RandomX Benchmarks! https://monerobenchmarks.info

[herrdrone]

Hi, as Monero gets closer to October POW's algo will switch from previous Cryptonight-R to RandomX (https://github.com/tevador/RandomX).

Coins like Loki and Wownero have already switched to a RandomX variation and Xmrig support them.
In particular, GPUs on RandomX perform similar or worst than they did on Cryptonight as data shows:

GPU	Cryptonight-R	RandomX
AMD
Vega 64	2200 H/s	1225 H/s
RX 480/580	960-1000 H/s	400-410 H/s
RX 560 4GB (1400/2200 MHz)	495 H/s	260 H/s
NVIDIA/EVGA
RTX 2080 Ti (1915/13600 MHz)	960-1000 H/s	400-410 H/s
GTX 1080 Ti (2037/11800 MHz)	927 H/s	1122 H/s
GTX 1070 Ti (1900/7600 MHz)	625 H/s	769 H/s

Source: https://github.com/SChernykh/RandomX_OpenCL
Source: https://github.com/SChernykh/RandomX_CUDA

For CPUs:

CPU	Cryptonight-R	RandomX
AMD 3900X (4.25GHZ ALL CORE, 3600MHZ RAM)	1335 H/s	13330 H/s
RYZEN 3700X	1018 H/s	6853 H/s
RYZEN 5 3600	803 H/s	6580 H/s
INTEL I9 9900K	630 H/s	2102 H/s
2X XEON E5 2670 V2	930 H/s	5815 H/s
INTEL I7 7700K	350 H/s	2100 H/s

Source: https://monerobenchmarks.info/
Source: https://monerobenchmarks.info/index.php
Source: https://github.com/tevador/RandomX#cpu-performance

Hope It is helpful for everyone, and those willing to share can submit results on this thread or website:

CPU
https://monerobenchmarks.info/submitCPU.php
GPU
https://monerobenchmarks.info/submitGPU.php

RandomX Benchmark tool: https://github.com/tevador/RandomX/releases
Xmrig CPU Miner: https://github.com/xmrig/xmrig

Others links
RandomX Audits: https://github.com/hyc/RandomxAudits

[1713865454]

1713865454

[MATHReX]

I submitted details to your website regarding CPU Ryzen 7 1700 & Intel i3-6100. I hope it helps!
This transition to MoneroX will definitely push people to build new CPU rigs.

[herrdrone]

I submitted details to your website regarding CPU Ryzen 7 1700 & Intel i3-6100. I hope it helps!
This transition to MoneroX will definitely push people to build new CPU rigs.

Thanks, Got Ryzen 7 1700 benchmark and submitted it (https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=YzNwUlJrRkJQVDA9)
but didn't get i3, yet you can submit it anytime you want.

for curiosity, are you using XMRig on benchmark mode or mining some RandomX coin like loki or wownero?

[MATHReX]

Thanks, Got Ryzen 7 1700 benchmark and submitted it (https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=YzNwUlJrRkJQVDA9)
but didn't get i3, yet you can submit it anytime you want.

for curiosity, are you using XMRig on benchmark mode or mining some RandomX coin like loki or wownero?

Sent the data for i3-6100 again.
Yes, I was mining Loki but stopped it after 24h as the profitability was in negative.
I wanted to test how the CPU performs hashing the new algorithm.
I hope it helps.

[herrdrone]

Thanks, Got Ryzen 7 1700 benchmark and submitted it (https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=YzNwUlJrRkJQVDA9)
but didn't get i3, yet you can submit it anytime you want.

for curiosity, are you using XMRig on benchmark mode or mining some RandomX coin like loki or wownero?

Sent the data for i3-6100 again.
Yes, I was mining Loki but stopped it after 24h as the profitability was in negative.
I wanted to test how the CPU performs hashing the new algorithm.
I hope it helps.

Thanks 

[Kodaman]

Lets get those CPUS back to work lol.

[MATHReX]

Lets get those CPUS back to work lol.

Still, I'm sure it's not going to be profitable at all.
Once XMR has moved to RandomX algo. The whole lot is going to switch to it as CPU is readily accessible to any.
Anyway, it is going to do wonders for securing XMR though.

[reb0rn21]

CPU algo is insane only thieves that have organized crime abusing it will own 50%+ of the hash with VPS

[herrdrone]

CPU algo is insane only thieves that have organized crime abusing it will own 50%+ of the hash with VPS

VPS are already very restrictive on their TOS. Malware more than before will be targeting CPU desktop/workstations.

[reb0rn21]

CPU algo is insane only thieves that have organized crime abusing it will own 50%+ of the hash with VPS

VPS are already very restrictive on their TOS. Malware more than before will be targeting CPU desktop/workstations.

They are but if I with one CC can make 1000 VPS in 2-3 days, those deceptive ppl with 100+ stolen identities and cards can make at least 3x 100 more damage then i alone
And yeah botnets too

[Kodaman]

If VPS CPU mining will be available then there will be so many unused resources from a lot of masternode projects will have a good use too...
If the mn projects will pay for their VPS cost and even profit then it will be great.

[herrdrone]

RandomX is now live on Testnet: https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/d9yocl/randomx_is_now_live_on_testnet/ 

[my dream2021]

I am so exciting about this, like mining Btc on 2009 LOL 
Last time I hear news update about Randomx on youtube chanel Red Panda Mining 4 days ago, so let's see what happen on 17:00 UTC on 30th Nov

[herrdrone]

I am so exciting about this, like mining Btc on 2009 LOL 
Last time I hear news update about Randomx on youtube chanel Red Panda Mining 4 days ago, so let's see what happen on 17:00 UTC on 30th Nov

Indeed. Right now, there is a lot of enthusiasm regarding RandomX and mining which I didn't see from a long time. 2018 was a disaster as basically asics were deployed on all gpu coins.

Preliminary information thread regarding the scheduled protocol upgrade of November 30: https://np.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/d884zt/preliminary_information_thread_regarding_the/

This is a post on reddit, focused on intel: https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/dbhkzr/intel_cpus_are_junk_compare_to_ryzen_but_still/

Also, Just updated Mining software section added: youtubers, overclocking guides for AMD & INTEL, RAM setup, etc: https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/miningSoftware.php

[herrdrone]

New feature was added to get some metrics

CPU vs CPU

https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/cpuVScpu.php

The point of this feature is to measure average hashrate (H/s), average TDP, Hash per watts between two CPU Models based on RandomX benchmarks submited on site.

Also, Overclocking guides have been added for AMD Ryzen, FX, athlon, phenom & Intel (Kaby, Skylake, Haswell, Ivy, Sandy): https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/miningSoftware.php#overclocking

[Set Ready Go]

looks really good. best xmr benchmarks out there. Appreciate your work

[herrdrone]

looks really good. best xmr benchmarks out there. Appreciate your work

Thanks! 

[bobben2]

I can confirm the numbers for a 3700X.  Mine is mining Loki at ~7000 H/s  atm.     Miner is XMRig 4.3.1-beta.
For comparison my old clunker PC with an i5 4460 CPU does 1450 H/s on the same algo/miner with 3 threads.

[herrdrone]

I can confirm the numbers for a 3700X.  Mine is mining Loki at ~7000 H/s  atm.     Miner is XMRig 4.3.1-beta.
For comparison my old clunker PC with an i5 4460 CPU does 1450 H/s on the same algo/miner with 3 threads.

Cool 

[adaseb]

Been out of the loop for a while and didn't realize that it was also GPU mineable. Looking at the scores it seems to be really CPU friendly.

I got some old single core Sempron and Celeron processors from the Litecoin days, anyone know what speeds you can expect with those ? Seems that the RX series is onpare to the other GPUs like with most other algos.

Regarding the CPU abuse, I think most weren't rented VPS or AWS but these were some infected botnet computers which mined in the background for unsuspecting people. This is actually the reason why they switched the algo originally from the original one that the coin was released in. Wonder how it will perform this time around.

[Huxley23]

Been out of the loop for a while and didn't realize that it was also GPU mineable. Looking at the scores it seems to be really CPU friendly.

I got some old single core Sempron and Celeron processors from the Litecoin days, anyone know what speeds you can expect with those ? Seems that the RX series is onpare to the other GPUs like with most other algos.

Regarding the CPU abuse, I think most weren't rented VPS or AWS but these were some infected botnet computers which mined in the background for unsuspecting people. This is actually the reason why they switched the algo originally from the original one that the coin was released in. Wonder how it will perform this time around.

Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU G3930 @ 2.90GHz runs around 400 h/s

[Huxley23]

So my Ryzen 5 3600 stock, is doing 6100 h/s with 16gb 2400 MHz (4 sticks) on XMRig-4.3.1 beta.

[Ursul0]

Been out of the loop for a while and didn't realize that it was also GPU mineable. Looking at the scores it seems to be really CPU friendly.

I got some old single core Sempron and Celeron processors from the Litecoin days, anyone know what speeds you can expect with those ? Seems that the RX series is onpare to the other GPUs like with most other algos.

Regarding the CPU abuse, I think most weren't rented VPS or AWS but these were some infected botnet computers which mined in the background for unsuspecting people. This is actually the reason why they switched the algo originally from the original one that the coin was released in. Wonder how it will perform this time around.

yes. I think it will be popular algo/coin to abuse. xmrig is very light and efficient and it's ready with randomx:)

[herrdrone]

Been out of the loop for a while and didn't realize that it was also GPU mineable. Looking at the scores it seems to be really CPU friendly.

I got some old single core Sempron and Celeron processors from the Litecoin days, anyone know what speeds you can expect with those ? Seems that the RX series is onpare to the other GPUs like with most other algos.

Regarding the CPU abuse, I think most weren't rented VPS or AWS but these were some infected botnet computers which mined in the background for unsuspecting people. This is actually the reason why they switched the algo originally from the original one that the coin was released in. Wonder how it will perform this time around.

AMD SEMPRON 2650 ~93 H/s - XMRig 4.4.0
https://imgur.com/gallery/i1o8W1t

[Ursul0]

2*Xeon E5 2660 v2 give 7330h/s on RandomX with 1 thread per core (L3 cache = 25MB*2slots)
setting higher thread count will degrade performance of paired(on a single core) threads

celeron g3930 = 450H
i5 7400 = 1500H

[Metroid]

in the end profit will determine its value, good seeing ryzen 3xxx doing good, this is good, something that a cpu is more useful than a gpu.

3900x or 3950x owners will be happy with this.

[philipma1957]

WHEN DOES THIS MINING START!!!!

[herrdrone]

WHEN DOES THIS MINING START!!!!

On november 30, details: https://np.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/d884zt/preliminary_information_thread_regarding_the/

In the meantime, you can try testnet pool like https://rx.minexmr.com/ with XMRig https://github.com/xmrig/xmrig/releases

[mstrozier]

WHEN DOES THIS MINING START!!!!

On november 30, details: https://np.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/d884zt/preliminary_information_thread_regarding_the/

In the meantime, you can try testnet pool like https://rx.minexmr.com/ with XMRig https://github.com/xmrig/xmrig/releases

Morning.  I tested the RandomX bench on both a Raspberry Pi 3 b+ and Pi 4 and submitted results several weeks ago.   I wanted to test out both units on the testnet pool however running into issues installing XMRig.  From the github I downloaded the source, built the build folder, changed directory into the build folder then ran cmake ..  and once that completed ran make

make ran into the following errors.  Any ideas?  I may test further on a fx8350 linux mint box that I have up running or my Ryzen 2600.  But was curious on the pi's usage    Errors are below:

Code:

In file included from /home/pi/mining/test/src/crypto/cn/SSE2NEON.h:123,
                 from /home/pi/mining/test/src/crypto/cn/soft_aes.h:31,
                 from /home/pi/mining/test/src/crypto/cn/CryptoNight_arm.h:34,
                 from /home/pi/mining/test/src/crypto/cn/CnHash.cpp:35:
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabihf/8/include/arm_neon.h: In function ‘__m128i _mm_set_epi32(int, int, int, int)’:
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabihf/8/include/arm_neon.h:10369:1: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘int32x4_t vld1q_s32(const int32_t*)’: target specific option mismatch
 vld1q_s32 (const int32_t * __a)
 ^~~~~~~~~

make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/xmrig.dir/build.make:1532: CMakeFiles/xmrig.dir/src/crypto/cn/CnHash.cpp.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:73: CMakeFiles/xmrig.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:84: all] Error 2

I ran this on 2 different Raspberry Pi 4's.  Both on 64 bit O/S Raspbian.  One of them with the kernal update to 64 as shown below

Code:

Linux Goober-Pi4 4.19.75-v8+ #1270 SMP PREEMPT Tue Sep 24 18:59:17 BST 2019 aarch64 GNU/Linux

2nd Pi 4 where the kernal hasn't been updated to 64 (this one is a controller for R606 / Newpac miners):

Code:

Linux Pi-Miner 4.19.66-v7l+ #1253 SMP Thu Aug 15 12:02:08 BST 2019 armv7l GNU/Linux

Thanks

[WhyMe]

2*Xeon E5 2660 v2 give 7330h/s on RandomX with 1 thread per core (L3 cache = 25MB*2slots)
setting higher thread count will degrade performance of paired(on a single core) threads

2* Xeon E5645 ( total is 12c/24t @2.4GHz )
Default setting is 12t and give 2220h/s. Setting other than 12t gives lower hashrate.
6t = 1680h/s
8t = 2030h/s
16t = 1920h/s
20t = 1640h/s ( and with 20t server is already 98-99% cpu usage )

[Marvell2]

WHEN DOES THIS MINING START!!!!

just mine loki on miner rocks i think , its using a randomx fork, ive been on it for the last month using it to tune my 4 rigs

[herrdrone]

WHEN DOES THIS MINING START!!!!

