Are these information correct @theymos?

[theymos]

I excluded TMAN and Vod on separate occasions for having overall Trust styles of being too trigger-happy/unforgiving/vindictive. Excluding someone from your trust list does not mean that you distrust them, just that you disagree with their ratings/trust-list. All three of TMAN, Vod, and OgNasty are forum veterans with good trade histories, and I would tend to trust all three of them (to varying degrees).

This drama is highly counterproductive. Nobody has a real trade complaint AFAICT, so the underlying facts hardly matter. For example, in this case TMAN/Vod made this fairly meaningless argument because OgNasty brought up the fairly meaningless claim about the exclusions because TMAN/Vod ... It's an endless cycle of pointless feuding. Nobody actually cares about the underlying facts -- the arguments are being made purely as a "gotcha" --, so there's no way to ever "win" this type of feud. OgNasty will want to say that I called TMAN/Vod vindictive, and TMAN/Vod will want to say that OgNasty was mischaracterizing my exclusions, but I challenge all of you to just knock it off. If you can't work together, then ignore each other, even if you're being prodded.

[Vod]

TMAN and Vod have both sullied their reputations to the point they are untrusted by the forum’s Administrator for making up lies about me.

OK, so we know the bolded part is just another lie from a habitual scammer.   

How many times now has the forum admin had to step in to correct OGNasty?

[Quickseller]

TMAN and Vod have both sullied their reputations to the point they are untrusted by the forum’s Administrator for making up lies about me.

OK, so we know the bolded part is just another lie from a habitual scammer.   

How many times now has the forum admin had to step in to correct OGNasty?

Geese, how fragile is your ego? Perhaps you should read the post one post above yours:

[...]
It's an endless cycle of pointless feuding. Nobody actually cares about the underlying facts -- the arguments are being made purely as a "gotcha" [...] but I challenge all of you to just knock it off. If you can't work together, then ignore each other, even if you're being prodded.

[TMAN]

This drama is highly counterproductive.

This we can all agree on... isnt it time for OG to ignore VOD and I, and us to do the same?

[LoyceV]

isnt it time for OG to ignore VOD and I, and us to do the same?

Yes! Or (as I've suggested before): have a couple of beers together! Find common ground, which I'm pretty sure is about 95% considering you're all long-term Bitcoin(talk) users, and ignore the rest.

I'm going to quote theymos on this:

just knock it off

[Thule]

TMAN and VOD on distrust LOL

HA HA years to late !!!!

[TMAN]

isnt it time for OG to ignore VOD and I, and us to do the same?

Yes! Or (as I've suggested before): have a couple of beers together! Find common ground, which I'm pretty sure is about 95% considering you're all long-term Bitcoin(talk) users, and ignore the rest.

I'm going to quote theymos on this:

just knock it off

I’ve put the fool on ignore, beers wouldn’t happen fella the only thing that would happen is me being bored by the dry lunch and I’d end up tbagging the prick after bitch slapping him.

I hope vod takes the same stance as I and that the fool OG stopps mentioning vod and I do frequently in posts, the forum will be a better place if we all stick to the ignore button as a solution, we are all too old for this shit

[Jet Cash]

we are all too old for this shit

Hey, I've only just hit middle age.

[Timelord2067]

I remember when marlboroza used to investigate UID's that were alts and flagged scammers as a warning to others...

Now he just poles sticks in long cold embers while mumbling more or less incoherently about how the legends surrounding him spar off in the distance.

[marlboroza]

I remember when marlboroza used to investigate UID's that were alts and flagged scammers as a warning to others...

I remember when timelord2067 exposed howeycoins and archived everything...
Locking thread, thanks forum Administration for answer.