Game Protect flag

[bob123]

I don't know why you try reasoning with somebody that gave negative trust feedback with child abuse and mental illness allegations.
He probably lives already in his imaginary world, where he can still scare somebody and where somebody still believes him.

You are right. To be honestly.. i don't know either.
I try to always call upon common sense and logic.

But i guess some people either don't want to or can't follow some simple logic
I think someone with a good mental health wouldn't behave as he does, so it indeed should be better to simply ignore him.

[1713871354]

1713871354

[1713871354]

1713871354

[Initscri]

You scammed all people visiting your site by lying and displaying wrong information in order to make money through affiliate links.
You did not steal from them directly. Nonetheless this is a scam.

What information is wrong?

Only because you are brain dead does not mean that the information stated on the Game Protect website is wrong!

Why are you even asking so hypocritical ?

You know exactly what information is wrong..

Maybe read the topic i have linked. There is enough evidence for deceptive information. No reason for me to argue with a stupid scammer here..

I don't know why you try reasoning with somebody that gave negative trust feedback with child abuse and mental illness allegations.
He probably lives already in his imaginary world, where he can still scare somebody and where somebody still believes him.

Well, he's hit a new low today. Posting on people's campaign management threads, services, etc making the "mental illness" claim.

http://archive.is/ATgrj

I'd never dream of copying pasting/spamming threads on this forum like that. I honestly don't know how he gets away with it.

[PrimeNumber7]

Get 5 BTC for proof who Game Protect scammed and for how much?

Since 3,5 years active and no scam so far.

You should pay out those 5 BTC to WinRateCasino. He proofed it in this thread.

Note that he can create a flag against you, if you don't.
And further, this (promising to pay out 5 BTC after a proof, but not doing so) is another reason to give you some neg trust rating.

The thread that WinRateCasino wrote only shows the lack of credibility on the part of game-protect in regards to his casino ratings, and the lack of value he provides in regards to the service he is providing. I don't see any evidence in the thread you linked that game-protect took anything of value from WinRateCasino without agreed compensation.

@game-protect - I don't believe you are actually responding to what is being said about you as to why the OP is calling you a "high risk". I can explain it to you if you do not understand so you can try to defend yourself:

marlboroza and others are saying that the determining factor of if someone makes it onto your "scam lists" is if they pay you or not. The link that WinRateCasino wrote and is cited above supports this. If you are listing businesses who have not paid you and are calling them a scam, you are not actually offering any kind of substantive service, and the list you provide on your website does not have any real value.

If any of the above is untrue or misrepresented, you should say why you believe this is untrue.

Your mass posts that everyone who agrees with the flag is mentally ill is annoying and doesn't do your credibility any favors.

[Initscri]

What shithole are you located in?

San Diego

I doubt it but if it were true AFAIK California doesn't have a "criminal defamation" law nor is it a federal thing, what with 1A and all.

Pretty sure it's Sweden if I remember correctly. There was a Wikipedia post at some point where a backlink / attr link was set to Game-Protect. The user who made the modification didn't protect his/her IP, and it was a Swedish IP.

I think I have it archived somewhere on his thread (and in my posts)

[AB de Royse777]

What shithole are you located in?

San Diego

Oi you sick! STFU. Remove the feedback you left in my profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5165032.0

Or I will troll you like fuck and you will get pregnant like you never did. Fucking pussy.

[Initscri]

What shithole are you located in?

San Diego

Oi you sick! STFU. Remove the feedback you left in my profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5165032.0

Or I will troll you like fuck and you will get pregnant like you never did. Fucking pussy.

Honestly, don't feed into his shit. Keep it professional, something which he is not. He's a troll. He'll keep trolling until he gets banned (if that happens)

[AB de Royse777]

Honestly, don't feed into his shit. Keep it professional, something which he is not. He's a troll. He'll keep trolling until he gets banned (if that happens)

This is pathetic. I woke up with a fresh mind earlier then I saw these false feedback in my feedback page. Now I feel angry and upset. This fuck ruined my morning. I hope mod teach him a lesson if possible or I may learn to avoid him. The upsetting thing is that I can not avoid the false feedback they left.


People who are not familiar with his nonsense they will think I am really a child abuser. This is a very serious accusation against anyone under any law.

