Is ...<name>... still/on DT/yet? - Requests welcome.

[Vod]

there is same error again
Lauda has now 2 exclusions but is show 0

It looks like the system treats includes 0 and excludes 0 differently, and sticks with the current status (YES or NO) when it hits 0.  I bet if Lauda were to go UP 1 and then DOWN 1, Lauda would then show as 0 inclusions.

[LoyceV]

there is same error again
Lauda has now 2 exclusions but is show 0

Thanks, I'm not sure why this is happening though. It's not a connection problem this time.

It looks like the system treats includes 0 and excludes 0 differently, and sticks with the current status (YES or NO) when it hits 0.  I bet if Lauda were to go UP 1 and then DOWN 1, Lauda would then show as 0 inclusions.

Nope, http://istimelord2067ondtyet.tk/ has the same problem at the moment.

[Vod]

Nope, http://istimelord2067ondtyet.tk/ has the same problem at the moment.

Then I think you have two issues.   

[Timelord2o67]

Nope, http://istimelord2067ondtyet.tk/ has the same problem at the moment.

Then I think you have two issues.   

Please delete the website thank you.

[dragonvslinux]

Nope, http://istimelord2067ondtyet.tk/ has the same problem at the moment.

Then I think you have two issues.    

Please delete the website thank you.

Please don't loyce, I think it's still useful to others.
(When working)

[Lauda]

Nope, http://istimelord2067ondtyet.tk/ has the same problem at the moment.

Then I think you have two issues.    

Please delete the website thank you.

Please don't loyce, I think it's still useful to others.
(When working)

Is that alright I wonder? I am fine with mine, but if somebody explicitly asks you not to do it for them and you still insist? Surveillance state? Note, I am not a fan of this mr. Timelord and think he is mentally sick at this point but I am not sure whether it is sensible to reject his request.

[dragonvslinux]

Nope, http://istimelord2067ondtyet.tk/ has the same problem at the moment.

Then I think you have two issues.    

Please delete the website thank you.

Please don't loyce, I think it's still useful to others.
(When working)

Is that alright I wonder? I am fine with mine, but if somebody explicitly asks you not to do it for them and you still insist? Surveillance state? Note, I am not a fan of this mr. Timelord and think he is mentally sick at this point but I am not sure whether it is sensible to reject his request.

That's a fair opinion, hence me suggesting it stays, to see what other users thought. To me, this is public data (taken from DT1 changes log right, more or less?) Therefore, I'd argue anyone is welcome to "re-format" this publicly accessible data and present as they please. Similar to how LoyceV is welcome to remove/keep it based on Timelord's wishes if he pleases, regardless of other users desire for it to remain. Kind of like when I did your trust statistics, no permission required for use of publicly accessible data.

[Lauda]

That's a fair opinion, hence me suggesting it stays, to see what other users thought. To me, this is public data (taken from DT1 changes log right, more or less?) Therefore, I'd argue anyone is welcome to "re-format" this publicly accessible data and present as they please. Similar to how LoyceV is welcome to remove/keep it based on Timelord's wishes if he pleases, regardless of other users desire for it to remain. Kind of like when I did your trust statistics, no permission required for use of publicly accessible data.

It is public data, data that most users will not be able to find or properly assess on their own. The website is not public data, it is targeted surveillance (be it for a joke or whatever else). I think it would be most fair for OP to shut down if a user requests it. On that note, I will not request mine to be taken down I like it. 

[dragonvslinux]

That's a fair opinion, hence me suggesting it stays, to see what other users thought. To me, this is public data (taken from DT1 changes log right, more or less?) Therefore, I'd argue anyone is welcome to "re-format" this publicly accessible data and present as they please. Similar to how LoyceV is welcome to remove/keep it based on Timelord's wishes if he pleases, regardless of other users desire for it to remain. Kind of like when I did your trust statistics, no permission required for use of publicly accessible data.

It is public data, data that most users will not be able to find or properly assess on their own. The website is not public data, it is targeted surveillance (be it for a joke or whatever else). I think it would be most fair for OP to shut down if a user requests it. On that note, I will not request mine to be taken down I like it. 

