ccminer 1.2.0/sgminer 0.1.3 for MTP: Fastest MTP miner for nvidia cards

[djm34]

I got 1.9Mh/s  with gtx 1070  (CUDA 10)  with last version of miner . No 2.5Mh/s

TDP : 125 Watt
Core +110
Mem : No OC (Default)

...And any DevFEE  applying on this miner ?

what is the default tdp of your card (I mean the 100%) looks particularly small what you report.

All the number I report are default clock and setting... (I mean you understand, if you lower tdp, you won't get what I report and I can't report for every setting used)

ps: I did a rapid check with 83% tdp and +110 on core, you should get around 2.5MH/s indeed (my card does)
So you should probably reboot and/or _make sure_ you used the latest release:

https://github.com/zcoinofficial/ccminer/releases/tag/1.1.21

[1714830162]

1714830162

[1714830162]

1714830162

[1714830162]

1714830162

[1714830162]

1714830162

[ekiller]

I got 1.9Mh/s  with gtx 1070  (CUDA 10)  with last version of miner . No 2.5Mh/s

TDP : 125 Watt
Core +110
Mem : No OC (Default)

...And any DevFEE  applying on this miner ?

what is the default tdp of your card (I mean the 100%) looks particularly small what you report.

All the number I report are default clock and setting... (I mean you understand, if you lower tdp, you won't get what I report and I can't report for every setting used)

ps: I did a rapid check with 83% tdp and +110 on core, you should get around 2.5MH/s indeed (my card does)
So you should probably reboot and/or _make sure_ you used the latest release:

https://github.com/zcoinofficial/ccminer/releases/tag/1.1.21

Ok, now  done.  I didn't use %100  TDP  .  (175-190 watt Average)

And What about DevFEE  ?

[djm34]

I got 1.9Mh/s  with gtx 1070  (CUDA 10)  with last version of miner . No 2.5Mh/s

TDP : 125 Watt
Core +110
Mem : No OC (Default)

...And any DevFEE  applying on this miner ?

what is the default tdp of your card (I mean the 100%) looks particularly small what you report.

All the number I report are default clock and setting... (I mean you understand, if you lower tdp, you won't get what I report and I can't report for every setting used)

ps: I did a rapid check with 83% tdp and +110 on core, you should get around 2.5MH/s indeed (my card does)
So you should probably reboot and/or _make sure_ you used the latest release:

https://github.com/zcoinofficial/ccminer/releases/tag/1.1.21

Ok, now  done.  I didn't use %100  TDP  .  (175-190 watt Average)

And What about DevFEE  ?

there is a donation of 0.25% (1 share over 400 goes to dev)

[djm34]

new release: https://github.com/zcoinofficial/ccminer/releases/tag/1.1.22

solved issue which were causing lost of connection and/or connection with pool, causing the miner stuck in bad state.
This problem doesn't happen anymore.

performance:

2080ti gets now 5.5MH/s

1080ti 3.55MH/s
3.9MH/s with OhGodAPill

1070 at 2.5MH/s

[MRizkBV]

Does not seem to be compatible with Nicehash. In 5 minutes of running, I got 6 rejected shares. No accepted shares at all :/

Using a 1080 Ti. This is not an issue when using trex.

[djm34]

Does not seem to be compatible with Nicehash. In 5 minutes of running, I got 6 rejected shares. No accepted shares at all :/

Using a 1080 Ti. This is not an issue when using trex.

it isn't compatible with nicehash... fyi... you'd get more by mining xzc and selling them yourself

[serg_25]

Looking forward to your AMD MTP miner...

[cirlama]

Looking forward to your AMD MTP miner...

he already has one: https://github.com/zcoinofficial/sgminer/releases
I get 1.7 Mh/s with it on rx580 8GB, but also waiting for an update...

[djm34]

Looking forward to your AMD MTP miner...

he already has one: https://github.com/zcoinofficial/sgminer/releases
I get 1.7 Mh/s with it on rx580 8GB, but also waiting for an update...

yes but I am planning some updates

[notsure85]

1.1.22 is still crashing randomly for me unfortunately.

Sometimes
- miner stops completely / script loop not working because the process is still alive
- miner is flooded with stratum errors / no accepts
- miner is flooded with increasing nonce / no accepts

6x1080ti 430.39

Mining on 2miners.
Second rig is running ubuntu/t-rex and not experiencing any issues.

Thanks for your development of free ccminer

[djm34]

1.1.22 is still crashing randomly for me unfortunately.

Sometimes
- miner stops completely / script loop not working because the process is still alive
- miner is flooded with stratum errors / no accepts
- miner is flooded with increasing nonce / no accepts

6x1080ti 430.39

Mining on 2miners.
Second rig is running ubuntu/t-rex and not experiencing any issues.

Thanks for your development of free ccminer

do you have a log file ? (I can probably force it crashes for the remaining issues)

[alucard20724]

getting 100% reject on nicehash

2x1080ti win10x64  driver 430.86

[djm34]

getting 100% reject on nicehash

2x1080ti win10x64  driver 430.86

it does not support nicehash (yet ? requires zcoin team approval)

[notsure85]

1.1.22 is still crashing randomly for me unfortunately.

Sometimes
- miner stops completely / script loop not working because the process is still alive
- miner is flooded with stratum errors / no accepts
- miner is flooded with increasing nonce / no accepts

6x1080ti 430.39

Mining on 2miners.
Second rig is running ubuntu/t-rex and not experiencing any issues.

Thanks for your development of free ccminer

do you have a log file ? (I can probably force it crashes for the remaining issues)

Not right now, but I am happy to create/provide one.
Didnt find a native --log switch though.

[djm34]

--debug, after you can just use >> log & (on linux)

[dgeo]

--debug, after you can just use >> log & (on linux)

There may be a memory leak. I see an increase of RAM and swap usage in 1.1.22. I saw the same thing in some early version.

[P00P135]

I am still seeing Trex being faster for my 1660, 2060 and 1070 GPU's under linux.  Especially pool side.

[djm34]

--debug, after you can just use >> log & (on linux)

There may be a memory leak. I see an increase of RAM and swap usage in 1.1.22. I saw the same thing in some early version.

I did a rapid check over several cycle (initialization, mining, change of block etc...) I don't see any memory leak. The amount of swap and RAM vary along a cycle however it is always freed before a new initialization. The only case which could cause subtantial increase of RAM would be running at very low difficulty where you would be solving solution faster than you send them to the pool (but again, once it is sent to the pool, the memory is freed). If it is the case, you should probably increase the difficulty

[dgeo]

I did a rapid check over several cycle (initialization, mining, change of block etc...) I don't see any memory leak. The amount of swap and RAM vary along a cycle however it is always freed before a new initialization. The only case which could cause subtantial increase of RAM would be running at very low difficulty where you would be solving solution faster than you send them to the pool (but again, once it is sent to the pool, the memory is freed). If it is the case, you should probably increase the difficulty

I watched a memory leak after several hours of stable mining. I'll try to make screenshots next time.

[djm34]

I did a rapid check over several cycle (initialization, mining, change of block etc...) I don't see any memory leak. The amount of swap and RAM vary along a cycle however it is always freed before a new initialization. The only case which could cause subtantial increase of RAM would be running at very low difficulty where you would be solving solution faster than you send them to the pool (but again, once it is sent to the pool, the memory is freed). If it is the case, you should probably increase the difficulty

I watched a memory leak after several hours of stable mining. I'll try to make screenshots next time.

yes would be good. How big was the memory leak ?