Bitcoin Forum
March 28, 2024, 11:27:24 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: More trust system abuse by Lauda  (Read 4539 times)
truth or dare
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 15


View Profile
March 02, 2020, 11:11:54 PM
 #181

As I update my thread tracking Lauda's Fake Flags I will, from now on, be naming those who are supporting Lauda's fake flags:

Reserved #1

Comment:

Flag 712: @bobitza , @ChuckBuck , @Enre , @JollyGood , @RBF , @rhomelmabini , @robelneo , @sabotag3x , @ScamViruS are supporting a fake flag created by Lauda: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5161689.msg53951875#msg53951875

Flag 1260: @AlexSimion , @joksim299 , @nullius , @TheUltraElite , @TMAN , are supporting a fake flag created by Lauda: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5161689.msg53951875#msg53951875




-<Echo chamber>-
Come back from the dark side suchmoon (we have cookies) FIFY.
-<Echo chamber>-

Might need to turn the -<Echo chamber>- down a little bit before you start offering cookies.

The incontrovertible truth is probably the type of echo one should not complain about. There are no cookies for. those who support scammers or try to inhibit their removal from the trust system. There is only a chance not to be a pariah once the scamming trust abusing core are removed.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1711625244
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711625244

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711625244
Reply with quote  #2

1711625244
Report to moderator
Timelord2067
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3626
Merit: 2210


💲🏎️💨🚓


View Profile
March 03, 2020, 12:47:13 AM
Last edit: May 16, 2023, 11:24:42 PM by Timelord2067
 #182

[quote author=truth or dare link=topic=5210651.msg53952087#msg53952087 date=1583190714]
The incontrovertible truth is probably the type of echo one should not complain about. There are no cookies for. those who support scammers or try to inhibit their removal from the trust system. There is only a chance not to be a pariah once the scamming trust abusing core are removed.
[/quote]

Possibly, but when users such as Lauda (or, to answer your comment) suchmoon go on a distrust spree:


you should be asking why you are encouraging them with your -<echo chamber>-?




At least a couple of these UID's are from the same geographical location (see if you can figure out where they are from by their profile names).

One "Gang" trying to pick off another "gang"

TECSHARE (OP)
In memoriam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958


First Exclusion Ever


View Profile WWW
March 03, 2020, 02:00:32 AM
 #183

Speaking of trust lists and standards, I noticed now that I demonstrated Vod had comitted a criminal act, you vaporized from that thread.

I encourage all people to "vaporize" from threads where blind accusations are made without proof.

If I have "comitted" a criminal act, join OG in a lawsuit, liar.

The fact that you doxed OGNasty with the intent to harass him, putting his safety at risk is not even under dispute. It is a well documented fact. It is also a fact this kind of action is something users are usually instantly and permanently banned for, in addition to it being a federal crime. Why would I join a lawsuit I am not a party to? Just more mindless gibbering.


So now 9 years of work building a positive reputation = "trust farming"? Sounds more like you are annoyed you can't dictate to every single person who they should be adding to their trust list.

No, including various shitheads just because they include you is what I meant by "farming". I'm not dictating anything, do whatever you want, just don't expect to be taken seriously with your "standards" and other BS when you included users like that.

Speaking of trust lists and standards, I noticed now that I demonstrated Vod had comitted a criminal act, you vaporized from that thread. I wonder why. Again, what is important is you don't like me, not that Vod, marlboroza, or Lauda are abusing the use of negative ratings as a form of retribution for speaking critically of them. Retribution only matters to you when it goes the way you don't like.

As opposed to what - me managing my trust lists exactly the way you like it?

Your theatrics would make more sense if e.g. you had been red-trusting for doxing or exposing account sellers in the past and not just when it suited you in your attacks against Vod and nutildah. On the other hand, you have a history of retaliatory and "non-standard" red trust in your personal squabbles like "You should focus on your own affairs instead of harassing others" and "I believe this user to be mentally ill". If it quacks like a duck and posts bullshit ratings like a duck, it shouldn't be in DT.

