0.01 BTC loan defaulted by (MakeMoneyBtc)

[robelneo]

I want to update my thread. I have created an accusation for 0.01BTC against MakeMoneyBtc. Today I received 0.002BTC. If I calculate the price of Bitcoin then I have got my money back which I sent to him. But unfortunately, it is not as I can't consider this as sold BTC at that time. In this case, if I waive the interest after the accusation then the remaining amount should be 0.008BTC. So, I am not removing negative trust or not asking anyone to remove the trust.

If you are in contact with the user still, you could tell them to try to find a sig campaign that accepts neg trusted accounts and explain why he wants to join a campaign with neg trust. You may also be able to contact the manager and see if they will let your address be the payment address until the loan is paid. Just an option you might try to explore.

I support this idea, but I don't want to recommend 1xbit maybe there's a campaign manager that is reading this discussion and willing to take him in so he can repay the loan, but those who gave him negative feedback should first remove the tag in exchange of using OP's address if the rule of the campaign stated that negative trusted members cannot join a campaign.

[1715025515]

1715025515

[1715025515]

1715025515

[1715025515]

1715025515

[1715025515]

1715025515

[Plaguedeath]

I support this idea, but I don't want to recommend 1xbit maybe there's a campaign manager that is reading this discussion and willing to take him in so he can repay the loan, but those who gave him negative feedback should first remove the tag in exchange of using OP's address if the rule of the campaign stated that negative trusted members cannot join a campaign.

1xbit will not accept him because he got negative trust, they're accept negative trust user if the feedback is because the user applying to their campaign, not because loan default, cheating, etc.

The only one way is participate bounties which I don't think profitable anymore, better for him to get a real life job in his country than rely on this forum.

His last post was 2 years ago, a good campaign manager only choose an active user.

[John Abraham]

I want to update my thread. I have created an accusation for 0.01BTC against MakeMoneyBtc. Today I received 0.002BTC. If I calculate the price of Bitcoin then I have got my money back which I sent to him. But unfortunately, it is not as I can't consider this as sold BTC at that time. In this case, if I waive the interest after the accusation then the remaining amount should be 0.008BTC. So, I am not removing negative trust or not asking anyone to remove the trust.

If you are in contact with the user still, you could tell them to try to find a sig campaign that accepts neg trusted accounts and explain why he wants to join a campaign with neg trust. You may also be able to contact the manager and see if they will let your address be the payment address until the loan is paid. Just an option you might try to explore.

I support this idea, but I don't want to recommend 1xbit maybe there's a campaign manager that is reading this discussion and willing to take him in so he can repay the loan, but those who gave him negative feedback should first remove the tag in exchange of using OP's address if the rule of the campaign stated that negative trusted members cannot join a campaign.

Even 1xbit is looking for a fresh account to ruin them. Last week they opened another new signature campaign and mentioned no negative feedback accounts (LOL). I won't suggest anyone wear a 1xcrap signature for a few hundred dollars. No matter how many difficulties he faces. Good to know that sashan didn't have to contact but the guy himself contacted sashan and paid him 0.002 Bitcoin. Sashan maybe thought he would never return since it's been four years, and the guy already got multiple negative feedback. He is unlikely to get accepted in any signature campaign. So, if he didn't care about his account anymore, He could have run away. This is a good sign that he returned and wants to pay the debt.

@Sashan, Royse777 Accept Neg Trusted users if it's nothing serious. He asks users to get pre-approval before they apply. You can see if Hhampuz accepts neg trusted users. You may request them to consider this guy. But, The guy should be active before he applies to any campaign.

[LoyceV]

you could tell them to try to find a sig campaign that accepts neg trusted accounts and explain why he wants to join a campaign with neg trust.

Who wants to tie their brand to a negative trusted account?

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

you could tell them to try to find a sig campaign that accepts neg trusted accounts and explain why he wants to join a campaign with neg trust.

Who wants to tie their brand to a negative trusted account?

