Craig Wright is official a fraud

[AGD]

Craig S. Wright ALIAS Faketoshi News: 'The Tulip Trust' is proven to be fake

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5182556.msg52384418#msg52384418

[1713879020]

1713879020

[1713879020]

1713879020

[1713879020]

1713879020

[hv_]

I never in a single day think about this shit you all call Craig who claimed to be satoshi , we all know he is lying and that he will never be the man behide the bitcoin and now he got himself shot from his lies , to pay a whole lots of bitcoin that he never had even if he sold his shit coin "BSV " he will still definitely be in debt and that is what happen to people like him and the follower should open their eyes now and dump the shit coin for real btc.

With the little help of Plato, we know, that we know nearly nothing

[finaleshot2016]

Why didn't he just use Bitcoin signmessage command?Genius in simplicity and all that.

He can also use the forum if he's the real satoshi. If the moderators and staffs know him, even he lost his account he can easily access it due to its personality. I'm still waiting for the pub announcement of the satoshi account here in bitcointalk.org and at first, I knew that Craig Wright was actually a fraud.

His actions are very reckless and obviously desperate for the title. The real SN is chillin' and laughing about this news.

[Wind_FURY]

I never in a single day think about this shit you all call Craig who claimed to be satoshi , we all know he is lying and that he will never be the man behide the bitcoin and now he got himself shot from his lies , to pay a whole lots of bitcoin that he never had even if he sold his shit coin "BSV " he will still definitely be in debt and that is what happen to people like him and the follower should open their eyes now and dump the shit coin for real btc.

With the little help of Plato, we know, that we know nearly nothing

Hahaha. That's very amusing, quoting Plato to justify a fraudster's actions, and to cause the on-lookers to believe that they are to blame for his mistakes.

[Herbert2020]

Why didn't he just use Bitcoin signmessage command?Genius in simplicity and all that.

he did do that but since he is fake and doesn't have the private keys, he tried to fool people into thinking the fake signature he provided was real. to do that he contacted a lot of different personalities including bitcoin core developers to back him up, everyone showed him the middle finger except Gavin lol.

[hv_]

I never in a single day think about this shit you all call Craig who claimed to be satoshi , we all know he is lying and that he will never be the man behide the bitcoin and now he got himself shot from his lies , to pay a whole lots of bitcoin that he never had even if he sold his shit coin "BSV " he will still definitely be in debt and that is what happen to people like him and the follower should open their eyes now and dump the shit coin for real btc.

With the little help of Plato, we know, that we know nearly nothing

Hahaha. That's very amusing, quoting Plato to justify a fraudster's actions, and to cause the on-lookers to believe that they are to blame for his mistakes.

Nope, you just changing the goalpost, I just say that its not easy to find out about the truth.

[hv_]

Why didn't he just use Bitcoin signmessage command?Genius in simplicity and all that.

he did do that but since he is fake and doesn't have the private keys, he tried to fool people into thinking the fake signature he provided was real. to do that he contacted a lot of different personalities including bitcoin core developers to back him up, everyone showed him the middle finger except Gavin lol.

The signing dose not prove it.

It is just a 'little' part of , an good indication.

Would you ask any PhD or CEO or ... To come up with the prove u little boy might accept the the guy has done PhD or is CEO, ore anything he seems to be? These ppl prove P2P most of the things not,to trolls

Nope. The prove was always in the pudding. Do your own due dilligence is always recommended, PoW

[hornetsnest]

Why didn't he just use Bitcoin signmessage command?Genius in simplicity and all that.

he did do that but since he is fake and doesn't have the private keys, he tried to fool people into thinking the fake signature he provided was real. to do that he contacted a lot of different personalities including bitcoin core developers to back him up, everyone showed him the middle finger except Gavin lol.

The signing dose not prove it.

It is just a 'little' part of , an good indication.

Would you ask any PhD or CEO or ... To come up with the prove u little boy might accept the the guy has done PhD or is CEO, ore anything he seems to be? These ppl prove P2P most of the things not,to trolls

Nope. The prove was always in the pudding. Do your own due dilligence is always recommended, PoW

Let me guess.You are a Craig Wright and BSV supporter?

[hv_]

Why didn't he just use Bitcoin signmessage command?Genius in simplicity and all that.

he did do that but since he is fake and doesn't have the private keys, he tried to fool people into thinking the fake signature he provided was real. to do that he contacted a lot of different personalities including bitcoin core developers to back him up, everyone showed him the middle finger except Gavin lol.

The signing dose not prove it.

It is just a 'little' part of , an good indication.

Would you ask any PhD or CEO or ... To come up with the prove u little boy might accept the the guy has done PhD or is CEO, ore anything he seems to be? These ppl prove P2P most of the things not,to trolls

Nope. The prove was always in the pudding. Do your own due dilligence is always recommended, PoW

Let me guess.You are a Craig Wright and BSV supporter?