On november 30, details: https://np.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/d884zt/preliminary_information_thread_regarding_the/

In the meantime, you can try testnet pool like https://rx.minexmr.com/ with XMRig https://github.com/xmrig/xmrig/releases

Morning.  I tested the RandomX bench on both a Raspberry Pi 3 b+ and Pi 4 and submitted results several weeks ago.   I wanted to test out both units on the testnet pool however running into issues installing XMRig.  From the github I downloaded the source, built the build folder, changed directory into the build folder then ran cmake ..  and once that completed ran make

make ran into the following errors.  Any ideas?  I may test further on a fx8350 linux mint box that I have up running or my Ryzen 2600.  But was curious on the pi's usage    Errors are below:

Code:

In file included from /home/pi/mining/test/src/crypto/cn/SSE2NEON.h:123,
                 from /home/pi/mining/test/src/crypto/cn/soft_aes.h:31,
                 from /home/pi/mining/test/src/crypto/cn/CryptoNight_arm.h:34,
                 from /home/pi/mining/test/src/crypto/cn/CnHash.cpp:35:
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabihf/8/include/arm_neon.h: In function ‘__m128i _mm_set_epi32(int, int, int, int)’:
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabihf/8/include/arm_neon.h:10369:1: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘int32x4_t vld1q_s32(const int32_t*)’: target specific option mismatch
 vld1q_s32 (const int32_t * __a)
 ^~~~~~~~~

make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/xmrig.dir/build.make:1532: CMakeFiles/xmrig.dir/src/crypto/cn/CnHash.cpp.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:73: CMakeFiles/xmrig.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:84: all] Error 2

I ran this on 2 different Raspberry Pi 4's.  Both on 64 bit O/S Raspbian.  One of them with the kernal update to 64 as shown below

Code:

Linux Goober-Pi4 4.19.75-v8+ #1270 SMP PREEMPT Tue Sep 24 18:59:17 BST 2019 aarch64 GNU/Linux

2nd Pi 4 where the kernal hasn't been updated to 64 (this one is a controller for R606 / Newpac miners):

Code:

Linux Pi-Miner 4.19.66-v7l+ #1253 SMP Thu Aug 15 12:02:08 BST 2019 armv7l GNU/Linux

Thanks

Hey, doing some reading I suggest you to increase swap area (https://www.linuxtechi.com/extend-swap-space-using-swap-file-in-linux/) and use gcc 7+. And try again.

Yet, It is better if you add this issue on XMrig's github to get help: https://github.com/xmrig/xmrig/issues

[mstrozier]

Thanks, I'll add the issue to the github.  I've tried the two suggestions given, increasing the swap size and gcc 7+ but still getting the same error.

[philipma1957]

Thanks, I'll add the issue to the github.  I've tried the two suggestions given, increasing the swap size and gcc 7+ but still getting the same error.

Has anyone gotten a rasp pi 4 to work?

[Ursul0]

2*Xeon E5 2660 v2 give 7330h/s on RandomX with 1 thread per core (L3 cache = 25MB*2slots)
setting higher thread count will degrade performance of paired(on a single core) threads

2* Xeon E5645 ( total is 12c/24t @2.4GHz )
Default setting is 12t and give 2220h/s. Setting other than 12t gives lower hashrate.
6t = 1680h/s
8t = 2030h/s
16t = 1920h/s
20t = 1640h/s ( and with 20t server is already 98-99% cpu usage )

I have 10 cores, 20 threads on each E5 and 25MB L3 cache
randomx needs 2MB scratchpad (cache) and 2+GB of RAM

so after it runs in 20 threads on 20 cores there's still about 10MB L3 cache and half the threads available. so I can run something like PASC miner there without actually increasing consumption:)



but then randomx performance gets degraded:

[herrdrone]

RandomX Testnet pools

Xmrig
randomx-benchmark.xmrig.com:7777
Github: https://github.com/xmrig/xmrig/issues/1204

supportXMR
69.164.198.226:3333
Site: http://69.164.198.226/
Related Post:https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/do6hyp/supportxmr_randomx_testnet_pool/

minexmr.com
rx.minexmr.com:4444
Site: https://rx.minexmr.com/
Related Post: https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/dfxpjy/minexmr_randomx_testnet_pool/

[seefatlow]

Makes no sense to me why anyone should be excited about coins moving to RandomX. The cost per added hashrate for RandomX is so much higher than that for a GPU mineable coin and if you think the network hashrate of a RandomX coin will be low, think again. Just take a look at the Loki network hashrate as an example of what's in store for all CPU mineable coins. It's 71 MH vs 11KH from a single Ryzen 3900X!! How many Ryzen 3900X do you need to make enough coins to ROI?

[herrdrone]

Makes no sense to me why anyone should be excited about coins moving to RandomX. The cost per added hashrate for RandomX is so much higher than that for a GPU mineable coin and if you think the network hashrate of a RandomX coin will be low, think again. Just take a look at the Loki network hashrate as an example of what's in store for all CPU mineable coins. It's 71 MH vs 11KH from a single Ryzen 3900X!! How many Ryzen 3900X do you need to make enough coins to ROI?

Guess you are late to discussion, as RandomX as well as others options were discussed to exhaustion months ago:

https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/316#issuecomment-472677985
https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/321

Unlike zcash, eth & others that have done absolutely nothing when their networks got overtaken by ASICs.

Monero is moving forward by implementing RandomX, properly tested and audited (https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/ckhuq9/randomx_audit_status_final/).

[Marvell2]

Makes no sense to me why anyone should be excited about coins moving to RandomX. The cost per added hashrate for RandomX is so much higher than that for a GPU mineable coin and if you think the network hashrate of a RandomX coin will be low, think again. Just take a look at the Loki network hashrate as an example of what's in store for all CPU mineable coins. It's 71 MH vs 11KH from a single Ryzen 3900X!! How many Ryzen 3900X do you need to make enough coins to ROI?

not sure what your issue is here, yeah the ryzen is a beast at random x , but its a beast at every other cpu algo out there anyways.  its 12 cores on a consumer chip basically we have never seen this type of power for non server builds.

i mean its expected it would destroy every cpu tuned algo out there, which random x is and it does, you can buy a
ryzen 3600 for 229 and get 6k on randomx , not sure what the issue is

[seefatlow]

Makes no sense to me why anyone should be excited about coins moving to RandomX. The cost per added hashrate for RandomX is so much higher than that for a GPU mineable coin and if you think the network hashrate of a RandomX coin will be low, think again. Just take a look at the Loki network hashrate as an example of what's in store for all CPU mineable coins. It's 71 MH vs 11KH from a single Ryzen 3900X!! How many Ryzen 3900X do you need to make enough coins to ROI?

not sure what your issue is here, yeah the ryzen is a beast at random x , but its a beast at every other cpu algo out there anyways.  its 12 cores on a consumer chip basically we have never seen this type of power for non server builds.

i mean its expected it would destroy every cpu tuned algo out there, which random x is and it does, you can buy a
ryzen 3600 for 229 and get 6k on randomx , not sure what the issue is

The issue here is the amount of hardware that needs to be bought for a CPU algo. For a GPU algo, all you need to increase hashrates is to buy the GPU and riser card. Now, you will have to get the whole shebang (PSU, memory, MB etc.) How will this be ever profitable? Will there ever be a riser card/board equivalent for CPUs?

[badbart]

Any idea on profits?  I set up one randomX rig and its mining loki, making .47 cents a day, I hope xmr is more. 

[sundownz06]

Shoot... It may be time to fire up my 100+ Xeon X5660 CPUs and my bank of Dell R815 servers again (120+ Opteron 6380).

Exciting stuff... I've had a lot of my farm turned off lately.

[herrdrone]

Any idea on profits?  I set up one randomX rig and its mining loki, making .47 cents a day, I hope xmr is more. 

Profitability on RandomX, only after fork is done on November 30 so you will have: network hashrate and monero price to do the math.

[joblo]

The issue here is the amount of hardware that needs to be bought for a CPU algo. For a GPU algo, all you need to increase hashrates is to buy the GPU and riser card. Now, you will have to get the whole shebang (PSU, memory, MB etc.) How will this be ever profitable? Will there ever be a riser card/board equivalent for CPUs?

That's all part of the cost per hash. It's no different than an algo with a lower hashrate requiring
more CPU (or GPU) power to produce the same hash. What matters is how much the hash is worth.

Yes Intel has Xeon Phi compute addin boards with up to 72 cores with 4:1 hyperthreading
for 288 threads. The're compute beasts but very expensive and not suitable for mining due
to the low mem/thread ratio. It maxes out at 384 GB which is similar to the cache/thread
ratio of most desktop CPUs.

[seefatlow]

The issue here is the amount of hardware that needs to be bought for a CPU algo. For a GPU algo, all you need to increase hashrates is to buy the GPU and riser card. Now, you will have to get the whole shebang (PSU, memory, MB etc.) How will this be ever profitable? Will there ever be a riser card/board equivalent for CPUs?

That's all part of the cost per hash. It's no different than an algo with a lower hashrate requiring
more CPU (or GPU) power to produce the same hash. What matters is how much the hash is worth.

Yes Intel has Xeon Phi compute addin boards with up to 72 cores with 4:1 hyperthreading
for 288 threads. The're compute beasts but very expensive and not suitable for mining due
to the low mem/thread ratio. It maxes out at 384 GB which is similar to the cache/thread
ratio of most desktop CPUs.

If Loki network hashrate is any indication, it's not going to be profitable for RandomX

[Quubik]

Well Loki cant show anything. XMR alone will bring 100x times USD value in daily rewards. Loki and Wownero together are traded about 2k usd daily. Thats ridic low.

There will probably be a lot of coins following monero, probably more than ever before.
So the market will be so much bigger for bad actors to dilute.

Still could go either way....

PS: Epic Cash based on Randomx shows 1.3-1.4usd per day for 3900x. Dont know if it's accurate though as havent had time to try.

Meiby someone could test just for lulz

[Marvell2]

Well Loki cant show anything. XMR alone will bring 100x times USD value in daily rewards. Loki and Wownero together are traded about 2k usd daily. Thats ridic low.

There will probably be a lot of coins following monero, probably more than ever before.
So the market will be so much bigger for bad actors to dilute.

Still could go either way....

PS: Epic Cash based on Randomx shows 1.3-1.4usd per day for 3900x. Dont know if it's accurate though as havent had time to try.

Meiby someone could test just for lulz

3900x are very profitable on CPU coins right now , close to 2-3 a day

[sundownz06]

Shoot... It may be time to fire up my 100+ Xeon X5660 CPUs and my bank of Dell R815 servers again (120+ Opteron 6380).

Exciting stuff... I've had a lot of my farm turned off lately.

My X5660 CPUs are doing ~1400-1500 server side after 24 hours. Not bad!

Excited to turn the Dell's back on and give them a go =) I have read they should do around 11kh each total.

Sure hope there is a decent profit window when Monero ports.

-----

Using a profit calc right now it shows 1500 H/S at $0.45 a day (which has good profit margin on my XEON chips) and the R815s at 11kh at $3.39… and I would guess it's a good assumption network hash rate will drop A LOT after the fork? That would be nice.

[seefatlow]

Well Loki cant show anything. XMR alone will bring 100x times USD value in daily rewards. Loki and Wownero together are traded about 2k usd daily. Thats ridic low.

There will probably be a lot of coins following monero, probably more than ever before.
So the market will be so much bigger for bad actors to dilute.

Still could go either way....

PS: Epic Cash based on Randomx shows 1.3-1.4usd per day for 3900x. Dont know if it's accurate though as havent had time to try.

Meiby someone could test just for lulz

There is already a single Loki miner contributing a whopping 17MH to the Loki network!! That hashrate is equivalent to 11K Ryzen 3900X units and that is only from a single miner. Once XMR forks, where do you think he will be diverting his hashrate to. And how many more of these giants lurking around waiting for the xmr fork. So, I'd say good luck trying to make a good profit from CPU mining.   

