What is happening to STO projects?

[FanEagle]

Many people assume that the STO project cannot develop properly, I only see if this is possible due to the lack of development and hard work from the team and this is why many people become pessimistic about STO. I think maybe this is a natural thing if now STO is defined as an unsuccessful project

It’s development is not attributed to the activeness of the team at all, I think that people does not generally just like STO projects because it does not look interesting to them, do you know that the way ICO do carryout campaign is also the same way that Bitbond did too, and virtually on everyone’s wall, you could see Bitbond, but even at that,. Nothing could still be shown about its development.

I have always known that anything that government is involved is always very slow in developing; the reason why you see ICO and IEO always growing is because they are both acting independently. If not for the scam that is in ICO, ICO to me is still the best form of crowd funding program that I have ever seen, and I just wish that something could be done to eliminate scam to zero level in ICO.

[poodle63]

some of the STO projects failed to collect their softcaps. either because of the existence of IEO or what, but if you see IEO is also not very successful with only a few successful projects. maybe a factor of investor confidence in new projects is still down.

People still prefer with IEO consider about the fact that it gives more guarantee than STO, so many investors have experienced with so many STOs are abusing the agreements and i hope they learn from there and never try to invest in ICO again.
STO is dead and it's the same as rest platform called TGE or something else.

[barbara44]

bitbond came with a license from the german's regulator but it can't even reach the softcap. STO is not worth project and it's a scam and so many STO has been scamming the hunters after they have reached softcap as some people said.
STO in the crypto is different from STO in the stock market. In crypto, the creator of that STO was abusing its STO.

I agree with you that STO is the same as ICO, equally easy for developers to manipulate
If the STO is carried out in a large exchange maybe the results could be better

I think STO is just an upgraded version of IPOs and that is why they are not gaining much recognition, if you look at it, you will see that IPO were the main method that companies do use to raise projects before, but this method met its downfall when ICO came into the market and many investor diverted all their investment from IPO market to ICO market, and if  may ask you, what do you think it is that really attracted people from IPO into ICO, despite the fact that IPO had security more than STO?

It was nothing but the big profit, the margin between the profit that IPO investors and ICO investors makes is too wide, and if you look at STO, it is almost the same pattern of IPO that they followed too with their very low profit return on investment which is not anything to write home about.