Self-made Legendary Observer - another well-deserved Legendary-xtraelv,Congrats!

[tbct_mt2]

I also read all posts from all Chipmixer participants (including you) because Chipmixer participants are considered to be the best posters. Chipmixer signature is like a batch now and helps in earning merits faster, so to ranking...

The first part is right but the second part is wrong. Applicants of ChipMixer must be very good posters to be accepted as participants. I meant they have to be very qualifying before getting acceptance from the manager of ChipMixer (DarkStar_) so they do have very good ability to earn merits.

I don't think the same user will earn more merits in the same period simply because becoming ChipMixer's participant and wearing ChipMixer signature.

[1714005922]

1714005922

[1714005922]

1714005922

[1714005922]

1714005922

[akamit]

I also read all posts from all Chipmixer participants (including you) because Chipmixer participants are considered to be the best posters. Chipmixer signature is like a batch now and helps in earning merits faster, so to ranking...

The first part is right but the second part is wrong. Applicants of ChipMixer must be very good posters to be accepted as participants. I meant they have to be very qualifying before getting acceptance from the manager of ChipMixer (DarkStar_) so they do have very good ability to earn merits.

I don't think the same user will earn more merits in the same period simply because becoming ChipMixer's participant and wearing ChipMixer signature.

Of course, they are quality posters and I don't doubt that and I also don't doubt DS's selection criteria. Those participants would not have got accepted in the first place if they weren't quality posters. My point was different, it's something like psychological I guess if I used the correct word. Chipmixer participants earn more merits than any other campaign participants.

As an example, Cryptotalk participants, do you think they will get more or equal merits the same as Chipmixer participants just because they wore Cryptotalk Signature? Whereas the whole forum keeps tagging one thing "Cryptotalk participants are SPAMMERS"... How many threads do you think are there about Cryptotalk? Don't you think there are quality posters? but they are just buried somewhere, they are barely get recognized because of the actual spammers, the only reason is they wore Cryptotalk signature.


I forget to mention other merit earning aspects in my previous post.

• Friends (not talking about abuse)
• Fans
• Country Man - Local boards (again not talking about abuse)

and so on. 

Those who are earning merits fast to faster, at light speed are either Meta, Rep, BH, WO, Local Boards posters or posting in all and are Chipmixer participants.

As an example, I miss my local board because I can't post there for some reason. If I could post there than I'd have earned more merits, right? So each member has their limitation which will affect their ranking.

[LoyceV]

As an example, Cryptotalk participants, do you think they will get more or equal merits the same as Chipmixer participants just because they wore Cryptotalk Signature? Whereas the whole forum keeps tagging one thing "Cryptotalk participants are SPAMMERS"... How many threads do you think are there about Cryptotalk? Don't you think there are quality posters? but they are just buried somewhere, they are barely get recognized because of the actual spammers, the only reason is they wore Cryptotalk signature.

Your signature on a forum says a lot about you, so if someone wears a "badge of honour", people are more likely to read their posts than someone who wears a "badge of spammers".
I've merited some posts with Cryptotalk signature lately, but I've probably reported more of them, or deleted them from my self-moderated threads.

[tbct_mt2]

Of course, they are quality posters and I don't doubt that and I also don't doubt DS's selection criteria. Those participants would not have got accepted in the first place if they weren't quality posters. My point was different, it's something like psychological I guess if I used the correct word. Chipmixer participants earn more merits than any other campaign participants.

It is clearer with your explanation. Previously, it is easily to infer your previous post in the way that users will earn merits faster after becoming Chipmixer's participants. I could be wrong in the way I inferred your previous post but I don't think I inferred it inappropriately.

People send merits to quality posts which deserve merits not because of posters wear ChipMixer signature. I (and others) can wear ChipMixer signature too but it does not help me earning merits faster. Different classes of users have different ability and speed of merit earning.

Anyway, thanks for the explanation and I eventually understood what you wanted to point out.
In other aspect, I agree that becoming ChipMixer's participants require them to maintain their post-quality as stably high as possible. Somehow it passively increases ChipMixer's participants' post quality over time but the process is very difficult to realize shortly.

[fillippone]

Your signature on a forum says a lot about you, so if someone wears a "badge of honour", people are more likely to read their posts than someone who wears a "badge of spammers".

