Bitcoin Forum
May 21, 2024, 08:58:57 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Payments on blockchain but not in Account  (Read 3462 times)
mattboldfield (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 17, 2014, 02:28:44 PM
 #21

ok just one of you's deal with me ok. PM your mate with your ideas but keep the channel clean so I can stop being overly confussed.
Let start again ok!
Can one of yous please look at what Im saying by Teamviewer please??
piotr_n
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2053
Merit: 1354


aka tonikt


View Profile WWW
March 17, 2014, 02:47:21 PM
 #22

Ok I will explain again, I am a newbie and half the talk your saying is going past my head about a million k's. Im not a retard, but you need to explain things simply to I get it.

All I got out of that is that one transaction has already been spent, and you agree that why does it not show.

Your confused about the isvalid as much as me!

I have already said -scan did not work and I done it twice. It scanned, but never showed the missing payments. How on earth can you expect the world to take Bitcoin seriously if these problems cannot be understood even by well seasoned user?? The sad part is I am out of pocket here! I seriously cant believe you said it doesn't matter that much!!

Well, for a starter, I am saying that there is no fucking way that your bitcoin client (working in a non-testnet mode) would return:
Code:
{
"isvalid" : false
}
... after
Code:
validateaddress 1JJA3L6UGUtrK3MzscbKdWFt8mrv6eHfkk

Either you found a bug in a piece of code that is very well tested (because completely wallet/chainstate independent) - or you cannot even execute a simple command properly.
Not to offend you, but knowing life, my odds are on the later.

In other words, paraphrasing you: how on earth can you expect anyone to take you seriously if the data you are providing are extremely hard to believe in?

Check out gocoin - my original project of full bitcoin node & cold wallet written in Go.
PGP fingerprint: AB9E A551 E262 A87A 13BB  9059 1BE7 B545 CDF3 FD0E
jl2012
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1097


View Profile
March 17, 2014, 02:55:39 PM
 #23

Ok I will explain again, I am a newbie and half the talk your saying is going past my head about a million k's. Im not a retard, but you need to explain things simply to I get it.

All I got out of that is that one transaction has already been spent, and you agree that why does it not show.

Your confused about the isvalid as much as me!

I have already said -scan did not work and I done it twice. It scanned, but never showed the missing payments. How on earth can you expect the world to take Bitcoin seriously if these problems cannot be understood even by well seasoned user?? The sad part is I am out of pocket here! I seriously cant believe you said it doesn't matter that much!!

Well, for a starter, I am saying that there is no fucking way that your bitcoin client (working in a non-testnet mode) would return:
Code:
{
"isvalid" : false
}
... after
Code:
validateaddress 1JJA3L6UGUtrK3MzscbKdWFt8mrv6eHfkk

Either you found a bug in a piece of code that is very well tested (because completely wallet/chainstate independent) - or you cannot even execute a simple command properly.
Not to offend you, but knowing life, my odds are on the later.

In other words, paraphrasing you: how on earth can you expect anyone to take you seriously if the data you are providing are extremely hard to believe in?

Interesting point Roll Eyes

EDIT: Well, I know what happened:

He ran

Code:
validateaddress <1JJA3L6UGUtrK3MzscbKdWFt8mrv6eHfkk>

Donation address: 374iXxS4BuqFHsEwwxUuH3nvJ69Y7Hqur3 (Bitcoin ONLY)
LRDGENPLYrcTRssGoZrsCT1hngaH3BVkM4 (LTC)
PGP: D3CC 1772 8600 5BB8 FF67 3294 C524 2A1A B393 6517
fsb4000
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 17, 2014, 03:03:35 PM
 #24

Code:
validateaddress 1JJA3L6UGUtrK3MzscbKdWFt8mrv6eHfkk
{
"isvalid" : true,
"address" : "1JJA3L6UGUtrK3MzscbKdWFt8mrv6eHfkk",
"ismine" : false
}
11inches
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
March 17, 2014, 03:31:07 PM
 #25

Ok I will explain again, I am a newbie and half the talk your saying is going past my head about a million k's. Im not a retard, but you need to explain things simply to I get it.