No idea why you keep blaming for anything Lauda-related but I'm sure there is an exciting conspiracy theory behind it - bring it on.

And you know my state of mind and reasoning for including people do you? Of course your baseless assumptions are above reproach. Actually I see you constantly trying to dictate to users who they should and shouldn't be including in their trust lists, unfortunately noobs usually just take you at face value and clear their lists because they don't know any better. I do however, and my refusal to capitulate is used as justification for impugning my character with all of your baseless assumptions.

Unlike you, I have no desire to be a forum cop, thus I don't spend my time patrolling the "mean streets" of Bitcointalk looking for reasons to tag people. As a result I tend to use my very limited use of negative ratings almost exclusively to tag people I have direct interactions with. Of course again, this is used as some kind of supposed evidence I am up to no good.

Did I leave Nutilduhh a rating? Are you suggesting I shouldn't even criticize them? Also what Vod did was not only a felony that put OGNasty's safety at risk, it is something other users get a permanent instaban for.

I asked you already once, if I removed the reference to Vods clearly observable obsessive compulsive disorder and replace it with one purely about his harassment and doxing of OGNasty, would you then consider that rating valid? You get blame because you endlessly attempt to deflect and cover for these people, even when you admit their behavior is abusive. You only ever even criticized Lauda recently as their behavior became too obviously inexcusable for you to maintain deniability in the matter. Also in the case of Vod you are explicitly giving him the authority to abuse the trust system by including him.
Vod
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3654
Merit: 3010


Licking my boob since 1970


View Profile WWW
March 03, 2020, 02:05:35 AM
 #184

Also what Vod did was not only a felony that put OGNasty's safety at risk

No it wasn't/I didn't, fool.  Even OG announced his life was more secure than ever.   (His constant encouragement of my actions against him and denial I affected him in any way was one of the reasons he could not sue me.)

 Cool


https://nastyscam.com - landing page up     https://vod.fan - advanced image hosting - coming soon!

OGNasty has early onset dementia; keep this in mind when discussing his past actions.
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3640
Merit: 8906


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
March 03, 2020, 02:13:22 AM
 #185

something other users get a permanent instaban for.

You keep repeating it as a fact but I don't recall you ever giving examples of users getting banned for posting dox in Investigations. Feel free to do that any time.
Vod
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3654
Merit: 3010


Licking my boob since 1970


View Profile WWW
March 03, 2020, 02:22:10 AM
 #186

You keep repeating it as a fact but I don't recall you ever giving examples of users getting banned for posting dox in Investigations. Feel free to do that any time.

I think he just ignored your point, then suggested that you ignore points.  :/

https://nastyscam.com - landing page up     https://vod.fan - advanced image hosting - coming soon!

OGNasty has early onset dementia; keep this in mind when discussing his past actions.
ChuckBuck
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 783


better everyday ♥


View Profile WWW
March 03, 2020, 02:35:45 AM
 #187

As I update my thread tracking Lauda's Fake Flags I will, from now on, be naming those who are supporting Lauda's fake flags:

Reserved #1

Comment:

Flag 712: @bobitza , @ChuckBuck , @Enre , @JollyGood , @RBF , @rhomelmabini , @robelneo , @sabotag3x , @ScamViruS are supporting a fake flag created by Lauda: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5161689.msg53951875#msg53951875

Flag 1260: @AlexSimion , @joksim299 , @nullius , @TheUltraElite , @TMAN , are supporting a fake flag created by Lauda: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5161689.msg53951875#msg53951875
I was thinking where is the right place for me to explain a bit about this support, and I choose this one.
Well, I know the jamalaezaz, I can say he's one of the worst managers I know from that time up till now. He is so greedy that he manages a large of projects at the same time, it is beyond his ability and leaves lots of connection accounts in bonus campaigns, not only that, he also works for many fake projects, they cheat investors and ultimately do not pay advertisers. A series of allegations surrounding him at the time. Personally, this guy is never reliable, so if there's any other flag to oppose this guy, I'll support it, not just Lauda.