I am wearing no signature.
I have my dearest posts in my signature.
I actively refused to wear some signature campaign proposed to me.
If I wear a campaign in the future, I don't think it will alter my posting habits, so I guess my merit flows will be untouched.

I will wear my signature campaign as a "badge of honour", indipendently by the merit or coin flows it will guarantee to me.

[DdmrDdmr]

I’ve just gone over the Top 50 merited profiles over the last 30 days, and the leading signature is “None or Personal”, followed by a neck-and-neck tie between Chipmixer and Cryptotalk.

The point being that Chipmixer for sure has good posters, but looking at it from a broader view, they represent 16% of the top merited over the past 30 days – the same as CryptoTalk (a larger perspective may change the ratios, but the 30 day one is pretty easy to do). 40% of the list don’t have a campaign signature.

Code:

Row Labels                    Count of Signature
Bitcasino                     1
Bitvest                       1
Blender                       2
Blochchain                    1
Bustadice                     2
Chipmixer                     8
CryptoTalk                    8
Digital Gold                  1
Irony attempt Signature       1
Majestic                      1
Match 365                     2
None or Personal              20
Smart Mixer                   1
Sportsbet                     1
Grand Total                   50

List:

Code:

Merits 30 days                Signature
348: theymos                  None or Personal
265: Corrosive                None or Personal
237: LoyceV                   Chipmixer
206: fillippone               None or Personal
196: Yatsan                   Blender
195: Steamtyme                Chipmixer
181: suchmoon                 Chipmixer
174: Kalemder                 Digital Gold
159: sirazimuth               None or Personal
155: Rikafip                  Bitvest
147: zasad@                   None or Personal
134: Icygreen                 CryptoTalk
134: mikeywith                Chipmixer
130: gmaxwell                 None or Personal
124: Foxpup                   None or Personal
123: micgoossens              None or Personal
121: Ratimov                  None or Personal
120: Laskoo                   None or Personal
118: xtraelv                  None or Personal
116: tk808                    None or Personal
115: kzv                      Irony attempt Signature
112: yogg                     Chipmixer
109: SpendingBitcoin          None or Personal
108: Last of the V8s          None or Personal
106: Basorexia                None or Personal
101: yahoo62278               CryptoTalk
99: masulum                   Smart Mixer
98: TwitchySeal               None or Personal
97: achow101                  None or Personal
93: pooya87                   Chipmixer
93: madnessteat               CryptoTalk
92: Mitchell                  Majestic
91: samcrypto                 Bustadice
91: igor72                    CryptoTalk
90: Hal                       None or Personal
88: nutildah                  Sportsbet
88: LFC_Bitcoin               Bitcasino
87: Carlton Banks             None or Personal
86: iasenko                   Chipmixer
84: sujonali1819              Match 365
82: Xal0lex                   Blochchain
82: GreatArkansas             Blender
80: Darker45                  Match 365
79: A-Bolt                    CryptoTalk
79: FontSeli                  CryptoTalk
78: o_e_l_e_o                 Chipmixer
78: Bttzed03                  CryptoTalk
77: BitcoinFX                 None or Personal
77: witcher_sense             CryptoTalk
77: Lakai01                   Bustadice

Note 1: I may have misinterpreted a corporate signature for a personal case in a case or two.
Note 2: I’m not even on the list, after hitting my ATL (excluding my first month or so here)

[fillippone]

Note 2: I’m not even on the list, after hitting my ATL (excluding my first month or so here)

There, my last smerit has gone.
Well deserved.
You made a sense of your personal text.

[The-One-Above-All]

I also read all posts from all Chipmixer participants (including you) because Chipmixer participants are considered to be the best posters. Chipmixer signature is like a batch^[1] badge now and helps in earning merits faster, so to ranking...

Nobody with any kind of  knowledge here considers chipmixer spammers here to be the best posters.

Chipmixer sig spammers are predominantly SHIT POSTERS and low functioning CORRUPT dregs. There are a tiny handful of reasonable Chipmixer spammers but the best posters on this forum would NEVER SPAM SIGS here.