All I got out of that is that one transaction has already been spent, and you agree that why does it not show.

Your confused about the isvalid as much as me!

I have already said -scan did not work and I done it twice. It scanned, but never showed the missing payments. How on earth can you expect the world to take Bitcoin seriously if these problems cannot be understood even by well seasoned user?? The sad part is I am out of pocket here! I seriously cant believe you said it doesn't matter that much!!

Well, for a starter, I am saying that there is no fucking way that your bitcoin client (working in a non-testnet mode) would return:
Code:
{
"isvalid" : false
}
... after
Code:
validateaddress 1JJA3L6UGUtrK3MzscbKdWFt8mrv6eHfkk

Either you found a bug in a piece of code that is very well tested (because completely wallet/chainstate independent) - or you cannot even execute a simple command properly.
Not to offend you, but knowing life, my odds are on the later.

In other words, paraphrasing you: how on earth can you expect anyone to take you seriously if the data you are providing are extremely hard to believe in?

he just wasn't sure how to execute the command. he was able to validate it properly shortly after. the transactions in question which he says he is missing from his balance are ones labelled No Inputs (Newly Generated Coins) on the blockchain. to the best of my knowledge, newly generated coins require 100-120 confirmations
mattboldfield (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 17, 2014, 03:32:29 PM
 #26

hi all, ok 11inches  recons that they payments are still being processed and yes

validateaddress 1JJA3L6UGUtrK3MzscbKdWFt8mrv6eHfkk
Gave back true, so I must have did what jl2012 said after all.

Swearing at your frustration.....lol....so funny!!


THX TO EVERYBODY!! WILL UPDATE AFTER TALKING TO ELIGUIS.
cheers!




mattboldfield (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 17, 2014, 03:45:50 PM
 #27

You know the bit I don't get is why

2014-03-03 - confirmed
2014-03-07- not confirmed
2014-03-10 - confirmed
2014-03-12 - confirmed
2014-03-15 - not confirmed

all were for pretty much the same amounts.

That link you gave said he did receive the payment just not available for spend.
I simply haven't received those above two payments, anyway will send off email now.
crazynoggin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 176
Merit: 100



View Profile
March 17, 2014, 03:57:42 PM
 #28

Got to love how the guy titles the top of this as a major bug in Bitcoin-QT when he really had no idea what he was doing..

Use my referral link if you want: https://primedice.com/?ref=Crazynoggin
mattboldfield (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 17, 2014, 04:29:41 PM
 #29

I haven't got to the end of this yet genius!
machinationus
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100



View Profile
March 17, 2014, 11:03:26 PM
 #30

hi, yes it all looks ok, but when I check under mined only 3 of the 5 payments come up.
The ones missing are at the top of the post.
Also that amount missing is not in their whatsoever. Shocked

happy to use teamviewer if you wish


REALLY?
You use "Teamviewer"
EXPECT to be very Ripped off!

mattboldfield (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 18, 2014, 03:45:39 AM
Last edit: March 18, 2014, 06:37:11 AM by mattboldfield
 #31

hi, yes it all looks ok, but when I check under mined only 3 of the 5 payments come up.
The ones missing are at the top of the post.
Also that amount missing is not in their whatsoever. Shocked

happy to use teamviewer if you wish


REALLY?
You use "Teamviewer"
EXPECT to be very Ripped off!

hi,
Funny you say that, I can tell someone had reconnected last night. The thx for playing popup was on the screen when I turned it on today.
Logfiles had also been deleted.
I have changed the codes now, but I will go reinstall my backup to be sure. Money is still their, but I really don't have anything to ripoff
Scary part is I doubt it was 11 inch's at all, be too obvious. Which only leaves mods that could have seen my P.M.
hmmm Bitcoin - really should have been called Scamcoin!
mattboldfield (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 18, 2014, 03:53:21 AM
Last edit: March 21, 2014, 01:39:47 AM by mattboldfield
 #32

Just received a PM from someone called "freshly picked flower" with ZERO activity

hey there,

im 99% sure i know what the issue is...i get the same problem with egilius. its a simple bug fix in ur local client. if you still need help with it, ill gladly take you up on the teamviewer offer and fix it real quick. let me kno

thx




Please try much harder you scammer!
mattboldfield (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 03:47:03 PM
Last edit: March 21, 2014, 01:58:08 PM by mattboldfield
 #33

Just a quick update, I still have not received a reply from Eliguis.
I also received a new payment yesterday from mining at Eliguis. Funnily enough It went straight through to my wallet.
I hope you bigwigs are still here for me if Eliguis can't explain, because honestly I don't think its a processing holdup.

