Projects that failed to keep their promise in 2019

[Pamadar]

The issue of projects not keeping to their promises is very popular in this industry. Even the airdroppers and bounty hunters are aware that anything could happen to their reward. Projects are quick to accuse bounty hunters for dumping the price of the tokens and this has always resulted in the project shifting the goal posts.

The very reason why investors and most bounty hunters are no longer interested taking the big risk of participating and supporting the project. There's no safe haven  with investing to new projects, most of this are created by the developers who are only aiming for quick benefits and always ready to runaway or to blame someone from their own mistakes. Failed project also bringing negative impressions to the entire ecosystem,

[drumamat]

Here are some projects that get listed on exchanges but ignore bounty hunters and airdroppers like they don't exists

1. Sparkpoint
2. Decimated
3. Nestree
4. Sero
Etc.

Any one has a solution to make this stop? if developers can't keep their promises even when they raise fund successful why needing how help to create awareness then?

If I'm not mistaken, then Nestree and Sero paid what they promised.Most likely You have not fulfilled some conditions....There are a lot of projects that have not fulfilled their promises.But it is necessary not to dwell on them and continue to participate in the bounty.Yet successful projects also exist.

[Lantind]

The issue of projects not keeping to their promises is very popular in this industry. Even the airdroppers and bounty hunters are aware that anything could happen to their reward. Projects are quick to accuse bounty hunters for dumping the price of the tokens and this has always resulted in the project shifting the goal posts.

Bounty hunters are actually not worthy of being accused of wasting tokens, because hunters only get reward on a small scale, so the potential for throwing away tokens will not have much effect on the exchange.

[sayaya17]

There are still some projects other than the ones you mentioned that do not want to pay participants after their project success, I do not know why they do so to the participants, but this does not comply with the agreements that they wrote on a bounty board before the project begins. I have also experienced this, but I can not do much.

[Yassin]

Prize hunters have worked for the promotion of the project, and have not received payment for hard work, a lot has happened, because the project failed, finally the hunters did not receive payment, I hope in 2020 it will not happen again, because they will really need the prize hunters to promote their project..

[Silberman]

Maybe the best idea here is to create a new topic for each of this projects, named "*Project Name* - is a scam! *some proofs presented...*". If this topic is active enough, project's team will have to do something.

This is already happening, in the scam accusation and reputation sections of the forum you can find many threads about people accusing projects of being scams and most of the project leaders never take the time to answer to those accusations because they know they are true and they also know that most people are never going to make any effort to research their project which could help them to find such thread, so they do not really care about those accusations.

[tiptopgemdotcom]

The scary things happen in the bear market and the broken promises by teams are the first example. The useless projects introduce their shitcoin to the investors and investors don't fall to their lying machine. The small exchanges are nor promised on the first date of IEO but they first prefer to list coin there.

[KimmyF]

Here are some projects that get listed on exchanges but ignore bounty hunters and airdroppers like they don't exists

1. Sparkpoint
2. Decimated
3. Nestree
4. Sero
Etc.

Any one has a solution to make this stop? if developers can't keep their promises even when they raise fund successful why needing how help to create awareness then?

We can change this matter because investor or Dev they believe only bounty hunters can dump the price. I see so many hunters, they didn't move any coin in 1-2 years. Same I found in Coinhe campaign, token still in wallet. Even bounty hunter reward isn't more than one day volume. I saw a token that dumped huge and lowest selling amount is more than bounty allocation.

[AmoreJaz]

The scary things happen in the bear market and the broken promises by teams are the first example. The useless projects introduce their shitcoin to the investors and investors don't fall to their lying machine. The small exchanges are nor promised on the first date of IEO but they first prefer to list coin there.

about 80-90% of those projects actually failed their promises. most of them are just good in creating their roadmap but when you talk about the real achievements, very few can directly answer that part.
maybe we need to list the projects that kept their promises, maybe that would be easier task because they are only few of them. the rest are failed ones.

[memed97]

Prize hunters have worked for the promotion of the project, and have not received payment for hard work, a lot has happened, because the project failed, finally the hunters did not receive payment, I hope in 2020 it will not happen again, because they will really need the prize hunters to promote their project..

For projects that are not well-known it will really need the prize hunters to make project promotions, but for projects that are already famous will not need prize hunters, because they can succeed without making bounties, and in the past there were also many successful projects just by making ICOs only, and don't make a bounty.

[naikturun]

It's happened a lot like that but you can't blame it unilaterally.
this could be due to the mistake of the bounty hunter for not following the rules or breaking.
it's a shame not to pay workers even though they are struggling to promote your project.

[asus09]

Prize hunters have worked for the promotion of the project, and have not received payment for hard work, a lot has happened, because the project failed, finally the hunters did not receive payment, I hope in 2020 it will not happen again, because they will really need the prize hunters to promote their project..

