CryptoSparks (OP)
Copper Member
Member
 Offline
Activity: 686
Merit: 39
|
 |
September 05, 2019, 05:39:54 PM
Last edit: December 07, 2019, 04:50:56 PM by CryptoSparks |
|
guigui371 LIVE TRIAL
HCP LIVE TRIAL
[FULL GUIDE] API KEY - WHAT is it , WHY you need it and HOW to create one ONEPAGER PDF
Why the red trust?The following post explains it in such a perfect way that i will just quote it. Please note that the user TECSHARE has no connection with our business, we actually never talked, but he/she understood perfectly what's going on this forum and represents a 3rd party opinion not driven by any personal interest.How many times do you I have to tell you that this isn't a court of law? Stop using terms like "innocent" and "guilty." Nobody here is thinking along those lines except for you. The fact stands you didn't even oppose the flag or try to work with theymos' new system. If you don't like it, cry to him about it, not us.
In short it seems as if you're intent on being the new resident Reputation troll.
As many times as you need to feel better about yourself I suppose. Innocent and guilty are very simple terms with clear meaning even outside of the legal system. Your semantic dance does nothing to change the fact that you have come to a conclusion first based on suspicion alone and are demanding that your suspicions be proven wrong rather than presenting actual evidence of malfeasance. This system of rule is the hallmark of totalitarians and dictators throughout history, and always results in many many more victims as those making the accusations almost never have any accountability if they are wrong. People aren't going to respect a system that is so arbitrary and open to abuse, resulting in even less people willing to play by the rules, thus creating even more breakdown of the community and people more willing to cheat and steal. I am absolutely working within Theymos's system, and furthermore I was one of the primary proponents of him introducing a standard of evidence of theft, contractual violation, or violation of applicable laws of which this new system is based upon in order to help prevent exactly these kind of arbitrary accusations. Y ou and your mob buddies are the ones not working within the system and are intent on raising your own profiles at the expense of the overall community which you pick out of a hat one by one to accuse.
This accusation is especially retarded as cryptocurrency is inherently a risky endeavor, let alone trading. You are attempting to enforce a standard that no one using a similar business model could ever meet. In effect you are dictating to this user what trading practices he may or may not use rather than bringing evidence of wrongdoing on their part. You might as well start tagging every gambling service if this is your standard of evidence. You and your wannabe internet police friends are the Bitcoin version of "permit Pattie." This is exactly what many people turn to cryptocurrency to escape, and here you are stripping that ability to have privacy, independence, and voluntary trade without 3rd party interference.Read the following threads for the full story: Flag - "CryptoSparks" Lending request or Partnership for FULLY Documentated Market Maker BOT [ROASTING]This forum has big problem with high rank spineless human beings [END]
     |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin mining is now a specialized and very risky industry, just like gold mining. Amateur miners are unlikely to make much money, and may even lose money. Bitcoin is much more than just mining, though!
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoSparks (OP)
Copper Member
Member
Offline
Activity: 686
Merit: 39
|
 |
September 05, 2019, 05:41:31 PM
Last edit: December 07, 2019, 04:17:11 PM by CryptoSparks |
|
|
|
|
|
Matt9301
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1008
|
|
September 05, 2019, 07:39:40 PM |
|
Is there any way to test it for free??
How can we believe in you?
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoSparks (OP)
Copper Member
Member
Offline
Activity: 686
Merit: 39
|
|
September 14, 2019, 07:42:57 AM |
|
Is there any way to test it for free??
How can we believe in you?
Hello, the bot is free to test 1 month, if you like it and want to keep it running,, only then you have to pay the commission. No need to believe me, there are 2 years of data you can download and dig into + you can access the test account via the api key in the 2nd post to verify trades are legit and real.
TRADES UPDATE 13th September 20195 WIN - 0 LOSS ROI: +1.7%  |
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3682
Merit: 3015
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
September 16, 2019, 01:29:53 AM |
|
Check trust of OP - just a simple HYIP scammer.
|
https://nastyscam.com - landing page up https://vod.fan - advanced image hosting - coming soon! OGNasty has early onset dementia; keep this in mind when discussing his past actions.
|
|
|
CryptoSparks (OP)
Copper Member
Member
Offline
Activity: 686
Merit: 39
|
|
September 16, 2019, 03:34:02 AM
Last edit: September 18, 2019, 08:22:17 PM by CryptoSparks |
|
Check trust of OP - just a simple HYIP scammer.