[sech1]

There is already a single Loki miner contributing a whopping 17MH to the Loki network!! That hashrate is equivalent to 11K Ryzen 3900X units and that is only from a single miner. Once XMR forks, where do you think he will be diverting his hashrate to. And how many more of these giants lurking around waiting for the xmr fork. So, I'd say good luck trying to make a good profit from CPU mining.   

Do your math, it's only 1400 Ryzen 3900X, not 11K, but I think in reality it's more like 10,000 old Xeon or Opteron farm. I don't think there are more than 10-20 such giant farms out there. Loki network is much bigger than 17 MH, and there's only 1 such farm mining it.

[herrdrone]

CLI v0.15.0.0 'Carbon Chamaeleon' released: https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/dtt2j3/cli_v01500_carbon_chamaeleon_released/

[michstuff72]

Anyone tried the older 2990x threadripper yet on random-x ?
guessing the new trx40 processors wil be a lot faster than the 3900x cpu...

[urger]

I need help running RandomX benchmark with largepages enabled.

My bat file content:

benchmark --mine --jit --largePages --threads 8 --init 8 --nonces 100000

Result:

RandomX benchmark v1.1.1
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
ERROR: Cache allocation failed
To use large pages, please enable the "Lock Pages in Memory" policy and reboot.

I have in "Security Settings > Local Policies > User Rights Assignment > Lock pages in memory" set to Everyone

Using windows 10

Any ideas?

[tg88]

It's time to turn on some servers, is HiveOS a good option to boot these servers and mining RandomX? or does anyone have any better suggestions?

[Set Ready Go]

It's time to turn on some servers, is HiveOS a good option to boot these servers and mining RandomX? or does anyone have any better suggestions?

nicehash OS could be a free alternative for you.

[herrdrone]

I need help running RandomX benchmark with largepages enabled.

My bat file content:

benchmark --mine --jit --largePages --threads 8 --init 8 --nonces 100000

Result:

RandomX benchmark v1.1.1
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
ERROR: Cache allocation failed
To use large pages, please enable the "Lock Pages in Memory" policy and reboot.

I have in "Security Settings > Local Policies > User Rights Assignment > Lock pages in memory" set to Everyone

Using windows 10

Any ideas?

What's your hardware specs?
Probably not enough L2/L3 cache to run 8 threads as RandomX requires: 16 KiB of L1 cache, 256 KiB of L2 cache and 2 MiB of L3 cache per mining thread.

[urger]

I need help running RandomX benchmark with largepages enabled.

My bat file content:

benchmark --mine --jit --largePages --threads 8 --init 8 --nonces 100000

Result:

RandomX benchmark v1.1.1
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
ERROR: Cache allocation failed
To use large pages, please enable the "Lock Pages in Memory" policy and reboot.

I have in "Security Settings > Local Policies > User Rights Assignment > Lock pages in memory" set to Everyone

Using windows 10

Any ideas?

What's your hardware specs?
Probably not enough L2/L3 cache to run 8 threads as RandomX requires: 16 KiB of L1 cache, 256 KiB of L2 cache and 2 MiB of L3 cache per mining thread.

Ryzen 7 1700x

[herrdrone]

I need help running RandomX benchmark with largepages enabled.

My bat file content:

benchmark --mine --jit --largePages --threads 8 --init 8 --nonces 100000

Result:

RandomX benchmark v1.1.1
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
ERROR: Cache allocation failed
To use large pages, please enable the "Lock Pages in Memory" policy and reboot.

I have in "Security Settings > Local Policies > User Rights Assignment > Lock pages in memory" set to Everyone

Using windows 10

Any ideas?

What's your hardware specs?
Probably not enough L2/L3 cache to run 8 threads as RandomX requires: 16 KiB of L1 cache, 256 KiB of L2 cache and 2 MiB of L3 cache per mining thread.

Ryzen 7 1700x

Ok, then try: --mine --jit --largepages --threads 8 --init 16 --nonces 100000

Examples:

https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFhwVGVVRkJRVDA9
https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFhwWlEwRkJQVDA9
https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFhwSlFVRkJQVDA9

[thefix]

The RYZEN 5 3600 seems like a pretty good compromise without having to break the bank and looks to be similar in performance to the 3700 but the 3900x is a beast and is very tempting. I imagine the new Threadrippers are going to have some amazing results on RandomX but will probably be cost prohibitive.

[batsonxl]

Right now my i7 3930k making 300h/s on cryptonightR and it values as 0.10$ for a day consuming 130w .
if im not wrong it will pay me about 0.25$ with randomx.im sure it will pay this for 2-3 days then after it will be again like 0.10$.All people waiting something huge but results becomes same at the end of the road.cryptonight always paid for cpu very little.so dont be sooo exited.

[MATHReX]

Right now my i7 3930k making 300h/s on cryptonightR and it values as 0.10$ for a day consuming 130w .
if im not wrong it will pay me about 0.25$ with randomx.im sure it will pay this for 2-3 days then after it will be again like 0.10$.All people waiting something huge but results becomes same at the end of the road.cryptonight always paid for cpu very little.so dont be sooo exited.

It's not that cryptonight paid so little for CPU.
It's a fact that there are many more CPUs active at the moment rather than GPUs.
So, there will be a lot more CPUs mining RandomX algorithm for Monero thus reducing profits drastically.
If it's profitable for people, they are going to mine and they will activate each and every bit of CPU power they have which is really good for decentralization but not for incentives.

[urger]

I need help running RandomX benchmark with largepages enabled.

My bat file content:

benchmark --mine --jit --largePages --threads 8 --init 8 --nonces 100000

Result:

RandomX benchmark v1.1.1
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
ERROR: Cache allocation failed
To use large pages, please enable the "Lock Pages in Memory" policy and reboot.

I have in "Security Settings > Local Policies > User Rights Assignment > Lock pages in memory" set to Everyone

Using windows 10

Any ideas?

What's your hardware specs?
Probably not enough L2/L3 cache to run 8 threads as RandomX requires: 16 KiB of L1 cache, 256 KiB of L2 cache and 2 MiB of L3 cache per mining thread.

Ryzen 7 1700x

Ok, then try: --mine --jit --largepages --threads 8 --init 16 --nonces 100000

Examples:

https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFhwVGVVRkJRVDA9
https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFhwWlEwRkJQVDA9
https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFhwSlFVRkJQVDA9

Same result, it has to do something with "Security Settings > Local Policies > User Rights Assignment > Lock pages in memory"

Without largepages it is running, but the hashrate is much less then reported from others for the same hardware.

[seefatlow]

Right now my i7 3930k making 300h/s on cryptonightR and it values as 0.10$ for a day consuming 130w .
if im not wrong it will pay me about 0.25$ with randomx.im sure it will pay this for 2-3 days then after it will be again like 0.10$.All people waiting something huge but results becomes same at the end of the road.cryptonight always paid for cpu very little.so dont be sooo exited.

It's not that cryptonight paid so little for CPU.
It's a fact that there are many more CPUs active at the moment rather than GPUs.
So, there will be a lot more CPUs mining RandomX algorithm for Monero thus reducing profits drastically.
If it's profitable for people, they are going to mine and they will activate each and every bit of CPU power they have which is really good for decentralization but not for incentives.

This is what I have been saying all along. If you think you will profit from investing in 4-5 or even 10 Ryzen 3900x systems in preparation for the XMR RandomX fork, you will be sorely disappointed. Please learn from both the Loki and ArQMA networks....there are a lot of CPU hashpower out there. Your multiple 3900X systems isn't going to make you any profit worth investing on. You have been warned..

[Marvell2]

Right now my i7 3930k making 300h/s on cryptonightR and it values as 0.10$ for a day consuming 130w .
if im not wrong it will pay me about 0.25$ with randomx.im sure it will pay this for 2-3 days then after it will be again like 0.10$.All people waiting something huge but results becomes same at the end of the road.cryptonight always paid for cpu very little.so dont be sooo exited.

It's not that cryptonight paid so little for CPU.
It's a fact that there are many more CPUs active at the moment rather than GPUs.
So, there will be a lot more CPUs mining RandomX algorithm for Monero thus reducing profits drastically.
If it's profitable for people, they are going to mine and they will activate each and every bit of CPU power they have which is really good for decentralization but not for incentives.

This is what I have been saying all along. If you think you will profit from investing in 4-5 or even 10 Ryzen 3900x systems in preparation for the XMR RandomX fork, you will be sorely disappointed. Please learn from both the Loki and ArQMA networks....there are a lot of CPU hashpower out there. Your multiple 3900X systems isn't going to make you any profit worth investing on. You have been warned..

yes long term maybe you are right but its all about efficiency, a 3900x will do 12k or more of randomx for 130 watt

those older cpus will do 3k for 70 to 100 watt so you are talking 4x maybe power use, the 3900x will make momey for at least six months and probably pay for themselves, beyond that who knows but either way its a new cpu so you can probably sell it in a year and be green greeN

[ZombieWorm]

sell it in a year and be green greeN

We all want to be green greeN!

[joblo]

I haven't found a xmrig discussion thread so I'll post here.

Has anyone gotten cuda-plugin to compile on Ubuntu 18.04?
It compiles on 19.04 but 18.04 fails:

Code:

-- Found CUDA: /usr (found suitable version "9.1", minimum required is "8.0") 
-- Configuring done
-- Generating done
-- Build files have been written to: /home/coin/miners/xmrig/xmrig-cuda-2.0.0-beta/build
coin@sys24:~/miners/xmrig/xmrig-cuda-2.0.0-beta/build$ make
[  8%] Building NVCC (Device) object CMakeFiles/xmrig-cu.dir/src/RandomX/wownero/xmrig-cu_generated_randomx_wownero.cu.o
In file included from /usr/include/host_config.h:50:0,
                 from /usr/include/cuda_runtime.h:78,
                 from <command-line>:0:
/usr/include/crt/host_config.h:121:2: error: #error -- unsupported GNU version! gcc versions later than 6 are not supported!
 #error -- unsupported GNU version! gcc versions later than 6 are not supported!
  ^~~~~
cc1plus: warning: unrecognized command line option ‘-Wno-class-memaccess’
CMake Error at xmrig-cu_generated_randomx_wownero.cu.o.Release.cmake:219 (message):
  Error generating
  /home/coin/miners/xmrig/xmrig-cuda-2.0.0-beta/build/CMakeFiles/xmrig-cu.dir/src/RandomX/wownero/./xmrig-cu_generated_randomx_wownero.cu.o


CMakeFiles/xmrig-cu.dir/build.make:105: recipe for target 'CMakeFiles/xmrig-cu.dir/src/RandomX/wownero/xmrig-cu_generated_randomx_wownero.cu.o' failed
make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/xmrig-cu.dir/src/RandomX/wownero/xmrig-cu_generated_randomx_wownero.cu.o] Error 1
CMakeFiles/Makefile2:67: recipe for target 'CMakeFiles/xmrig-cu.dir/all' failed
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/xmrig-cu.dir/all] Error 2
Makefile:83: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 2

[herrdrone]

I haven't found a xmrig discussion thread so I'll post here.

Has anyone gotten cuda-plugin to compile on Ubuntu 18.04?
It compiles on 19.04 but 18.04 fails:

Code:

-- Found CUDA: /usr (found suitable version "9.1", minimum required is "8.0") 
-- Configuring done
-- Generating done
-- Build files have been written to: /home/coin/miners/xmrig/xmrig-cuda-2.0.0-beta/build
coin@sys24:~/miners/xmrig/xmrig-cuda-2.0.0-beta/build$ make
[  8%] Building NVCC (Device) object CMakeFiles/xmrig-cu.dir/src/RandomX/wownero/xmrig-cu_generated_randomx_wownero.cu.o
In file included from /usr/include/host_config.h:50:0,
                 from /usr/include/cuda_runtime.h:78,
                 from <command-line>:0:
/usr/include/crt/host_config.h:121:2: error: #error -- unsupported GNU version! gcc versions later than 6 are not supported!
 #error -- unsupported GNU version! gcc versions later than 6 are not supported!
  ^~~~~
cc1plus: warning: unrecognized command line option ‘-Wno-class-memaccess’
CMake Error at xmrig-cu_generated_randomx_wownero.cu.o.Release.cmake:219 (message):
  Error generating
  /home/coin/miners/xmrig/xmrig-cuda-2.0.0-beta/build/CMakeFiles/xmrig-cu.dir/src/RandomX/wownero/./xmrig-cu_generated_randomx_wownero.cu.o


CMakeFiles/xmrig-cu.dir/build.make:105: recipe for target 'CMakeFiles/xmrig-cu.dir/src/RandomX/wownero/xmrig-cu_generated_randomx_wownero.cu.o' failed
make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/xmrig-cu.dir/src/RandomX/wownero/xmrig-cu_generated_randomx_wownero.cu.o] Error 1
CMakeFiles/Makefile2:67: recipe for target 'CMakeFiles/xmrig-cu.dir/all' failed
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/xmrig-cu.dir/all] Error 2
Makefile:83: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 2

I just asked them about this on reddit, this is their response:

CUDA has very strict compiler requirements, so you have 2 options:

1. Update CUDA to recent version.

2. Install older compiler like
sudo apt install gcc-6 g++-6
and specify compiler on cmake phase
cmake .. -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=gcc-6 -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=g++-6

Link to answer: https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/dvv637/xmrig_500_stable_release_unified_3_in_1_miner/f7iota4?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x

[ol92]

I haven't found a xmrig discussion thread so I'll post here.