Just because you likely are far too low functioning to realize most of their spurious garbage is net negative that is no reason to feltch your garbage all over the place. We have challenged plenty of chipmixer sig spammers to present their best original thought inspiring posts for analysis. Most ran away. They are just backscratching corrupt scum who lodge themselves on DT and cycle merit and trust inclusions.

@ iamsenko or whatever...

CHANGE THE TITLE if you are not really going to make it AFTER the merit system. You can not say AFTER the merit system if you were airdropped ANY merit.

You need to have joined AFTER THE MERIT system right? or did not receive ANY airdropped merit.

Although it is hilarious to see SELF CYCLED noob "Legendary" or " heros" seemingly dreaming they are some kind of superior breed ....haha you do realize MOST of the REAL achievements here were made by premerit legends that have hardly any of this crappy cycled merit? Look at all the big developers, REAL scam hunters, etc  all old members that hardly have any cycled merits.

I mean how SLOW and RETARDED would you have to be to not find out about bitcoin for the first 7+ years hahah.....

self made = dumb shits who were too stupid to realize bitcoin existed for years on end. ...... well done dummies. Thanks for coming 7 years after the party started just to claim only you guys are the smartest and best because now you can feltch, beg and spam to get some bitcoin dust that we all got for 100x less.

RULZ legends

LULZ legends

[mikeywith]

I mean how SLOW and RETARDED would you have to be to not find out about bitcoin for the first 7+ years hahah.....

To many people , bitcoin does not revolve around this very forum, I do not claim to have known bitcoin 1 week after Satoshi published the bitcoin whitepaper,it took me many years to get involved, but i have learned about bitcoin long before i sign up to the forum, I used to search for many things , mostly mining related and I was always directed to this forum, i, like many others , used to get what I wanted and leave, i was more into facebook and telegram groups, and to be honest the forum with this old SMF style was never tempting enough.

In fact even when I decided to sign up to bitcointalk, it was mainly for the market place and nothing else, but then suddenly and out of nowhere, i started to be active here and decided to give back, i contributed a lot to the forum specially the mining section, never bothered applying for any signature campaign for almost a year despite having earned tons of merit.

I also think what's worse than not knowing about bitcoin early enough, is knowing about it and not owning enough of it  ,  if you knew bitcoin when it was pretty cheap and you don't own a lambo by now, then you don't have the right to mock new comers.

I am sure I saw your name in my list!
 

What list is that? i haven't received any notification regarding that  

[fillippone]

I am sure I saw your name in my list!
 

What list is that? i haven't received any notification regarding that  

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5200519.msg53050251#msg53050251

I thought you were referring to that list in your previous comment.

[suchmoon]

The point being that Chipmixer for sure has good posters, but looking at it from a broader view, they represent 16% of the top merited over the past 30 days – the same as CryptoTalk (a larger perspective may change the ratios, but the 30 day one is pretty easy to do). 40% of the list don’t have a campaign signature.

At last count, Cryptotalk had nearly 10 times as many members as Chipmixer.

Last 30 days are heavily skewed by the art contest. I don't know if that favors Chipmixer or Cryptotalk though.

[mk4]

What I wanted to say is that for some newbies and old members it may take a long time to rank to Legendary. Even some members will never reach that rank because either they will retire from this forum or will be dead.

Yeah, sure it is difficult. 1000 merits is definitely no joke. But I'm referring to mostly to those users have been registered for more than 2 years and with like 300+ activity points, and are complaining on how impossible it is to earn merit even though 90% of their posts are on bounty/airdrop threads. I get your point though.

[The-One-Above-All]

I mean how SLOW and RETARDED would you have to be to not find out about bitcoin for the first 7+ years hahah.....

To many people , bitcoin does not revolve around this very forum, I do not claim to have known bitcoin 1 week after Satoshi published the bitcoin whitepaper,it took me many years to get involved, but i have learned about bitcoin long before i sign up to the forum, I used to search for many things , mostly mining related and I was always directed to this forum, i, like many others , used to get what I wanted and leave, i was more into facebook and telegram groups, and to be honest the forum with this old SMF style was never tempting enough.

In fact even when I decided to sign up to bitcointalk, it was mainly for the market place and nothing else, but then suddenly and out of nowhere, i started to be active here and decided to give back, i contributed a lot to the forum specially the mining section, never bothered applying for any signature campaign for almost a year despite having earned tons of merit.

