⭐️ [ANN] [STO] Cancer Treatment Proven Since '09 ⭐️ MINIMUM INVESTMENT ONLY $90 ⭐️

[LoraKalash]

Will you tell your clients what exact drugs you will give them or their pet? I mean, patients have a right to know this information, right?

Interesting question, by the way. If they will tell, it can help their competitors to steal the approach, if not - clients may say no to the treatment.

Yeap, I have same thoughts. I'm interested how will they solve this problem in case it is a problem.

Well, I think that we should wait for Gary. He will give you the answer as he always do. But, I'm curious about it too.

Kira I am assuming you are talking about me answering the questions above.

First, all patients and dog owners will have to sign an Non Disclosure Agreement (NDA).  And if they ask we will tell them, the drugs and that it is a proprietary treatment and they will be bound by the NDA.

But.... think about the last time you had any treatment or surgery for that matter on yourself.  If any of your have. This is how it usually goes. They will tell you the potential dangers and such but at least for me I have never see a list of drugs or even the method they used.  I have had both back surgery and eye surgery.  And they told me about how long the surgery would be, and how long the recovery would be and what after care i would need to do.  Never was I told every drug they would be using.  The exactly surgical method and tools.  If I asked they would certainly tell me and they will be on their medical records but medical records are protected.

Or if you bring in your dog for surgery.  You don't get to go in with the dog while they are doing the surgery and see what they are using. A It is the same when we treat a dog.

So the short answer. We will tell them is if they ask and I will tell them they are bound by a NDA. The NDA will be part of the papers they sign before hand.  We will always tell them what they can expect from using our treatment and after care.

There is another reason we are very hesitant to give out all the drugs in this treatment and need to protect it with a NDA.  You all know the one drug is a chemotherapy drug.  Actually a combo of several drugs depending on the type of cancer.  The other drug, is in some place, no longer needs a prescription to get it and it can be purchase in those areas over the counter.  So if there is someone who is or their dog is, being treated by a doctor or vet with chemo and they find out what this other drug is, they could say "Hey I should try that." And they go, on their own, and buy the other drug and take the other drug at home while having the chemo in their system.  And they do this without supervision of a doctor or vet, proper dosage or strict protocol, they could literally kill themselves.  And who do you think is going to be blamed?  But if we protect our treatment, have all patients sign NDA, AND tell everyone this treatment should only be given and used under the supervision of a doctor or veterinarian, then we are legally protected and more importantly so are dogs and people.

Gary

By the way, if someone will try to use your method without your supervising and will get bad effects, could he go to court to try to get money from you?

He can try, but how will he proove that that was because of AdSana clinic? But, I'm sure, that there will be a lot of such situations in the future.

[1714065941]

1714065941

[1714065941]

1714065941

[1714065941]

1714065941

[1714065941]

1714065941

[1714065941]

1714065941

[garyn]

And if they ask we will tell them, the drugs and that it is a proprietary treatment and they will be bound by the NDA.

When you will have thousands of clients, you will never find out who of them could be a spy. That's why, I don't think that NDA will be effective.

By the way, if someone will try to use your method without your supervising and will get bad effects, could he go to court to try to get money from you?

By the way, if someone will try to use your method without your supervising and will get bad effects, could he go to court to try to get money from you?

I want to try and answer all these questions at once.  First with all the disclaimers we will on our website and that people will have to sign we will legally be protected if someone tries on their one.

The bigger question I want to address is the one about it is inevitable that after treating 1000's of dogs and people the word will get out.  Yes you are correct although it has not gotten out of China with the hospitals there since 2009.  But I am sure it will.  So as part of our promotion we are going to make sure people understand one thing.

Who would you rather be treated by or have your dog treated by (1) the company whose has the inventor of the treatment as their Chief Science Officer so that if anything needs to be addressed or adjusted in the treatment it can be handled quickly and properly. Or (2) a company that found out about it and are doing it on their own, with NO past research to guide them, NO past use of the treatment since 2009 to guide them and NO inventor of the treatment to help them if needed.