Has anyone gotten cuda-plugin to compile on Ubuntu 18.04?
It compiles on 19.04 but 18.04 fails:

Code:

-- Found CUDA: /usr (found suitable version "9.1", minimum required is "8.0") 
-- Configuring done
-- Generating done
-- Build files have been written to: /home/coin/miners/xmrig/xmrig-cuda-2.0.0-beta/build
coin@sys24:~/miners/xmrig/xmrig-cuda-2.0.0-beta/build$ make
[  8%] Building NVCC (Device) object CMakeFiles/xmrig-cu.dir/src/RandomX/wownero/xmrig-cu_generated_randomx_wownero.cu.o
In file included from /usr/include/host_config.h:50:0,
                 from /usr/include/cuda_runtime.h:78,
                 from <command-line>:0:
/usr/include/crt/host_config.h:121:2: error: #error -- unsupported GNU version! gcc versions later than 6 are not supported!
 #error -- unsupported GNU version! gcc versions later than 6 are not supported!
  ^~~~~
cc1plus: warning: unrecognized command line option ‘-Wno-class-memaccess’
CMake Error at xmrig-cu_generated_randomx_wownero.cu.o.Release.cmake:219 (message):
  Error generating
  /home/coin/miners/xmrig/xmrig-cuda-2.0.0-beta/build/CMakeFiles/xmrig-cu.dir/src/RandomX/wownero/./xmrig-cu_generated_randomx_wownero.cu.o


CMakeFiles/xmrig-cu.dir/build.make:105: recipe for target 'CMakeFiles/xmrig-cu.dir/src/RandomX/wownero/xmrig-cu_generated_randomx_wownero.cu.o' failed
make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/xmrig-cu.dir/src/RandomX/wownero/xmrig-cu_generated_randomx_wownero.cu.o] Error 1
CMakeFiles/Makefile2:67: recipe for target 'CMakeFiles/xmrig-cu.dir/all' failed
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/xmrig-cu.dir/all] Error 2
Makefile:83: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 2

I just asked them about this on reddit, this is their response:

CUDA has very strict compiler requirements, so you have 2 options:

1. Update CUDA to recent version.

2. Install older compiler like
sudo apt install gcc-6 g++-6
and specify compiler on cmake phase
cmake .. -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=gcc-6 -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=g++-6

Link to answer: https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/dvv637/xmrig_500_stable_release_unified_3_in_1_miner/f7iota4?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x

install latest cuda: it should use gcc 7

[joblo]

I haven't found a xmrig discussion thread so I'll post here.

Has anyone gotten cuda-plugin to compile on Ubuntu 18.04?
It compiles on 19.04 but 18.04 fails:

I just asked them about this on reddit, this is their response:

CUDA has very strict compiler requirements, so you have 2 options:

1. Update CUDA to recent version.

2. Install older compiler like
sudo apt install gcc-6 g++-6
and specify compiler on cmake phase
cmake .. -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=gcc-6 -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=g++-6

Link to answer: https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/dvv637/xmrig_500_stable_release_unified_3_in_1_miner/f7iota4?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x

install latest cuda: it should use gcc 7

gcc 6 did the trick. It's the simpler choice as the package is available in the repo, cuda 10 is not.

Thanks.

[tg88]

It's time to turn on some servers, is HiveOS a good option to boot these servers and mining RandomX? or does anyone have any better suggestions?

nicehash OS could be a free alternative for you.

I'm testing nhos but after loading the OS nothing happens ... do you know if it is currently supporting mining via CPU?

Tomorrow I will test hiveOS.

[batsonxl]

Right now my i7 3930k making 300h/s on cryptonightR and it values as 0.10$ for a day consuming 130w .
if im not wrong it will pay me about 0.25$ with randomx.im sure it will pay this for 2-3 days then after it will be again like 0.10$.All people waiting something huge but results becomes same at the end of the road.cryptonight always paid for cpu very little.so dont be sooo exited.

It's not that cryptonight paid so little for CPU.
It's a fact that there are many more CPUs active at the moment rather than GPUs.
So, there will be a lot more CPUs mining RandomX algorithm for Monero thus reducing profits drastically.
If it's profitable for people, they are going to mine and they will activate each and every bit of CPU power they have which is really good for decentralization but not for incentives.

This is what I have been saying all along. If you think you will profit from investing in 4-5 or even 10 Ryzen 3900x systems in preparation for the XMR RandomX fork, you will be sorely disappointed. Please learn from both the Loki and ArQMA networks....there are a lot of CPU hashpower out there. Your multiple 3900X systems isn't going to make you any profit worth investing on. You have been warned..

yes long term maybe you are right but its all about efficiency, a 3900x will do 12k or more of randomx for 130 watt

those older cpus will do 3k for 70 to 100 watt so you are talking 4x maybe power use, the 3900x will make momey for at least six months and probably pay for themselves, beyond that who knows but either way its a new cpu so you can probably sell it in a year and be green greeN

  Everyone talking about hashrate why no one saying about payment for these hashrate? waaaaww 12000H/s.they think it will pay like CN4?
I dont care  what hashrate they are promising,i do care is what do they pay for.What a meaning of 12k hashrate if it pays for that 1.5$. 3900 costs 700-900$.only cpu ROI 500 days.
  my 3930k makes 0.25$ it is old cpu and what did you say about 3900 more 4 times efficiency right? ok 0.25x4=1$ for a day.What a joke.

[Set Ready Go]

It's time to turn on some servers, is HiveOS a good option to boot these servers and mining RandomX? or does anyone have any better suggestions?

nicehash OS could be a free alternative for you.

I'm testing nhos but after loading the OS nothing happens ... do you know if it is currently supporting mining via CPU?

Tomorrow I will test hiveOS.

Im not using nhOS myself , but im sure they support cpu mining, xmrig 3.1.1 installed so. probably some settings you have to figure out.

Take a look and see if you have missed anything: https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/public-prod-data/o/marketing%2Fnhos-guide-en.pdf?generation=1563192105178740&alt=media

[Marvell2]

Right now my i7 3930k making 300h/s on cryptonightR and it values as 0.10$ for a day consuming 130w .
if im not wrong it will pay me about 0.25$ with randomx.im sure it will pay this for 2-3 days then after it will be again like 0.10$.All people waiting something huge but results becomes same at the end of the road.cryptonight always paid for cpu very little.so dont be sooo exited.

It's not that cryptonight paid so little for CPU.
It's a fact that there are many more CPUs active at the moment rather than GPUs.
So, there will be a lot more CPUs mining RandomX algorithm for Monero thus reducing profits drastically.
If it's profitable for people, they are going to mine and they will activate each and every bit of CPU power they have which is really good for decentralization but not for incentives.

This is what I have been saying all along. If you think you will profit from investing in 4-5 or even 10 Ryzen 3900x systems in preparation for the XMR RandomX fork, you will be sorely disappointed. Please learn from both the Loki and ArQMA networks....there are a lot of CPU hashpower out there. Your multiple 3900X systems isn't going to make you any profit worth investing on. You have been warned..

yes long term maybe you are right but its all about efficiency, a 3900x will do 12k or more of randomx for 130 watt

those older cpus will do 3k for 70 to 100 watt so you are talking 4x maybe power use, the 3900x will make momey for at least six months and probably pay for themselves, beyond that who knows but either way its a new cpu so you can probably sell it in a year and be green greeN

  Everyone talking about hashrate why no one saying about payment for these hashrate? waaaaww 12000H/s.they think it will pay like CN4?
I dont care  what hashrate they are promising,i do care is what do they pay for.What a meaning of 12k hashrate if it pays for that 1.5$. 3900 costs 700-900$.only cpu ROI 500 days.
  my 3930k makes 0.25$ it is old cpu and what did you say about 3900 more 4 times efficiency right? ok 0.25x4=1$ for a day.What a joke.

i paid $499 for all my 4 3900x cards in october  and currently one is alreddy paid off lol , no i won’t tell you what i am mining
the cpu is so powerful i get 3x to 4x hash rate of older cpus on other cpu algos,even if xmr is not profitabilty on randomx that just means ill continue to make nice profits on the. other cpu only coins im mining now.

i cant see that happening though, i expect to pay off all 4 boxes in six months max which is 3x better than buying asics or gpus atm.  Of course i also have gpu rigs , all im doing is upgrading my existing gpu rigs to 3900x rigs

to each his own

[Marvell2]

my 3900x have been making between 1.50 (loki) and $3 a day

i expect $3 a day to be the min when randomx starts on xmr that’s pretty good to me

[philipma1957]

Right now my i7 3930k making 300h/s on cryptonightR and it values as 0.10$ for a day consuming 130w .
if im not wrong it will pay me about 0.25$ with randomx.im sure it will pay this for 2-3 days then after it will be again like 0.10$.All people waiting something huge but results becomes same at the end of the road.cryptonight always paid for cpu very little.so dont be sooo exited.

It's not that cryptonight paid so little for CPU.
It's a fact that there are many more CPUs active at the moment rather than GPUs.
So, there will be a lot more CPUs mining RandomX algorithm for Monero thus reducing profits drastically.
If it's profitable for people, they are going to mine and they will activate each and every bit of CPU power they have which is really good for decentralization but not for incentives.

This is what I have been saying all along. If you think you will profit from investing in 4-5 or even 10 Ryzen 3900x systems in preparation for the XMR RandomX fork, you will be sorely disappointed. Please learn from both the Loki and ArQMA networks....there are a lot of CPU hashpower out there. Your multiple 3900X systems isn't going to make you any profit worth investing on. You have been warned..

yes long term maybe you are right but its all about efficiency, a 3900x will do 12k or more of randomx for 130 watt

those older cpus will do 3k for 70 to 100 watt so you are talking 4x maybe power use, the 3900x will make momey for at least six months and probably pay for themselves, beyond that who knows but either way its a new cpu so you can probably sell it in a year and be green greeN

  Everyone talking about hashrate why no one saying about payment for these hashrate? waaaaww 12000H/s.they think it will pay like CN4?
I dont care  what hashrate they are promising,i do care is what do they pay for.What a meaning of 12k hashrate if it pays for that 1.5$. 3900 costs 700-900$.only cpu ROI 500 days.
  my 3930k makes 0.25$ it is old cpu and what did you say about 3900 more 4 times efficiency right? ok 0.25x4=1$ for a day.What a joke.

I am buying ryzen 9 3900x for 500 + 33 = 533  and I get 50 + 30 = 80 in rebates so they cost me 453
I did bios upgrade on my asrock x370 board cost = zero
I sold the ryzen 7 1800x for 106

453 - 106 = 347 for upgrade  from 1800x to 3900x   The pc unit uses 110 watts  to mine.  that is 2.64 kwatts a day or say 3 kwatts.

 at 15 cent power I pay 45 cents to run it.    so 100 cents - 45 cents = 55 cents a day pure profit.  Oh for the next 4-5 months  I will save 10 a month  so 50 bucks off my heating bill.
It is quiet and can mine for years with no issues.

PLUS IT IS  a solid pc.  I have 3 at the moment.  I may do 3 more.

[Set Ready Go]

Xmr-stak released new version for random x without devfee.  Lets do some benchmarking!

[sech1]

- They released it as a separate binary, not regular xmr-stak.
- Source code they attached is straight copy from XMRig in RandomX part.
- No fee means they don't plan to support it, it's a throwaway release.
- Some long and obscure instructions on how to prepare for the fork.

Given the history of Fireice's and Monero "relationship", I wouldn't trust this release. It can be anything inside.

[jaymillerSR]

Sorry for a bit off topic.  For the same price would it be better to buy (2x Ryzen 5 3600) or a single Ryzen 9 3900x?

[Set Ready Go]

Sorry for a bit off topic.  For the same price would it be better to buy (2x Ryzen 5 3600) or a single Ryzen 9 3900x?

well 2 R5 3600 should be around 200 euro less, then ofc mobo ram etc...

also you will need a good motherboard for 3900x, decent cpu cooler etc.... from my point of view the 3600 is the winner.

