I think in general most WOs have the decency to leave out altcoin talk to be respectful of the sanctity of the thread. An occasional mention seems fine but repeated pushing of alts is highly discouraged.
Considering it's not the Altcoin fucking Discussion board, it makes sense.
Irrelevant and usually bullshit.
If it looks like shit and smells like shit and scales like shit, it's probably a shitcoin
Yeah, but I still think that nutildah is suggesting that WO tolerates a bit of sporadic mentioning of shitcoins, even though some of us get more irritated than others about such presentation, yet in the end, I think it boils down to a infofront having a decent degree of tolerance, and even allowing them to go overboard a bit, including some of his own shit coin sympathies... Sometimes, the shitcoin pumpers will just get beaten down, even while some of the regulars might get away with mentioning a shitcoin here or there, from time to time, without getting beaten down by a large number of other thread participants, because they don't generally discuss shitcoins too much....
Anyhow, I suppose part of my point is that if there is some allowance of shitcoin discussion on the WO thread, then it becomes a little bit of a slippery slope in determining degrees of shit, rather than just asserting that everything that is not related to bitcoin is shit... there seems to be no real way to objectively define what is or what is not a shitcoin, even though whatever level of line drawing that infofront is doing, accompanied by complaints from regulars on the forum, does seem to cause a striking of a decent balance of allowance of some discussion of shitcoins in the thread.