CharityAuction
          ▄▄▄████████▄▄▄   
       ▄▄███████▀▀▀▀███████▄
     ▄████▀▀           ▀▀████▄
   ▄███▀▀   ▄▄████████▄▄   ▀▀███▄
  ████▀   ████▀██████████    ▀███▄
 ████   ▄███▀▄  ▀    ██████   ▀███▄
▄███   ████▄    ▄█▄  ▀██████    ███▄
████  ▄███▀     ▀█▀      ▀███▄  ████
████  ████▄▄█▄      ▄█▄   ████  ████
████  ▀████████▄   ███▀  ▄███▀  ████
▀███   █████████▄   ▀   ▀████   ███▀
 ████   ▀████████   ▄ ▀▄▄██    ████
  ████▄   ███████▄▄██▄▄███   ▄████
   ▀███▄▄   ▀▀████████▀▀   ▄▄███▀
     ▀████▄▄            ▄▄████▀
       ▀▀███████▄▄▄▄███████▀▀
           ▀▀▀████████▀▀▀
          ▄▄▄████████▄▄▄   
       ▄▄███████▀▀▀▀███████▄
     ▄████▀▀           ▀▀████▄
   ▄███▀▀   ▄▄████████▄▄   ▀▀███▄
  ████▀   ████▀██████████    ▀███▄
 ████   ▄███▀▄  ▀    ██████   ▀███▄
▄███   ████▄    ▄█▄  ▀██████    ███▄
████  ▄███▀     ▀█▀      ▀███▄  ████
████  ████▄▄█▄      ▄█▄   ████  ████
████  ▀████████▄   ███▀  ▄███▀  ████
▀███   █████████▄   ▀   ▀████   ███▀
 ████   ▀████████   ▄ ▀▄▄██    ████
  ████▄   ███████▄▄██▄▄███   ▄████
   ▀███▄▄   ▀▀████████▀▀   ▄▄███▀
     ▀████▄▄            ▄▄████▀
       ▀▀███████▄▄▄▄███████▀▀
           ▀▀▀████████▀▀▀
ColdScam
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3640
Merit: 8906


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
March 03, 2020, 02:37:32 AM
 #188

~

So you just made it up?

Most of your other "points" is just an army of straw people that's been debated ad nauseam. Of course I'm going to notice new stuff that you bring up.
TECSHARE (OP)
In memoriam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958


First Exclusion Ever


View Profile WWW
March 11, 2020, 09:20:06 AM
 #189

Moor coordinated attacks using the trust system as a weapon to silence others:

Lauda   2020-03-11   Reference   Intentionally spreading false information.

I am sure this has nothing to do with this:

~

Maybe Lauda is just taking it back? This is just another good example of Lauda trying to hide the fact that they are a normie wearing 4chan culture like a suit to camouflage themselves like Steve Buscemi and his skateboard desperately trying to convince his fellow kids he is one of them. The idea of chastising some one for being racist while simultaneously lauding shitposting culture is self contradictory and yet another demonstration of the fact that Lauda exists more as a fabrication than a real personality.
TwitchySeal
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2492
Merit: 2003


Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!


View Profile
March 11, 2020, 12:29:38 PM
 #190

something other users get a permanent instaban for.

You keep repeating it as a fact but I don't recall you ever giving examples of users getting banned for posting dox in Investigations. Feel free to do that any time.

Wait...vod posted the dox in investigations?  The sub forum created specifically as a place to post personal information?

