Signature campaign managers have the most Alt accounts.

[joniboini]

What's the verdict? Is it to prevent possible connections on the campaign manager accounts? I don't know. But this is still sketchy.

CryptoMania should be able to answer it (or maybe theymos with the IP log data). But it seems like DontMe has managed their ANN thread, and possibly their communications on this forum. I guess they trusted DontMe.

So, either sent them an e-mail or ask on Telegram.

[crwth]

CryptoMania should be able to answer it (or maybe theymos with the IP log data). But it seems like DontMe has managed their ANN thread, and possibly their communications on this forum. I guess they trusted DontMe.

What bugs me the most is that there's even no warning that they would be changing "managers"/"accounts" in the old thread. This is the last post in the old thread before it was locked. Definitely not a warning message. Just out of the blue. Contacting the site would be ideal.

[magneto]

What's the verdict? Is it to prevent possible connections on the campaign manager accounts? I don't know. But this is still sketchy.

It's quite likely that they're still using Dontme as campaign manager, just under a new alt now, in my opinion. It's highly unlikely that the handover to any new campaign would be this smooth and unannounced, and happen within such a short period of time.

The owner of the site may well be informed of these series of events and continued to put their trust into Dontme, despite the allegations, since they wouldn't be negatively affected.

CryptoMania should be able to answer it (or maybe theymos with the IP log data). But it seems like DontMe has managed their ANN thread, and possibly their communications on this forum. I guess they trusted DontMe.

What bugs me the most is that there's even no warning that they would be changing "managers"/"accounts" in the old thread. This is the last post in the old thread before it was locked. Definitely not a warning message. Just out of the blue. Contacting the site would be ideal.

Contacting the site wouldn't yield anything probably since they would probably have vested interest not to tell the truth.

Anyhow, I don't really see a problem with participating in the campaign itself (if you are willing to take on the risk of non-payment), or any wrongdoing on the website's behalf per se. It's solely the reputation of Dontme that is at stake here.

[YOSHIE]

It's quite likely that they're still using Dontme as campaign manager, just under a new alt now, in my opinion. It's highly unlikely that the handover to any new campaign would be this smooth and unannounced, and happen within such a short period of time.

He said this and answered.

My Apologies to all of the old participants that I can’t inform everyone of you. I just told Dontme to delete it right away and I will manage it now. So, I am carefully accepting a new participants now that are good at quality post.

I will see the development of the campaign, if later on I find irregularities, lies, deception.
I will report it.

[PrimeNumber7]

A new account is created, SlotsCryptoMania, today.

Old thread was locked and content was deleted https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5185018.msg52468510#msg52468510

And a new Signature campaign thread was created https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5187424.0

ANNOUNCEMENT!!!
The 1st Signature Campaign Thread was deleted. This will be the new one. We are now again Open for all ranks and we will only accept good quality posters.

What's the verdict? Is it to prevent possible connections on the campaign manager accounts? I don't know. But this is still sketchy.

bakkang was banned this past spring. It is possible this was done out of fear of getting banned for ban evasion.

He is accepting people that generally make really bad posts, so I wouldn’t be surprised if he is the same person.

[logfiles]

What's the verdict? Is it to prevent possible connections on the campaign manager accounts? I don't know. But this is still sketchy.

Very suspicious and probable alt if i may say.

If it was the real owner as they claim. They would be so concerned about the reputation, and so they would probably have joined the discussion in this thread and tried to tell people about their way forward even before abruptly creating a new thread.

Also, I am wondering what they are going to do to the people who were already participating. What about they pay for the time they have spent advertising their business?

[YOSHIE]

Apparently, the new manager @ SlotsCryptoMania, also violates its own campaign rules. Trouble again.

Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5187424.msg52553456#msg52553456

http://archive.is/6KheD

Pay close attention to the rules made.

Rules and Requirements:

-Only constructive post will be counted.
-Negative trusts members can’t join the campaign.

Proof:



trust: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=808431

@HatakeKakashi



trust: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=333524

@numanoid

Look what he said.

Yes  and we are very strict to accept participants now.

~~~

I see from BPIP, Black.

~~~

Yes, maybe, you can't, but let it go.
I give what I see.

[Murat]

Apparently, the new manager @ SlotsCryptoMania, also violates its own campaign rules. Trouble again.

Both of the user's feedback is neutral. They didn't receive any feedback from DT members.

https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=HatakeKakashi

https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=numanoid

[Little Mouse]

@YOSHIE
I can't see negative DT tag on these profile you shared. May be you are using custom trust list and have added these persons in your trust list, or somebody from your trust list has added these persons in their trust list.