[AdolfinWolf]

Honestly, don't feed into his shit. Keep it professional, something which he is not. He's a troll. He'll keep trolling until he gets banned (if that happens)

This is pathetic. I woke up with a fresh mind earlier then I saw these false feedback in my feedback page. Now I feel angry and upset. This fuck ruined my morning. I hope mod teach him a lesson if possible or I may learn to avoid him. The upsetting thing is that I can not avoid the false feedback they left.


People who are not familiar with his nonsense they will think I am really a child abuser. This is a very serious accusation against anyone under any law.

Honestly, don't feed into his shit. Keep it professional, something which he is not. He's a troll. He'll keep trolling until he gets banned (if that happens)

This user should actually be banned for abusing the feedback system like this.

Pretty sure that leaving so many retaliatory ratings based on nothing falls under trolling. Especially when the accusations are this serious.

However, trolling isn't allowed. If a user is habitually posting obviously false nonsense ("obviously false nonsense" to an outsider, NOT to someone who follows or is involved in the discussion) just to stir up trouble, then it's considered trolling, which is prohibited. Such cases should be thoroughly documented in the report though (There are tons of reports that just say "trolling", but moderators don't have time to look through each user's post).

I'm pretty sure this takes the cake.

[Initscri]

Honestly, don't feed into his shit. Keep it professional, something which he is not. He's a troll. He'll keep trolling until he gets banned (if that happens)

This is pathetic. I woke up with a fresh mind earlier then I saw these false feedback in my feedback page. Now I feel angry and upset. This fuck ruined my morning. I hope mod teach him a lesson if possible or I may learn to avoid him. The upsetting thing is that I can not avoid the false feedback they left.


People who are not familiar with his nonsense they will think I am really a child abuser. This is a very serious accusation against anyone under any law.

Honestly, don't feed into his shit. Keep it professional, something which he is not. He's a troll. He'll keep trolling until he gets banned (if that happens)

This user should actually be banned for abusing the feedback system like this.

Pretty sure that leaving so many retaliatory ratings based on nothing falls under trolling. Especially when the accusations are this serious.

However, trolling isn't allowed. If a user is habitually posting obviously false nonsense ("obviously false nonsense" to an outsider, NOT to someone who follows or is involved in the discussion) just to stir up trouble, then it's considered trolling, which is prohibited. Such cases should be thoroughly documented in the report though (There are tons of reports that just say "trolling", but moderators don't have time to look through each user's post).

I'm pretty sure this takes the cake.

Yea, I completely agree. It's absolutely annoying. I mean, I've received 9 negative reps from the guy when I had otherwise perfect trust before. It definitely wasn't a fun a time seeing the 9 negative reps.

But, at the end of the day, I know the mods probably have a massive amount of trust abuse to contend with. I do think the mods should seriously consider action on GP though; even just to set a precedent.

Suggesting people are involved in "illegal" activities without any proof was defamation enough, but bringing child accusations into it... that's a whole new level.

[xtraelv]

Yea, I completely agree. It's absolutely annoying. I mean, I've received 9 negative reps from the guy when I had otherwise perfect trust before. It definitely wasn't a fun a time seeing the 9 negative reps.

You still have perfect trust. Untrusted feedback doesn't display by default.

I have numerous muppets that have placed untrusted feedback in my untrusted feedback repository.  Untrusted feedback can also be described as the rogues gallery.

I believe The Pharmacist has received some of the most colorful untrusted feedback.  Funny to read. Gives an insight into the mindset of some people

Creating a proper and well documented flag support thread against a stupid scammer is a waste of time.

Correct! It is unlike more lucrative to put the proof on the table who I scammed and for how much and get 5 BTC:

Get 5 BTC for proof who Game Protect scammed and for how much?

So why does marlboroza waste his time with this thread or flag or whatever it is instead of getting 5 BTC?

Is he extremely mentally ill or does he intentionally commit the criminal offense of defamation with claiming that after 3,5 years without any scam using this service is a high-risk?

Get 5 BTC for proof who Game Protect scammed and for how much? First come first serve!

This is a bit like the John McAfee Bitfi unhackable challenge. It (Bitfi) was hacked a number of times - just not in the way that they worded it.