Ignorant troll detected. This thread shows why i have received 5 negative feedback in 24 hours While this is what our clients think of us: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5184519.msg52462616#msg52462616You should move that mirror out of the way then Really? Is that the "roasting" I was promised? You're gonna have to do better than that, son. While I have your attention, riddle me this: Why is a quantitative trading programmer begging for money here in the bitcointalk lending board? The ones I know started earning $125k right out of college, with no real-world experience. The good ones can earn half a million or more with bonuses. Something isn't adding up. And by the way; a vouch from your scammy alt isn't helping your case. Just an FYI.
False accusation here. Yes looks like someone is throwing the stone and hiding the hand. He deleted most of his posts. Thanks DireWolfM14, have been a pleasure. I add you to my roasted list, but remember that what happens on the internet stays on the internet. I'm collapsing my replies in a single post so he can't do anything to delete them reporting to a moderator as non-legit ups! There are so many little tricks going on this forum.... I genuinely think it is unfair for the DT people to give u red trust. For what it is worth here are my results of using the Arakne Bot since 2 september 2019.  Edit: I was also very skeptical about this invetsment at first. Now I have daily contact with this user and I trust him with managing my funds on Bitmex. Also he has only API key for trading, not for WITHDRAW. I think calling this user a PONZI owner is very strange because the funds never are fully in his control or away from bitmex. Anyway there is never a guarantee of profit, but is based on future predictions which have been turning out quite well. I have 100% winrate as of now with his trading algo.
It's also worth notice that we have been attacked by a lot of users related with the gambling section and services, which of course are direct competitors. I let everyone to decide what's better investment between :
A- gambling sites / games / casinos most of which are coded to make the player lose on the long term. Also you need to deposit and trust that they will not eventually exit scam or that will actually pay you.
B- sustainable and long term proved trading system with 96.5% win rate which makes small but safe trades and is able to exploit the compound effect and earn almost 500% in 20 months. ALL WHILE KEEPING FULL AND TOTAL CONTROL OF YOUR FUNDS ON YOUR OWN BITMEX ACCOUNT because the bot has only access to order creation via API KEY! And we are talking about Bitmex, the number 1 exchange , never hacked and with over 30k BTC in the insurance pool funded by liquidations. |
|
|
|
CryptoSparks (OP)
Copper Member
Member
Offline
Activity: 686
Merit: 39
|
|
September 18, 2019, 03:33:58 PM
Last edit: September 18, 2019, 08:15:28 PM by CryptoSparks |
|
In the new onepager there are all info and risks described with a bit more detail. Hopefully this will be easy enough for trolls to understand how with our current business model is technically impossible to build any ponzi or scam, simply because we never have access to funds. |
|
|
|
CryptoSparks (OP)
Copper Member
Member
Offline
Activity: 686
Merit: 39
|
|
September 21, 2019, 03:53:36 PM |
|
Time to celebrate the 1000 views in the LEGENDARY roasting show  TRADES UPDATE 21th September 20194 WIN - 0 LOSS ROI: +1.3%  API KEY STILL DISABLED BECAUSE WE ARE IN A NEW POSITION ALREADY |
|
|
|
Leeo711
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
September 22, 2019, 04:30:44 PM |
|
CryptoSparks i joined only for this, i sent u a msg via telegram, plz check it out.
I loved how u didn't bend the knees to who attacked u, but replied with wins.
|
|
|
|
|
DireWolfM14
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2170
Merit: 4237
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
|
|
September 22, 2019, 04:43:13 PM |
|
CryptoSparks i joined only for this, i sent u a msg via telegram, plz check it out.
I loved how u didn't bend the knees to who attacked u, but replied with wins.
