Game Protect flag

[nutildah]

Where is the verification by police or authorities that I scammed h4ns for 210€ July 2019?

Its in the same place as the court ruling awarding you 20,000 € in damages from h4ns.  

Your business here is completely finished at this point. I don't understand what you feel you have to gain by hanging around besides more ridicule and chances to prove that you, game-protect aka Game Protect of game-protect.com, are a scammer.

[1713928541]

1713928541

[1713928541]

1713928541

[1713928541]

1713928541

[TECSHARE]

Supported the flag. Although I was always positive on the Game-Protect's side assuming they're fighting the scam casinos and trying to get user's money back but I'm not aware of a single case where they successfully managed to help someone out. At this point, it looks like they're just another business trying to make money off casinos by either 'extortion' or 'blackmailing'.

Pretending to fight scams and using it as cover to attack your opponents and competitors is quite useful and profitable, just look at the BitCops on the default trust. Defy them and they will use their authority at any opportunity to serve their own personal interests, be it for profit, protecting their pals, or soothing butthurt. Much like game-protect, if you refuse to get on your knees and suck they will make an example out of you to send a message to everyone else to comply.

[TwitchySeal]

Supported the flag. Although I was always positive on the Game-Protect's side assuming they're fighting the scam casinos and trying to get user's money back but I'm not aware of a single case where they successfully managed to help someone out. At this point, it looks like they're just another business trying to make money off casinos by either 'extortion' or 'blackmailing'.

Pretending to fight scams and using it as cover to attack your opponents and competitors is quite useful and profitable, just look at the BitCops on the default trust. Defy them and they will use their authority at any opportunity to serve their own personal interests, be it for profit, protecting their pals, or soothing butthurt. Much like game-protect, if you refuse to get on your knees and suck they will make an example out of you to send a message to everyone else to comply.

wut

Are you implying game-protect is a victim?

He will be thrilled if so.

[nutildah]

Pretending to fight scams and using it as cover to attack your opponents and competitors is quite useful and profitable, just look at the BitCops on the default trust. Defy them and they will use their authority at any opportunity to serve their own personal interests, be it for profit, protecting their pals, or soothing butthurt. Much like game-protect, if you refuse to get on your knees and suck they will make an example out of you to send a message to everyone else to comply.

So now you've taken to defending a proven scammer and the least trusted member on the forum in order to carry on your ageless vendetta against the DT system... Classy.

[TECSHARE]

Pretending to fight scams and using it as cover to attack your opponents and competitors is quite useful and profitable, just look at the BitCops on the default trust. Defy them and they will use their authority at any opportunity to serve their own personal interests, be it for profit, protecting their pals, or soothing butthurt. Much like game-protect, if you refuse to get on your knees and suck they will make an example out of you to send a message to everyone else to comply.

So now you've taken to defending a proven scammer and the least trusted member on the forum in order to carry on your ageless vendetta against the DT system... Classy.

Where did I defend game-protect? Please quote.

I simply pointed out his racket is not unique and also one used by many occupying the default trust.

[TwitchySeal]

Pretending to fight scams and using it as cover to attack your opponents and competitors is quite useful and profitable, just look at the BitCops on the default trust. Defy them and they will use their authority at any opportunity to serve their own personal interests, be it for profit, protecting their pals, or soothing butthurt. Much like game-protect, if you refuse to get on your knees and suck they will make an example out of you to send a message to everyone else to comply.

So now you've taken to defending a proven scammer and the least trusted member on the forum in order to carry on your ageless vendetta against the DT system... Classy.

Where did I defend game-protect? Please quote.

I simply pointed out his racket is not unique and also one used by many occupying the default trust.

I'm not sure if you were or not so I asked.  Seems like you were, doesn't make sense though.

Much like game-protect, if you refuse to get on your knees and suck they will make an example out of you to send a message to everyone else to comply.

[nutildah]

Pretending to fight scams and using it as cover to attack your opponents and competitors is quite useful and profitable, just look at the BitCops on the default trust. Defy them and they will use their authority at any opportunity to serve their own personal interests, be it for profit, protecting their pals, or soothing butthurt. Much like game-protect, if you refuse to get on your knees and suck they will make an example out of you to send a message to everyone else to comply.

So now you've taken to defending a proven scammer and the least trusted member on the forum in order to carry on your ageless vendetta against the DT system... Classy.

Where did I defend game-protect? Please quote.