They may able to find a spot in low paying campaigns but I do not think any high paying campaign will allow negative trusted accounts especially when there are many other users competing for the spot.

[John Abraham]

you could tell them to try to find a sig campaign that accepts neg trusted accounts and explain why he wants to join a campaign with neg trust.

Who wants to tie their brand to a negative trusted account?

1xCrap? Oh, I am kidding. They are looking for fresh accounts without negative feedback.

BTW, Shouldn't it vary from case to case?
There are several users on several campaigns with negative trust. I understand they were allowed because of their contribution to the forum, and their rank also matters. Campaign managers may get convinced if Accuser also requests them and explain everything. In this case, this user has almost zero chance of getting accepted. He wasn't active for long, and his rank was low. He got plenty of negative feedback.

I am not specific about this case only. I am saying that negatively trusted users also may get a spot if the campaign manager thinks their Feedback is not severe. You know what I am indicating. Yes, The incorrect use of Feedback. That's why Campaign managers also ask their participants to get pre-approval.

[shasan]

I am not specific about this case only. I am saying that negatively trusted users also may get a spot if the campaign manager thinks their Feedback is not severe. You know what I am indicating. Yes, The incorrect use of Feedback. That's why Campaign managers also ask their participants to get pre-approval.

I have seen negatively trusted users have been accepted by several campaign managers but all those who have been accepted were heroes/legendary and the feedback wasn't something like a proven scam. And as you said they had enough contributions to the forum but considering with those this user has nothing. He could be accepted by such a campaign like bitvest I don't think he will be accepted on any campaign which is running for now.

[arabspaceship123]

You sent bitcoin so he should return BTC. You didn't agree to loan in USDT.

He's been absent for 3 years he's repaid some of the loan so he's made steps in the right direction but it isn't complete until you've been repaid wholly. Did he pay 0.002BTC because he expects negative trust removal?

I want to update my thread. I have created an accusation for 0.01BTC against MakeMoneyBtc. Today I received 0.002BTC. If I calculate the price of Bitcoin then I have got my money back which I sent to him. But unfortunately, it is not as I can't consider this as sold BTC at that time. In this case, if I waive the interest after the accusation then the remaining amount should be 0.008BTC. So, I am not removing negative trust or not asking anyone to remove the trust.

[Agbe]

This what I am afraid off and trying to avoid in all ramifications. How can someone borrowed money from another person and ran away from the money, if you know that you can't meet up as stipulated time elapsed, he has to pm the leander to notify him the situational report so the person would be also away and have reasons with the situation and extend the loan to a convenient date for the borrower to pay off his or her loan but running away from it is very bad.

[virasog]

What shocked me most was his answer in this topic.
After this I don't think it is likely that people will ever trust this person again.

The only important thing to note in this message is this and the rest is all stories.

I am OK with the negative feedback and the flag, because I deserve it and I don't use the bitcointalk account so much anyway.

When a person is not interested in his account, why would be he interested in paying back the loan. He is indirectly saying that negative feedback does not matter to him as he don't care for the BTT account.  Also, he has asked for another two months and who knows he won't be online here by that time to respond and pay back.

[LoyceV]

When a person is not interested in his account, why would be he interested in paying back the loan.

To clear his conscience?

[virasog]

When a person is not interested in his account, why would be he interested in paying back the loan.

To clear his conscience?

A person who has moral values and want to clear his conscience, he will surely pay his loan. Even if a person does not have money to pay back loan, he can ask for the extension of loan or maybe start paying loan in small amounts on monthly basis but if anyone stops responding to the person or ask for unreasonable times to pay back, he will probably not willing to pay back.

Let's hope OP pay back the loan and prove all of us wrong.

[shasan]

How can someone borrowed money from another person and ran away from the money, if you know that you can't meet up as stipulated time elapsed, he has to pm the leander to notify him the situational report so the person would be also away and have reasons with the situation and extend the loan to a convenient date for the borrower to pay off his or her loan but running away from it is very bad.