There's nothing suspicious about that vouch. It couldn't be an alt of the OP. He's not so stupid to think that anyone would fall for such blatant shilling. [/sarcasm] Actually, he really is that stupid. Just go through his post history for proof. |
|
|
|
CryptoSparks (OP)
Copper Member
Member
Offline
Activity: 686
Merit: 39
|
|
September 22, 2019, 04:45:24 PM
Last edit: September 22, 2019, 04:58:59 PM by CryptoSparks |
|
CryptoSparks i joined only for this, i sent u a msg via telegram, plz check it out.
I loved how u didn't bend the knees to who attacked u, but replied with wins.
Thanks mate, i replied to you, welcome in the army! CryptoSparks i joined only for this, i sent u a msg via telegram, plz check it out.
I loved how u didn't bend the knees to who attacked u, but replied with wins.
There's nothing suspicious about that vouch. It couldn't be an alt of the OP. He's not so stupid to think that anyone would fall for such blatant shilling. [/sarcasm] Actually, he really is that stupid. Just go through his post history for proof. Still here loser? What about this Legendary? For the unbelievers, I have to share my status of using his Arakne bot. Back to back winning trades by CryptoSparks his bot. I want to thank you for running this bot on my bitmex account. My advise is to ignore the haters from now on. You know what they do: FUD and tell everyone it is a scam and than they develop their own bot as showed in the images. Funny that jealousy makes people do this kind of stuff. Trading is always risk vs reward. Until now I am still very glad I had opportunity to use his bot. Everyone here reading this. Decide for yourself if you want to use his service or not, I really don't care. Only thing that bothers me is the always constant negative bullshit he gets for his efforts.  Happy trading everyone  ARAKNE REACHED THE 5 BTC CAP WE WERE LOOKING TO MANAGE ON BITCOINTALK.
Subscription will be CLOSED AT MIDNIGHT, when the free vps deal expires.
Thanks to who took the risk and did his own research.
You guys are the reason why i haven't left this forum yet. TRADES UPDATE 22th September 20195 WIN - 0 LOSS ROI: +3.9%  |
|
|
|
FruitsBasket
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1017
|
|
September 22, 2019, 05:21:32 PM |
|
CryptoSparks i joined only for this, i sent u a msg via telegram, plz check it out.
I loved how u didn't bend the knees to who attacked u, but replied with wins.
There's nothing suspicious about that vouch. It couldn't be an alt of the OP. He's not so stupid to think that anyone would fall for such blatant shilling. [/sarcasm] Actually, he really is that stupid. Just go through his post history for proof. You are very smart[/sarcasm] LOL. I see you are jealous, probably a rekt hodler. Edit: I hope that you are not seriously so ignorant. I even offered to share read only api key, yet no one bothered to ask. So I sent screenshot with proofs and still u ignorant. |
fck@dt-alwayzz_newbz
|
|
|
CryptoSparks (OP)
Copper Member
Member
Offline
Activity: 686
Merit: 39
|
|
September 23, 2019, 05:59:57 AM
Last edit: November 07, 2019, 07:33:24 AM by CryptoSparks |
|
SUBSCRIPTIONS OFFICIALLY CLOSED
Join the waiting list to be notified in case new spots are available
https://t.me/Arakne  |
|
|
|
nutildah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 7909
|
|
September 23, 2019, 06:26:30 AM |
|
Wow, you made $11.33 in 20 days, that's terrific!  Watch out everybody, a market maker star is born!  It would appear that the majority of your trades were positive, so that is commendable. However, if you charge your clients 30% of the profits + a $10 VPN fee, while conducting the same trades for them via API, that means they are sitting on a net loss of $2.40. Maybe you can squeak out a few more trades before the end of the month to put them back at a net zero. |
|
|
|
CryptoSparks (OP)
Copper Member
Member
Offline
Activity: 686
Merit: 39
|
|
September 23, 2019, 06:56:56 AM
Last edit: September 23, 2019, 07:20:54 AM by CryptoSparks |
|
Wow, you made $11.33 in 20 days, that's terrific! Watch out everybody, a market maker star is born! It would appear that the majority ALL of your trades were positive, so that is commendable. However, if you charge your clients 30% of the profits + a $10 VPN fee, while conducting the same trades for them via API, that means they are sitting on a net loss of $2.40. Maybe you can squeak out a few more trades before the end of the month to put them back at a net zero. Buddy why you can't accept we are legit? The profits are in term of ROI %. With 100$ in the account you will never get rich with 20% per month on avg. The 100$ mark exists so the entry barrier is low, the people can test it and if they like it they deposit a real bankroll The higher the bankroll, the higher the profit. Is simple math. MarketMaking with 100$ is a joke even though still profitable thanks to compound, people with very low bankrolls should try our upcoming swing trading bot |
|
|
|
nutildah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 7909
|
|
September 23, 2019, 08:15:21 AM |
|
It would appear that the majority ALL of your trades were positive, so that is commendable.
