Is World War 3 coming because of the bombing in Iraq?

[Subrata65]

I hope Europe countries and Russia are smart enough not to intervene in this conflict.

[Kopiev]

Is it true that Trump is just making a way to delay his trial with the senate that's why he bombed Iraq? This kind of big issue triggers WW3. Does he even think?

I think he really did something very thoughtful. The previous president of Ukraine did similar things, only on a smaller scale. At the end of his reign he sent sailors to the water area of Russia (to the right death) to start a full-fledged war and introduce martial law in the country. Thank God he did not succeed. The sailors were simply taken prisoner (they were already exchanged for Ukrainian prisoners), not killed 

[Hannu]

I hope Europe countries and Russia are smart enough not to intervene in this conflict.

Yeah, there's somebody rigi containers in a war zone (cheap electricity?)

[boyptc]

I hope Europe countries and Russia are smart enough not to intervene in this conflict.

Let's hope that they won't but it seems that Trump has already responded and he won't reply back to the said attack. I've read that it can be a diversion attack for Trump's impeachment and making him like a hero for declaring peace since elections is near on US.

That's base from socmed comments.

[Sherepp]

I hope Europe countries and Russia are smart enough not to intervene in this conflict.

Let's hope that they won't but it seems that Trump has already responded and he won't reply back to the said attack. I've read that it can be a diversion attack for Trump's impeachment and making him like a hero for declaring peace since elections is near on US.

That's base from socmed comments.

It really does look very altruistic. I hope Trump did it for world peace, not personal interests

[peter0425]

I hope Europe countries and Russia are smart enough not to intervene in this conflict.

Let's hope that they won't but it seems that Trump has already responded and he won't reply back to the said attack. I've read that it can be a diversion attack for Trump's impeachment and making him like a hero for declaring peace since elections is near on US.

That's base from socmed comments.

It really does look very altruistic. I hope Trump did it for world peace, not personal interests

i doubt that he really meant peace because if that is what he wanted then there should no killing happens,as he knew the retaliation will happen knowing how Iranian Governments stands in each War they have.

and why is it very timely?that in the heat of impeachment the decision has been made?purely diversionary .

[boyptc]

I hope Europe countries and Russia are smart enough not to intervene in this conflict.

Let's hope that they won't but it seems that Trump has already responded and he won't reply back to the said attack. I've read that it can be a diversion attack for Trump's impeachment and making him like a hero for declaring peace since elections is near on US.

That's base from socmed comments.

It really does look very altruistic. I hope Trump did it for world peace, not personal interests

We don't know what the intentions are but we should remain positive and hoping that it's truly for the world peace.

We don't want to see another war.

[Sherepp]

I hope Europe countries and Russia are smart enough not to intervene in this conflict.

Let's hope that they won't but it seems that Trump has already responded and he won't reply back to the said attack. I've read that it can be a diversion attack for Trump's impeachment and making him like a hero for declaring peace since elections is near on US.

That's base from socmed comments.

It really does look very altruistic. I hope Trump did it for world peace, not personal interests

i doubt that he really meant peace because if that is what he wanted then there should no killing happens,as he knew the retaliation will happen knowing how Iranian Governments stands in each War they have.

and why is it very timely?that in the heat of impeachment the decision has been made?purely diversionary .

In the light of possible impeachment, such a decision does look like a distraction or even an attempt to collect more votes in its favour

[desticy]

I doubt that the United States will be so reckless as to unleash a third world war. Moreover, this war is not profitable for anyone. And the main question is who will fight with whom?
Iran wants to be a normal country and live a normal life, so they agreed to a nuclear deal, and as a result receive additional sanctions from the United States, which in turn prohibit European countries from dealing with Iran. Glaring injustice.

[zelikman]

I doubt that the United States will be so reckless as to unleash a third world war. Moreover, this war is not profitable for anyone. And the main question is who will fight with whom?
Iran wants to be a normal country and live a normal life, so they agreed to a nuclear deal, and as a result receive additional sanctions from the United States, which in turn prohibit European countries from dealing with Iran. Glaring injustice.

How can war not be profitable ? You contradict capitalism. It doesn't matter who's with whom, it matters who will be the primary beneficiary

[UNOE]

I doubt that the United States will be so reckless as to unleash a third world war. Moreover, this war is not profitable for anyone. And the main question is who will fight with whom?
Iran wants to be a normal country and live a normal life, so they agreed to a nuclear deal, and as a result receive additional sanctions from the United States, which in turn prohibit European countries from dealing with Iran. Glaring injustice.

How can war not be profitable ? You contradict capitalism. It doesn't matter who's with whom, it matters who will be the primary beneficiary

Very easily.
Look at what happened to Germany after The Great War.
To whole Europe to be exact.
People thought there was never going to be another war of that proportion again because of the enormouse damages that everyone suffered.
It was impossible for the defeated to pay enough reparations to the victors in order to cover their damages.
Most wars will end without any profit whatsoever especially in modern times when you can't just seize resources and exploit populations to cover the costs.

[johnwest]

I have always thought that after World war 2, if there was another war then it would be the end of this world. But we should not see a nuclear war in future.

After the blunder of Iran hitting a passenger Ukrainian airline, it will be very for Iranian army to conduct future attacks right now. Its really sad that a passenger plane got in between this stupidity. 

[UNOE]

There's no way 2 powers with nuclear arms ever ingage in warfare against eachother.
They know the destructive power they'd retaliate with.
If every country in the world had nukes, we'd have world peace.
If Iran really had WMD, USA would never invade.