Hi - anyone else using Game Protect to enforce their claim regarding the Curacao license scam? I instructed them over 3 months ago and paid 5% of my claim to them up front but am struggling to get any specific information about the progress. I have to chase them every 3-4 weeks for an update but always get a response which sounds like they're annoyed i'm even chasing... Anyone else having the same issue? I know this isn't something that can be sorted overnight but a courtesy e-mail every couple of weeks to let me know how they're getting on and what the expected timeline is would be appreciated - they have been paid after all.

Game Protect - my ticket number is 171.

For everyone else, the reason i resorted to Game Protect is because the Casino in question never replied to any of my e-mails/complaints for months and months. I then went to their "License Provider" who also just fobbed me off with lies. My Claim total is nearly £13k albeit GP have said they can get me 50-60% of this back. Which is more than the big fat 0 i have managed over the last few months.

However if the comments already appearing on my thread are anything to go by then it could still be a big fat 0! I will keep my thread update if/when anything actually happens but i'm over 3 months in now...

The "mentally ill" and "child abuser" feedback you posted is "scamming" every user that reads it. Do I get my 5 BTC now ? 35LixBd3DEkqVjPtbai5hgeGX3ZUzqPnq3

Here in your own words:

I personally do not care about this feedback system, as everyone can state what ever nonsense he like. I could only consider provable feedback based on facts.

One thing is clear, the one who make false and misleading statements in the feedback section of someone, is the one who is untrustworthy and not the one who receive it. Logic?

http://web.archive.org/web/20190715150409/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1769527.msg17709620

marlboroza alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned in this topic, I believe that anyone dealing with game-protect is at a high risk of losing money, and guests would be well-advised to avoid doing so

I see numerous warning signs :

Deceptive commercial conduct.

No contact details - i.e. real name and address that a legitimate business would display.

An Ed Magedson style business model.

Your hastily placed feedback on 40 forum members proves that you are dishonest.

To place such a flag does not require proof of a successful scam.  It only requires warning signs that indicate someone dealing with you has a high risk of losing their $.
It doesn't stop anyone from dealing with you. It just alerts them to be cautious.

[marlboroza]

Yea, I completely agree. It's absolutely annoying. I mean, I've received 9 negative reps from the guy when I had otherwise perfect trust before. It definitely wasn't a fun a time seeing the 9 negative reps.

9? Damn, I have only 3. Look at it from bright side, you have received 1 positive feedback.

On serious note, just look at feedback you have received because of my post and you will notice how GP is taking things out of context.

[wwzsocki]

I supported this flag because I have already read multiple threads with accusations against Game-Protect and personally discussed with this member a couple of times.

Additionally, reported a couple of his spammy posts, with FUD and stupid accusations in different threads, published by Hhampuz, Darkstar_ , LoyceV, Yahoo62278 and couple of other members, who supported this flag also.



I think he is mad because he left me such annotation in my trust:



I know that this has no power, but I just don't like it. Nevermind if he writes about me. That he doesn't like or trust me, but something like this?

That I abuse children? Is just way too much!!!

I think something should be done, to not let such members an opportunity, to use the trust system, to their needs, especially when it goes to revenge.

Something like no possibility to add trust annotations for flagged members or any other feature, which stop trust annotations abuse.

I just don't want to have such nonsense and simple lie in my trust annotations. He should be not only flagged but banned for obvious abuse of forum rules.

Game-Protect is like a disease for this forum and we need to find a way, to resolve this problem.

[Joel_Jantsen]

I always thought GP is sane and a mature person. Not anymore after the feedback he left on my profile. Like was I hoping for such a retard all this while to hire a lawyer and defeat casinos who ought to scam the players? I was so wrong.

@GP: There are a number of members who support this flag and aren't related to casino operators or your competition in any way. That shows your service isn't helping anyone.

[xtraelv]

I always thought GP is sane and a mature person. Not anymore after the feedback he left on my profile. Like was I hoping for such a retard all this while to hire a lawyer and defeat casinos who ought to scam the players? I was so wrong.

@GP: There are a number of members who support this flag and aren't related to casino operators or your competition in any way. That shows your service isn't helping anyone.