We know that even if we had 100 Canine Cancer Centers we could not treat all the dogs with cancer in the US.  So eventually we will start licensing out the treatment which will include full support on the treatment.

[Kira_Fedorova]

And if they ask we will tell them, the drugs and that it is a proprietary treatment and they will be bound by the NDA.

When you will have thousands of clients, you will never find out who of them could be a spy. That's why, I don't think that NDA will be effective.

By the way, if someone will try to use your method without your supervising and will get bad effects, could he go to court to try to get money from you?

By the way, if someone will try to use your method without your supervising and will get bad effects, could he go to court to try to get money from you?

I want to try and answer all these questions at once.  First with all the disclaimers we will on our website and that people will have to sign we will legally be protected if someone tries on their one.

The bigger question I want to address is the one about it is inevitable that after treating 1000's of dogs and people the word will get out.  Yes you are correct although it has not gotten out of China with the hospitals there since 2009.  But I am sure it will.  So as part of our promotion we are going to make sure people understand one thing.

Who would you rather be treated by or have your dog treated by (1) the company whose has the inventor of the treatment as their Chief Science Officer so that if anything needs to be addressed or adjusted in the treatment it can be handled quickly and properly. Or (2) a company that found out about it and are doing it on their own, with NO past research to guide them, NO past use of the treatment since 2009 to guide them and NO inventor of the treatment to help them if needed.

We know that even if we had 100 Canine Cancer Centers we could not treat all the dogs with cancer in the US.  So eventually we will start licensing out the treatment which will include full support on the treatment.

When are you planning to licenses to third parties? Will token holder get dividends from this income and all new incomes that will be added in the future?

[Piastr]

And if they ask we will tell them, the drugs and that it is a proprietary treatment and they will be bound by the NDA.

When you will have thousands of clients, you will never find out who of them could be a spy. That's why, I don't think that NDA will be effective.

By the way, if someone will try to use your method without your supervising and will get bad effects, could he go to court to try to get money from you?

By the way, if someone will try to use your method without your supervising and will get bad effects, could he go to court to try to get money from you?

I want to try and answer all these questions at once.  First with all the disclaimers we will on our website and that people will have to sign we will legally be protected if someone tries on their one.

The bigger question I want to address is the one about it is inevitable that after treating 1000's of dogs and people the word will get out.  Yes you are correct although it has not gotten out of China with the hospitals there since 2009.  But I am sure it will.  So as part of our promotion we are going to make sure people understand one thing.

Who would you rather be treated by or have your dog treated by (1) the company whose has the inventor of the treatment as their Chief Science Officer so that if anything needs to be addressed or adjusted in the treatment it can be handled quickly and properly. Or (2) a company that found out about it and are doing it on their own, with NO past research to guide them, NO past use of the treatment since 2009 to guide them and NO inventor of the treatment to help them if needed.

We know that even if we had 100 Canine Cancer Centers we could not treat all the dogs with cancer in the US.  So eventually we will start licensing out the treatment which will include full support on the treatment.

When are you planning to licenses to third parties? Will token holder get dividends from this income and all new incomes that will be added in the future?

Token holders have right for dividends from all profits, that company receives. So, there is no matter what and when will be added.

[garyn]

[As was said, people here invest very rarely. They prefer to wait for investments from institutional investors in order to be sure that this project is interesting to Funds.

That's true. Investors here burned their hands many times in 2017-2018. Now, they are very careful with investing in startups. Many of them prefer to buy tokens on exchanges.

Well that will a shame and their loss if they wait for Institutional Investors because if we get all the money from the Institutional
Investor, the STO will be closed and people from the forum will not even be able to get in on the low STO prices.

AND you also said above that they will wait till they can buy them in the exchanges then I can guarantee you by then the price of the SANA tokens will be much higher.  And they will pay a lot more for the tokens.  Then when buy theses SANA tokens at an exchange, they will all be saying "I wish I had a chance to have bought into this at a lower price".  

