Open letter to bounty managers

[eoni]

Well, i'm new member and it's my first post. i have registered here from a bounty program. And i agree, quantity is not quality. 2 or 3 great interventions should be enough, instead of a lot of "nothing".

[1715217788]

1715217788

[1715217788]

1715217788

[rhomelmabini]

I'm curious if the OP is referring to all managers as "bounty Managers" or if he/she is talking strictly about bounty campaigns?

As far as just bounty campaigns go, being as a lot of those users are going to post in the altcoin boards and clutter the hell out of those boards, I could see advocating for lowered weekly minimums for bounty campaigns.

There is a 3rd option here though. You can always go get an actual job and not worry about having to post a weekly minimum on here.

I guess he is referring to all bounty managers that handling signature campaigns may it be paid by shitcoins or bitcoins.

The thing is even if it lessen or lowered the minimum posts per week this users just post to meet the required quantity without even thinking what they post if spam or off topic. I guess this is a sluggish reason on creating this open letter by just lowering the minimum required posts. Because, if you already know that manager required that x amount, then why bother sent an application in the first place if you find it tiresome to do so?

Exactly. Find a stable job, keep married with it and never bother to apply any sig camps here anymore, it's that simple to do.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

You can't post on child boards when promoting a signature campaign , its been stated in the bounty rules that posts made on any child boards will not be counted

I think you mean local boards, because child boards are just subsections, like Reputation is a child board of Trading Discussion--someone correct me if I'm wrong with that example as I'm just writing this off the top of my head.

Look at all the shitposts in this thread, written in garbage English and with little thought put into them.  Know why?  It's because bounty hunters generally know how to write about only a few topics, and bounty hunting is one of them.  Fifteen posts per week should be just fine for members to handle and not spam.  The problem is that everyone has alts enrolled in bounties, and so they're managing who knows how many accounts, each cranking out the maximum number of posts. 

The max number of paid posts for the Chipmixer campaign is 50, and there are plenty of members who can hit that number and still have every single post be decent.  If you can't make all fifteen of your weekly posts constructive, the problem lies with you, not the bounty or campaign.

[CarnagexD]

I think the number of post is not a problem but I like the suggestion to lower the minimum so people will not be force to post just to hit the quota.

  I still don't know why these people are keep complaining about the rules for bounty, If you know you can't keep the work on your job why did you apply then? As far as I know bounty managers are not responsible on the campaign rules, they are just based on forum rules which abide the the rules of bitcointalk. They are on staking, checking and reporting.

Let's get real here, we know there's a lot of bounty hunters that are just posting non sense just to pass the requirement weekly so they can get a stake, so I think the process should start in the selection process, bounty managers should give time to to do a manual selection process.

Having that said, manual selection process will take a lot of time to do since there are approximately a hundreds of bounty hunter in a single campaign, even a thousand if it is known and big campaign.
What could be an effective solution is that general ruling for campaign should be, participants must scatter their post on different sections making the signatures appear on every sections. It is an eye sore seeing the same poster just right after the thread you've read into talking about nonsense matter.

[The Cryptovator]

Opps! I am not going to feeding OP with merits. @OP, can I ask why you have wear signature if you heat weekly requirements. Who are forcing you? No one, right ? So don't join any campaign if you feel uncomfortable. Someone paying you just for posting on the forum. They never ask you about traffic or something else. Do you believe anyone should pay when you make post on like Facebook or Twitter? Its same it ? Its just a crypto forum. Who are paying you just for posting they might have some requirements. If you like freedom then who is forcing you to join on the campaign? When you will do a job there is a time frame for work. You can't adjust it by yourself if you are not owner. So campaign is same and most likely you are talking about it.

First you should search how many post has been made on meta regarding signature campaign. Then you were should make post. This post really wasn't necessary. So I will consider this topic as a spam topics and spam opportunity for signature spammer (I am not excluding me). So please stop make duplicate topics regarding same subjects. This is more dangerous spam from something else. Because this thread calling more spammer here. And yes, you might call me a spammer I would not mind since I have commented here as well.

Of course managers should reject all spammers application and believe doing with btc signature campaigns. But campaign with tokens never monitoring by managers I think. That's main issue. Most of spam reason is token campaign more than btc signature. And token campaign could manage by even with newbie user. So who will control and how.

[Debonaire217]

And also consider that you joined because of the payment, and they will pay you from your posts. Limiting the number of posts might not be fair for them as they also have their target that's why they need you. You don't need to join in the first they've already stated the task.