I also think what's worse than not knowing about bitcoin early enough, is knowing about it and not owning enough of it  ,  if you knew bitcoin when it was pretty cheap and you don't own a lambo by now, then you don't have the right to mock new comers.

I am sure I saw your name in my list!
 

What list is that? i haven't received any notification regarding that  

Thanks mikey for helping support what we said.

Bitcoin did revolve around this forum 7yrs ago pretty much and this is still really the center of the crypto movement. Your story is rather peculiar..so although you knew about bitcoin years ago, you did not buy it when it was cheap because you didn't want to join the board and contribute then but rather you just wanted to " get what you want and leave"?  back then(whilst others were single handed forcing huge scams to offer 2 000 000 000 usd compensation offers to the board or fighting to introduce fair launch protocols or making people into millionaires) but now you decided to join and spam chipmixer based on some gamed and cycled merit score then they ( real achievers)  can not point out the obvious that most noobs are fools that have achieved nothing except ass licking scammers here and proving they will support their scamming  actions and make excuses for their undeniably financially dangerous behaviors.......for what reason exactly??  As we said most "self made" legends are non achieving scammer supporting sig spamming moronic scum bags.  SELF MADE = nothing burger noob. Of course feel free to prove us wrong. We are not aiming that at you specifically but since once again you wish to wade in and make some strange comments then you have involved yourself.

If people have been here on this forum since 2012 ish (or known about bitcoin for years on end, but didn't join due to the forum layout haha) then yes if they are not multi millionaires  then certainly they are fools that were either not true believers or have been suckered into stupid alt icos that parted them from their btc.

There are a handful of people that have moved up via the merit rankings near hero /legend that are not total and utter dregs and scammer supporting ass lickers ( only the scammers that give them merits and are on DT of course) but that would be a tiny tiny fraction of those on meta board if any at all.

The big achievers here that made any real differences, are the pre merit legend/heros or were here long before the moronic merit system was sharted upon the members. You didn't realize bitcoin/crypto was a thing and didn't get involved until after the merit system = lol

Good to see suchmoon still making a total idiot of her revolting self  After stating " good poster" and " bad poster" are meaningless terms without strict definition and criteria. Is still here making posts that are conflating high merit with good post. NOW SPAMMING CHIPMIXER too haha  no lambos for suchmoon it seems, perhaps a lambo tractor could handle her anyway. Keep spamming and saving your bitcoin dust suchmoon.

When is the thread title being changed ? you can't be " after" the merit system if you had air dropped merits can you?

The largest achievers here are PRE MERIT LEGENDS many of which have hardly ANY cycled merits,compared to the non achieving ass feltching noob lengeds/heros in meta that willingly and knowingly support scammers here.

[TheBeardedBaby]

There are yet no Legendariles, after the last 14 days cycle update. I'll keep an eye on the suchmoon's list and will update if there is any change.

[TheBeardedBaby]

No legendary yet, but we entered the competition now, some of us crossed the activity line for ranking up all we have now is just luck.
I would like to aks suchmoon to update the list, I prefer their format

[o_e_l_e_o]

Seems I won the activity requirement lottery, and ranked up on just my second eligible activity increase (784, 798).

Happy new year to me

[fillippone]

Seems I won the activity requirement lottery, and ranked up on just my second eligible activity increase.(786, 798).

Happy new year to me

You have long been a legendary member of the forum. Now the tag only confirms that. Grinding activity is way more easy and boring than grinding merits.
Congratulations.

Edit: according to BPIP.org your promotion has the positive side effect to make me the second highest merited hero member after ddmrddmr. Nice.

[TheBeardedBaby]

Seems I won the activity requirement lottery, and ranked up on just my second eligible activity increase.(786, 798).

Happy new year to me

Whoohoo, congratulations. That was a great new year surprise. I'll update the OP with this great news tomorrow.
Wish you all a great and successful new year.

[GazetaBitcoin]

Congrats oeleo! You achieved something almost impossible. Like unobtanium

And you totally deserved it!

[TheBeardedBaby]

No one on the second place yet. Oeleo had incredible luck, who do you think will be the next one to rank up to Legendary? I preferr the suchmoon's list from my second post