Buddy why you can't accept we are legit? Because you keep lying. You had 4 losing trades, and even if the losses were so small they aren't reflected in your balance, they are still losses. How could you generate a negative Realised PNL without a losing trade? You don't have any verifiable data that demonstrates your bot is capable of profiting with larger amounts of bitcoin. All you have data on is your 7.615 mBTC deposit, which is less money than the minimum you are asking to participate. By the way, what is your advertised 495% ROI based on? 2 years of testing data? Testing of what? The exact same bot you have now with no modifications whatsoever? You should probably clarify this when advertising your service because that's part of what makes the whole thing look like a con. |
|
|
|
FruitsBasket
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1017
|
|
September 23, 2019, 08:24:00 AM |
|
Wow, you made $11.33 in 20 days, that's terrific! Watch out everybody, a market maker star is born! It would appear that the majority of your trades were positive, so that is commendable. However, if you charge your clients 30% of the profits + a $10 VPN fee, while conducting the same trades for them via API, that means they are sitting on a net loss of $2.40. Maybe you can squeak out a few more trades before the end of the month to put them back at a net zero. U have to think percentage wise lol. Anyway you are probably jealous and don' t know how his bot works and how Bitmex works. |
fck@dt-alwayzz_newbz
|
|
|
CryptoSparks (OP)
Copper Member
Member
Offline
Activity: 686
Merit: 39
|
|
September 23, 2019, 08:31:25 AM
Last edit: September 23, 2019, 08:49:56 AM by CryptoSparks |
|
It would appear that the majority ALL of your trades were positive, so that is commendable.
Buddy why you can't accept we are legit? Because you keep lying. You had 4 losing trades, and even if the losses were so small they aren't reflected in your balance, they are still losses. How could you generate a negative Realised PNL without a losing trade? You don't have any verifiable data that demonstrates your bot is capable of profiting with larger amounts of bitcoin. All you have data on is your 7.615 mBTC deposit, which is less money than the minimum you are asking to participate. By the way, what is your advertised 495% ROI based on? 2 years of testing data? Testing of what? The exact same bot you have now with no modifications whatsoever? You should probably clarify this when advertising your service because that's part of what makes the whole thing look like a con. You had 4 losing trades Wrong once again. I already explained what those negative PNL of 0.0001 mBTC ( 0.001$ loss) several times in the other Threads. There's a bug in the bitmex websocket's position endpoint. After several days without trades, the position value restores and the endpoint returns error when trying to access it. This causes the bots to crash. What's the solution until bitmex fixes the problem? Make instant 1 contract trades to unlock the endpoint. That 0.001$ loss is the fee paid as taker(necessary to close the "unlock trade" in less than 1 second) and the mathematical loss that come from the 0.5$ of spread between the ask and the bid. I have all kind of verifiable data, if you are unable to access a bitmex account via terminal is not my problem, but i will make an easy step by step guide when i will have some free time. You still don't understand what a Market Maker is , and why they REQUIRE HUGE AMOUNT OF CAPITALS. Please DYOR before making a fool of yourself over and over again. The 495% roi in 20 months is backtest, the exact same code that is running right now with 100% win rate. Before attacking the validity of backtest, please learn what they are and why they are mandatory for every legit bot. Thanks |
|
|
|
nutildah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 7909
|
|
September 23, 2019, 08:48:23 AM |
|
I already explained what those negative PNL of 0.0001 mBTC ( 0.001$ loss) several times in the other Threads.
