Bounty hunters killed ICO?

[Bonwin]

Till today, many projects are still calling for the services and supports of bounty hunters. Had it been they are not doing the right thing, then a lot of them would have called it quit with bounty hunters.
I still believe that bounty hunters are very useful and their presence is highly needed to keep a project alive.

[1713581387]

1713581387

[1713581387]

1713581387

[1713581387]

1713581387

[1713581387]

1713581387

[1713581387]

1713581387

[Bossfidelity]

It's quite funny how several people tend to level accusations on bounty hunters without sound reasoning. Bounty hunters are only concerned with the promotion of projects and that hasn't stopped even with the newly popularised IEO which became popular after the demise of ICO.

[suryapro]

Yes. thanks to the participation of prize hunters, project will have success. if we look at what percentage is obtained by the prize hunters, only a small portion of the total funds allocated, which is around 1-3%. and most of the failure of ICO is the lack of management and expertise of the team they have. and not from prize hunters, I suppose.

[tothemoonoff]

If I say I just learned what is crypto and bounty, would you call me looser? 
Still better late than never. If I bet a good project with bounty, Im gonna hold it and not gonna kill my project 

[fzatni]

1) a project collected funds,
2) Funds allocation (among advisors, bla bla bla and bounty hunters)
3) Considering there are thousands of BH, the price of a token dropped dramatically
4) Investors bought token on ICO see this crap and less people invest in ICOs.

True or False?

Like you were wrong, Bounty Hunter didn't kill ico. The allocation for bounty hunters is on average 2%-3% or it will not be more than 5%. In my opinion the price dropped dramatically because investors sell tokens at low prices hoping to buy more and after that prices go up. Or the ico gives too many bonuses for investors

[baigreen]

This is all a myth. Which bad projects are told to investors. That hunters are ruining the price. The hunters are to blame for the lack of stability in the project. And investors, as naive fools, take this for the truth. It is all about community interest in the project. How to look at interest? Yes, look at the site traffic statistics for one project 100,000 a month and another ate 3,000 visitors gaining. That is the whole problem.

[globalking]

I don't think so bounty hunters killed ICOs the majority of ICOs are doing scams that was the biggest reason why many people are not trusting ICOs.

[Khuongcute2503]

1) a project collected funds,
2) Funds allocation (among advisors, bla bla bla and bounty hunters)
3) Considering there are thousands of BH, the price of a token dropped dramatically
4) Investors bought token on ICO see this crap and less people invest in ICOs.

True or False?

This is not true !! Hunters don't make as many tokens as you think.

In fact, hunters only account for 2-5% of tokens of the project. This number is too small to kill an ICO.
The nature of the ICOs died of so many fraudulent projects and not strictly controlled. Most projects do not have too many highlights that make investors feel excited. Those are the reasons ICO died, cannot blame hunters

[thesmallgod]

Right, bounties should be after ICO to prevent instant price dump after exchange listing.

I have had yahoo62278 saying in one telegram page that he has proofs that many projects that launch bounty campaign get their token dumped and literally it means most hunters dump their token but also from experience, even when hunters tokens are locked, token still get dumped. XCT token is a primary example of this. My conclusion is that there are many factors that responsible to token getting dumped but dev team are the major contributor to the dump in price because they are the one that supposes to protect everyone including token dump. Some project even offers up to 90% bonus for purchasing a token.

[Rahib khan]

Your point is right but not fully because a project success because of there team not by other.If bounty Hunter destroyed the ico then bounty would been finished by right now.

[wildflower18]

I don't think so bounty hunters killed ICOs the majority of ICOs are doing scams that was the biggest reason why many people are not trusting ICOs.

This is also right most people do not trust Ico’s because of failed to meet the requirements of their project and mostly scams Ico. Bounty hunters not the only one who should blame why Ico’s failed they have only amount of token who received during Ico.

[Dimkpakpa]

I disagree with this, many Devs became greedy and each time they get tired of their project and plan on exiting scam, they set up a bounty and dump during distribution of rewards, that way they can pin down the blame on Hunters

[Punamidin]

Lies. Hunter's don't kill projects, most times these Hunters receive their reward after the Devs must have dumped the loving light out of it. So no, I don't agree that Hunter's are responsible for the death of shitty ICOs of nowadays

[Dergansion]

I think not bounty hunter kill ico project.but nothing investor to believe for invest buy their ico project on presale.if they can make believe some investor to succeafull their project with good marketing program.i think ico will be succes and many investor join there

[faadhilah]

Bounty hunters have helped the ICO to more easily get investors. Bounty hunters work hard to promote the ICO and of course, they also expect Token payouts. Bounty hunters sometimes also become investors so I guess they don't kill the ICO.

[sarmrakib]

1) a project collected funds,
2) Funds allocation (among advisors, bla bla bla and bounty hunters)
3) Considering there are thousands of BH, the price of a token dropped dramatically
4) Investors bought token on ICO see this crap and less people invest in ICOs.

True or False?

I think its true the initial price of the token falling down but Bounty hunters always promotes a project and help to raise the funds .So it could be better to come out with a good plan to restrict the hunter to sell the initially .Hopefully it will helps to success the project.

[santiagomaicon]

A lot of scam/dead projects killed ICO, not bounty

[Kang TB]

no, i don't agree with you,,
because the fact an ICO project need bounty hunters to spread the word about the project itself my friend
and not all bounty hunters will dump their rewards after the project listed on exchange mate 

[lepbagong]

In the current situation, there is a sluggishness in almost all new projects that run ICO, because most of them run only with the aim of profit for a short time to develop the project. what is certain is that many investors are now watching and are not in a hurry to put their capital in a new ICO, so the influence is quite large.

[Anonylz]

I respectfully disagree, the percentage allocated to bounty campaigns most times is not enough to influence the price of a project, in fact, i think ico or project owners are hiding behind the excuse of bounty to dump their own price, who are this private investors? have you seen the outrageous bonus given to private investors, they could afford to sell for less without feeling it, they are the real ico killers not hunters.