Which one makes sense

[#Darren]

It does not matter at all, there are enough examples of success and failures in both cases. More importantly to research the project before getting into bounty or investment, otherwise even IEO sale can turn out to be a scam.

[1715053905]

1715053905

[1715053905]

1715053905

[1715053905]

1715053905

[1715053905]

1715053905

[xvids]

Which one should come first? better to get through bounty before ICO/IEO fund raising or better to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing... Suggestion need

If you are looking for a higher stake or much more higher reward then join before they even starts the fund raising.
But it is also risky sincewe wouldn't know if they would be successful or not.
But if you want to secure your reward then join the bounty campaign that have an ongoing fund raising that already have a huge amount of investment.

[Doranile432]

I promoted a bounty project that is already over due to its use case but i never knew they haven't start their fundraising at all, i guess i am a bad researcher, i should have quit if i knew because most times they end up a failure

[huige007]

Either of the two could lead you to nothing if it ends up to be a scam so why not just get through it before the project runs. You have the option to maximize the stakes given anyway so why not that?
Just make sure you made your research in search of possible fraud or scam, it'll be worth the work and efforts in the end.

You have made some point certainly. All would turn out to be useless if the chosen project is not capable of returning any profits. The market is full of scams and before participating into bounties, it is best to do deep researches on one’s own. Once that step is cleared, go with running bounty while the fundraising is taking place. That way, he wont have to wait for long to make good bucks.

[Endikadija]

I promoted a bounty project that is already over due to its use case but i never knew they haven't start their fundraising at all, i guess i am a bad researcher, i should have quit if i knew because most times they end up a failure

If you do know that you are very bad in this case and i can't even understand what was your point. what you are saying in your post is about to tell others about your personal story and no more. What do you mean about "its use case". Dude, wake up from your sleep. no one asks you about have you watched the schedule of the fundraising or not because that's probably your fault. in this case, OP is talking about joining in the bounty when the ico is still in progress or it's not yet started.

[Kersh768]

Which one should come first? better to get through bounty before ICO/IEO fund raising or better to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing... Suggestion need

I would suggest running a bounty during the crowdsale or fundraising in order to have parallelism with the outcome. If one would go first, the hype or popularity of the project has a tendency to fade. Also, this kind of process is what I saw to the previous successful projects in this industry, which is in my opinion, proving it to be effective if not interrupted by the market situation.

[seleme]

I promoted a bounty project that is already over due to its use case but i never knew they haven't start their fundraising at all, i guess i am a bad researcher, i should have quit if i knew because most times they end up a failure

If you do know that you are very bad in this case and i can't even understand what was your point. what you are saying in your post is about to tell others about your personal story and no more. What do you mean about "its use case". Dude, wake up from your sleep. no one asks you about have you watched the schedule of the fundraising or not because that's probably your fault. in this case, OP is talking about joining in the bounty when the ico is still in progress or it's not yet started.

IMO, he talks about the successful projects without any ICO or IEO. If the token is used widely by the customers and the real use rate is higher than competitors, there is no need to start a new token sale for collecting more money for development. Even the private investor group can fund the project with the secret agreement but I don't think the OP had made decent research before thinking about to make an investment decision.

[arimamib]

Either of the two could lead you to nothing if it ends up to be a scam so why not just get through it before the project runs. You have the option to maximize the stakes given anyway so why not that?
Just make sure you made your research in search of possible fraud or scam, it'll be worth the work and efforts in the end.

You have made some point certainly. All would turn out to be useless if the chosen project is not capable of returning any profits. The market is full of scams and before participating into bounties, it is best to do deep researches on one’s own. Once that step is cleared, go with running bounty while the fundraising is taking place. That way, he wont have to wait for long to make good bucks.

being part of a bounty campaign can indeed be utilized, the most important thing is to do your research properly because what can determine the profit or not is the research that was made and how confident you are with the project that was followed

[SirLancelot]

Either of the two could lead you to nothing if it ends up to be a scam so why not just get through it before the project runs. You have the option to maximize the stakes given anyway so why not that?
Just make sure you made your research in search of possible fraud or scam, it'll be worth the work and efforts in the end.

Everything here for now is full of risk, which I think that there is no way that we can avoid it if we want to continue to be a part of this bounty hunting, so it is either we give up completely or we just keep pressing till we get the right project that will not maltreat us bounty hunters.

