie]

Seems like Steve will be more strict in monitoring the participants performance in this campaign.

Yeah... let's make good posts for the good for the forum.

actually, i still don't know what the criteria he made to choose the current member?
because of the active member and the most member receive rewards from HQ POST from the contest still got removed,
can @SteveStake share what the criteria for him to choose the current member? is it because the current member made a less post from the other?

[CryptoBry]

Seems like Steve will be more strict in monitoring the participants performance in this campaign.

Yeah... let's make good posts for the good for the forum.

actually, i still don't know what the criteria he made to choose the current member?
because of the active member and the most member receive rewards from HQ POST from the contest still got removed,
can @SteveStake share what the criteria for him to choose the current member? is it because the current member made a less post from the other?

I hope nobody gets angry at my post here. The way I am seeing it is that Steve is just using his own discretion in choosing who remains and who to kick in the campaign. I was kicked too but I am not complaining all because I decided to left even before Steve decided not to pick me...for the reason that I am afraid to be banned here. And I think we have to respect the decision of the campaign manager no matter how unacceptable it maybe.

[r1s2g3]

It is indeed a nice move by Steve and as long as Steve is able to throw out spammer from his campaign then I guess how much and how Steve is paying is not our business at all.

Good luck Steve to you, your business and people enrolled in your campaign.

[bitcoinisbest]

Change is good as it helps you to revive and make some decisions which can help the company as well in the long run.

Couple of my observations:-

Instead of having standard pay rate for all member rank you can segregate the pay rate based on rank.
Instead of having max post 10 per day can reduce to 8 and can make max to 32.
If it permits you can increase the members for this campaign to max 50 or can increase slowly as whatever suits it.

[pushups44]

I am glad you are making some positive changes to your campaign. Provided you can monitor your participants, your campaign shouldn’t generate too much spam (and harm to the forum).

I will withdraw my request to have your signatures banned. Although I will continue to allow anyone to continue posting in the thread for now.

I am also happy that despite my criticisms of certain sensitive topics at Bitcointalk the OGs of the forum have decided to give me a chance and continue with this campaign. While I was thinking of leaving this campaign, I decided to stay as the pay rate is better and it looks like the mood toward this campaign has changed as well.

Anyway, I appreciate the feedback and am working to improve the quality of my posts. From now on it's just about quality all the way, and the new pay structure in my view incentivizes that.

[BL46K 7193R]

Have a look, I think these are quality post . I can share my some post link in below:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5146688.msg51357311#msg51357311

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5150549.msg51342817#msg51342817

[r1a2y3m4]

Good to see that there is a changes for this signature campaign. This 100 min characters will reduce the spam. I think it's all good now, or maybe it could be even better if people in this campaign will spread their posts on the whole week. 

Because of the reason that steve will only accept participants in here, I want to regain my position in this campaign. Since I think that I'm making good quality post while being in this campaign. Safe to say, the basis of a quality post is having merits. I received many of those and I received on different known people in this forum.

Needs to be reviewed for merit abuse:
r1a2y3m4 merit received: 19 | Posts deleted: 22

The probable answer for quickseller in putting my name on his list is this: Ask these people:dbshck(staff), asu(top 3 merited user),  crwth(DT1 if I'm not mistaken), cabalism13.

The campaign of stake.com is looking good now and it changed for the better. I would like to join again. No spam, quality post will come.

[YuginKadoya]

Last week's pay rate - $3, $2, $1, $0.50 per 10 posts (rank based)
Current pay rate - $11 per 10 posts (all ranks)

Last week's paid post limit - ∞
Current paid post limit - 30 (10 per day)

Last week's total posts - 1521
Current total posts - A lot less

It is good that you change the pay rates and making it higher than possible I only wish you can bring back the Bitcoin payment since there is no limit with the number of posts but that is your decision and I respect that,

And now that it has a limit on the last week limitless post I guess it will sure prevent spam's and burst posts, Since I have suggested it in the past on Telegram when I am only starting on the Campaign, There are many users that are contradicting this because they prefer posting without limit, So I keep my silent back then,

And I have seen that many are not in favor with the same rank payments but I am cool with it and it is still your decision if you would change it or not, well past is past and I guess you have done a great move regarding this,

Last week's total members - 125
Current total members - 27

I have seen that a lot of members had been removed even some good quality posters but overall a lot had been removed and again it is your call as a campaign manager and I am thankful because I am still in the campaign, I will do my best and strive even harder,

[SteveStake]

A lot of people are saying the pay rate shouldn't be the same for all members. Is this because you believe if I make different rates based on rank then the rate will go higher for upper ranks? The only thing having a different pay rate will do is take money away from the lower ranks, it won't change anything for Legendary/Hero.

[Findingnemo]

A lot of people are saying the pay rate shouldn't be the same for all members. Is this because you believe if I make different rates based on rank then the rate will go higher for upper ranks? The only thing having a different pay rate will do is take money away from the lower ranks, it won't change anything for Legendary/Hero.

They are just suggesting rank based pay rates because higher the rank more the signature space you get.

But it depends on the one who manages it and I too don't think same pay rate for all the campaign participants which give space for HQ low ranked poster to earn same as HQ high ranked member.

[fortunecrypto]

A lot of people are saying the pay rate shouldn't be the same for all members. Is this because you believe if I make different rates based on rank then the rate will go higher for upper ranks? The only thing having a different pay rate will do is take money away from the lower ranks, it won't change anything for Legendary/Hero.

 Steve really is one different manager I have never seen this before but glad that he increase the pay rate, there are people reapplying I wonder if Steve will accept them again or give them a second chance if I'm on his shoes I'll take a chance on new applicants but there are good posters that were dropped also I guess they also deserve second chance.

[judeafante]

Steve has addressed all the issues about Stake.com and has come out a new rules and a new pay rate, I think it's time that we show respect to the guy on his decisions to drop a lot of participants and how the pay rate is structured, let's now move on things will change for the better
let's give it to the guy who can listen and come out with a hard decision like this.