The person who has the intention to scam anyone then the user may ask for non-collateral loan and if want to take any other benefit then the user may ask for an extension if there is no chance to get any more benefit then the user might go offline or stop responding.

[2double0]

How can someone borrowed money from another person and ran away from the money, if you know that you can't meet up as stipulated time elapsed, he has to pm the leander to notify him the situational report so the person would be also away and have reasons with the situation and extend the loan to a convenient date for the borrower to pay off his or her loan but running away from it is very bad.

The person who has the intention to scam anyone then the user may ask for non-collateral loan and if want to take any other benefit then the user may ask for an extension if there is no chance to get any more benefit then the user might go offline or stop responding.

Some people take extensions because they genuinely need it, but your point is valid too. I have witnessed some well-established names on this forum scamming for money and it was not just through loans but escrows too.
But as you said, if the intention is to scam only, nobody will even ask for an extension and just run away with the money as all they needed was the money at the end of the day.

[CryptSafe]

This what I am afraid off and trying to avoid in all ramifications. How can someone borrowed money from another person and ran away from the money, if you know that you can't meet up as stipulated time elapsed, he has to pm the leander to notify him the situational report so the person would be also away and have reasons with the situation and extend the loan to a convenient date for the borrower to pay off his or her loan but running away from it is very bad.

It is very dissappointing such an experience. Borrowing and not being able to meet up payment as agreed is not good I must admit but if it happens unintentional then the borrower should be given a benefit of doubt then if it exceeds the day of grace given then any actions can be metted on the borrower as long as it is within the covers of the law and platform where such agreement took place then is is ok to go  but I see no reason why a borrower who can not meet up with repayment run away. Anyways, this platform has some standards so borrowing would need you having a clear thought over it before making an attempt otherwise your account would go in for it.

[coin-investor]

How can someone borrowed money from another person and ran away from the money, if you know that you can't meet up as stipulated time elapsed, he has to pm the leander to notify him the situational report so the person would be also away and have reasons with the situation and extend the loan to a convenient date for the borrower to pay off his or her loan but running away from it is very bad.

The person who has the intention to scam anyone then the user may ask for non-collateral loan and if want to take any other benefit then the user may ask for an extension if there is no chance to get any more benefit then the user might go offline or stop responding.

Some people take extensions because they genuinely need it, but your point is valid too. I have witnessed some well-established names on this forum scamming for money and it was not just through loans but escrows too.
But as you said, if the intention is to scam only, nobody will even ask for an extension and just run away with the money as all they needed was the money at the end of the day.

I agree it's adding insult to injury if the borrower keeps asking for a loan extension but in the end, he will not eventually pay, this kind of person doesn't have a conscience if they are going to do this, if you ask for an extension be sure to honor it, you are still not a scammer if you ask for an extension but not honoring your words is what makes you a scammer.

[albon]

The person who has the intention to scam anyone then the user may ask for non-collateral loan and if want to take any other benefit then the user may ask for an extension if there is no chance to get any more benefit then the user might go offline or stop responding.

I feel sad about your loss; the loan service is really risky, and the person who borrowed 0.01BTC is not the only one who defaulted the loan, but the list goes on; it is great that you knew their methods of deception in order to refrain from giving the loan if you encounter another person whom you suspected, there are many people who have multi accounts in the forum, so perhaps if this scammer person defrauded the loan and lost his account and its reputation, he does not care because he already got the loan money and sacrifices one of his accounts. Unfortunately, scammers focus on such services that you provide, so you should be more vigilant, and if you suspect a person, even if At 1%, you do not agree to lend to him, even if it is a small amount.

[shasan]

Some people take extensions because they genuinely need it, but your point is valid too. I have witnessed some well-established names on this forum scamming for money and it was not just through loans but escrows too.
But as you said, if the intention is to scam only, nobody will even ask for an extension and just run away with the money as all they needed was the money at the end of the day.

You are right that some people genuinely need extensions and that's why they ask for extensions. But while too much extension without a single dollar repaid is really suspicious and it should be turned into a scam.