[joblo]

Sorry for a bit off topic.  For the same price would it be better to buy (2x Ryzen 5 3600) or a single Ryzen 9 3900x?

well 2 R5 3600 should be around 200 euro less, then ofc mobo ram etc...

also you will need a good motherboard for 3900x, decent cpu cooler etc.... from my point of view the 3600 is the winner.

At this time I would agree because AMD now owns the 8+ core consumer market with no price pressure
from Intel........yet.

When Intel launches a price war with Cascade Lake X AMD may respond by lowering the price of the bigger R7s
to keep their price advantage.

Then there's the upcoming TR3000 which could also be disruptive.

In other news, Tom has a story about the new Intel Ponte Vecchio GPUs to be released in 2020 possibly
creating more competition in the GPU market.

With all these exciting developments it's too bad mining is in the dumps generally.

[herrdrone]

Security Warning: CLI binaries available on getmonero.org may have been compromised at some point during the last 24h.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/dyfozs/security_warning_cli_binaries_available_on/

[sech1]

From what I've seen so far on loki/wownero/arqma, there's 100 MH/s ready to mine Monero from day 1. How much more is ready? No one knows.

[sech1]

Most rigs use Intel CPUs, there won't be 11 KH/s per rig. Even if they all were AMD AM4 boards, have you tried to buy 3900X recently? Mission impossible. But I do think hashrate will go up to 1 GH/s after the fork.

[Metroid]

$600 usd cpu to give $1 per day still better than anything a gpu can offer at moment but is not only the $600, you need motherboard $100, memory $40 and ssd $30, $770 just to start it off. ROI 770 days, 2 years, hehehehehehehe if is $1 per day net, i mean without electricity or any other cost. Investing in mining has been the worse investment for the past 2 years and will continue till coin prices multiply in 2020 or 2021 but even though, it might still be, best thing is to protect yourself from stupid decisions and that includes, invest any money in mining whatsoever.

[MATHReX]

Most rigs use Intel CPUs, there won't be 11 KH/s per rig. Even if they all were AMD AM4 boards, have you tried to buy 3900X recently? Mission impossible. But I do think hashrate will go up to 1 GH/s after the fork.

There are many more CPUs running at a current moment rather than GPUs. So if they are all turned on at the same time and pointed towards Monero, the hash will be at a crazy number.
It will also be easier to create a miner for it to run in FPGA because of the compatibility with CPU mining. So, that's that.
Still, I hope early adopters can crunch some hashes and earn a good number of coins before it hits the fan.

[joblo]

It will also be easier to create a miner for it to run in FPGA because of the compatibility with CPU mining.

At best you can create emulation of CPU which will be less efficient than regular CPU (of course).

A point that is missed by many. Emulating a CPU is a lot more complex than emulating a hashing
algorithm.

There is always FUD leading up to a big fork, most of it self serving.

[herrdrone]

CLI v0.15.0.1 'Carbon Chamaeleon' released!
https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/e0j5s1/cli_v01501_carbon_chamaeleon_released/

Monero Network Upgrade(Hard Fork) Countdown
http://xmr.noctism.com/

[Hueristic]

A point that is missed by many. Emulating a CPU is a lot more complex than emulating a hashing
algorithm.

There is always FUD leading up to a big fork, most of it self serving.

Yeah, that is always a great time to accumulate.

What are the numbers for a 2700X guys?

[herrdrone]

What are the numbers for a 2700X guys?

Around +5000 H/s for 2700X

https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFhwUk0wRlJRVDA9
https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFRkVGQwSkJRVDA9

For those interested on Ryzen 3950X, getting +13500 H/s checkout full post: https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/e1dtir/randomx_on_3950x/

[jstefanop]

FYI we have built a prototype plug in play CPU based home miner. Not sure if we are going to release it yet, but its essentially a CPU system shrunk to the minimum size possible, with custom BIOS and components optimized for  Random X and based off 3900.

Operation will be similar to Apollo, it runs off an embedded linux system with browser based GUI.

14KH/s @150 Watts at the wall using our custom PSU, in a quiet stackable 7x7x2.5 inch box. 

[dingdongtobias]

FYI we have built a prototype plug in play CPU based home miner. Not sure if we are going to release it yet, but its essentially a CPU system shrunk to the minimum size possible, with custom BIOS and components optimized for  Random X and based off 3900.

Operation will be similar to Apollo, it runs off an embedded linux system with browser based GUI.

14KH/s @150 Watts at the wall using our custom PSU, in a quiet stackable 7x7x2.5 inch box. 

THANK YOU for this total not important and helpfull information for us.

[Hueristic]

What are the numbers for a 2700X guys?

Around +5000 H/s for 2700X

https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFhwUk0wRlJRVDA9
https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFRkVGQwSkJRVDA9

For those interested on Ryzen 3950X, getting +13500 H/s checkout full post: https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/e1dtir/randomx_on_3950x/

Thx, been debating this or a 1920x or a 3600 for a htpc that will background hash. So Ryzen lineup is heavily bandwidth dependent? I'm aware that ryzen performance curve peaks at ~3600 ram spd so is that we are seeing with randomx as well?

[GingerAle]

What are the numbers for a 2700X guys?

Around +5000 H/s for 2700X

https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFhwUk0wRlJRVDA9
https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFRkVGQwSkJRVDA9

For those interested on Ryzen 3950X, getting +13500 H/s checkout full post: https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/e1dtir/randomx_on_3950x/

Thx, been debating this or a 1920x or a 3600 for a htpc that will background hash. So Ryzen lineup is heavily bandwidth dependent? I'm aware that ryzen performance curve peaks at ~3600 ram spd so is that we are seeing with randomx as well?

my 1920x got around 7kh/s. overall the build was $500-700. Amazon has a deal going for $200 for the 1920x. I probably went overboard with the amount of ram. I thought it needed 2 gb per thread... no, its 2gb per numa node. and 1920x is just 1 node. So you could get away with 8gb to 16 gb prolly.

[herrdrone]

What are the numbers for a 2700X guys?

Around +5000 H/s for 2700X

https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFhwUk0wRlJRVDA9
https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFRkVGQwSkJRVDA9

For those interested on Ryzen 3950X, getting +13500 H/s checkout full post: https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/e1dtir/randomx_on_3950x/

Thx, been debating this or a 1920x or a 3600 for a htpc that will background hash. So Ryzen lineup is heavily bandwidth dependent? I'm aware that ryzen performance curve peaks at ~3600 ram spd so is that we are seeing with randomx as well?

Yes, 3600 Mhz ram speed works well in general.
For Ryzen general tips are:

- Turn off PBO and auto overclocking.
- Manually Overclock CPU (Ryzen Master) and increase core voltage.
- Turn on XMP profile on BIOS.
- Tune memory using Ryzen Dram Calculator

On this video Anthony explains overclocking details very well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7w1EGPZUESU&feature=emb_logo

[Hueristic]

my 1920x got around 7kh/s. overall the build was $500-700. Amazon has a deal going for $200 for the 1920x. I probably went overboard with the amount of ram. I thought it needed 2 gb per thread... no, its 2gb per numa node. and 1920x is just 1 node. So you could get away with 8gb to 16 gb prolly.

Good info thanks.

Yes, 3600 Mhz ram speed works well in general.
For Ryzen general tips are:

- Turn off PBO and auto overclocking.
- Manually Overclock CPU (Ryzen Master) and increase core voltage.
- Turn on XMP profile on BIOS.
- Tune memory using Ryzen Dram Calculator

On this video Anthony explains overclocking details very well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7w1EGPZUESU&feature=emb_logo

IOU +sM as soon as I get some.

Any Mobo recommendations guys?
I've been pretty happy with asrock last few generations, I'll need 3 pci-E 8x slots is there a specific solid stable series you guys recommend.
AFA as ram is samsung b-die still the goto option, any specific recommendations on what 32gb kit?
Also AM4 Ryzen doesn't like to clock over 2 slots well is the TH series the same?

Added: just watched the vid, good info. I like this Anthony guy, he knows what he's talking about. I've had LTT on ignore forever since that whining sniveling Linus doesn't know jack shit (I watched one of his vids on system building where he did everything wrong and thought "jesus i hope the kids don't do what this moron is doing")(also he was such a massive fanboi i couldn't listen to him)  and i was getting spammed with his channel. With the decoupling he touched on i was reminded of my 939 socket OC days.
btw check out Buildzoid if you haven't already.

Added again: Yeah so after watching that vid now youtube has ignored my settings and has recommended that fucktard LTT channel as every goddamn recommended for me. Muthafucker I hate google. Now I'm off to downvote every vid they spammed me with (j/k I hit not interested on them all). Too bad i'll never what one of those anythony vids again (knowingly) because of the LTT spam.


Great Vid here on TR V/S R9
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AR4ICNbG9EM&lc

[batsonxl]

Any news???
 Today is nov29 when this thing is goint to start?

[sech1]

Countdown is here: https://community.xmr.to/xmr-countdown/

[batsonxl]

Countdown is here: https://community.xmr.to/xmr-countdown/

Thanks man

[gerixusyu]

Generaly can somebody post what is good and cheap configuration for CPU minning ,how RAM memmory needed

Ryzen 5   3600x   (how much RAM)
Ryzen 9   3900x   (how much RAM)

Also, can we use cheaper motherboard like

https://www.asus.com/us/Motherboards/PRIME-A320M-K/

https://www.biostar.com.tw/app/en/mb/introduction.php?S_ID=925#

[dragonmike]

You shouldn't use a cheap mobo if you're going to miner 24/7 with your CPU. The VRMs get hot. They need a beefy cooling solution.

If ASUS, go Prime x570 Pro.

[gerixusyu]

What about RAM memmory ?

[dragonmike]

What about RAM memmory ?

Check this out for mobo comparisons: https://i.redd.it/dzbx9fdkxv731.png

RAM-wise, you want ideally DDR4-3600 at lowest possible cas latency.

[funnyman7777]

What time is scheduled FORK and do we need new wallet + address to be able to mine it?

[herrdrone]

What time is scheduled FORK and do we need new wallet + address to be able to mine it?

Fork is already done 

If you are using official gui/cli just update binaries: https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/e0j98n/gui_v01501_carbon_chamaeleon_released/

[herrdrone]

Just a couple of changes on https://monerobenchmarks.info/ as fork is done and RandomX is implemented on mainnet.

Site has been since 2016 many cryptonight benchmarks were submitted. All of them have been moved to:

https://cryptonight.monerobenchmarks.info/



Thanks to everyone who tested on testnet using XMRig and Benchmark tool before fork and submitted their results on randomx.monerobenchmarks.info.

Now those benchmarks are on main site and all requests from https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info will be automatically redirected to https://monerobenchmarks.info/.



Site Sections

- CPU vs CPU (Hash per Watts, TDP, etc.) https://monerobenchmarks.info/cpuVScpu.php

- AMD CPU Benchmarks. https://monerobenchmarks.info/singleCPUAMD.php

- INTEL CPU Benchmarks. https://monerobenchmarks.info/singleCPUINTEL.php

- Dual Xeon Benchmarks. https://monerobenchmarks.info/multiDUALXEON.php

- Quad Opteron Benchmarks. https://monerobenchmarks.info/multiQUADOPTERON.php

- Mining Software & tools. https://monerobenchmarks.info/miningSoftware.php



As more benchmarks are added site will grow accordingly.
Thanks everyone 

[herrdrone]

RandomX Sniffer - detecting mining malware on Windows

https://github.com/tevador/randomx-sniffer

[seefatlow]

Here's the hashrate for my AMD rig

Algo : RandomX
Avg hashrate : 11kh/s
Miner: XMRig 5.01
CPU: Ryzen 9 3900x @ 3.8GHz
Memory : 2x 16GB GSkill 3600MHz 18-22-22-42
System power draw : 200W
Threads used : 24

[herrdrone]

Here's the hashrate for my AMD rig

Algo : RandomX
Avg hashrate : 11kh/s
Miner: XMRig 5.01
CPU: Ryzen 9 3900x @ 3.8GHz
Memory : 2x 16GB GSkill 3600MHz 18-22-22-42
System power draw : 200W
Threads used : 24

Thanks for sharing 

[philipma1957]

i have three rigs.

they vary 9900 to 10700.

all are asrock x570 rigs.

all have 2 sticks of ram 🐏.

i need to tweak some more.

[percy_tc]

I have a wierd behaviour on my Intel 9300H cpu. I limited CPU speed to 3GHz, just to avoid overheating, so it does not matter how many threads are running it always 3GHZ.

This is a 4 core (8 HT) CPU with XMRIG 5.0.1

With 1 CPU Thread: I have about 500hash/s
With 2 CPU Thread: I have about 2x 500hash/s = about 1000
With 3 CPU Thread: I have about 3x 500hash/s = about 1500
With 4 CPU thread: I have abour 4x 350 hash /s = about 1400

I guess that as i have 4 core CPU i should be able to reach about 4x 500 hash/sec, however this is not the case.

