project products cannot function properly!

[Cekerula]

In achieving the success of a project certainly influenced by several factors including organizational governance, project managers, project teams, project roadmaps, project partners and also what products they want to offer in the market.
especially the experience of the developer and the team because this is the core of the project. which will determine that the project can achieve success in the market if the project can be managed by an experienced team and developer. The experienced team is very influential on the success of the project, those who have long managed the project and have valid experience in the past certainly have a good background.
In addition partners are also very important because the larger the project partners, the more investors will join them.
but the problem is the products they offer on the market can't operate properly.

in this case I am more confident with the experience / performance of the developer team and the project, I doubt about the product! the fact is that projects that have quality products do not guarantee that they can work well in the market.

[1713512683]

1713512683

[1713512683]

1713512683

[1713512683]

1713512683

[X-ray]

I agree and it has already proven so many times by so many quality projects but remember dude you can't build the perfect rome just in a day and all need step by step to build a fully balancing product that can be accepted by the communities.
To be adopted by the community is something difficult to be implemented because we know that crypto is not yet very familiarized especially about the beta app's testers.
A quality product doesn't guarantee it can work well in the market but it needs the time to change people's mind and build full balancing product that will be working perfectly.

[HK88]

projects require a lot of time for the products they make to function well in this crypto market apart from this basically project developers are responsible for this, if serious developers develop according to their work maps of course the project produces good results and the products they make are valuable on the market.

[fzatni]

In achieving the success of a project certainly influenced by several factors including organizational governance, project managers, project teams, project roadmaps, project partners and also what products they want to offer in the market.
especially the experience of the developer and the team because this is the core of the project. which will determine that the project can achieve success in the market if the project can be managed by an experienced team and developer. The experienced team is very influential on the success of the project, those who have long managed the project and have valid experience in the past certainly have a good background.
In addition partners are also very important because the larger the project partners, the more investors will join them.
but the problem is the products they offer on the market can't operate properly.

in this case I am more confident with the experience / performance of the developer team and the project, I doubt about the product! the fact is that projects that have quality products do not guarantee that they can work well in the market.

indeed it is still a problem when the project is at the product development and implementation stage in the real world.  there are people who actually have a product but the supporting facilities are still lacking, this is a problem for a project that is difficult to develop let alone a project based on AI technology for infrastructure.  projects with the aim of mass payments with blockchain still seem to be having difficulty because there is still little knowledge of blockchain that knows how it works.  in my opinion that's the main problem

[confreslamp]

No project can function well without a working product. Look back at 2019 where there were only ICOs with whitapaper, that gained very high profits, none of them survived till that moment, so it is essential to have a functioning product with real value to achieve success.

[1000alasan]

agree, the project product is not a guarantee that the project will succeed, but a professional development team that needs to be considered in a project, without the performance of the developer of course the products they make will not function properly.

[Strongkored]

I can say that what you said is true, many projects products look good but very disappointing when they are launched, even when the project products is good and also the team is very experienced they need a long time to be able to show that their product is going well for investors.

Currently seeing who is developer team really has to do because the project is good even though it is good in concept etc without the support of the development team experts in their fields can almost be sure it is only a concept without product.

[avikz]

In achieving the success of a project certainly influenced by several factors including organizational governance, project managers, project teams, project roadmaps, project partners and also what products they want to offer in the market.
especially the experience of the developer and the team because this is the core of the project. which will determine that the project can achieve success in the market if the project can be managed by an experienced team and developer. The experienced team is very influential on the success of the project, those who have long managed the project and have valid experience in the past certainly have a good background.
In addition partners are also very important because the larger the project partners, the more investors will join them.
but the problem is the products they offer on the market can't operate properly.

in this case I am more confident with the experience / performance of the developer team and the project, I doubt about the product! the fact is that projects that have quality products do not guarantee that they can work well in the market.

We have millions of project managers and developers and the success of a project certainly doesn't depend on them. That can give them some initial hype during their funding stage but nothing else! I personally have invested in few ICOs at the beginning of 2017 when the market was booming. But in reality, 70% of them never came out with a product. 30% of them came out with a really armature product which eventually went down to drain with thousands of negative reviews from disappointed users and angry investors.

