Sportsbetting odds, which do you prefer?

[sana54210]

The best is when nobody knows but you have some greater understanding to give better value on the bet odds then others perceive.

That's how a smart gamblers reacts, he finds games and odds that he thinks he has the advantage, it doesn't mean an instant win but having a chance of winning in every bet you will make, that is a recipe for success. Every game has odds but not every game you can find value, so limiting your bet on games that you like and you see value is necessary and everyone has to have a discipline to do that successfully.

In my opinion, I do not buy into the idea of been limited to a particular game just because it’s interesting or because I love it. That is hell No. So how will I learn other games or know about others if all I do is strictly cliche to one particular game? Like you mentioned, which is absolutely right, all that matters is Disciple. Regardless the game, there is always odds to each game but we only have to be disciplined. No casino game is 100% risk free. It all has its up and down but as gamblers, we have learnt to deal with all odds.

For the post, I would prefer the above 2.0 odds, this is because I like to wager higher, I trust in predictions and I always believe it would work like it always did.

[yvesp110]

This question is all relative and I'm game for the bet either way so long as its possible to be placing a live bet then any odds almost can be worth a try.   That is the scary thing but often you can tell before game end which way will win and why.    The best is when nobody knows but you have some greater understanding to give better value on the bet odds then others perceive.

I am not a big enough gambler, but nevertheless I don’t take part in this kind of entertainment very often.  But I can not say that gambling is a very good source of income.  In any case, this opportunity is not available to everyone.

I have been pretty avid player in the sports category and gambling in sports has pretty good entertainment along with the monetary benefits that you could make while gambling. You make use of real life experience and evaluate the players involved in the game on the basis of their past performance. Something that does not involve the probability factors so much. Odds of success are good.

[Dread Pirate Roberts]

if we talking of odd betting in a sportbook it all depends on the team we choose. sometimes also even if the selected team has smaller odds, all possibilities stillexist from the player's condition or place, I think the odds have been determined according to their analysis. now it depends on the player himself who determines, because basically the website also gambles on the odd value. im prefer join great match so its 50:50 chance.

[mirakal]

im prefer join great match so its 50:50 chance.

Me I would not, the odds would be 1.90 and you already loss 10% if you win.
If there's more option in the line available, I would choose to increase it at least over 2.00.

For example, in basketball, both ML offers 1.90 but when you bet on -2.5, you'll get over 2.00, so I'm choosing the -2.5.

[bitgolden]

Theres no other people that can be trusted up when it comes to analysis but only yourself and i would much prefer on losing up my own money with my own analysis rather than on following someones path which it can give out depression or regrets in the end.You wouldn't gain something like experience or analyzing your mistake since you are just following someones bet.

About on the question i will prefer on betting lower 2x bet yet it do have high chance of winning but it cant happen anytime.

I don’t see anything right here and as a matter of fact, this is absolutely wrong.
There are so many people that are specialized in predictions. Some get paid for predicting, might not be 100% correct but to a great extent it can be accurate.

What is the essence of losing your money to a game because of lack of trust, if you are not good at the game and also have insecurity with trusting, then it’s advisable to quit completely.  Everything about gambling is a risk, and risky your money by trusting a prediction is also part of the game. I do this a whole lot. There are times it fails, but many at times it worked greatly for me.

Well, for the post I will also go with less than zero maybe because I believe it’s on a safe side.

[leea-1334]

I try with odds which are higher then 2, and accumulate max 3 of them on one ticket with lower stake which is always 10% of my bank. So if I bet on total odd around 10 with for example $100, possible win is $1000 and I have 10 chances to win with this system. If you fail to win at least two times in such way of betting, they you should stop to bet on sports.

I see a few people try this parlay strategy,,, and you also see it in dice a lot. The only difference is people who try this in sportsbet usually know their games really well. But to get odds of over 2, the teams have to be balanced even if you know them well, you can never tell their form until the game itself so the only way is to get live odds, which is hard to do for parlay.

[Questat]

I see a few people try this parlay strategy,,, and you also see it in dice a lot.

Come again? I don't know that you can parlay in dice... Maybe what you meant is martingale, or betting on low change with high possible win?

[Adriano2010]

I preffer odds over 2. I think is more easy to have more chances to win with and also if get a bad series then is more easy to recover if odds are over 2 and win.

I see a few people try this parlay strategy,,, and you also see it in dice a lot.

Come again? I don't know that you can parlay in dice... Maybe what you meant is martingale, or betting on low change with high possible win?

I think martingale is a strategy will not bring nothing good and make lose a lot if try to recover with.

[Pamadar]

im prefer join great match so its 50:50 chance.

Me I would not, the odds would be 1.90 and you already loss 10% if you win.
If there's more option in the line available, I would choose to increase it at least over 2.00.

For example, in basketball, both ML offers 1.90 but when you bet on -2.5, you'll get over 2.00, so I'm choosing the -2.5.

That's also a good option when dealing inside gambling, trying to extend your earnings from the games that you truly understand. You can do this
when you are fully comfortable with your knowledge about the game. There's always different styles of betting, and most of the time, if there's a good
chance to make your profit rise much higher, you're going to try your best in understanding the game.

[Avirunes]

[..]

I most of the times bet with chances lower than 2.00 but sometimes if I feel like I have won some extra over my target that I set then I don't mind trying some risky odds.

Also at times when my research on performances indicate underdog having a good chance then I also don't back down from betting at high odds.