Well the do.  Now!  They won't later.  

And if you are betting that they will sink in value like all the others after the offering.  Those other ICO's whose value bottomed after the ICO, most only had a MVP and need the money to create the product.  We have the treatment, it has been used since 2009, and as soon as we open a Canine Cancer Center we will have patients.  With all the press that we will be issuing, and the good results for our patients, our SANA price will not bottom out like all the rest.  It will react more like a stock does on a stock exchange based on Supply and Demand, Profits, our story and the market, being treating cancer patients

But I cannot force anyone to invest now.  I can only show them the opportunity they have now.

Gary

It is interesting that I answered this question above today.  Because I just go off the phone with a company that wants us to join up with them and they will supply a licensed Broker-Dealer to sell our security offering and then we will be put on a security token exchange run by a country NOT a company.  

IF this happens, once we have the Broker Dealer onboard, we will immediately go to the main sale price of $.20 USD per token instead of the $.10 USD per token price we have right now.  And investors will be competing with a broker dealer to buy the tokens.

All I can say is if you have been considering investing in our project, perhaps now is the time.  Not later.

PLEASE NOTE: This is not hyping the investment, this is just keeping you up to date on all the possible things that may happen with the project.  Once I do my complete due diligence on this company and the broker dealer, attorneys and country do their due diligence on us and all is a go, we will go with the company.

Gary

[hosseinimr93]

The Telegram link which is shown on the first post of the thread does not work. It says "There is no Telegram account with the username you provided" I also tried to find the link on the website. But I couldn't find it. Is there any other link to Telegram group or it has become inactive?

[garyn]

The Telegram link which is shown on the first post of the thread does not work. It says "There is no Telegram account with the username you provided" I also tried to find the link on the website. But I couldn't find it. Is there any other link to Telegram group or it has become inactive?

You are correct. Here is the link.  https://t.me/AdSana71919.  I was giving you my personal one which is what I gave you and it is not the group.

Gary

[Piastr]

[As was said, people here invest very rarely. They prefer to wait for investments from institutional investors in order to be sure that this project is interesting to Funds.

That's true. Investors here burned their hands many times in 2017-2018. Now, they are very careful with investing in startups. Many of them prefer to buy tokens on exchanges.

Well that will a shame and their loss if they wait for Institutional Investors because if we get all the money from the Institutional
Investor, the STO will be closed and people from the forum will not even be able to get in on the low STO prices.

AND you also said above that they will wait till they can buy them in the exchanges then I can guarantee you by then the price of the SANA tokens will be much higher.  And they will pay a lot more for the tokens.  Then when buy theses SANA tokens at an exchange, they will all be saying "I wish I had a chance to have bought into this at a lower price".  

Well the do.  Now!  They won't later.  

And if you are betting that they will sink in value like all the others after the offering.  Those other ICO's whose value bottomed after the ICO, most only had a MVP and need the money to create the product.  We have the treatment, it has been used since 2009, and as soon as we open a Canine Cancer Center we will have patients.  With all the press that we will be issuing, and the good results for our patients, our SANA price will not bottom out like all the rest.  It will react more like a stock does on a stock exchange based on Supply and Demand, Profits, our story and the market, being treating cancer patients

But I cannot force anyone to invest now.  I can only show them the opportunity they have now.

Gary

It is interesting that I answered this question above today.  Because I just go off the phone with a company that wants us to join up with them and they will supply a licensed Broker-Dealer to sell our security offering and then we will be put on a security token exchange run by a country NOT a company.  

IF this happens, once we have the Broker Dealer onboard, we will immediately go to the main sale price of $.20 USD per token instead of the $.10 USD per token price we have right now.  And investors will be competing with a broker dealer to buy the tokens.

All I can say is if you have been considering investing in our project, perhaps now is the time.  Not later.

