I’ve recently learned the many advantages of cryptocurrencies and how they can revolutionize the way we use money around the world, so why are the world’s governments not adopting them to be used as a form of currency?
There are many advantages of cryptocurrencies that surpass fiat currencies that we used on a day to day basis such as better security due to blockchain technology, cryptocurrencies not really being affected by global financial events as it is a decentralized currency
Why are the governments not adopting cryptocurrencies? Is it a world-wide conspiracy by the elite in order to keep in power? Or is it that the people in charge are rather ignorant of the advantages of cryptocurrencies in order to keep the current system of power?
Because politicians and bankers would lose control. You like most people think the money used in the economy actually exists "somewhere" as a whole, but it doesn't. With fiat money, this is easy to disguise and you appear to live in that illusion. With Bitcoin this is not possible, every single satoshi is accounted for in the blockchain.
Did you know banks only keep 10% (or less) of your money at any given time? I bet you didn't. You should investigate fractional reserve banking.
Truth is, Bitcoin makes things clear and transparent, unlike the way things are right now. It is in fact a cause to make the economy collapse, because the current economy is based in non-existent money. It is a gigantic ponzi scheme, banks and governments make the MLM people look like saints.
With fiat money you can't tell how much money is out there, especially in electronic fashion. You see digits and zeroes in your bank account, i think that money exists somewhere in a vault. It doesn't.
This is a shocking reality most people ignore, as long as they can go on with their lives...
Since Bitcoin removes the veil, those that scam the most have the most to lose. When this reality becomes apparent on a worldwide scale, the economy will have to change probably with the last of the crashes.
If you learn truth today, you have the chance to flee into Bitcoin (or gold whatever). Like any MLM scheme, there is not enough for everyone to withdraw (which is what causes the collapse or "pop" of the bubble), most people would not be able to cash, unless it is done slow enough to give time to banks to shrink. Usually that is not how it happens, people enter in panic and the bankrun occurs.
Now think of a worldwide bankrun. Less than 10% of the money in banks exists at any given time...
The irony is that some people say Bitcoin is the bubble "because is backed in nothing"... But Bitcoin is valuable for other reasons, while fiat money isn't. A "promise" that your fiat "could" be exchanged by "something" at the bank. In reality it is impossible, since even when "backed" nominally, they practice fractional reserve as well and in most legislation you can't actually exchange the thing, ie. USD for gold when it was "backed" in it. It was all a mountain of lies, a bubble waiting to pop. When the USD was no longer "backed" by gold in 73, they lowered the pressure a little, it was the honest thing. People should get in their heads that fiat currency is only valid as long as their governments continue to "keep the promise". But don't you ever try to make them fulfill it...
You know that politicians are liars, they say one thing and do the opposite. Honest money like Bitcoin is too dangerous for them, as their secrets would come to light. And yes, some would like to FUD people into thinking Bitcoin is "criminal's" money, when the main criminals are them. Bitcoin has its rules exposed and accepted by the community that uses it, fiat isn't. The rules for fiat cam be changed by decree, ie. when a gov decides to print "some more" to make their budget fit in, and at that moment everyone becomes poor. Do it slowly enough like the USA and most people would even think that coin is great.
But they can't control Bitcoin. Its 21 million. If the community wanted 42, the whole would need to accept this change, not a few guys in power. Everyone would need to be willing to accept a "half value" from such devaluation, something that is never consulted to people under fiat currency rule. I imagine if something like this would ever occur, it would be with a hard fork probably with some rule that everyone owning 1 would now own 2 after it takes effect (so that in theory everyone would keep the same). This is too convoluted and unnecessary anyway and will probably never be done, but its an extreme example.
Of course the true base unit is the satoshi, which every bitcoin contains 100 million of... If you express things in satoshis rather than bitcoins, it has ample space left for low value expressions, far more than the useless cents of USD and EUR.