I support a clean simple unchanged stable and open scalable Bitcoin protocol.

It happened that BSV is this and CSW is one of the major speakers for it.

Hope this is not a problem for you

[fenixosup]

Craig started like a clown and ended like a criminal

[virasog]

Craig started like a clown and ended like a criminal

Craig Wright is 49 years old and a person who is that much mature should not be saying such childish statements which can only make people laugh.

I have not been following him recently. What happen on the legal action which was taken against him on his claims to be the inventor of bitcoin ?

[Wind_FURY]

I never in a single day think about this shit you all call Craig who claimed to be satoshi , we all know he is lying and that he will never be the man behide the bitcoin and now he got himself shot from his lies , to pay a whole lots of bitcoin that he never had even if he sold his shit coin "BSV " he will still definitely be in debt and that is what happen to people like him and the follower should open their eyes now and dump the shit coin for real btc.

With the little help of Plato, we know, that we know nearly nothing

Hahaha. That's very amusing, quoting Plato to justify a fraudster's actions, and to cause the on-lookers to believe that they are to blame for his mistakes.

Nope, you just changing the goalpost, I just say that its not easy to find out about the truth.

I didn't move anything. You did, when you quoted Plato. But what he proved is, he's not Satoshi, which might be good for him, if he's Satoshi. Satoshi himself telling everyone not to listen to him.

[yazher]

I knew it, He was just lying but people at least need to prove somehow that he is a real fraudster, but today everything is clear now!
I think more people like him will show up in the future the best thing we can do to these people is to ignore them until they give us real proof on what they are proving themselves for.

[Davidcasbury]

Ultimately, Wright's safeguard against a contempt charge depends on his power to confirm that the keys to decryption are beyond the power of his.

Freedman, for the part of his, put forward proof that Wright might be lying about precisely how a number of different keys are needed because of this job, or even that Wright might actually be in possession of them currently.

Wright's additional program is seemingly to deflect custodianship or maybe ownership of several of the bitcoin which would presumably be a part of the holdings of his. He accused Freedman of conflating bitcoin kept inside the Tulip Trust with bitcoin kept inside the Liberty Reserve, a defunct cryptocurrency exchange.

Likewise, Wright later reported that 821,000 bitcoin have been unaccounted for since they had been legally represented by an enterprise called Wright International Investments by way of a convoluted ownership building that Judge Bruce Reinhardt must clarify.

Is it the role of yours that in case you are highly effective at accessing the essential info about these Bitcoin, you'd still not, under the purchase of mine, create that information? that you simply do not need to produce anything having to do with 821,000 Bitcoin since they are not your Bitcoin?, Reinhardt requested.

It was eventually found, at some point at minimum, that Wright was the single shareholder of this particular business.
Get More Info

[abdobe]

This guy has long bothered the crypto community with his claims about Bitcoin. I'm glad that he was officially recognized as a fraudster

[Searing]

Craig started like a clown and ended like a criminal

His whole fraud, IMHO, got 'real' for FakeSatoshi Craig Wright when the Australian Tax Authorities went after him for Bitcoin.

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/b7hsar/craig_wright_may_be_under_criminal_investigation/

I'm unsure, but I think that is on hold, till he can prove he is Satoshi. From all that the rest of this farce has gone on.

Likely, without the Australian Tax Authorities pushing this, he could have claimed he was Satoshi till the cows came home

and it would not matter. But from that, he managed to scam the Bitcoin SV forked investors and then, of course, the Dave

Klieman estate loss in court, etc. Now he is on such a slippery slope I suspect his only recourse in 2020 is to say "gasp"

the "supposed" trustees ran off with the Bitcoin! Who'd a thunk it?

What I can't figure out is WHY the people backing this 'fraud' are not up in arms after the Dave Klieman trial and are

not yanking out of Bitcoin SV and his other dubious activities. I guess it is true, for a real 'sting' to happen, like in the

movie, you have to have enough greed to far overcome any common sense.

Anyway, it all started with the Australian Tax Authorities and likely it will be the start of the end there and then

continue through the rest of this 'farce' until he is fully discredited or in jail for tax fraud among other things.

Brad

[mazdafunsun]

This is not news that he is a fraud,  he was just doing it for the money.
As I understand he is shilling BCH and this is why he wanted attention and he made he did reach his goal, he got huge amounts of attention form claiming that he is satoshi if you think of it, then it is a smart marketing move.

[Distraction]

Craig Wright insisted on claiming to be Satoshi but it was not a convincing assertion. All the things about Craig Wright is a lie and that is absolutely surprising and funny. I wonder what he is going to do next.

[hornetsnest]

Dr Wright looks nothing like Satoshi

[Gi01]

I'm surprised it took a long time for people to finally realise that Craig Wright was a complete fraud.  Someone who claims to be Satoshi and didn't have nothing to help prove that indeed he is Satoshi. HE just wanted to take advantage of the fact that no one knows the identity of Satoshi and trend...