  ▄▄███████▄███████▄▄▄
 █████████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀████▄▄
███████████████
       ▀▀███▄
███████████████
          ▀███
 █████████████
             ███
███████████▀▀               ███
███                         ███
███                         ███
 ███                       ███
  ███▄                   ▄███
   ▀███▄▄             ▄▄███▀
     ▀▀████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████▀▀
         ▀▀▀███████▀▀▀
░░░████▄▄▄▄
░▄▄░
▄▄███████▄▀█████▄▄
██▄████▌▐█▌█████▄██
████▀▄▄▄▌███░▄▄▄▀████
██████▄▄▄█▄▄▄██████
█░███████░▐█▌░███████░█
▀▀██▀░██░▐█▌░██░▀██▀▀
▄▄▄░█▀░█░██░▐█▌░██░█░▀█░▄▄▄
██▀░░░░▀██░▐█▌░██▀░░░░▀██
▀██
█████▄███▀▀██▀▀███▄███████▀
▀███████████████████████▀
▀▀▀▀███████████▀▀▀▀
▄▄██████▄▄
▀█▀
█  █▀█▀
  ▄█  ██  █▄  ▄
█ ▄█ █▀█▄▄█▀█ █▄ █
▀▄█ █ ███▄▄▄▄███ █ █▄▀
▀▀ █    ▄▄▄▄    █ ▀▀
   ██████   █
█     ▀▀     █
▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄
▄ ██████▀▀██████ ▄
▄████████ ██ ████████▄
▀▀███████▄▄███████▀▀
▀▀▀████████▀▀▀
█████████████LEADING CRYPTO SPORTSBOOK & CASINO█████████████
MULTI
CURRENCY
1500+
CASINO GAMES
CRYPTO EXCLUSIVE
CLUBHOUSE
FAST & SECURE
PAYMENTS
.
..PLAY NOW!..
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3640
Merit: 8906


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
March 11, 2020, 12:35:37 PM
 #191

Wait...vod posted the dox in investigations?  The sub forum created specifically as a place to post personal information?

Yes. However:

2. It is not allowed to post someone's dox if it is especially obvious that you're just using the dox as a weapon. For example, if there are no remotely-plausible trade complaints, then the person can't be a scammer, and their dox should not be posted.
TwitchySeal
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2492
Merit: 2003


Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!


View Profile
March 11, 2020, 12:45:38 PM
 #192

Wait...vod posted the dox in investigations?  The sub forum created specifically as a place to post personal information?

Yes. However:

2. It is not allowed to post someone's dox if it is especially obvious that you're just using the dox as a weapon. For example, if there are no remotely-plausible trade complaints, then the person can't be a scammer, and their dox should not be posted.

Fair.

Was vod motivated by any of Ogs ponzi schemes?  I feel like that would easily meet the bar of 'remotely plausible'.

I guess if it was just about not paying taxes on his own ponzi it would be a grey area?

  ▄▄███████▄███████▄▄▄
 █████████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀████▄▄
███████████████
       ▀▀███▄
███████████████
          ▀███
 █████████████
             ███
███████████▀▀               ███
███                         ███
███                         ███
 ███                       ███
  ███▄                   ▄███
   ▀███▄▄             ▄▄███▀
     ▀▀████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████▀▀
         ▀▀▀███████▀▀▀
░░░████▄▄▄▄
░▄▄░
▄▄███████▄▀█████▄▄
██▄████▌▐█▌█████▄██
████▀▄▄▄▌███░▄▄▄▀████
██████▄▄▄█▄▄▄██████
█░███████░▐█▌░███████░█
▀▀██▀░██░▐█▌░██░▀██▀▀
▄▄▄░█▀░█░██░▐█▌░██░█░▀█░▄▄▄
██▀░░░░▀██░▐█▌░██▀░░░░▀██
▀██
█████▄███▀▀██▀▀███▄███████▀
▀███████████████████████▀
▀▀▀▀███████████▀▀▀▀
▄▄██████▄▄
▀█▀
█  █▀█▀
  ▄█  ██  █▄  ▄
█ ▄█ █▀█▄▄█▀█ █▄ █
▀▄█ █ ███▄▄▄▄███ █ █▄▀
▀▀ █    ▄▄▄▄    █ ▀▀
   ██████   █
█     ▀▀     █
▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄
▄ ██████▀▀██████ ▄
▄████████ ██ ████████▄
▀▀███████▄▄███████▀▀
▀▀▀████████▀▀▀
█████████████LEADING CRYPTO SPORTSBOOK & CASINO█████████████
MULTI
CURRENCY
1500+
CASINO GAMES
CRYPTO EXCLUSIVE
CLUBHOUSE
FAST & SECURE
PAYMENTS
.
..PLAY NOW!..
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3640
Merit: 8906


