Not all bounty hunters do research on projects

[Crypto5060]

People get lazy when it comes to researching investors inclusive. On the other hand, most times no there's no knowing which is scam and which isn't some fake teams are good at looking real to get investors money and trust.

[xSkylarx]

doing research is quite a lot of time to do and that is one of the causes of the many bounty participants not doing it and I think it becomes reasonable, should be able to publish a project in this forum need strict regulation.

But research is very important if you're bounty hunting. If you just join a project without knowing the background of it your time might go into waste in the end. When I was still bounty hunting, I would research all about it just for that whole day. After that ICO it gived me some decent amount of tokens I sold for bitcoin.

[Johnzky]

Because most of them has no care what’s the outcome of each project what’s important for them is participating,spamming and collect the bounty other than that they have no care,and the worst thing?they don’t even know how to read and understand white paper so how would they spent even a minute checking the project?

[Jpti]

It is always required to do rigorous research before participating in bounty campaigns for any project. It is also recommended before investing in any project.
I have found that many bounty hunters do not research and read whitepaper or any other documents featuring the goals of a project. We must research beforehand.

[kaka manteng]

Many bounty hunters are still promoting worse projects that have worse Whitepaper and teams with no past experience of how cryptocurrency works ,what makes a team pro?its their past history of achievements with other projects or companies but I'm still surprised that people are promoting very very worse projects on here ,the last one I checked hours ago has no team but its been run by one person or two ,no office address and the Whitepaper is not making sense at all and its like a copycat project but guess what? The bounty spreadsheet is already full of hunters.

I think the problems most bounty hunters are facing is entirely their faults ,bounty hunters are responsible for their end results because many never learn to read or do thorough research and later they will start complaining about time wasted of bounties.

I really agree as you say ... there are lots of bounty hunters who complain about the results of the campaign they did 2 - 3 months. because before they took part in a particular project, in my opinion that they did not carry out detailed research ... such as the TEAM they have and the Whitepaper and roadmap that is certain ... and what is important for me is the bounty manager who has managed many projects ..

[ridha inoue]

Prize hunters always blame the paid manager because the prize fails and ends with fraud, but they forget to do the research first.
before starting to join the Bounty Campaign, it is strongly recommended to do research first.
if we can analyze a project then we will not get project fraud.

[Aptekary]

Prize hunters always blame the paid manager because the prize fails and ends with fraud, but they forget to do the research first.
before starting to join the Bounty Campaign, it is strongly recommended to do research first.
if we can analyze a project then we will not get project fraud.

I am more than confident that practically most of all bounty companies are alike in their quality.  What research do not conduct, all the same result will be the same.  Of course there may be exceptions, because fraudsters are already beginning to become impudent and are trying to easily access the resources of Bounty Hunters such as Ethereum Bazis.

[eidoscore]

of course not, because few of bounty hunter just participated and do the task in campaign.
few of them are too lazy for make research and filter where good project and bad project, because research itself it's too difficult for newcomer in bounty campaign

[andrearz]

of course not, because few of bounty hunter just participated and do the task in campaign.
few of them are too lazy for make research and filter where good project and bad project, because research itself it's too difficult for newcomer in bounty campaign

doing the research was too much of a process as participants in their bounty campaigns only doing tasks according to project orders and waiting for payment, this was quite reasonable.

[novy]

of course not, because few of bounty hunter just participated and do the task in campaign.
few of them are too lazy for make research and filter where good project and bad project, because research itself it's too difficult for newcomer in bounty campaign

doing the research was too much of a process as participants in their bounty campaigns only doing tasks according to project orders and waiting for payment, this was quite reasonable.

Not every person can perform reasonable research. Usually, bad or scam projects have nice looking websites where you can see the team and whitepaper. There are some groups of people in darknet, who can run a fake ico for you. In this case, the bounty hunter is not defended against scammers. 

[BitTraderCute]

of course not, because few of bounty hunter just participated and do the task in campaign.
few of them are too lazy for make research and filter where good project and bad project, because research itself it's too difficult for newcomer in bounty campaign

doing the research was too much of a process as participants in their bounty campaigns only doing tasks according to project orders and waiting for payment, this was quite reasonable.

Not every person can perform reasonable research. Usually, bad or scam projects have nice looking websites where you can see the team and whitepaper. There are some groups of people in darknet, who can run a fake ico for you. In this case, the bounty hunter is not defended against scammers. 

scam projects was difficult to identified now.they have similarity with real projects and maybe there is no differences.even real projects could be scam projects while they leave projects after listed in market.i think bounty hunter also do the best effort to avoid scam projects.

[sheenaedago]

of course not, because few of bounty hunter just participated and do the task in campaign.
few of them are too lazy for make research and filter where good project and bad project, because research itself it's too difficult for newcomer in bounty campaign

The reason why bounty hunters didn't research too much because of mindset of getting bounty tokens not as serious as an investor. Most investors were those applying research before having an engagement, and they should be more digging up in order to have assurance for a certain project to avoid being scammed.

[GGmith]

yes most bounty hunters don't care about that and always promote fraud projects. in plain view it was stated that there was a warning {SCAM} but there were still many who joined and promoted them and this is what needs to be considered

[Karlinz]

This no guar in this space, I have been through that tedious research process before joining bounty but it happens that even the ones that I least expect payments from where the ones that eventually turned out to be rewarding. The are basic details that I consider before participating, no more a lot of rigorous research

[Kwansimaa]

Bounty Hunters continue to promote worse projects and trust me they will not stop promoting such projects because they are not willing to learn anything new just the previous knowledge they have already acquired. Instead of researching more on projects before they promote, they just jump in to promote when they start seeing huge allocations.

[arnoldrimmer]

80% of bounty hunters do not make research and its really so unfortunate cos they just do campaigns cos others are doing ans can't tell a thing about the project they are campaigning for. And that's why most of this projects takes advantage of them

[roosbit]

I agree with you!

If research was the first thing we all did before joining a bounty campaign we might actually have a chance of not promoting or having scam projects in this ecosystem in the first place. But why does this happen, because we are desperate and have no time to do our due diligence which is being unfair to ourselves!

[Google+]

I think they have done research by looking at the team, and briefly reading the whitepaper and understanding the project concepts they want to develop, and usually when the bounty hunter has implemented it all does not guarantee the bounty campaign will succeed, usually there are still some problems that make the bounty hunter a little disappointed.

[reality18]

A bounty hunter should not blame anyone for joining a scam or unsuccessful project because it must be first understood that this is crypto and it is a free market. There are no set regulations to check scam or unfitting projects hence it is up to investors and bounty hunters to do personal researches in order to come up with the authenticity level and potentials of the coin before joining any activity of the project.

[VanDeinsberg12]

of course not, because few of bounty hunter just participated and do the task in campaign.
few of them are too lazy for make research and filter where good project and bad project, because research itself it's too difficult for newcomer in bounty campaign

The reason why bounty hunters didn't research too much because of mindset of getting bounty tokens not as serious as an investor. Most investors were those applying research before having an engagement, and they should be more digging up in order to have assurance for a certain project to avoid being scammed.

Investors need to choose the one that will be very profitable for them all while bounty participants are betting their efforts but remember about the social media participants can join various bounty and that's why majority of the don't care about that.