Multiple Round ICOs?

[xiboothrezi]

reasonable or not there are binding conditions. So it is very important for us to examine the roadmap of the project that will be supported. projects from professional developers will definitely carry out activities according to the targets in the roadmap, all scheduled and on target. In recent years, IEO has become more popular, so some projects that have done ico some time ago decided to gain greater investor confidence through Ieo.

[1714629368]

1714629368

[1714629368]

1714629368

[13abyknight]

The entire point of splitting ICO/IEO rounds into multiple phases is to reach out to the investors in a way that makes it seem that investing in earlier rounds ends up being the most profitable. Offers like X% discount or bonus tokens on the first round, (X/2), (X/4) and so on for subsequent rounds attracts a lot of investors to buy into the project earlier in exchange for a chance at making more profit.

[The Cryptologist]

Have you heard of ICOs with multiple rounds? Like they raise a certain amount of money now, use that money for primary aims and goals, and then a few months/years down the line (as part of their original plan) launch a second round to fund additional goals and further project development? Just wondering if this is a thing, if so please provide me with some links to projects that have done so.

Trust me, that ICO is will not do anything good in the end. Two rounds is acceptable but doing it for 3rd and so on and it's going on for a year then it is really bad. I have seen many ICOs reached their softcap but they were showing their true greed when they want to reach close to hardcap. Those ICOs are looking for a quick profit more than the investors.

[asder250]

Do not invest into ICOs that hold token sale for 1 year. Look on the most successful ICOs, they raised money in few days.  

[Jating]

Have you heard of ICOs with multiple rounds? Like they raise a certain amount of money now, use that money for primary aims and goals, and then a few months/years down the line (as part of their original plan) launch a second round to fund additional goals and further project development? Just wondering if this is a thing, if so please provide me with some links to projects that have done so.

Yes, I guess it's just normal specially if the money they have raised initially is not enough to push the project to the next level. I'm sorry though but I can't provide some links but I have seen this in the past.

Project plans changes a lot, there could be roadmaps initially but as it move forward there could be changes that can affect the budget of the project so it's necessary that another round for additional fundings. What I don't like is that project changing the rules of the bounty in the end or at the middle because they failed to raise the funds needed.

[iyah adrian]

Previously, there were many projects that did this and that was very reasonable. But now it seems that there are not many more even no more projects that do ICO in several periods for development. All completed from stage to stage, at least 3 months a long time to do ICO.

[alt-fire]

Multiple model of ico is a good model to rise some funds. Why I think so? Because investors have a warranty and proof of existing company. Short ico's without rounds is not so good like multiple rounds which runs about months or even a few months so people can check the project and to be proof in their existing and can believe them.

[Saisher]

Have you heard of ICOs with multiple rounds? Like they raise a certain amount of money now, use that money for primary aims and goals, and then a few months/years down the line (as part of their original plan) launch a second round to fund additional goals and further project development? Just wondering if this is a thing, if so please provide me with some links to projects that have done so.

I don't remember the names of those projects, but there are coins that do several rounds of ICO, they sell their team shares or shares that they've locked and plan to sell in the future, of course, it should clearly detailed in their roadmap, and they already have products to back it up.

[Peterdav]

I think it's normal ICOs with multiple rounds and i've seen in some ICO project. I think they still have allocations for the next ICO for development of their project.

[Golftech]

Previously, there were many projects that did this and that was very reasonable. But now it seems that there are not many more even no more projects that do ICO in several periods for development. All completed from stage to stage, at least 3 months a long time to do ICO.

They are trying to reached the actual funds that needed to complete the project and make it sure that the progress will happen, many of those ICO's are
just doing nothing even doing multiple rounds of sale period or even they've collected the hard cap but nothing being provided to the supporters and
become nothing at all but just a broken promises that can't be reliable.

[ALLAH 1]

In cryptocurrency all Dev has main target is huge community support and give them service as they want, what is easy. For community support and funds, multiple rounds is easy for sale and gather funds.

[nxnqauff]

It gives multiple ways. 1. Desperate of the team to raise money by some means, 2. Investors ignores project for multiple ways even with extended date. Etc..

[defyance]

Several rounds of ICO can be for different reasons. This could be planned by the project, but could be due to failed token sales, which is more likely.

[nikogluttonym]

And then, when entering the token exchange, only early investors win. Because it has cheaper tokens and reduces prices by selling their tokens. The token should always be sold at the same price so that everything is honest for all holders.

[akeegan]

Nuls is trying to create a precursor to an ICO called the SCO which will be rad to showcase which projects are promising from the ones that aren't

[martina14]

It is normal that an ICO have several stages.
This is on their plan at first, they will just put some number of tokens on the stage to reach the cap then will raise the price after that.
This will level the early investors to get the cheapest token price.

[asyakashi]

it was a sign that the project was not in great demand so the Team extended the sales period in several rounds.
there are several projects that use this method to achieve their sales.
some succeed but many also fail, if it involves a bounty hunter this is a big gamble.

[PuertoLibre]

it was a sign that the project was not in great demand so the Team extended the sales period in several rounds.
there are several projects that use this method to achieve their sales.
some succeed but many also fail, if it involves a bounty hunter this is a big gamble.

Extending the required time and increasing the minimum amount are the signs of bad promotions by the team. Using different methods dor achieving the soft cap is usually thought by the slowly developing projects, there are not concrete mechanisms for detecting the most legit project. Several projects with uniques market ideas can be an exception but the market never gives lifetime access to the tokens of these projects. Extended token sales also help the team to analyze the previous round of token sales with the right management tools. That is the reason why investors never like to take pre-sale bonuses as an early bird on the projects.

[coin-investor]

Have you heard of ICOs with multiple rounds? Like they raise a certain amount of money now, use that money for primary aims and goals, and then a few months/years down the line (as part of their original plan) launch a second round to fund additional goals and further project development? Just wondering if this is a thing, if so please provide me with some links to projects that have done so.

I haven't stumble project that does a second round of crowdfunding, but if ever there is a coin that will do that, they will have the trust of investors because they have already proven that they can deliver what they promise.

but they can only do that if they have locked token or team allocated for the team that they intend to use for the second round of crowdfunding.
Projects should have a buyback plan, which is highly recommended so they can sell their tokens that they buy back.

[AndRE177]

Have you heard of ICOs with multiple rounds? Like they raise a certain amount of money now, use that money for primary aims and goals, and then a few months/years down the line (as part of their original plan) launch a second round to fund additional goals and further project development? Just wondering if this is a thing, if so please provide me with some links to projects that have done so.

I heard that now there are almost no successful ICO projects left, there are only scammers who, under the guise of new ideas, are trying to attract new investors. I would rather participate in IEO at popular exchanges than risk taking part in a new form of ICO.