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
March 11, 2020, 02:09:25 PM
 #193

Was vod motivated by any of Ogs ponzi schemes?  I feel like that would easily meet the bar of 'remotely plausible'.

Og's dox wasn't a huge secret anyway so whoever felt screwed by his schemes didn't need it published if they wanted to find him. Doxing him served no positive purpose.
TECSHARE (OP)
In memoriam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958


First Exclusion Ever


View Profile WWW
April 09, 2020, 05:26:42 AM
 #194

Lauda   2020-04-06   Reference   "Continues to defame me out of spite. Avoid dealing this user and do not trust a word that he writes. "

So what is this, the 8th time Lauda has removed and replaced their negative ratings for me? You keep claiming you are updating new information... but it you are literally just repeating yourself and replacing the ratings to manipulate the trust system to make sure your negative is perpetually at the top of my trust ratings page.

More clear attempts to silence criticism using the trust system as a tool of abuse from Lauda.

Lauda   2020-02-28   Reference   Continues to defame me out of spite. Will merge with other ratings later.
dragonvslinux
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 2204


Crypto Swap Exchange


View Profile
June 14, 2020, 06:37:54 PM
 #195

Lauda   2020-04-06   Reference   "Continues to defame me out of spite. Avoid dealing this user and do not trust a word that he writes. "

So what is this, the 8th time Lauda has removed and replaced their negative ratings for me? You keep claiming you are updating new information... but it you are literally just repeating yourself and replacing the ratings to manipulate the trust system to make sure your negative is perpetually at the top of my trust ratings page.

More clear attempts to silence criticism using the trust system as a tool of abuse from Lauda.

Lauda   2020-02-28   Reference   Continues to defame me out of spite. Will merge with other ratings later.

Ideally, tell us something we don't know next time. This tactic is old news. All this tells us is that Lauda likes to be on top. Interpret as you will.
On a side note, I was watching a documentary recently about how many are more sexually frustrated in these lockdown times. I wonder if there is a correlation here.

█▀▀▀











█▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
e
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████████████
████████████▄███
██▐███████▄█████▀
█████████▄████▀
███▐████▄███▀
████▐██████▀
█████▀█████
███████████▄
████████████▄
██▄█████▀█████▄
▄█████████▀█████▀
███████████▀██▀
████▀█████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
c.h.
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀█











▄▄▄█
▄██████▄▄▄
█████████████▄▄
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███░░█████████
███▌▐█████████
█████████████
███████████▀
██████████▀
████████▀
▀██▀▀
ChuckBuck
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 783


better everyday ♥


View Profile WWW
June 15, 2020, 11:26:40 AM
 #196

Ideally, tell us something we don't know next time. This tactic is old news. All this tells us is that Lauda likes to be on top. Interpret as you will.
On a side note, I was watching a documentary recently about how many are more sexually frustrated in these lockdown times. I wonder if there is a correlation here.
Just a curiosity, what motivates you to touch old topics on a regular basis? Previously, I saw you touching on Yolodice's signature campaign topic, now this topic. There is no really interesting information given, you just touch here and say some bullshit. What is its effect? It would be better if you provide any other evidence of Lauda's abuse. But nothing, you send a link to a irrelevant videos. Do you get money to promote that video here? Just curious  Roll Eyes Also want to know if I am wrong anywhere when posting this