Yes BPIP is effectively a surveillance as you put it, but I don't believe it should be shut down because of that. It usefully surveils the judgement of those who are default trust (in a position of power, as well as others), as opposed to surveillance state traditionally surveilling a large number of the population somewhat indiscriminately.

A surveillance state is a country where the government engages in pervasive surveillance of large numbers of its citizens and visitors.

Not forgetting that Loyce isn't a country and BPIP isn't the government. Surveillance tool what be a better way to describe your argument 
A better argument in my opinion is that it could arguably be in breach of cyber-bullying laws in certain countries, due to it's specific nature.
Interesting discussion though 

[Lauda]

Yes BPIP is effectively a surveillance as you put it, but I don't believe it should be shut down because of that. It usefully surveils the judgement of those who are default trust (in a position of power, as well as others), as opposed to surveillance state traditionally surveilling a large number of the population somewhat indiscriminately.

BPIP is a general surveillance tool not targeting anyone in particular. This is different.

A surveillance state is a country where the government engages in pervasive surveillance of large numbers of its citizens and visitors.

Not forgetting that Loyce isn't a country and BPIP isn't the government. Surveillance tool what be a better way to describe your argument 
A better argument in my opinion is that it could arguably be in breach of cyber-bullying laws in certain countries, due to it's specific nature.
Interesting discussion though 

Loyce is Switzerland, and I called him that first, therefore a country and therefore has a government. I demand that this definition is correct!

[LoyceV]

Nope, http://istimelord2067ondtyet.tk/ has the same problem at the moment.

Please delete the website thank you.

I've canceled the domain. That means someone else can now register it.

Please don't loyce, I think it's still useful to others.

This whole thing started as a joke, with temporary domain names.

To me, this is public data (taken from DT1 changes log right, more or less?) Therefore, I'd argue anyone is welcome to "re-format" this publicly accessible data and present as they please.

Correct. And if I'd make this data for all users, I wouldn't censor it, but it's a joke targeting only a few users.

I will not request mine to be taken down I like it. 

Good It expires in August though.

[Lauda]

I've canceled the domain. That means someone else can now register it.

Great!

I will not request mine to be taken down I like it. 

Good It expires in August though.

Welp, maybe peloso and the other Turkish baboons can pay for its renewal and any other associated costs.

[LoyceV]

Welp, maybe peloso and the other Turkish baboons can pay for its renewal and any other associated costs.

Dot.tk domains need a creditcard to be extended. I keep that information away from crypto.

Nope, http://istimelord2067ondtyet.tk/ has the same problem at the moment.

Then I think you have two issues.   

I found the issue, but I'm not sure how to fix it: My scraper uses LoyceBot's browser cookie to download data that's only available after for registered users. It stopped working, which broke my Trust Flag Viewer too.
The cookie is still valid, so I'm not sure what changed.

[peloso]

Welp, maybe peloso and the other Turkish baboons can pay for its renewal and any other associated costs.

for what ? you are the past and i already forget you

you have only the opportunity to set flags and nothing else
thats wonderfull )

[Timelord2067]

Nope, http://istimelord2067ondtyet.tk/ has the same problem at the moment.

Please delete the website thank you.

I've cancelled the domain.

Thank you for respecting my request.

[LoyceV]

Bump: DT1 got updated, which made some changes.

IF I would have made one for myself, it would now show I'm DT2

[Timelord2o67]

Bump: DT1 got updated, which made some changes.

IF I would have made one for myself, it would now show I'm DT2

Think of it in terms of Football/Soccer or even trading cards ...

You've been relegated to the second division for a term (just be thankful it's only a month, not a year)  

Would you like my DT1 autograph?  

[DireWolfM14]

What's up with TMAN?  It's been over 3 weeks since he's logged on.  I hope all is well with him.

[Timelord2o67]

What's up with TMAN?  It's been over 3 weeks since he's logged on.  I hope all is well with him.

I'm sure he'll be back. (Unless there was something urgent preventing him from posting) I see he's been offline since the 19th, if he's still offline in another two weeks I would appreciate it if you could post a note on my "Grim Reality" thread so we can monitor his activity.

Thanks.

[Vod]

What's up with TMAN?  It's been over 3 weeks since he's logged on.  I hope all is well with him.

I heard he dropped his phone in the loo.     I think he has a new one by now but maybe is just taking some time off...