[MonsterV]

But the chance of win will certainly be much smaller right? the greater the risk the greater the odds. if you are not prepared for defeat then it is better to use a strong team with small odds its more better, the important thing is the chance of win is more bigger, that's the principle of my gambling

But smaller odds usually also mean bigger wagers to make some decent profit. And bigger wagers mean the possibility to lose more money if the bet doesn't go the way you planned. There is no bulletproof strategy unfortunately. 

There will be no bulletproof strategy in gambling. But there are still many opportunities to minimize the chances of loss, for example with the parlay system, I think this system is very effective in reducing the chances of loss, where we have to get the winning points first. Then gamble from the profits of the first win, but if the initial results lose, then the martiangle system can be used to cover the initial losses but are very risky.

[BitcoinTurk]

Never rely on proportions to make predictions. Of course, the lower odds will always be the more likely option to win, but remember that odds are often misleading. In particular, it is impossible to comment on the question you asked, according to the rates, and the rates you mentioned are also impossible. You can never have the same ratio as the two opposite options you specify. If so, users can use their bonus balances in these options and cause a loss of gambling. Therefore, I think that there is no need to brainstorm too much about such events.

[logicgate]

But the chance of win will certainly be much smaller right? the greater the risk the greater the odds. if you are not prepared for defeat then it is better to use a strong team with small odds its more better, the important thing is the chance of win is more bigger, that's the principle of my gambling

But smaller odds usually also mean bigger wagers to make some decent profit. And bigger wagers mean the possibility to lose more money if the bet doesn't go the way you planned. There is no bulletproof strategy unfortunately. 

There will be no bulletproof strategy in gambling. But there are still many opportunities to minimize the chances of loss, for example with the parlay system, I think this system is very effective in reducing the chances of loss, where we have to get the winning points first. Then gamble from the profits of the first win, but if the initial results lose, then the martiangle system can be used to cover the initial losses but are very risky.

  There is no perfect strategy in gambling and no one ever has won multiple games by applying the same strategy. So I think one should rather focus on one’s own experience because experience and a mathematical mind helps a lot when it comes to strategy formulation during gambling. It is always good to have a perceiving mindset which helps to formulate counter strategy and block the opponent.

[Questat]

I see a few people try this parlay strategy,,, and you also see it in dice a lot.

Come again? I don't know that you can parlay in dice... Maybe what you meant is martingale, or betting on low change with high possible win?

I think martingale is a strategy will not bring nothing good and make lose a lot if try to recover with.

No question about that but the fact that this method is still popular, I can think of some possibilities that this is also working to some people doing it using the proper timing. For instance, I can do martingale in just 2 games like a race to 3 games if I believe this team should win at least one game.

[Oceat]

I see a few people try this parlay strategy,,, and you also see it in dice a lot.

Come again? I don't know that you can parlay in dice... Maybe what you meant is martingale, or betting on low change with high possible win?

I think martingale is a strategy will not bring nothing good and make lose a lot if try to recover with.

No question about that but the fact that this method is still popular, I can think of some possibilities that this is also working to some people doing it using the proper timing. For instance, I can do martingale in just 2 games like a race to 3 games if I believe this team should win at least one game.

Martingale is just a strategy that needs pure luck or a higher probability to win in any gambling games. But the effect on it if ever you win/lose is just the same and is easily gonna make your bankroll disappear anytime. Therefore the risk was 50/50 and one should make a decision if they think that this is not the right time to continue, then stop or else you will suffer from those losses.

[Japinat]

Martingale is just a strategy that needs pure luck or a higher probability to win in any gambling games.

It doesn't need pure luck, gambler use the martingale strategy because they don't believe in pure luck, they likely want to make sure they will win all the time using this risky gambling method.

[shoreno]

Martingale is just a strategy that needs pure luck or a higher probability to win in any gambling games.

It doesn't need pure luck, gambler use the martingale strategy because they don't believe in pure luck, they likely want to make sure they will win all the time using this risky gambling method.

but the question is it did work for them and did they won all the time after applying the martingale system to thier gambling sessions ?  no i dont think so  . they can win some but not in a streak manner  . at the end of the day its only up to them if how they will spend thier winning or if how they will control themselves rather . 

p.s :  if martingale doesnt require a luck then how do you think it will trigger  ?

[noormcs5]

Martingale is just a strategy that needs pure luck or a higher probability to win in any gambling games.

It doesn't need pure luck, gambler use the martingale strategy because they don't believe in pure luck, they likely want to make sure they will win all the time using this risky gambling method.

There has been enough discussion on martingale strategy and it has been concluded by most people that martingale strategy is of no use. The experienced gamblers never use the martingale strategy because of its high risk and low reward.

[Distinctin]

There has been enough discussion on martingale strategy and it has been concluded by most people that martingale strategy is of no use. The experienced gamblers never use the martingale strategy because of its high risk and low reward.

This thread is slowly getting out of discussion, martingale is not discuss here it's a flag betting using either odds above or below 2.00 in sportsbook.
Martingale are normally use in dice and not in sports.

[gabbie2010]

I would like to hear some of your comments based on your experience here.

Sports betting is one of the favorite games in gambling and I always wanted to experience a long term winning.

Therefore I'd like to get some of your opinion based on your experience, which is odds listed below gives you a better chance of winning?

a) over 2.00 or b) less than 2.00

The lower the odd the better the chances of wining that is why bookies uses smaller odds on a potential winning teams while using a higher odd for the weaker team, I usually accumulates the lower than 2.00 odd by betting on sure games which in most cases often results to wining however despite the numbers of my accumulated odds the values are still small because my maximum numbers of accumulation is four or five matches which I considered reasonable with a much lower risk unlike accumulating ten to twenty matches if a match is loss that is absolute or overall loss.