Most of the projects that we have now can really not be predicted, and like you said, there is still possibility of them scamming even if we join the campaign along the line, so better we join at the early stage, though we still have to look at it In the aspect of our time, it would have saved our time also if the period we took part in the project is when they have started raising fund, and if they eventually scam, it will still not be like the period that we have used on them from the beginning.

[owengtam09]

Which one should come first? better to get through bounty before ICO/IEO fund raising or better to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing... Suggestion need

As long as you are promoting a promising bounty or ICO then it doesn't matter which one should come first and I think both of them bounty and ICO can have possibly had a scam so it is depend, so before promoting a bounty or ICO make sure that you check their project 1st than to waste your time promoting them.

[tinyteapot]

Which one should come first? better to get through bounty before ICO/IEO fund raising or better to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing... Suggestion need

This depends largely on your targeted investors, you might run the bounty first then proceed to fund raising because people are already aware of your project, alternatively you can run both together but never make mistake of trying to raise fund before bounty unless you have private investors.

[Reid]

IEO is for the project to put the token first in an exchange. Mostly they create their own trading platform for that purpose.
Next is the bounty. That is for advertisement.
Just for people or investors to see that a project is going on and it could be bought at this certain website.

I dont think a bounty should come first. How are you the investors going to end up buying it without information?

[yulionoo]

in my opinion both have weaknesses and strengths. if we follow ICO or IEO before fundraising, we will get more tokens, the more we immediately join, the more coins we will get. but if in fact the project that we are participating in is a scam then what we are doing is in vain and losing money. and if we join in raising and taking place we can avoid fraud at least we know that the project we are taking is not a scam. but the coins we will get are not many. I myself prefer to join the ICO when the fundraising takes place even though the tokens I get are few but the ICO that I follow is not a scam.

[Xampeuu]

I think both are the same. while the promotion was taking place and with fundraising, many projects were successful with the system, and by first promoting it to the end and resuming sales, many projects were successful. I think it depends on the policies of the development team to use which method

[Yamifoud]

I think both are the same. while the promotion was taking place and with fundraising, many projects were successful with the system, and by first promoting it to the end and resuming sales, many projects were successful. I think it depends on the policies of the development team to use which method

But most projects Bounties/ICO are having a promotion before taking into the fundraising. What makes difficult here is the risk for investors putting up their money for no assurance of returns. If this project never gets enough money during their fundraising, it maybe won't go over with its launching period. Thus, many investors compromised themselves and give doubts to reinvest ICO/Bounties that don't have a working product because of their past experience. Of course, they'll be taking it seriously and nothing it makes sense investing projects that always broked their promises, and much worse if they will turn into a scam which it is mostly happening nowadays.

[BigBos]

I suggest supporting the project from the beginning before they start ICO / IEO. if you are absolutely sure about the project, there is no reason to wait to support it when their program has run. however, the prizes you get to become more. some people sometimes regret not supporting the project before they start selling it.

[Sab11]

Which one should come first? better to get through bounty before ICO/IEO fund raising or better to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing... Suggestion need

With fundraising while performing bounty is a very nice way to raise huge fund to support thier project , because it will attract alot of investors, but always remember the risk when investing this seasen because alot of project turns in scam.

[wajik-tempe]

Which one should come first? better to get through bounty before ICO/IEO fund raising or better to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing... Suggestion need

Both are good but i usually doing bounty with on going fundraising because the duration of the bounty is not long. I usually joined a bounty for one month and move for another bounty next month, because i will have more chance to have many good altcoin. But if you really trust a project, you better do it from the announcement date because you will earn much if the project reach big success

[GideonGono]

I suggest supporting the project from the beginning before they start ICO / IEO. if you are absolutely sure about the project, there is no reason to wait to support it when their program has run. however, the prizes you get to become more. some people sometimes regret not supporting the project before they start selling it.

And there are those people who also regret joining from the very first week up to the last and get absolutely nothing since it exist just to scam people no matter what kind of project they would sell. The thing is you need to do some research on your own and think logically rather than emotions. There are a lot of enticing projects out there but you should look around whether the people involved are legit and is the project possible or does it only exist in the fiction where the reality is just too much for it to happen. It’s hard to trust ICOs this days.

[mirgo1791]

with use of more on offers as the blockchain customs of offers for developer on works as referring service the IMO might be of one with the early initials on investors to put with one on exchange as expecting with returns on denomination.