PLEASE NOTE: This is not hyping the investment, this is just keeping you up to date on all the possible things that may happen with the project.  Once I do my complete due diligence on this company and the broker dealer, attorneys and country do their due diligence on us and all is a go, we will go with the company.

Gary

Great news! Hope, you will finish this deal. But, how exact they can help you? I don't think, that anybody here knows how it works.

[ValeraGolyb]

Some projects are practicing so called buy-back model, when project buy tokens from bounty hunter and other token holders. Did you think about this model?

[Kira_Fedorova]

Some projects are practicing so called buy-back model, when project buy tokens from bounty hunter and other token holders. Did you think about this model?

Good model, by the way. It stops bounty hunters and other token holders from selling tokens quickly, right after the end of sales, when token is getting listed on any exchange.

[Kiriya]

Some projects are practicing so called buy-back model, when project buy tokens from bounty hunter and other token holders. Did you think about this model?

Good model, by the way. It stops bounty hunters and other token holders from selling tokens quickly, right after the end of sales, when token is getting listed on any exchange.

When this model is used, token holders try to get more tokens, before next stage of buy-back will start. It helps the price of the token to grow greatly.

[Anna_Petrova]

Some projects are practicing so called buy-back model, when project buy tokens from bounty hunter and other token holders. Did you think about this model?

Good model, by the way. It stops bounty hunters and other token holders from selling tokens quickly, right after the end of sales, when token is getting listed on any exchange.

When this model is used, token holders try to get more tokens, before next stage of buy-back will start. It helps the price of the token to grow greatly.

You must understand one thing. This project offers security token, but not utility. That model is used for utility tokens usually, because there is no other ways of getting profit from utility tokens except selling them.

[Piastr]

Some projects are practicing so called buy-back model, when project buy tokens from bounty hunter and other token holders. Did you think about this model?

Good model, by the way. It stops bounty hunters and other token holders from selling tokens quickly, right after the end of sales, when token is getting listed on any exchange.

When this model is used, token holders try to get more tokens, before next stage of buy-back will start. It helps the price of the token to grow greatly.

You must understand one thing. This project offers security token, but not utility. That model is used for utility tokens usually, because there is no other ways of getting profit from utility tokens except selling them.

Why not to try? Yes, there are more ways to get profit with security tokens, but one more way won't be redundant in my opinion.

[Anna_Petrova]

Some projects are practicing so called buy-back model, when project buy tokens from bounty hunter and other token holders. Did you think about this model?

Good model, by the way. It stops bounty hunters and other token holders from selling tokens quickly, right after the end of sales, when token is getting listed on any exchange.

When this model is used, token holders try to get more tokens, before next stage of buy-back will start. It helps the price of the token to grow greatly.

You must understand one thing. This project offers security token, but not utility. That model is used for utility tokens usually, because there is no other ways of getting profit from utility tokens except selling them.

Why not to try? Yes, there are more ways to get profit with security tokens, but one more way won't be redundant in my opinion.

It won't, of course. But, what I wanted to say was, that developers can refuse to add this model to their existing one, because there are already many ways to get profits from tokens.

[Kiriya]

[As was said, people here invest very rarely. They prefer to wait for investments from institutional investors in order to be sure that this project is interesting to Funds.

That's true. Investors here burned their hands many times in 2017-2018. Now, they are very careful with investing in startups. Many of them prefer to buy tokens on exchanges.

Well that will a shame and their loss if they wait for Institutional Investors because if we get all the money from the Institutional
Investor, the STO will be closed and people from the forum will not even be able to get in on the low STO prices.

AND you also said above that they will wait till they can buy them in the exchanges then I can guarantee you by then the price of the SANA tokens will be much higher.  And they will pay a lot more for the tokens.  Then when buy theses SANA tokens at an exchange, they will all be saying "I wish I had a chance to have bought into this at a lower price".  

Well the do.  Now!  They won't later.  

