Bounty Campaigns now trial and error method

[robelneo]

Hi All,

This is not about scam projects. This is about the projects which fail to raise enough funds due to what so ever reasons. When bounty hunters work for weeks and at the last moment project announces that they can no longer run it due to insufficient funds raised, its nothing but a waste of time and energy for us.
In my opinion, should project teams have enough fundings before they look for investors? What is called MVP is very important for the users to check for before investing.
MVP will ensure that even if funds are not raised as expected, it can be delayed but not dead.
From your point of view, what other points are there which projects and investors both look for?

That should be the case for new projects now that wants public funds, but unfortunately, majority of ICO IEO and STO now wants to do crowdfunding in zero out of the pocket, everything is just lip service and they don't want to invest their own money they only invest in website, host and hire freelancers to launch their announcement, that will only cost $1000 maximum.

[virasisog]

Hi All,

This is not about scam projects. This is about the projects which fail to raise enough funds due to what so ever reasons. When bounty hunters work for weeks and at the last moment project announces that they can no longer run it due to insufficient funds raised, its nothing but a waste of time and energy for us.
In my opinion, should project teams have enough fundings before they look for investors? What is called MVP is very important for the users to check for before investing.
MVP will ensure that even if funds are not raised as expected, it can be delayed but not dead.
From your point of view, what other points are there which projects and investors both look for?

For me we can't assure the amount because considerably if the project failed to raise their minimum cap it is considered a failure unles like the other project who failed but they raised a good amount they still continue to pay the bounty as far as i know in the past.
The funds for the bounty is not necessary because if they have a peronal funds they will use it for advertisement and promotions and for the bounty hunters or the participants will look for success of the particular project .We need to be wise in picking or choosing a biunty that have a huge or big chance of becoming successful

[kodtycoon]

They better raise funds privately and and when they have  the platform set up and coin already in the market, that would be the time that they can do bounty campaign for awareness, like what Emirex is doing right now, they are already in the market and they are doing bounty campaign and referrals contest.

sounds good  but why not all can do this   ? maybe its not simple to do  . its hard to get discovered or sell your products if you wont market it   .and whats the purpose of marketing if they were already succesful because they already got alot of investors  and the coin is already listed  ?  this is why most projects do bounty first or wont do bounty anymore   . trial and error indeed for the hunters  if they want to  gain a valueale coin thru bounty  .

In essence, having a large amount of funds at the beginning is the most important thing that developers must have, no problem they don't immediately list their tokens on the exchange because when they have large funds at the beginning it would be better to conduct or make a campaign that pays with bitcoin or even ethereum, then so that the marketing they make will be better if compared to them trying to find funds through investors by conducting campaigns

[inanilujimi]

Investor confidence has faded with the promise of a large project, which is why the bounty is not as good as before.
ICO or IEO are no longer in demand unless the project already has a large company behind it.

[safari88]

Hi All,

This is not about scam projects. This is about the projects which fail to raise enough funds due to what so ever reasons. When bounty hunters work for weeks and at the last moment project announces that they can no longer run it due to insufficient funds raised, its nothing but a waste of time and energy for us.
In my opinion, should project teams have enough fundings before they look for investors? What is called MVP is very important for the users to check for before investing.
MVP will ensure that even if funds are not raised as expected, it can be delayed but not dead.
From your point of view, what other points are there which projects and investors both look for?

i think at first you must ask about that because for me i will ask about this so incase that the project does not raise enough funds then they will refund the investor money.
then i will leave the project but if the project says that he will continue no matter how much it's raised during the ICO then i will join it.

[Mighty_crypt]

Whether good or bad, tiresome or discouraging I will still keep hunting as a bounty hunter, the fact about bounties is you can never tell what will happen and i'm not ready to wait around, with my research and my persistence spirit i will hit the jackpot one day

[Script3d]

Investor confidence has faded with the promise of a large project, which is why the bounty is not as good as before.
ICO or IEO are no longer in demand unless the project already has a large company behind it.

The confidence faded a long time ago because most of the ICO is just a scam, promising big things but no commitment updating or expanding the project at all. There were certain times ICO was hot which was way before and the recent craze was IEO but it still didn't result into anything positive, i think crypto investors should just invest in STO rather than ICO/IEO because of the government regulation.

[zhekinsp]

Hi All,

This is not about scam projects. This is about the projects which fail to raise enough funds due to what so ever reasons. When bounty hunters work for weeks and at the last moment project announces that they can no longer run it due to insufficient funds raised, its nothing but a waste of time and energy for us.
In my opinion, should project teams have enough fundings before they look for investors? What is called MVP is very important for the users to check for before investing.
MVP will ensure that even if funds are not raised as expected, it can be delayed but not dead.
From your point of view, what other points are there which projects and investors both look for?

Hunters available for the project to hire without paying any money initially show bounty projects taking advantage of this made bounty campaigns look uncertainty most of the time. So bounty hunters actually need to be e changed before asking about it team about their behaviour while running bounty campaigns.