I am one of such people. I have never gambled in a real casino and have never gambled crypto in an online casino. * (with the exception of free faucets and lotteries run on exchanges. )

Sorry I've lived a sheltered life. I don't gamble in casinos or at the races, don't smoke, don't do drugs and rarely drink alcohol.

[hacker1001101001]

@GP: There are a number of members who support this flag and aren't related to casino operators or your competition in any way. That shows your service isn't helping anyone.

I even don't think any of the regular gambler's use such services anymore, GP does not even prove any success rate here. So it's better to think they are doing this without any convincing results. I also read they endorsed some of the casinos themselves which totally makes it look like an money making business with not much ethics.

Sorry I've lived a sheltered life. I don't gamble in casinos or at the races, don't smoke, don't do drugs and rarely drink alcohol.

Really!!


Source

[Initscri]

Yea, I completely agree. It's absolutely annoying. I mean, I've received 9 negative reps from the guy when I had otherwise perfect trust before. It definitely wasn't a fun a time seeing the 9 negative reps.

9? Damn, I have only 3. Look at it from bright side, you have received 1 positive feedback.

On serious note, just look at feedback you have received because of my post and you will notice how GP is taking things out of context.

Yea, I know, I remember that. His feedback regarding you is a prime example of how the man can take things out of context, spin them, and attempt to create a defamatory statement.

@GP: There are a number of members who support this flag and aren't related to casino operators or your competition in any way. That shows your service isn't helping anyone.

I even don't think any of the regular gambler's use such services anymore, GP does not even prove any success rate here. So it's better to think they are doing this without any convincing results. I also read they endorsed some of the casinos themselves which totally makes it look like an money making business with not much ethics.

Sorry I've lived a sheltered life. I don't gamble in casinos or at the races, don't smoke, don't do drugs and rarely drink alcohol.

Really!!


Source

TBH, In my opinion, there was never even a reason to use GPs service UNTIL he provided evidence of cases being won. Everytime we asked, we were either ignored, showered with negative trust, or called "mentally ill"

Going through GPs affiliate links is just giving GP affiliate cash. That's it. Nothing more. And until he proves otherwise, that's all it's going to be.


Also, I like how he's kind of disappeared the last couple of days since the spotlight has grown larger. Hopefully he ain't coming back.

[Hhampuz]

So... Did he get banned?

[nutildah]

So... Did he get banned?

Hope not, he still owes me 5 BTC!

Get 5 BTC for proof who Game Protect scammed and for how much? First come first serve!

I'd like to claim the 5 BTC offer.  

Game Protect - Get Paid did not want me to mention them in my thread. Nevertheless, IF you do successfully complete my claim then this comes from my overall amount anyway. So it's still paid from what i am owed.

Like i said in my first post, i am aware that these things don't happen over night, but the only time i have heard from you in 3 months is when i chase - and then i get a short sharp response. I would love to represent a success story for you on this forum and would gladly let everyone on here know if that turns out to be the case.

Scammed: Jenniraye88
How much: 5% of £13k, or £650

Please make the BTC payment to the address in my profile.

Thanks, and have a great day.

 

If he was banned, then that pretty much guarantees he will have scammed this user, unless they post an update saying otherwise. Oh well. He knows where to find my BTC address.

[bones261]

So... Did he get banned?

     I wouldn't be surprised if he was at least temp banned. He only had 25 off topic posts deleted in a day or two. Also, he hasn't posted in 3 days. I'm sure the bogus negative trust comments didn't help in any either. When I first noticed the trust comments, I also found the comment about children particularly disturbing. I am particularly offending since I'm a gay man, and this slur is often used against gay men. However, since he gave it to everyone, I'm certain it wasn't meant to be targeting against me as a homophobic smear. He just wanted to be generally offensive. At least he didn't come out and say, "sexually" abusive. although I am certain that was what he was applying.

Hope not, he still owes me 5 BTC!

    I don't think he would give out that bounty even if you recorded his confession.  Besides, knowing him, even if he gave you the 5 BTC, they are probably tainted.

[actmyname]

Not banned. Signature still there and they aren't shown as banned on BPIP.Looks like they're just taking a break - maybe finally veering off the forum and now into sanity?