And if you are betting that they will sink in value like all the others after the offering.  Those other ICO's whose value bottomed after the ICO, most only had a MVP and need the money to create the product.  We have the treatment, it has been used since 2009, and as soon as we open a Canine Cancer Center we will have patients.  With all the press that we will be issuing, and the good results for our patients, our SANA price will not bottom out like all the rest.  It will react more like a stock does on a stock exchange based on Supply and Demand, Profits, our story and the market, being treating cancer patients

But I cannot force anyone to invest now.  I can only show them the opportunity they have now.

Gary

So, how much time do investors have to invest in your project before you will raise the token's price to $0.2?

[Piastr]

Well that will a shame and their loss if they wait for Institutional Investors because if we get all the money from the Institutional
Investor, the STO will be closed and people from the forum will not even be able to get in on the low STO prices.

AND you also said above that they will wait till they can buy them in the exchanges then I can guarantee you by then the price of the SANA tokens will be much higher.  And they will pay a lot more for the tokens.  Then when buy theses SANA tokens at an exchange, they will all be saying "I wish I had a chance to have bought into this at a lower price". 

Well the do.  Now!  They won't later. 

And if you are betting that they will sink in value like all the others after the offering.  Those other ICO's whose value bottomed after the ICO, most only had a MVP and need the money to create the product.  We have the treatment, it has been used since 2009, and as soon as we open a Canine Cancer Center we will have patients.  With all the press that we will be issuing, and the good results for our patients, our SANA price will not bottom out like all the rest.  It will react more like a stock does on a stock exchange based on Supply and Demand, Profits, our story and the market, being treating cancer patients

But I cannot force anyone to invest now.  I can only show them the opportunity they have now.

Gary

There are a lot of projects, that do not list their token on exchanges after the end of sales at all. That's why people here prefer to buy them on exchanges, because it means, that tokens are already listed, so the project is not a scam. I'm just telling you how it goes here.

[ValeraGolyb]

[As was said, people here invest very rarely. They prefer to wait for investments from institutional investors in order to be sure that this project is interesting to Funds.

That's true. Investors here burned their hands many times in 2017-2018. Now, they are very careful with investing in startups. Many of them prefer to buy tokens on exchanges.

Well that will a shame and their loss if they wait for Institutional Investors because if we get all the money from the Institutional
Investor, the STO will be closed and people from the forum will not even be able to get in on the low STO prices.

AND you also said above that they will wait till they can buy them in the exchanges then I can guarantee you by then the price of the SANA tokens will be much higher.  And they will pay a lot more for the tokens.  Then when buy theses SANA tokens at an exchange, they will all be saying "I wish I had a chance to have bought into this at a lower price".  

Well the do.  Now!  They won't later.  

And if you are betting that they will sink in value like all the others after the offering.  Those other ICO's whose value bottomed after the ICO, most only had a MVP and need the money to create the product.  We have the treatment, it has been used since 2009, and as soon as we open a Canine Cancer Center we will have patients.  With all the press that we will be issuing, and the good results for our patients, our SANA price will not bottom out like all the rest.  It will react more like a stock does on a stock exchange based on Supply and Demand, Profits, our story and the market, being treating cancer patients

But I cannot force anyone to invest now.  I can only show them the opportunity they have now.

Gary

You really need to visit blockchain and crypto events. Have you already decided what will be the first?

[Piastr]

As for me, I think that they won't need to visit more than 1 event, because they will find all money at once. They only need to prepare very well.

[ValeraGolyb]

As for me, I think that they won't need to visit more than 1 event, because they will find all money at once. They only need to prepare very well.

Maybe, you are right. But, I don't think that they should not rely on one big investor, because he can change him mind.

[Kira_Fedorova]

As for me, I think that they won't need to visit more than 1 event, because they will find all money at once. They only need to prepare very well.

Maybe, you are right. But, I don't think that they should not rely on one big investor, because he can change him mind.

Moreover it is not good, when one person or organization buys all tokens, that give a right of vote. I think they understand that.