CharityAuction
          ▄▄▄████████▄▄▄   
       ▄▄███████▀▀▀▀███████▄
     ▄████▀▀           ▀▀████▄
   ▄███▀▀   ▄▄████████▄▄   ▀▀███▄
  ████▀   ████▀██████████    ▀███▄
 ████   ▄███▀▄  ▀    ██████   ▀███▄
▄███   ████▄    ▄█▄  ▀██████    ███▄
████  ▄███▀     ▀█▀      ▀███▄  ████
████  ████▄▄█▄      ▄█▄   ████  ████
████  ▀████████▄   ███▀  ▄███▀  ████
▀███   █████████▄   ▀   ▀████   ███▀
 ████   ▀████████   ▄ ▀▄▄██    ████
  ████▄   ███████▄▄██▄▄███   ▄████
   ▀███▄▄   ▀▀████████▀▀   ▄▄███▀
     ▀████▄▄            ▄▄████▀
       ▀▀███████▄▄▄▄███████▀▀
           ▀▀▀████████▀▀▀
          ▄▄▄████████▄▄▄   
       ▄▄███████▀▀▀▀███████▄
     ▄████▀▀           ▀▀████▄
   ▄███▀▀   ▄▄████████▄▄   ▀▀███▄
  ████▀   ████▀██████████    ▀███▄
 ████   ▄███▀▄  ▀    ██████   ▀███▄
▄███   ████▄    ▄█▄  ▀██████    ███▄
████  ▄███▀     ▀█▀      ▀███▄  ████
████  ████▄▄█▄      ▄█▄   ████  ████
████  ▀████████▄   ███▀  ▄███▀  ████
▀███   █████████▄   ▀   ▀████   ███▀
 ████   ▀████████   ▄ ▀▄▄██    ████
  ████▄   ███████▄▄██▄▄███   ▄████
   ▀███▄▄   ▀▀████████▀▀   ▄▄███▀
     ▀████▄▄            ▄▄████▀
       ▀▀███████▄▄▄▄███████▀▀
           ▀▀▀████████▀▀▀
ColdScam
dragonvslinux
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 2204


Crypto Swap Exchange


View Profile
June 15, 2020, 01:50:32 PM
 #197

Ideally, tell us something we don't know next time. This tactic is old news. All this tells us is that Lauda likes to be on top. Interpret as you will.
On a side note, I was watching a documentary recently about how many are more sexually frustrated in these lockdown times. I wonder if there is a correlation here.
Just a curiosity, what motivates you to touch old topics on a regular basis? Previously, I saw you touching on Yolodice's signature campaign topic, now this topic. There is no really interesting information given, you just touch here and say some bullshit. What is its effect? It would be better if you provide any other evidence of Lauda's abuse. But nothing, you send a link to a irrelevant videos. Do you get money to promote that video here? Just curious  Roll Eyes Also want to know if I am wrong anywhere when posting this

Fair point, I hadn't noticed that the topic was old to be honest otherwise wouldn't of posted (same with Yolodice). But the latter was slightly different as there is false advertising going on, hence not being the only one (check the feedback of the OP). Not even sure what led me though, a late night by looks of it Huh Then again, an opinion is still an opinion, even two months too late.
[sarcasm]
I'll keep C4 shilling on fresh threads from now on, don't worry. Do you like naked attraction though? Just curious. Haha, you're funny  Cheesy
[/sarcasm]

█▀▀▀











█▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
e
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████████████
████████████▄███
██▐███████▄█████▀
█████████▄████▀
███▐████▄███▀
████▐██████▀
█████▀█████
███████████▄
████████████▄
██▄█████▀█████▄
▄█████████▀█████▀
███████████▀██▀
████▀█████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
c.h.
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀█











▄▄▄█
▄██████▄▄▄
█████████████▄▄
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███░░█████████
███▌▐█████████
█████████████
███████████▀
██████████▀
████████▀
▀██▀▀
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!