Now you're even starting to sound like him. For starters, you're inferring that we asked him to suck our collective dick, and because he didn't, we "made an example out of him." You're inferring that his problem isn't his but that of the DTs. That's just fucking stupid man. Get a grip.

I simply pointed out his racket is not unique and also one used by many occupying the default trust.

His racket is unique. He's the only one going around shitting on everything casino-related in hopes of luring new victims to prey on. Its an incredibly shitty business model, and nobody on the default trust list does the same thing. Oh but of course that's not what you said, you said something entirely different, and I'm sure you're going to educate us all on it right now.

[TECSHARE]

Pretending to fight scams and using it as cover to attack your opponents and competitors is quite useful and profitable, just look at the BitCops on the default trust. Defy them and they will use their authority at any opportunity to serve their own personal interests, be it for profit, protecting their pals, or soothing butthurt. Much like game-protect, if you refuse to get on your knees and suck they will make an example out of you to send a message to everyone else to comply.

So now you've taken to defending a proven scammer and the least trusted member on the forum in order to carry on your ageless vendetta against the DT system... Classy.

Where did I defend game-protect? Please quote.

Now you're even starting to sound like him. For starters, you're inferring that we asked him to suck our collective dick, and because he didn't, we "made an example out of him." You're inferring that his problem isn't his but that of the DTs. That's just fucking stupid man. Get a grip.

I simply pointed out his racket is not unique and also one used by many occupying the default trust.

His racket is unique. He's the only one going around shitting on everything casino-related in hopes of luring new victims to prey on. Its an incredibly shitty business model, and nobody on the default trust list does the same thing. Oh but of course that's not what you said, you said something entirely different, and I'm sure you're going to educate us all on it right now.

Corrupt people can call out other corrupt people. There doesn't have to be a "good guy" even if the claim is legitimate. The person who is the "good guy" in one circumstance can be the "bad guy" in other places where it serves them. Game-protect is most certainly corrupt, but calling him out doesn't make you above reproach.

This racket is not at all unique and is as old as time. Mafias and cartels have been using this method since societies existed. You either cooperate or they organize to harm your reputation, lively hood, or life itself.

[nutildah]

Corrupt people can call out other corrupt people. There doesn't have to be a "good guy" even if the claim is legitimate. The person who is the "good guy" in one circumstance can be the "bad guy" in other places where it serves them. Game-protect is most certainly corrupt, but calling him out doesn't make you above reproach.

I never said I was above reproach, and I never scammed anyone. game-protect on the other hand, has. If you think this thread is just about naming good guys and bad guys, you're missing its entire point.

This racket is not at all unique and is as old as time. Mafias and cartels have been using this method since societies existed. You either cooperate or they organize to harm your reputation, lively hood, or life itself.

I was talking specifically about how it applied to crypto casinos. GP is unique in that case. Despite what you may think, DT isn't a mafia or cartel with nefarious intent. Its quite the opposite. I've investigated, exposed and gone after all kind of scammers and other people trying to make money off the forum in less-than-honest ways, in just about every conceivable business sector related to cryptocurrency. My being in a sportsbook campaign has nothing to do with my contempt for GP -- its been around for far longer than that. If you insist on defending him, be my guest.

But it doesn't seem like you're actually here to do that. It seems like you're just using this thread to continue your never-ending battle against the DT system. Perhaps you should start your own thread about it.

[TECSHARE]

Corrupt people can call out other corrupt people. There doesn't have to be a "good guy" even if the claim is legitimate. The person who is the "good guy" in one circumstance can be the "bad guy" in other places where it serves them. Game-protect is most certainly corrupt, but calling him out doesn't make you above reproach.

I never said I was above reproach, and I never scammed anyone. game-protect on the other hand, has. If you think this thread is just about naming good guys and bad guys, you're missing its entire point.

This racket is not at all unique and is as old as time. Mafias and cartels have been using this method since societies existed. You either cooperate or they organize to harm your reputation, lively hood, or life itself.

I was talking specifically about how it applied to crypto casinos. GP is unique in that case. Despite what you may think, DT isn't a mafia or cartel with nefarious intent. Its quite the opposite. I've investigated, exposed and gone after all kind of scammers and other people trying to make money off the forum in less-than-honest ways, in just about every conceivable business sector related to cryptocurrency. My being in a sportsbook campaign has nothing to do with my contempt for GP -- its been around for far longer than that. If you insist on defending him, be my guest.

