feryjhie loan default

[DarkStar_]

feryjhie took a loan from me on May 30, 2019. After requesting extensions and promising to repay soon, I never got a repayment. The last time we talked was August 9th, though he did logon at a later date to attempt to claim his LOTEO bounty rewards (which was blocked with the help of sapta and roycilik).

I was scammed for 0.006BTC (and interest) from feryjhie defaulting the loan. The coins were sent via this transaction. I have left them a negative trust feedback and am creating this thread to create a flag. (Please support!)

[1714767580]

1714767580

[logfiles]

Flag supported from my side.
The user seems to have a very bad past record of late loan payments and at times only pays after a scam accusation has been opened against him/her.

I was curious about the transaction in the user's address: https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/address/3FERY5GPg4e1KwxXPKb2pb46tntR44U3st
Turns out he even received 0.01 BTC in that very address on 1st July which was more than enough to repay the loan, but never bothered to save his/her reputation by repaying the loan at that time.
He/she instead just spent the BTC

[TalkStar]

I don't know how could some default a loan just for 0.006BTC. Such a cheap mentality they got which always push them to commit something like this.

Flag supported from my end and hopefully others gonna do the same for this user.

Hopefully i will add this loan defaulter details on ★ List of Proven Scammers ( Bitcointalk users Only) ★.
@Darkstar_ you may take a look on this thread for getting information about all loan defaulters of bitcointalk.

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

Now this is foolishness as this user is a Hero member with quite some merit earned meaning he would had been eligible to participate in any campaign to get the funds needed to payback the loan. Just two week of participating in a signature campaign would had clean that loan plus interest that's if user was interesting. Hero members are recieving around that amount weekly on almost all campaign I'm seeing.

Nevertheless, tagged and supported flag, don't think there's a reasonable excuse not to tagged him. Assuming he has not login then that would had been an excuse. Sorry for your lost OP.

[DarkStar_]

Now this is foolishness as this user is a Hero member with quite some merit earned meaning he would had been eligible to participate in any campaign to get the funds needed to payback the loan. Just two week of participating in a signature campaign would had clean that loan plus interest that's if user was interesting.

They did try to apply to numerous campaigns without any success. I'm guessing that was their plan, but in the end they decided that the ~$60 USD was worth more than an account that couldn't get accepted into any major campaign. Perhaps things would be different if Yobit's much easier to enter campaign was open at the time.

Sorry for your lost OP.

Thanks. Fortunately this loss was quite small compared to other loans I've given and I do have the potential of recovering at least part of the lent funds from their LOTEO bounty.

[ryzaadit]

-snip

-snip-

Just checked his trust page, at 2014-2015 he also defaulted the loan 2 times, before the trust system introduce to bitcointalk he already receives a few negative trusts. Also at his trust page there have some "Warning" from @Muhammed Zakir the account probably Sold/Hacked/Change Hand.

To be honest its kinda weird, @Darkstar_ accepted the loan requested based on his trust score, Maybe considering his earned merits i think. Just my 2 cents his merit earned for build a bit reputation for him to participate at Bitcoin Signature Payment / Loan Requested.

Thanks. Fortunately this loss was quite small compared to other loans I've given and I do have the potential of recovering at least part of the lent funds from their LOTEO bounty.

Good luck Darkstar,

Really glad @sapta & @roycilik can help your problem.

[JeromeTash]

To be honest its kinda weird, @Darkstar_ accepted the loan requested based on his trust score, Maybe considering his earned merits i think. Just my 2 cents his merit earned for build a bit reputation for him to participate at Bitcoin Signature Payment / Loan Requested.

I doubt if it was based on just merit. He probably just tried to give the user a benefit of doubt given the requested amount wasn't abnormally a lot... but it's kind of silly for the loan defaulter to lose such an old account just because of 0.006 BTC.

He could have got even more than that from a signature campaign within 1 week. He is the one who has lost, more than Darkstar_