Any ideas?

[Set Ready Go]

I have a wierd behaviour on my Intel 9300H cpu. I limited CPU speed to 3GHz, just to avoid overheating, so it does not matter how many threads are running it always 3GHZ.

This is a 4 core (8 HT) CPU with XMRIG 5.0.1

With 1 CPU Thread: I have about 500hash/s
With 2 CPU Thread: I have about 2x 500hash/s = about 1000
With 3 CPU Thread: I have about 3x 500hash/s = about 1500
With 4 CPU thread: I have abour 4x 350 hash /s = about 1400

I guess that as i have 4 core CPU i should be able to reach about 4x 500 hash/sec, however this is not the case.

Any ideas?

Thats not how it works. Your gotta calculate the l1/l2/l3 cache. Scratchpad for rx is 2mb l3.
So even though your have 4 cores you cant utilize Them all, or you can but hashrate Will drop as you noticed yourself .

[Metroid]

just for the sake of testing and hobby, on my ryzen 3600 1.31v 4.2ghz, although is 100% stable on every program and benchmark to date, it crashes on xmrig with 9,10,11 and 12 threads, 8 threads is stable and so far no crashes, pulling 5200h/s with 8 treads. Pretty good, profitability was higher and now has been crashing, at moment 5200 h/s is doing $1 per day gross and $0.50 net. I will not let it mine for long, not worth the hassle if profit is less than $2 for the cpu, my cpu can generate $10 per day with other things but is nice monero is back strong on the cpu side of things.

[herrdrone]

XMRig 5.1.0, improved RandomX performance (up to +6-7% on Intel CPUs, +2-3% on Ryzen CPUs)

https://github.com/xmrig/xmrig/releases/tag/v5.1.0

[dallase]

my cpu can generate $10 per day with other things

if that were possible, there would be no stock on cpus.

[Metroid]

my cpu can generate $10 per day with other things

if that were possible, there would be no stock on cpus.

Yes if all the people had the same knowledge as I do, here is the data, https://whattomine.com/coins/101-xmr-randomx?utf8=%E2%9C%93&hr=5200.0&p=120&fee=2.0&cost=0.1&hcost=0.0&commit=Calculate , it seems profitability is going down more and more.

[miner29]

Getting 10600 hash using a 2970WX TR.  32gb ram xmrig and just let it run on what it defaulted too.  Will see if i can improve over just stock.  CPU is on water.

[Metroid]

https://dpwhga.by.files.1drv.com/y4phGyc04dqMnLHeFapCn-qqAjxdI87XqOUON5jFNmaXZDSuVPdfgbmVdUNpkACHzGdBhdfVb-Ug4PcD6esy1pW-CW8RZRGnDGf4KALjS2vUK2HFriTeerlFUftw4Zvt-h1kSoy_DZ5iWeGLoO2Tk7IbWzKqmh4j0gVUaWCVcYiB-nlK7y-aW_ponm-VHVqKmqhcU8I6Hbtu6aNzrVtYDPZA--Fjz6ksM5EaugxaepfFpg/xmrigryzen3600.jpg

I had to update the motherboard bios and voila, all 12 threads work without any problems. Pulling 7000 h/s, it seems this website does not accept onedrive images. I put the link, hope anybody can see it now.

[herrdrone]

https://dpwhga.by.files.1drv.com/y4phGyc04dqMnLHeFapCn-qqAjxdI87XqOUON5jFNmaXZDSuVPdfgbmVdUNpkACHzGdBhdfVb-Ug4PcD6esy1pW-CW8RZRGnDGf4KALjS2vUK2HFriTeerlFUftw4Zvt-h1kSoy_DZ5iWeGLoO2Tk7IbWzKqmh4j0gVUaWCVcYiB-nlK7y-aW_ponm-VHVqKmqhcU8I6Hbtu6aNzrVtYDPZA--Fjz6ksM5EaugxaepfFpg/xmrigryzen3600.jpg

I had to update the motherboard bios and voila, all 12 threads work without any problems. Pulling 7000 h/s, it seems this website does not accept onedrive images. I put the link, hope anybody can see it now.

Excellent 
it would be easier if you upload image to imgur

[Metroid]

https://dpwhga.by.files.1drv.com/y4phGyc04dqMnLHeFapCn-qqAjxdI87XqOUON5jFNmaXZDSuVPdfgbmVdUNpkACHzGdBhdfVb-Ug4PcD6esy1pW-CW8RZRGnDGf4KALjS2vUK2HFriTeerlFUftw4Zvt-h1kSoy_DZ5iWeGLoO2Tk7IbWzKqmh4j0gVUaWCVcYiB-nlK7y-aW_ponm-VHVqKmqhcU8I6Hbtu6aNzrVtYDPZA--Fjz6ksM5EaugxaepfFpg/xmrigryzen3600.jpg

I had to update the motherboard bios and voila, all 12 threads work without any problems. Pulling 7000 h/s, it seems this website does not accept onedrive images. I put the link, hope anybody can see it now.

Excellent 
it would be easier if you upload image to imgur

Good to know this website accepts images from imgur, I never used that service, will see in the future as an alternative. Thanks.

[Hueristic]

https://dpwhga.by.files.1drv.com/y4phGyc04dqMnLHeFapCn-qqAjxdI87XqOUON5jFNmaXZDSuVPdfgbmVdUNpkACHzGdBhdfVb-Ug4PcD6esy1pW-CW8RZRGnDGf4KALjS2vUK2HFriTeerlFUftw4Zvt-h1kSoy_DZ5iWeGLoO2Tk7IbWzKqmh4j0gVUaWCVcYiB-nlK7y-aW_ponm-VHVqKmqhcU8I6Hbtu6aNzrVtYDPZA--Fjz6ksM5EaugxaepfFpg/xmrigryzen3600.jpg

I had to update the motherboard bios and voila, all 12 threads work without any problems. Pulling 7000 h/s, it seems this website does not accept onedrive images. I put the link, hope anybody can see it now.

Excellent 
it would be easier if you upload image to imgur

Good to know this website accepts images from imgur, I never used that service, will see in the future as an alternative. Thanks.

Do it now i'm not getting an account just to look at that link.

[lunobird]

I'm trying to mine monero on miningpoolhub with with xmr rig miner.

Keeps saying DNS error: "unknown node or service"

What do i need to put in the config file or what I'm doing wrong?

donate-level": 5,
    "donate-over-proxy": 1,
    "log-file": null,
    "pools": [
        {
            "algo": null,
            "coin": null,
            "url": " us-east.randomx-hub.miningpoolhub.com:20580",
            "user": "MyUserName.MyWorkerName",
            "pass": "x",
            "rig-id": null,
            "nicehash": false,
            "keepalive": false,
            "enabled": true,
            "tls": false,
            "tls-fingerprint": null,
            "daemon": false,
            "self-select": null
        }

[herrdrone]

I'm trying to mine monero on miningpoolhub with with xmr rig miner.

Keeps saying DNS error: "unknown node or service"

What do i need to put in the config file or what I'm doing wrong?

donate-level": 5,
    "donate-over-proxy": 1,
    "log-file": null,
    "pools": [
        {
            "algo": null,
            "coin": null,
            "url": " us-east.randomx-hub.miningpoolhub.com:20580",
            "user": "MyUserName.MyWorkerName",
            "pass": "x",
            "rig-id": null,
            "nicehash": false,
            "keepalive": false,
            "enabled": true,
            "tls": false,
            "tls-fingerprint": null,
            "daemon": false,
            "self-select": null
        }

Try: https://xmrig.com/wizard

[lunobird]

I'm trying to mine monero on miningpoolhub with with xmr rig miner.

Keeps saying DNS error: "unknown node or service"

What do i need to put in the config file or what I'm doing wrong?

donate-level": 5,
    "donate-over-proxy": 1,
    "log-file": null,
    "pools": [
        {
            "algo": null,
            "coin": null,
            "url": " us-east.randomx-hub.miningpoolhub.com:20580",
            "user": "MyUserName.MyWorkerName",
            "pass": "x",
            "rig-id": null,
            "nicehash": false,
            "keepalive": false,
            "enabled": true,
            "tls": false,
            "tls-fingerprint": null,
            "daemon": false,
            "self-select": null
        }

Try: https://xmrig.com/wizard

Thanks that worked.

Is there a way i can also gpu mine while xmr rig is cpu mining?  Do i have to let one core/thread free on the cpu so the desktop can be more responsive?

Thanks

[batsonxl]

Like i said before 1st 6hours paid good, the 12 hours double decrease rewards,now it is looks like CN4 again ))
People who were too exited where are you?
3930k made on CN4 300h/s = 0.10$
Now on RandomX 1750h/s = 0.20$  ))) woooowww profit doubled....

Can someone help me to survive little more, i have problem with this.
Benchmark shows 2300h/s but it mines at 1750h/s,  MB msi x79 gd45 plus 32gb RAM + 32 GB virtual memory.win10 64bit
2nd problem xmrstak show error at the beginning ALOCMEMORY FAILED. what is this?

[sech1]

Like i said before 1st 6hours paid good, the 12 hours double decrease rewards,now it is looks like CN4 again ))
People who were too exited where are you?
3930k made on CN4 300h/s = 0.10$
Now on RandomX 1750h/s = 0.20$  ))) woooowww profit doubled....

Can someone help me to survive little more, i have problem with this.
Benchmark shows 2300h/s but it mines at 1750h/s,  MB msi x79 gd45 plus 32gb RAM + 32 GB virtual memory.win10 64bit
2nd problem xmrstak show error at the beginning ALOCMEMORY FAILED. what is this?

3930k should be able to do up to 2500 h/s on RandomX if you use XMRig. Try xmrig.com/wizard to get your initial config.json then just run it and it'll update the config for your CPU and start mining.
P.S. Of course it can only achieve this hashrate if you've enabled huge pages in your OS.

[herrdrone]

I'm trying to mine monero on miningpoolhub with with xmr rig miner.

Keeps saying DNS error: "unknown node or service"

What do i need to put in the config file or what I'm doing wrong?

donate-level": 5,
    "donate-over-proxy": 1,
    "log-file": null,
    "pools": [
        {
            "algo": null,
            "coin": null,
            "url": " us-east.randomx-hub.miningpoolhub.com:20580",
            "user": "MyUserName.MyWorkerName",
            "pass": "x",
            "rig-id": null,
            "nicehash": false,
            "keepalive": false,
            "enabled": true,
            "tls": false,
            "tls-fingerprint": null,
            "daemon": false,
            "self-select": null
        }

Try: https://xmrig.com/wizard

Thanks that worked.

Is there a way i can also gpu mine while xmr rig is cpu mining?  Do i have to let one core/thread free on the cpu so the desktop can be more responsive?

Thanks

Cool 

Yes it is possible, with XMRig you can mine monero using GPU and CPU. Yet, if you plan to do only cpu mining with XMRig and mine something else with your GPU then indeed you will have to let one core/thread to handle both miners, you will have to test to find best balance.

[philipma1957]

What are the numbers for a 2700X guys?

Around +5000 H/s for 2700X

https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFhwUk0wRlJRVDA9
https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFRkVGQwSkJRVDA9

For those interested on Ryzen 3950X, getting +13500 H/s checkout full post: https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/e1dtir/randomx_on_3950x/

Thx, been debating this or a 1920x or a 3600 for a htpc that will background hash. So Ryzen lineup is heavily bandwidth dependent? I'm aware that ryzen performance curve peaks at ~3600 ram spd so is that we are seeing with randomx as well?

my 1920x got around 7kh/s. overall the build was $500-700. Amazon has a deal going for $200 for the 1920x. I probably went overboard with the amount of ram. I thought it needed 2 gb per thread... no, its 2gb per numa node. and 1920x is just 1 node. So you could get away with 8gb to 16 gb prolly.

Some help on setup my rig is under preforming big time. i have a threadripper

[batsonxl]

Like i said before 1st 6hours paid good, the 12 hours double decrease rewards,now it is looks like CN4 again ))
People who were too exited where are you?
3930k made on CN4 300h/s = 0.10$
Now on RandomX 1750h/s = 0.20$  ))) woooowww profit doubled....

Can someone help me to survive little more, i have problem with this.
Benchmark shows 2300h/s but it mines at 1750h/s,  MB msi x79 gd45 plus 32gb RAM + 32 GB virtual memory.win10 64bit
2nd problem xmrstak show error at the beginning ALOCMEMORY FAILED. what is this?

3930k should be able to do up to 2500 h/s on RandomX if you use XMRig. Try xmrig.com/wizard to get your initial config.json then just run it and it'll update the config for your CPU and start mining.
P.S. Of course it can only achieve this hashrate if you've enabled huge pages in your OS.