There's a bug in the bitmex websocket's position endpoint. After several days without trades, the position value restores and the endpoint returns error when trying to access it. This causes the bots to crash. What's the solution until bitmex fixes the problem? Make instant 1 contract trades to unlock the endpoint. That 0.001$ loss is the fee paid as taker(necessary to close the "unlock trade" in less than 1 second) and the mathematical loss that come from the 0.5$ of spread between the ask and the bid.
Nevertheless, its still a loss. I have all kind of verifiable data, if you are unable to access a bitmex account via terminal is
not my problem, but i will make an easy step by step guide when i will have some free time.
No, you don't. You have 1 data set of a handful of trades made this month. Anything else you are referring to is non-applicable to the service you are offering in this thread. You still don't understand what a Market Maker is , and why they REQUIRE HUGE AMOUNT OF CAPITALS. Please DYOR before making a fool of yourself over and over again.
As defined by BitMEX a "market maker" is ANYBODY who places a limit order. You could place a limit order of 0.001 BTC and boom, voila, you are now a market maker. So the "requiring huge amount of capitals" idea is completely bogus. Perhaps don't be such an over-assuming ass if you don't want to make an ass of yourself over and over again. The 495% roi in 20 months is backtest, the exact same code that is running right now with 100% win rate. Before attacking the validity of backtest, please learn what they are and why they are mandatory for every legit bot.
You are just expecting people to take your word that you have not altered either the bot or the data set. Why can't you see the problem here? Again, all you actually have data on is your 7.615 mBTC deposit, which is less money than the minimum you are asking to participate. I see this as incredibly risky and would never touch what you are offering. Some people are lazy at heart and too enamored by the idea of "passive income" to dig deeper into what they are getting themselves involved in, so you will inevitably find new suckers to draw into your scheme. If you make them all broke, I can't help but think they deserved it. |
|
|
|
CryptoSparks (OP)
Copper Member
Member
Offline
Activity: 686
Merit: 39
|
|
September 23, 2019, 09:08:09 AM
Last edit: September 23, 2019, 09:30:43 AM by CryptoSparks |
|
I already explained what those negative PNL of 0.0001 mBTC ( 0.001$ loss) several times in the other Threads.
There's a bug in the bitmex websocket's position endpoint. After several days without trades, the position value restores and the endpoint returns error when trying to access it. This causes the bots to crash. What's the solution until bitmex fixes the problem? Make instant 1 contract trades to unlock the endpoint. That 0.001$ loss is the fee paid as taker(necessary to close the "unlock trade" in less than 1 second) and the mathematical loss that come from the 0.5$ of spread between the ask and the bid.
Nevertheless, its still a loss. I have all kind of verifiable data, if you are unable to access a bitmex account via terminal is
not my problem, but i will make an easy step by step guide when i will have some free time.
No, you don't. You have 1 data set of a handful of trades made this month. Anything else you are referring to is non-applicable to the service you are offering in this thread. You still don't understand what a Market Maker is , and why they REQUIRE HUGE AMOUNT OF CAPITALS. Please DYOR before making a fool of yourself over and over again.
As defined by BitMEX a "market maker" is ANYBODY who places a limit order. You could place a limit order of 0.001 BTC and boom, voila, you are now a market maker. So the "requiring huge amount of capitals" idea is completely bogus. Perhaps don't be such an over-assuming ass if you don't want to make an ass of yourself over and over again. The 495% roi in 20 months is backtest, the exact same code that is running right now with 100% win rate. Before attacking the validity of backtest, please learn what they are and why they are mandatory for every legit bot.