Oh, and in regards to one of the mods trying to hack me, well today an attempt was made on email account.

Wednesday, March 19, 2014 1:38:31 AM UTC
IP Address: 176.61.140.133
Location: Chicago, IL, USA

But already they have given up!
Such a bitchslap when the only arsenal left is spam!

I'm not happy I tell you.
Press connections I have are very interested though!
zee112212
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 65
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 04:10:05 PM
 #34

The title is very misleading. lol
mattboldfield (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 04:40:34 PM
Last edit: March 21, 2014, 01:36:58 AM by mattboldfield
 #35

I hope you are right, please entertain me with the answer then?

Yes as I thought, re: above comment, no answers to give!!

For anyone else that wants to bomb my thread, if you don't have a solution, please refrain from making yourself look STUPID!
mattboldfield (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 21, 2014, 01:04:19 AM
Last edit: March 21, 2014, 01:34:56 AM by mattboldfield
 #36

Hi, this is the reply I got from Eliguis:

Sounds like a problem with your wallet software/provider. Eligius has sent the payments, its up to your wallet or service to account for them.



Right, I am still in deliberation with Eliguis, but its not looking good so far.
Also have updated to latest V9 Qt and no change has been made!
machinationus
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100



View Profile
March 21, 2014, 11:56:47 PM
 #37

I would not blame Eligius as some one can see all the public address's there
Hey I lost 0.047 so I turned the donations to 99% and they still paid the mining
fee to the wallet thief! 14gFWFSg9dxARw2khji4bnJmUYQp56aXbC

mattboldfield (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 22, 2014, 05:36:30 AM
Last edit: March 22, 2014, 05:51:54 AM by mattboldfield
 #38

No, I definitely don't blame Eliguis, I blame a major bug in the bitcoin-qt app and Eliguis also confirm this.
As already stated the payments are on the blockchain, just not in my wallet or even recognised by my wallet.
I also have reinstalled a backup and reinstalled the updated QT twice. Once on my O/S and once on my backed up O/S AND the its the exact same thing - The deposits have never made it to the wallet!
Look at all the people rushing to my defence around here-NOT!

They hope ignoring me will make it all go away. But they are in for a rude shock!
I simply cant tell enough people to stay away from this cryptocoin B.S.!
Its just a giant scam! Its had 4 years to come to fruition and nothing. Funniest part is all the Altcoin idiots thinking their coins will be viable when BITRIP can't even be taking seriously and is flawed.




dowsey14
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 22, 2014, 06:59:24 AM
 #39

Matt,

Open the Bitcoin-QT client.

Wait for the blockchain to synchronize.

Go to your receive tab, copy the receiving address or the address that your coins were supposed to be sent to, we'll call this YourAddress.
Is it 1JJA3L6UGUtrK3MzscbKdWFt8mrv6eHfkk ?
If it is, then use that one.

Open up the debug console window, and type

dumpprivkey YourAddress

You should see the private key for that address. If it's not there, you don't have access to any coins at that address.
mattboldfield (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 22, 2014, 08:44:51 AM
 #40

It says:
Private key for address 1JJA3L6UGUtrK3MzscbKdWFt8mrv6eHfkk is not known (code -4)

So that means what?? because the last two payments I received ok and I have transferred to and from this account with no problem.

Where are the payments?Huh Why do they not show up in mined or wallet?
Why do the two missing payments on eliguis show up with a (S) in front of them and all payments I received have a (G) in front of them. Why is Eliguis saying its a wallet issue.

These are some of the reasons Bitrip can't succeed, Whom in their right mind can be bothered with this crap? I go to shop I give you cash I go home with item, this is just simply stupid!




Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!