Thanks man it worked perfect on Xmrig performed good results 2400H/s. Cpu is stock clocks.i need to change cooler.
I have antec kuhler 920 which drives me crazyzzzz.it is very loud, it has sounds like asic working around.I hate this antec kuhler 920.i think antec engineers did this cooler from their ,,,ss    Cpu tem is 65C

[herrdrone]

What are the numbers for a 2700X guys?

Around +5000 H/s for 2700X

https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFhwUk0wRlJRVDA9
https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFRkVGQwSkJRVDA9

For those interested on Ryzen 3950X, getting +13500 H/s checkout full post: https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/e1dtir/randomx_on_3950x/

Thx, been debating this or a 1920x or a 3600 for a htpc that will background hash. So Ryzen lineup is heavily bandwidth dependent? I'm aware that ryzen performance curve peaks at ~3600 ram spd so is that we are seeing with randomx as well?

my 1920x got around 7kh/s. overall the build was $500-700. Amazon has a deal going for $200 for the 1920x. I probably went overboard with the amount of ram. I thought it needed 2 gb per thread... no, its 2gb per numa node. and 1920x is just 1 node. So you could get away with 8gb to 16 gb prolly.

Some help on setup my rig is under preforming big time. i have a threadripper

you may find this useful, asrock bios setup:

https://www.anandtech.com/show/12542/overclocking-the-amd-ryzen-apus-guide-results/5

and ryzen master

https://www.anandtech.com/show/12542/overclocking-the-amd-ryzen-apus-guide-results/7

EDIT. enabling huge pages is mandatory to get better hashrate:

On Windows: https://support.sisoftware.co.uk/knowledgebase.php?article=52

And Linux: https://kerneltalks.com/services/what-is-huge-pages-in-linux/

[wei0339]

Thanks that worked.

Is there a way i can also gpu mine while xmr rig is cpu mining?  Do i have to let one core/thread free on the cpu so the desktop can be more responsive?

Thanks

You can see the help file of XMRIG.   

xmrig.exe --help

use CPU + AMD GPU +NV GPU
xmirig.exe ...... --opencl   --cuda

[Set Ready Go]

What are the numbers for a 2700X guys?

Around +5000 H/s for 2700X

https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFhwUk0wRlJRVDA9
https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFRkVGQwSkJRVDA9

For those interested on Ryzen 3950X, getting +13500 H/s checkout full post: https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/e1dtir/randomx_on_3950x/

Thx, been debating this or a 1920x or a 3600 for a htpc that will background hash. So Ryzen lineup is heavily bandwidth dependent? I'm aware that ryzen performance curve peaks at ~3600 ram spd so is that we are seeing with randomx as well?

my 1920x got around 7kh/s. overall the build was $500-700. Amazon has a deal going for $200 for the 1920x. I probably went overboard with the amount of ram. I thought it needed 2 gb per thread... no, its 2gb per numa node. and 1920x is just 1 node. So you could get away with 8gb to 16 gb prolly.

Some help on setup my rig is under preforming big time. i have a threadripper

I have found out that my first gen ryzens and threadripper gets a few hundred more hashes using only physical cores instead of trying to utilize all of the cache so for example:
1920x

Code:

-t 12, --cpu-affinity 0x555555,

Going from 2666 to 3200 ram gave better performance with 16 threads.
R5 1600

Code:

-t 6, --cpu-affinity 0x555

this for xmrig. you can also try set higher cpu priority . --cpu-priority    set process priority (0 idle, 2 normal to 5 highest)
Latest version should also give 2-3% better hashrate.

[herrdrone]

14360 H/s with AMD Ryzen 9 3900X @ 4150 MHz, 1.25V (Rig Specs + Screenshot)

https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/e5q6p2/14360_hs_with_amd_ryzen_9_3900x_4150_mhz_125v/

[herrdrone]

XMRig 5.1.1, fixed various system response/stability issues

https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/e5ylbs/xmrig_511_fixed_various_system_responsestability/

[herrdrone]

AMD 3950x Final results of Hashrate after Optimizations ~ 17.000 H/s

https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/e7dm1p/amd_3950x_final_results_of_hashrate_after/

[herrdrone]

XMRig 5.2.0, 1GB huge pages, automatic huge pages and Intel prefetchers configuration on Linux + Ryzen hashrate improvements

https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/e94ljc/xmrig_520_1gb_huge_pages_automatic_huge_pages_and/

9526 h/s on Ryzen 7 3700X (XMRig 5.2.0 + 1GB pages + MSR mod on Ubuntu)

https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/e962fu/9526_hs_on_ryzen_7_3700x_xmrig_520_1gb_pages_msr/

[joblo]

I have found out that my first gen ryzens and threadripper gets a few hundred more hashes using only physical cores instead of trying to utilize all of the cache so for example:
1920x

Code:

-t 12, --cpu-affinity 0x555555,

Going from 2666 to 3200 ram gave better performance with 16 threads.
R5 1600

Code:

-t 6, --cpu-affinity 0x555

this for xmrig. you can also try set higher cpu priority . --cpu-priority    set process priority (0 idle, 2 normal to 5 highest)
Latest version should also give 2-3% better hashrate.

Gen 1 have a smaller cache so fewer threads.

I'm always dubious about boosting CPU priority. It shouldn't make a difference, but if it does
it indicates a problem with other processses. Better to deal with those processes.

[sech1]

Can anyone try this Ryzen boost mod on Windows? I tested it and got +6% on Ryzen 7 3700X
https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/e9tuvd/randomx_boost_guide_for_ryzen_on_windows_9100_hs/

[rednoW]

Can anyone try this Ryzen boost mod on Windows? I tested it and got +6% on Ryzen 7 3700X
https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/e9tuvd/randomx_boost_guide_for_ryzen_on_windows_9100_hs/

from 4100 to 4300h/s on ryzen 5 1600 @ 3600mhz (3200 cl16 ram)

[herrdrone]

XMRig 5.2.1, added automatic MSR mod for Ryzen CPUs on Linux

https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/eah5db/xmrig_521_added_automatic_msr_mod_for_ryzen_cpus/

[herrdrone]

XMRig 5.3.0, added automatic MSR mod for Windows, by using signed WinRing0 driver

https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/eaxf44/xmrig_530_added_automatic_msr_mod_for_windows_by/


19.2 KHs on Ryzen 9 3950x

https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/eazoru/192_khs_on_ryzen_9_3950x/


Hit 7.3k h/s, R53600, 3000 MT/s memory 14-17-17-17-38, MSR mod

https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/eavzko/hit_73k_hs_r53600_3000_mts_memory_1417171738_msr/

[herrdrone]

OC 101 for Ryzen 3000 CPUs

https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/ebjnwp/oc_101_for_ryzen_3000_cpus/


RAM 101 for Ryzen 3000 CPUs

https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/ebj5h1/ram_101_for_ryzen_3000_cpus/

[Ursul0]

monero hash lingering just below 1GH, currently at 970300044 H/s ... and it all started so well:)

imo the best performer out there is 14nm Celeron because it costs nothing to most people. On my gpu rigs (mostly 12GPUs) G3930s is doing about 490H (on loki variant, which is slightly higher than rx0) for 7W off the wall. Note the lower hash on Nvidia rigs, both are 10GPUs  




And here is my dual 10 core xeons, barely profitable with 290W off the wall each:

[Enormo Nero]

Exactly 100W per CPU power draw
I don't know what kind of an electricity bill do you have but I pay only 4,3 €urocents for KWH!

and for my dual Xeon 12+12-core delivers steady 10000H/s after Xmrig 5.3 with hyperthreading switched off. It is even able to achieve 11000-12500H/s rates fron time to time..

When I put some serious Multitasking workloads on it at the same time the mining Hashrate drops 1000-2500h/s but that is more memory affected penalty than a CPU-affected drop.. As they can handle any kind of not even a reasonable size but a huge amount of Multitasking workloads with only a few 4-8% CPU utilization when mining is off. I have only 32gb RAM so I'm amazed at how well it can handle all that overload from both utilization at the same time where it obviously should have 64gb to be optimal. Decluding image and video editing tasks..

It isn't even the flagship model Xeons! Running 24/7 2.79Ghz allcore Turbo max 63celsius temperatures..

And you can count on that the xmr will definitely gain value towards usd at least 2-3x from what it is now so I'm very happy with this level of profits

If you need one like that I'm happy to build or provide one for you 1100-3000€ depending on equipments and quaranteed Hashrate minimum is 10000.

[herrdrone]

XMRig 5.4.0, multiple MSR related fixes and improvements and 2 new RandomX variants

https://old.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/edokfo/xmrig_540_multiple_msr_related_fixes_and/

[Dowper_]

What is the hashrate of 3700X with the latest miner?

[sech1]

What is the hashrate of 3700X with the latest miner?

Up to 9670 h/s with top low-latency memory: https://i.imgur.com/b95B6kC.png

[herrdrone]

XMRig 5.5.0, fix for 1st-gen Ryzen crashes, environment variables in config file, bugfixes

https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/eh83wj/xmrig_550_fix_for_1stgen_ryzen_crashes/

[Permonik]

Dual Mining
Random X and ETC mining - one CPU thread is free for GPU mining

[nordmann666]

 you dont need to reservate a core

https://ibb.co/s1VL98T

[herrdrone]

XMRig 5.5.1: https://github.com/xmrig/xmrig/releases/tag/v5.5.1

[Dowper_]

My results with Ryzen 5 1600AF:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8Zs03TCap0

[herrdrone]

AMD THREADRIPPER 3960X ~20800 H/s

Details & Benchmark -> https://monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFhwVk1FRkJRVDA9

[joblo]

Have you tried mining monero with the fastest monero mining platform RagerX which can increase hashrate more than 10% and its referral program is also good? Can you please check and share info about it?

Increasing the displayed hashrate 10% is as simple as adding one line of code.

Code:

hashrate *= 1.1

There are other threads discussing that piece of trash.

[herrdrone]

Windows 10 tuning guide for RandomX mining: https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/f18825/windows_10_tuning_guide_for_randomx_mining/

[joblo]

Dual Mining
Random X and ETC mining - one CPU thread is free for GPU mining

It is not necessary to reserve a CPU thread for GPU mining as long as you don't raise the
priority of the CPU miner.

When dual mining the GPU miner process can run at a slightly higher priority than the CPU minier
to reduce scheduling delays. But in my experience I rarely see any impact to GPU mining performance
when a CPU miner is also running full throttle. It depends on both the GPU and CPU algos being mined.

It's never a good idea to increase the priority of CPU miners.

Now to get back on topic, I'm looking forward to seeing some result for the 3990x.

[herrdrone]

XMRig 5.6.0
- AMD Navi are now supported for RandomX mining.

https://github.com/xmrig/xmrig/releases/tag/v5.6.0

[philipma1957]

anyone trying underclocks ?

i have a ryzen 9 3900x. set it to freq 3600. volts at 1.0

2 sticks of 8gb ram.

used 21 threads 🧵

using nicehash 2 ... 19

a evga 1660 doing phoinex eth.

rig pulls 217 watts. and earns 1.38 usd on nice hash.

217 watts is 5.1kwatts a day or 51 cents at ten cent power.

so 1.38-0.51= 87 cent daily profit.

i had a ryzen 7 1800x flashed my mobo to run the 3900x

i got the cpu for 430- 100 for the 1800x = 330 cost

 roi will be a year. if it makes 87 cents a day

[heavyarms1912]

anyone trying underclocks ?

i have a ryzen 9 3900x. set it to freq 3600. volts at 1.0

2 sticks of 8gb ram.

used 21 threads 🧵

using nicehash 2 ... 19

a evga 1660 doing phoinex eth.

rig pulls 217 watts. and earns 1.38 usd on nice hash.

217 watts is 5.1kwatts a day or 51 cents at ten cent power.

so 1.38-0.51= 87 cent daily profit.

i had a ryzen 7 1800x flashed my mobo to run the 3900x

i got the cpu for 430- 100 for the 1800x = 330 cost

 roi will be a year. if it makes 87 cents a day

have set it to 1.0625v @ 3800 Mhz.  3600 CL14 ram kits (e-die overclocked).  Gets about 13.5 Khs.

[philipma1957]

anyone trying underclocks ?

i have a ryzen 9 3900x. set it to freq 3600. volts at 1.0

2 sticks of 8gb ram.

used 21 threads 🧵

using nicehash 2 ... 19

a evga 1660 doing phoinex eth.

rig pulls 217 watts. and earns 1.38 usd on nice hash.

217 watts is 5.1kwatts a day or 51 cents at ten cent power.

so 1.38-0.51= 87 cent daily profit.

i had a ryzen 7 1800x flashed my mobo to run the 3900x

i got the cpu for 430- 100 for the 1800x = 330 cost

 roi will be a year. if it makes 87 cents a day

have set it to 1.0625v @ 3800 Mhz.  3600 CL14 ram kits (e-die overclocked).  Gets about 13.5 Khs.