For projects that are not well-known it will really need the prize hunters to make project promotions, but for projects that are already famous will not need prize hunters, because they can succeed without making bounties, and in the past there were also many successful projects just by making ICOs only, and don't make a bounty.

With project famous they don't needed bounty hunter for promoting their coin to investor, just make advertisement with some website and many investor will interested with their coin, many ICOs without promoting as bounty campaign keep success and have higher price after listing on exchange market and keep stable with higher price after long term listed with exchange market.

[poodle63]

The scary things happen in the bear market and the broken promises by teams are the first example. The useless projects introduce their shitcoin to the investors and investors don't fall to their lying machine. The small exchanges are nor promised on the first date of IEO but they first prefer to list coin there.

if the team failed to deliver the promises and it's a scam attempt. in the bearish market, the scammer will be putting their money as the main priority. So many projects that failed to keep their promises and we can see from the latest chart if more than 80% IEOs are crap.

[Greatchu]

This is one of the main issues bounty hunters face when participating in campaigns that don't have the funds escrowed in advance or that aren't run by a reputable campaign manager, so make sure you DYOR into each campaign to avoid wasting time and effort on offerings that might be potential scams

Not trust bounty campaign manager make us waste time for joining bounty campaign and not received reward any more, although project failed when bounty campaign manager trusted they will announce with their campaign failed during ICO is not success, but whit bounty campaign success on ICO always delay distributed coin for bounty participants.

Hmm.. this was one of the reasons why I stopped doing bounty campaigns and then switched to a campaign that paid me in BTC rather than in tokens. Very few of the ICOs are successful nowadays and even if some ICO is listed in an exchange they delay the distribution of bounty. The excuse being given is that if they distribute the bounty quickly, then the hunters will dump all their tokens and crash the prices. But the real reason is to give enough time for the promoters to dump their tokens in the exchanges. The bounty hunters will get their tokens, only after the dumping by the promoters is complete.

I find this hard to believe because i did some research on new projects of this year and some still manage to pay bounty hunters what they promised, i can start listing successful bounties this year and believe me they are over 10 now

[gweedo]

Prize hunters have worked for the promotion of the project, and have not received payment for hard work, a lot has happened, because the project failed, finally the hunters did not receive payment, I hope in 2020 it will not happen again, because they will really need the prize hunters to promote their project..

For projects that are not well-known it will really need the prize hunters to make project promotions, but for projects that are already famous will not need prize hunters, because they can succeed without making bounties, and in the past there were also many successful projects just by making ICOs only, and don't make a bounty.

Those projects have many famous investment funds and many people participate in private sale. So they do not need to conduct an ICO or IEO to raise capital. These are really good and quality projects in this market, from 2017 until now, I have only seen a few of them. And up to now, those projects are still working very well

[bitcoindusts]

Here are some projects that get listed on exchanges but ignore bounty hunters and airdroppers like they don't exists

1. Sparkpoint
2. Decimated
3. Nestree
4. Sero
Etc.

Any one has a solution to make this stop? if developers can't keep their promises even when they raise fund successful why needing how help to create awareness then?

Stop patronizing these scam projects.  That would be the best move.  If it is possible, we should publish their bad action on the social media and keep tweeting their incompetence towards the bounty hunters.  Or if someone really wanted to put the project down, they can find legal flaws on the project and inform the authority.

[adjed]

There are so many of them from 2018 to 2019 and the sad fact is that many of them raised millions of dollars during their sales, you mentioned Sero but I have to admit that while Sero might not have delivered on their promises, atleast their investors didn't lose money, they gave decent returns for the investors, that is more than investors of Sparkster and the rest of those shots could say, I know that Cryptocurrency investments are risky investments but it's projects like this that makes us lose faith entirely, thankfully there are projects out there that helps us keep the faith.

[DDante]

Few projects deliver their promises and many don't, if you are not ready for the risks then quit hunting for bounty projects, i am used to disappointment in crypto space already and yet i don't feel like stopping

[Genemind]

There are even lots of worse projects than these. Lots of bounty hunters were ended up unpaid this year after exerting too much effort for different ICO's and IEO's which is really disappointing. We only have to get rid of these kinds of projects and do more research so we'll never get scammed again. Let's just be wiser than these kinds of scam projects.

[fudster]

There are so many of them from 2018 to 2019 and the sad fact is that many of them raised millions of dollars during their sales, you mentioned Sero but I have to admit that while Sero might not have delivered on their promises, atleast their investors didn't lose money, they gave decent returns for the investors, that is more than investors of Sparkster and the rest of those shots could say, I know that Cryptocurrency investments are risky investments but it's projects like this that makes us lose faith entirely, thankfully there are projects out there that helps us keep the faith.

I rode the pump of SERO but wasn't lucky to have dumped on its ATH. Many of the traders are looking or opportunity to profit and get out of this miserable bear days so I started trying to look for pumps and I guess if you do find it enjoyable to ride the pumps these days, its still something you get to accustomed to doing. I'm all forgetting all the teams who failed to fulfill their promise and go on.