Stake vs Fixed bounty allocation

[robelneo]

I'm ok with fixed if their token is already in the market, but prefer stakes based allocation if it is not, as a legendary member, choosing a stake based allocation is more advantageous and profitable, as long as the project is legit and they will not lock the token, it's not about the stakes anymore it's if the project has a good potential in the market that matters.

[wendiar19]

With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?

I like the stakes , because I only like to participate in a signature campaign so the stake is the best choice in the fixed allocation, because the allocation always pays a small amount per week so I prefer stake. but if bounty allocation is small fixed token will be better than stake.

[xOdiumNostrumx]

Well, as the OP has already established, there are advantages and disadvantages to both mentioned concepts of reward "counting". I usually prefer the stake system as most of the time the fixed allocations per activity tends to be quite low, but of course there are shiny exceptions to that.

[Sonik33]

With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?

I think the two bounty systems are both good and profitable. All depends on the responsibility of the bounty provider and their consistency in carrying out the bounty. Whatever system is used if they keep their promises to bounty campaign hunters then there will be no problem with bounty allocation with any system. I am more suited to the stake system because the results I get are in accordance with my business and work. The more I work hard the bigger the stake I get. Big profits motivated me to continue to give the best performance.

[cudora]

Stake based bounties are bringing much more profit, especially with less participants. Just search for them and you can even find a good bounty with 200 Facebook participants. Fixed payouts are pretty small in general, so I would go for stakes.

[freedomgo]

Stake based bounties are bringing much more profit, especially with less participants. Just search for them and you can even find a good bounty with 200 Facebook participants. Fixed payouts are pretty small in general, so I would go for stakes.

That's like a hidden gem in the bounty world, lol.
I wish it's just that easy to find good campaign with less participants as normally when the project is good, it has a lot of participants.
Also, the competition now is higher as there are only few bounty that are good while lots of bounty participants in the space.

[bittick]

Fixed allocation is better when we have known if the token already traded in exchange site and we can calculate how much money that will be paid for us, but this is not a good idea when it comes to the coin that is still in the ico phase and the price is not yet determined by the market. In this case, stake reward will be much better consider how much will be received by the bounty participants are random.

[pankowri]

With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?

In my opinion,I think both systems are good in their own way. Stake system is good if there has no change after the tokensale for low participants or any particular reason. However, fixed allocation is also good because there has no possibility to change it later. It is already fixed.

[novy]

For the signature campaign, I would prefer to have a combined proposal. For example, we are receiving some fixed value of the coins and at the end of the bounty, if there are still some budget remains, the manager just distributes the rest to the hunters.

[digitalblock]

The reward will be all about the same - it is annoying. Because some people can try and make a quality product and others do nothing. And in the end, all will receive an equal number of awards.

[forexandcryptoauditor]

I think both have their pros and cons.
With fixed allocation we are guarantee of what we will receive. But this method I have observed less rewards, even though there are less participants.
On the other hand there are chances getting more rewards when there are less participants in case of stake based allocation.
I have also seen the criteria in some bounties where its mentioned that if there are less than xxxx participants, rewards will be reduced by 50%. 
I think it matters only taking part in the good project's bounty.

[sammy21]

the most annoying thing is that very often in the bounty campaigns there are scammers who use someone else’s work to get rewards in creating articles or videos

if it's like that, we can only submit to the manager bounty. if the bounty manager is meticulous, they can overcome it. but if the bounty manager does not matter and is not careful, we as original makers must feel disadvantaged.
Regardless of the stake system or fix allocation in the form of tokens, the stake is definitely more fun and profitable.

[tranduong123]

I think that those who participate in social campaigns like facebook and twitter will like to be able to fix the token fixed because of these campaigns many people participate in.

[wywoc]

With the current situation when there are too many cheaters in social and content campaigns , I think the best way is a fixed allocation instead of stake to ensure hunter benefits, and maybe limited participants.

[ub27]

Both stake and fixed bounty allocations have their good sides.  For stake, when there are few bounty hunters and large reward, you benefit more, that's if there won't be extension or slash.  I prefer fixed bounty allocation since you are aware of the tokens/coins you are targeting even if many people flood the campaign. Fixed also gives you motivation to work better. Also even if fixed bounty is extended, it doesn't affect hunters negatively.

[killat]

It all depends on the hype of the project.  If the hype is very high then fixed allocation can be a much better option as after splitting the stakes through all participants the number of tokens you'll get will be most likely very low.

If the hype is low, this means the bounty pool is split through less participants, then stakes is a better option here.

[suvo05]

With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?

At the past, I used to participate in the fixed allocated bounty. but now I prefer token-based bounty. When you are doing token-based then there is always a chance of getting a lot or getting nothing. There are some more difficulties also in the fixed allocation.
a. The number of such bounties is very less.
b. You have to do harder work than the stake bounty.
c. Not easy to get the job.
 

[Chicky213]

I prefer fixed cause the token one will earn will not be determined by the amount of participants that joins the bounty. Sometimes you earn less with stake based bounty cause there will be so much crowd that joined the bounty  except there is a cap for participants.

[SolarWindMiningCompany]

With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?

Fixed is usually employed to control the amount of tokens a participant can likely get an also enable free sharing among participants but the best rewarding type has to be Stake bounty allocation as the amount of tokens acquired by each participant now depends on its competing strength

[royalfestus]

Stakes have better advantages than fixed bounty allocation,the only advantage fixed allocation has is fair payment across all  bounty hunters but stakes are based on how hardworking you are

Stake is not that profitable if you are low rank participant and as long as high rank members keep joining the campaign they keep diluting the reward and low rank member keep losing their reward to them. Also for fixed reward the low number of participants is not beneficial but it is very good for low rank bounty participants, they have guaranteed reward without sharing with anyone