Yeah I can get to 13,100  from my current 9,000    but the power used  2x

so with cheaper ram   

and underclocked cpu using only 19 threads  and my gear is doing much better at watts per hash then your rig.

my cpu runs at 50c to 52c  .  I was interested if anyone has tired to underclock

I am down to 3600 freq
and 0.99 volt clocks
19 to 21 threads
very stable and quiet rig.  plus I can use it for other things if I want.

[Herry Toms]

Which mining software did you use there? I'm mining monero using xmr-stak-rx hashrate is almost same as Xmrig but the advantage of this miner is it is free, I don't have a 1% fee as Xmrig.

[herrdrone]

I think Hashrate is okay, but if you possible for you please try mining monero with the fastest mining platform RagerX I think it can increase hashrate around 8% to 10% especially for Rayzen CPU's.

Which mining software did you use there? I'm mining monero using xmr-stak-rx hashrate is almost same as Xmrig but the advantage of this miner is it is free, I don't have a 1% fee as Xmrig.

Based on your post history.
SHILL ON YOUR OWN THREAD

[heavyarms1912]

anyone trying underclocks ?

i have a ryzen 9 3900x. set it to freq 3600. volts at 1.0

2 sticks of 8gb ram.

used 21 threads 🧵

using nicehash 2 ... 19

a evga 1660 doing phoinex eth.

rig pulls 217 watts. and earns 1.38 usd on nice hash.

217 watts is 5.1kwatts a day or 51 cents at ten cent power.

so 1.38-0.51= 87 cent daily profit.

i had a ryzen 7 1800x flashed my mobo to run the 3900x

i got the cpu for 430- 100 for the 1800x = 330 cost

 roi will be a year. if it makes 87 cents a day

have set it to 1.0625v @ 3800 Mhz.  3600 CL14 ram kits (e-die overclocked).  Gets about 13.5 Khs.

Yeah I can get to 13,100  from my current 9,000    but the power used  2x

so with cheaper ram  

and underclocked cpu using only 19 threads  and my gear is doing much better at watts per hash then your rig.

my cpu runs at 50c to 52c  .  I was interested if anyone has tired to underclock

I am down to 3600 freq
and 0.99 volt clocks
19 to 21 threads
very stable and quiet rig.  plus I can use it for other things if I want.

I never mentioned power consumption so you can't make a comparison in efficiency.
I experimented with 21 threads the power saved at wall is 10w for me while hashrate is 12khs down from 13.5khs.  Efficiency no is 13500/198w ~ 68 and 12000/188w ~ 63.
Note:  I got a Radeon VII at fixed clocks also consuming power.  HW-Info nos were roughly around 116w at 3.8-3.9 Ghz clocks and 111w at 3.6 Ghz clocks for 3900X.

Also, simply undervolting doesn't translate to power savings.  1.0625v or 0.95v core voltage makes no difference to power consumption at wall.  There should be more to it.

[philipma1957]

so with 20 threads and stock cooler i run at 59 temp.

clock set to 3500 volts to 0.095

two sticks of  cheaper 8 gb ram.

savings are no water cooler needed.

unit burns 217 watts at kwatt meter.  earns around 1.40 usd.

second unit burns 249 watts at kwatt meter earns around  1.28 usd.

using nicehash 3.05

1660 gpus set to 80% power and volts.

so i burn 466 watts or 11 kwatts a day.

my adjusted winter rates are 10 cents so i pay 1.10 in power a day and earn 2.68

gain 1.58.

stock coolers save 100 x 2 = 200
cheap ram save 100.

so i save 300 in parts maybe more like 330 in parts. my power is 1.10 so that is 300 days of mining saved.

yeah i do 8500 to 9000 hash vs 13000 hash.

i don’t claim this is smarter then pushing the gear hard.

i am asking if anyone else tries this.

[heavyarms1912]

so with 20 threads and stock cooler i run at 59 temp.

clock set to 3500 volts to 0.095

two sticks of  cheaper 8 gb ram.

savings are no water cooler needed.

unit burns 217 watts at kwatt meter.  earns around 1.40 usd.

second unit burns 249 watts at kwatt meter earns around  1.28 usd.

using nicehash 3.05

1660 gpus set to 80% power and volts.

so i burn 466 watts or 11 kwatts a day.

my adjusted winter rates are 10 cents so i pay 1.10 in power a day and earn 2.68

gain 1.58.

stock coolers save 100 x 2 = 200
cheap ram save 100.

so i save 300 in parts maybe more like 330 in parts. my power is 1.10 so that is 300 days of mining saved.

yeah i do 8500 to 9000 hash vs 13000 hash.

i don’t claim this is smarter then pushing the gear hard.

i am asking if anyone else tries this.

And I guess what I am suggesting is that you're not saving much power reducing the threads.  you might want to try out with 24 threads.
When I experimented with raw undervolt+underclock it didn't save power in actual.

Also, I am on stock cooler and micron e-die's are quite cheap.  $65-$70 for 16gb kit.  That's what I got.

It's 414w at wall for the VII hashing at 85 Mhs + 3900X at 13.5 Khs.
https://imgur.com/a/OcKi3S0

[Dowper_]

If someone don't know how to mine with CPU, see my tutorial:

Monero CPU Mining Tutorial - https://youtu.be/fsHYK4zmRlU

[herrdrone]

Now to get back on topic, I'm looking forward to seeing some result for the 3990x.

AMD THREADRIPPER 3990X ~43800 H/s (156,4 Hash per Watts) with XMRig 5.7.0
https://monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFhwVmVrSm5RVDA9

Source from crypto mining blog: https://cryptomining-blog.com/11384-randomx-mining-performance-on-amd-ryzen-threadripper-3990x-processor-64c-128t/

[herrdrone]

thats a LOT! Is there any info on hashrate on the same setup on RagerX miner?

Coinluminary and Herry Toms only use their accounts to SHILL, you have done it before on this thread and you do on others particularly today as your post history shows.

Yet, I will take your statement and point some facts:

- RagerX is closed source with 3.5% fee. And was only created to mine on pool with same name (does not accept any other mining software), so miner/rig owner is not on control of it.
- Those who have used it regret it, as they figure out they will never get paid. So they switch to XMRig and point rig to any other pool they choose.
https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/ff4bfh/ragerx/
- You are breaking forum rules by spamming, and creating posts with no value to discussion.

I encourage community to report spammers to moderators.
Thanks.

[herrdrone]

A new section has been added where CPU with 4+ records are listed with all details: #cores, #threads, default tdp, socket type, memory supported, cache size (L1, L2 & L3), lithography, hash per watts, average hashrate, and more.

https://monerobenchmarks.info/list.php

[Set Ready Go]

If anyone has gotten their hands on a Ryzen 3 3100/3300x   feel free to share the hashrate , settings etc...

Im thinking maybe swap a 1600 to the newer 3100..

[herrdrone]

If anyone has gotten their hands on a Ryzen 3 3100/3300x   feel free to share the hashrate , settings etc...

Im thinking maybe swap a 1600 to the newer 3100..

Ryzen 3 3100 ~ 4600 H/s using XMRig
https://monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFhwbGQwRkJRVDA9

[Hueristic]

Anyone have a clue about Ampere vs Big Navi on RandomX?

[sech1]

Anyone have a clue about Ampere vs Big Navi on RandomX?

Both will suck compared to CPUs. Big Navi will suck even more due to lack of native support for RDNA2 in xmrig.

[sxemini]

Anyone have a clue about Ampere vs Big Navi on RandomX?

Both will suck compared to CPUs. Big Navi will suck even more due to lack of native support for RDNA2 in xmrig.

XMRig have native support for Ampere? Or how do i understand you post?

[sech1]

XMRig have native support for Ampere? Or how do i understand you post?

NVIDIA GPUs are efficient enough with straight-forward RandomX VM emulation, they even support directed rounding floating point operations in CUDA, so there's no need to add support for each new GPU. Generic CUDA code will just work. But even 2080 Ti does only 1600-1700 h/s. 3000 series will do a bit more, but still far from enough to compete with CPUs. AMD GPUs, on the other side, require native GCN/RDNA assembler code to run RandomX efficiently.

[herrdrone]

Ryzen 7 3700X getting +10 Kh/s by sech1

Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/j9uy97/testing_ryzen_7_3700x_limits_10_khs_achieved/

[herrdrone]

Ryzen 5950X ~17 Kh/s
Full details -> https://monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFRkak1FRlJRVDA9

[herrdrone]

Ryzen 5 5900X ~ 13 Kh/s
https://monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFRkak1FSjNRVDA9

Ryzen 5 5600X ~ 7.2 Kh/s
https://monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFRkak1FRjNRVDA9

[herrdrone]

Ryzen 5950X ~19.8 Kh/s
Full details -> https://monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=YzNwRGQwSkJRVDA9

[herrdrone]

Ryzen 7 3700X ~10061 H/s
Details and screenshots -> https://monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=YzNwRGVVRkJRVDA9 

[herrdrone]

Monero mining calculator added to site -> https://monerobenchmarks.info/miningCalculator.php

[FP91G]

Finally, now beginners can clearly see that there is no freebie in mining on processors.
The payback of the processor is 1500-2000 days, so mining is now useless.
It is possible, of course, to mine coins in order to sell them in the future at a better price. But on the other hand, if it is not profitable to mine the coin now, it may be better to invest

[herrdrone]

Right now it's tight, it's possible to get profits only on free/low electric rate per kWh.
Also, efficiency matters being ~100+ Hash per Watts the best performing processors.
Alt-season was short-lived too, just lasted around 3-4 months.

[philipma1957]

Hi, as Monero gets closer to October POW's algo will switch from previous Cryptonight-R to RandomX (https://github.com/tevador/RandomX).

Coins like Loki and Wownero have already switched to a RandomX variation and Xmrig support them.
In particular, GPUs on RandomX perform similar or worst than they did on Cryptonight as data shows:

GPU	Cryptonight-R	RandomX
AMD
Vega 64	2200 H/s	1225 H/s
RX 480/580	960-1000 H/s	400-410 H/s
RX 560 4GB (1400/2200 MHz)	495 H/s	260 H/s
NVIDIA/EVGA
RTX 2080 Ti (1915/13600 MHz)	960-1000 H/s	400-410 H/s
GTX 1080 Ti (2037/11800 MHz)	927 H/s	1122 H/s
GTX 1070 Ti (1900/7600 MHz)	625 H/s	769 H/s

Source: https://github.com/SChernykh/RandomX_OpenCL
Source: https://github.com/SChernykh/RandomX_CUDA

For CPUs:

CPU	Cryptonight-R	RandomX
AMD 3900X (4.25GHZ ALL CORE, 3600MHZ RAM)	1335 H/s	13330 H/s
RYZEN 3700X	1018 H/s	6853 H/s
RYZEN 5 3600	803 H/s	6580 H/s
INTEL I9 9900K	630 H/s	2102 H/s
2X XEON E5 2670 V2	930 H/s	5815 H/s
INTEL I7 7700K	350 H/s	2100 H/s

Source: https://monerobenchmarks.info/
Source: https://monerobenchmarks.info/index.php
Source: https://github.com/tevador/RandomX#cpu-performance

Hope It is helpful for everyone, and those willing to share can submit results on this thread or website:

CPU
https://monerobenchmarks.info/submitCPU.php
GPU
https://monerobenchmarks.info/submitGPU.php

RandomX Benchmark tool: https://github.com/tevador/RandomX/releases
Xmrig CPU Miner: https://github.com/xmrig/xmrig

Others links
RandomX Audits: https://github.com/hyc/RandomxAudits

so


Xmrig CPU Miner: https://github.com/xmrig/xmrig

this is a viable link?

[JayDDee]

so


Xmrig CPU Miner: https://github.com/xmrig/xmrig

this is a viable link?

Yes.

[herrdrone]

Hi everyone, 5 years ago I created monerobenchmarks.info and in the next days I will no longer manage it.

When I started, monero was just around $8 price and had different miners like joblo, yam, cpu-miner opt and others for cpu mining. Claymore, Wolf and ccminer were the ones for gpu mining. This spreadsheet was the only one gathering results: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1RqXRS9d9GqLHUrvXXu_0Mxce-0kHSI63fjSgqYpXUU0/edit#gid=0

Since there a lot happened: attacks, asics, 4 algo switchs and a couple of bull runs that triggered the price above $400. Yet, monero development has always answered well as the scenario requires it.

To keep short and sweet, I thank all the community and everyone who visited and supported the site. Also thanks to all miners for submitting their results, I will no longer run site due to personal reasons but i am going to keep an eye on monero as I really use it.

I thank again the community for adding a link on getmonero.org to monerobenchmarks.

Happy weekend and happy mining!

PS. I am gonna try to make a dump of the data and publish it on a google spreadsheet or similar for everyone to use. Will add link when it is done.