I can give you a nice example of PryvateCoin. This ICO had an actual working product even before it came out for funding and the product was really amazing, a killer of whatsapp! However, the ICO could not take off and eventually the developers lost their interest on the product. It's still available in playstore, but not functioning anymore! Product quality is not the only thing, they also lack marketing skills!

[Maturnuwun]

product one of the thrones of a project, if the product has high quality many consumers will buy it, including investors like products that have a good function, if developers can create quality products and can function well as stated on their work map automatically investors will be interested to invest in it.

[Tipstar]

The prime reason for this is people are not doing ICO to fund for the product but are creating products so that they'll be able to start an ICO. Even though your motive is good and is serious on your work, if you don't have the expertise, don't raise funds to learn.

[Ccscopst]

Most projects that hold a decent ICO have something to show before you give them any money. It could be an MVP (minimum viable product), some strings of code, or at least some partnership with a respectable company. Any project that promises to use the raised funds for the development of a product is, at very best, trying to get some easy money. What they should do is develop their product further, not just start working on it.
and that's one of the things they need to consider if their project is to be successful and the products they create are sold out in the market.

[Rikotin]

the product is the most important part of the project because if the product has a good function, it shows that the developer can run their program correctly. but in this period many developers created quality products but did not produce good results.

[Kezacky]

project products that don't work well because the team can't develop their projects properly, but not all developers are like that. I think that developers who do not have experience in managing previous projects greatly affect the projects they currently manage, including products that fail, investors also will not be interested in the project.

[Coyster]

If you ask me I think the most important aspect of a project is the final product that they offer, that's the end that justifies the means.
A project cannot have a wonderful manager, good team, good developers and when their product gets to the market it's struggles to have a worth, that would only infuriate already existing investors and scare away other possible ones.

So in my opinion if a team has a good end product, it's growth would be accelerated and even those who weren't part of the project at the initial stage would love to join in and invest because now they can see a real project with a worthwhile product that could be good in the future.

[kram31]

Product will make the team continue working and the project to be better in the future.
This product is not that important at the start of the project.
You are very right, most investors are looking on the partnership they have and how they are launching their propose project.

[Bitbtc8]

In achieving the success of a project certainly influenced by several factors including organizational governance, project managers, project teams, project roadmaps, project partners and also what products they want to offer in the market.
especially the experience of the developer and the team because this is the core of the project. which will determine that the project can achieve success in the market if the project can be managed by an experienced team and developer. The experienced team is very influential on the success of the project, those who have long managed the project and have valid experience in the past certainly have a good background.
In addition partners are also very important because the larger the project partners, the more investors will join them.
but the problem is the products they offer on the market can't operate properly.

in this case I am more confident with the experience / performance of the developer team and the project, I doubt about the product! the fact is that projects that have quality products do not guarantee that they can work well in the market.

Its just like you've said that projects that have quality products do not guarantee the success of the project, your point says it all, it has come to the point where by you will see projects been managed by new teams with no past crypto experience ends up been a successful one than projects with pro teams,all this can't be predict either been a crypto investor or just a crypto trader so this is why we take risks

[wedosgibas]

A good product will not be created if team has no experience, of course they have experience even though it is still limited. And to cover this, project with a serious team will find suitable partners to support its products.

[jerrison]

remeber, ideas arent always regular as there is no need for them if thye were. you come up with something new and it is only you as the visioner and the man with the idea that can really comprehend what you intend to achieve and in  most cases, your achievement of that project is the global usage of the product so loads of sensitization has to be put in place and also your developers have to catch the aim and idea before giving you  perfect design. Logically, you have to create enough sensitization for people to see things the way you intend for them to.

[Stanlo]

Its absolute waste of time for any developer to build a project without good working product,unlike the past where its all about whitepaper of every projects now things have change drastically,if you can do your own research you will see that many ICO Projects are near their death after 2018 bear market took over and these projects are still struggling till date

[pandanaran]

a serious team will focus on the products they launch, for example investors before investing certainly see whether the products they make can function well? yes, if a project has a superior product structure it will attract a lot of investment in the market, but conversely if the product they launch looks bad, of course investors will not want to fund an unclear product.