But it doesn't seem like you're actually here to do that. It seems like you're just using this thread to continue your never-ending battle against the DT system. Perhaps you should start your own thread about it.

You were talking about something other than what I was talking about. Good for you. This thread is just a perfect example to draw very apt parallels to this method of corruption which people who are more adept at applying it within the default trust manage to get away with. I would (and have) started threads about it, but of course any time I do the gnashing of the teeth, crying, and wailing from individuals such as yourself is never ending preventing any productive discussion. It is all part of the group effort to silence anyone criticizing the made men, and unless you get on your knees by ignoring the malfeasance of the other made men, then you are the them in the us vs them.

[TwitchySeal]

Guys, this is the Game-protect flag thread.

[suchmoon]

Guys, this is the Game-protect flag thread.

I think it's great that TECSHARE showed up to bring new deflective material for game-protect because the whole "when did I scam? defamation!!!!@#$" spiel was getting boring. Now we have learned that game-protect is acting exactly the same as DT members. I'm just surprised that TECSHARE, the lone fighter for intertubes justice, hasn't started flags against all those DT members that scammed 210 euro for non-existent services. Such negligence.

[TECSHARE]

Guys, this is the Game-protect flag thread.

I think it's great that TECSHARE showed up to bring new deflective material for game-protect because the whole "when did I scam? defamation!!!!@#$" spiel was getting boring. Now we have learned that game-protect is acting exactly the same as DT members. I'm just surprised that TECSHARE, the lone fighter for intertubes justice, hasn't started flags against all those DT members that scammed 210 euro for non-existent services. Such negligence.

Thanks for proving my point.

[Astargath]

Guys, this is the Game-protect flag thread.

A really useless thread as long as GP is not banned.

[game-protect]

I think it's great that TECSHARE showed up to bring new deflective material for game-protect because the whole "when did I scam? defamation!!!!@#$" spiel was getting boring. Now we have learned that game-protect is acting exactly the same as DT members. I'm just surprised that TECSHARE, the lone fighter for intertubes justice, hasn't started flags against all those DT members that scammed 210 euro for non-existent services. Such negligence.

According to your brain wash theory, sending over 100 emails each other is non-existent services?

Over the time GP and I have sent each other more than 100 emails concerning several issues and scam cases of Curacao based books.

[marlboroza]

Thanks for proving my point.

You have made your points months ago (several red flags posted by you):

T thinks GP is criminal:

I challenge you to place this 5 BTC with a trusted escrow and clear terms. Otherwise all this is, is free PR for you with zero risk. You won't however, because you are afraid some one might claim it and you would have to pay to expose your own criminal activity

T thinks GP is running protection racket, he can't find information about company:

[...]This is a lot like the protection racket you run, you get something but give nothing. Funny for some one who claims to be a hub of judging the trustworthiness of others, there seems do be zero information about your company publicly available. Everything you do is an illusion.

T doesn't think any more, T made a statement that GP runs protection racket.

What a shocker, veiled threats from a guy who runs a protection racket.

So why are you spamming this thread? Go spam your off topic replies about DT somewhere else.
@GP, may I remind you that we are still waiting for https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5163510.msg52743100#msg52743100

[game-protect]

@GP, may I remind you that we are still waiting for https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5163510.msg52743100#msg52743100

I already answered here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5163510.msg52744068#msg52744068

[marlboroza]

@GP, may I remind you that we are still waiting for https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5163510.msg52743100#msg52743100

I already answered here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5163510.msg52744068#msg52744068

Nope, you didn't. Can you please read again and:

show email where he said that he does not want refund yet, instead, he wants you to continue with the case.

That email should be somewhere around July 1. if not on July 1., and:

show email from September where you said you are closing support tickets and that he will be refunded.

Can you do that?

GP why have you removed posts from this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5124769.0;all ? Makes no sense, look, posts are archived http://archive.is/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5124769.0;all

[suchmoon]

According to your brain wash theory, sending over 100 emails each other is non-existent services?

Did h4ns pay you 210 euro to send 100 e-mails?

[game-protect]

According to your brain wash theory, sending over 100 emails each other is non-existent services?

Did h4ns pay you 210 euro to send 100 e-mails?

No, he donated 210€ for my assistance and assistance was delivered.

You can only donate to Game Protect and it does not take payments.

https://game-protect.com/donate