You are just expecting people to take your word that you have not altered either the bot or the data set. Why can't you see the problem here? Again, all you actually have data on is your 7.615 mBTC deposit, which is less money than the minimum you are asking to participate. I see this as incredibly risky and would never touch what you are offering. Some people are lazy at heart and too enamored by the idea of "passive income" to dig deeper into what they are getting themselves involved in, so you will inevitably find new suckers to draw into your scheme. If you make them all broke, I can't help but think they deserved it. Nevertheless, its still a loss. Is not a loss caused by the algo and is so small that has absolutely no value or impact on the overall ROI. Nice try Anything else you are referring to is non-applicable to the service you are offering in this thread. Learn what backtests are an why 600 trades over 20 months are valuable evidence. Furthermore the real 33 wins in a row in 3 weeks since launch is no handfull and is not luck. Is backtest accuracy. There's no way to prove the backtest accuracy without giving access to the source code to competent people. This will never happen because: a. source code will never ever ever be shared b. most of users in here, including yourself, are just... users. you know how to use SOME things, you have no idea how and why they work that way. But is ok. Is not your job. But at least avoid starting a witch hunt while you have very little knowledge in the sphere of interest. Accept to be wrong sometimes. I see this as incredibly risky and would never touch what you are offering. Some people are lazy at heart and too enamored by the idea of "passive income" to dig deeper into what they are getting themselves involved in, so you will inevitably find new suckers to draw into your scheme. If you make them all broke, I can't help but think they deserved it. Everything market related, has risks. You might find that risking on average 5% of all bankroll per position is too risky, but that's just your opinion. I have no other interest than bringing profits to my clients, simply because i earn only from their profits. I wonder why you never attack casinos and betting games that earn on users' loss and are CODED to make the player lose on long term. I wonder why you can't accept that there are systems and people able to make money from trading. 2 BLN daily volume on bitmex, and everybody is loosing money? You know right that those 2bln are the amount of money that winners take to losers? Also, do you think i would put my real funds on a public access account? That deposit is coming straight from a commission from another bot. Furthermore backtest shows that going bellow 7 mbtc as bankroll, would cause arakne to try marketmaking with less than 1 contract(which of course is impossible). this because the bot is so safe that the first entry put you at only 1% risk. Market Makers BOT are designed to provide liquidity and collecting the rebates. What kind of liquidity do you think you can provide with 100$ ? I like how the others are stupid and lazy, while you prove yourself to know absolutely nothing about market behaviors or our business model. Other users know you very well, you think you can damage my business with your flags and red trust? Your pathetic attempts only brought attention on Arakne, and all the points i debunked with knowledge,data and reputable sources only cleared more doubts that people could have had. Congratulations, you managed to type 4 paragraphs while saying nothing.
Just oppose the flag and be on with your day.
I don't have time to deal with another cryptohunter.
I see. So it is ok for you to run around making unsupported allegations, but supported allegations against your own behaviors are not acceptable. I think you need to prove to me you aren't involved in a protection racket because you seem to have a large ego and air of superiority. Perhaps I'd consider withdrawing my support after more evidence of his legitimacy has come to light.
Isn't this the exact opposite of the intended purpose of flags? I thought the evidence was supposed to be presented before supporting it, not create a conclusion and then build a narrative around it. You know, innocent until proven guilty, not your rep is toast until you can prove yourself/appease the mob. Guys, I know its way satisfying to hunt down dirt bags, but in the process you are degrading this community to a standard of mob justice and might makes right. This atmosphere not only drives out honest users, it creates constant chaos and conflict which is a great way for scam artists to hide in by not only easily diverting attention, but making it a simple task to target honest users who are resisting corruption. I know casting suspicion and hoping to be right is way easier than doing the research to prove it first, but this precedent of guilty until proven innocent needs to stop. This community highly values privacy, anonymity, autonomy, and decentralization, all things that are regularly stripped from users under this precedent. There are so few platforms left where there is even a chance of preserving these things. Don't let this forum be consumed by this malignant obsession with finding and punishing scammers at all costs, because they will ALWAYS be there, no matter how many you stop. Can you go hide under a rock now? Thanks  PEOPLE, LISTEN TO THIS USER THAT IS VERY WORRIED ABOUT YOUR MONEYWhy should you enter the markets with a proved system, better go BETTING on the service he spams everywhere. We all know how safe and profitable is bettingIf you are bettor, learn also how you can make money with that... but is WAY HARDER and WAY riskier than trading.  |
|
|
|
|
