Is PanduGeddonrozak related : Pandu Geddon and rozak

[Sarah Azhari]

I don't take offense, just curious about him because managing 2 bounty threads that indicate fake.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5398905.msg60147639#msg60147639

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5398874.msg60145940#msg60145940

if that is true, that possible PanduGeddonrozak tries to ruin the name of those members.

[1715118946]

1715118946

[1715118946]

1715118946

[1715118946]

1715118946

[1715118946]

1715118946

[Apocollapse]

You can't stop anyone to create alt accounts in this forum since it's allowed, I find it's pointless the one who created PanduGeddonrozak account to attack Pandu Geddon and rozak. Honestly it doesn't ruin their reputation, but more like advertise to both Pandu Geddon and rozak lol. They don't need to care behind of this account, giving red tag and flag are enough.

[retreat]

in this forum anyone can do anything to harm someone's reputation, I don't know what happened to the fake account maker and the members who are Pandu Geddon and Rozak but this seems to be their personal problem that has not been resolved.

[FatFork]

in this forum anyone can do anything to harm someone's reputation, I don't know what happened to the fake account maker and the members who are Pandu Geddon and Rozak but this seems to be their personal problem that has not been resolved.

There is no evidence to support this claim; I view this as pure speculation.
The newbie account may have chosen his name purposely to attract attention. However, I don't know what the purpose of creating fake bounty campaigns is other than trolling the forum.

As a side note, maybe we should tag those who blindly sign up for campaigns despite clear warnings from other members?

[Apocollapse]

As a side note, maybe we should tag those who blindly sign up for campaigns despite clear warnings from other members?

No you shouldn't, tagging bounty hunters because they're dumb and lazy enough to read the rules will lead an abuse since they're not a scammer or likely to scam anyone. Neutral tag is correct regarding this case for your self note or warning for the other manager to accept them in the future campaign, but I doubt manager will selective enough to accept the bounty hunters.

[FatFork]

As a side note, maybe we should tag those who blindly sign up for campaigns despite clear warnings from other members?

No you shouldn't, tagging bounty hunters because they're dumb and lazy enough to read the rules will lead an abuse since they're not a scammer or likely to scam anyone. Neutral tag is correct regarding this case.

I didn't say it should be a negative tag. Neutral tag is still tag. 

[stompix]

The newbie account may have chosen his name purposely to attract attention. However, I don't know what the purpose of creating fake bounty campaigns is other than trolling the forum.

If he would have wanted to attack attention he would have used far more recognized names from DT1 or the top merit sources/receivers of the forum, no offense to the two involved but I doubt the impact created by that composite name.
To me it's clearly somebody who wants to take revenge, seeing how both members have tagged quite a lot of bounty cheaters, the method of revenge is some fake bounty topics, for me is quite clear one of the tagged ones did it, and since one matches an older campaign here, I would raise my bet one level and say the cheater or one of his alts was banned from the previous Sovryn campaign.

Anyhow, seeing the warning the pulitoken team has posted, I've tagged him, if not outright scamming he is still impersonating people.

[robelneo]

Anyhow, seeing the warning the pulitoken team has posted, I've tagged him, if not outright scamming he is still impersonating people.

Tagged him also I don't know the reasons why he is impersonating these two people but there's already a connection, he is victimizing bounty hunters, imagine these bounty hunters who participated in his two campaigns are expecting to receive rewards if not busted they just wasted their time and effort, it's good that you created a thread about this bounty manager.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

As a side note, maybe we should tag those who blindly sign up for campaigns despite clear warnings from other members?

No you shouldn't, tagging bounty hunters because they're dumb and lazy enough to read the rules will lead an abuse since they're not a scammer or likely to scam anyone.

I wouldn't even go so far as to give them a neutral just for putting in an application--that's taking things a bit too far IMO.  If a member gets accepted and actually starts advertising for a scam project, that's a more reasonable debate.

I read the first 4 or so posts in this thread, and I'm still confused as to precisely what's going on here.  I'm not familiar with who Pandu Geddon and rozak are.  Are they bounty managers?  I'm really confused about the member who combined those names, as it seems bizarre to do so.  Guess I'll keep reading the rest of the thread for entertainment.

[Apocollapse]

If a member gets accepted and actually starts advertising for a scam project, that's a more reasonable debate.

I think it's a bit complicated to debate about scam campaign in bounty section because most of them are scammy. We can determine the project is scam doesn't because of the plagiarized whitepaper, ponzi, pyramid scheme etc (anything that lead a red flags). But most bounties now often reduced their own bounty distribution, pay lower than their promise, the coin doesn't get listed on exchange, crash and become worthless etc that I feel mostly bounties is a scam without going to debate IMO.

I'm not familiar with who Pandu Geddon and rozak are.  Are they bounty managers?  

Below is their accounts if you wanted to look:
Pandu Geddon https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3416506
rozak https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1016105

They're actively exposing cheaters in the bounty sections, perhaps those cheaters that they have tagged are going mad and want to revenge them by creating an alt account with Pandu Geddon and rozak username. But as I said it's really pointless, it wouldn't hurt their reputation.

[lovesmayfamilis]

Just look at his deleted messages. This is an unsuccessful detective who is probably jealous of the two accounts, so he combined them in his nickname.
It's most likely a personal vendetta, and his alternate accounts have been exposed by our detectives.

https://ninjastic.space/search?author=PanduGeddonrozak&board=129

how about rozak and Pandu Geddon! rozak always sends merits for Pandu Geddon on the board ALTS! come on bro.. he's building a farm did you really not see it? Awaklara rarely posts in every discussion while Rozak and Pandu Geddon do the opposite.

You are right, they can exchange merit with each other but that should not be interpreted as a connection between accounts managed by the same person ^{[alt account].} You still need solid evidence to accuse them and so far you haven't risked anything.

I think you have a problem with the three of them, is your main account really damaged because it was caught cheating? If my guess is correct, then you should really apologize for that from your main account because maybe I will also mark you as ^{[honest man]}

[Pandu Geddon]

thanks, OP for creating this thread.

I'm not too surprised by the account. I just wanted to share how it all started.
the account was created after the @3accountsconnected account that created the thread of accusations against me, Awaklara, and Rozak. https://ninjastic.space/topic/5390709

and another coincidence is that thread was created after I published a catch of several accounts with Senior Member and Full Member ratings.
just my assumption, that the account is someone who is offended by my actions.

[Sarah Azhari]

thanks, OP for creating this thread.

I'm not too surprised by the account. I just wanted to share how it all started.
the account was created after the @3accountsconnected account that created the thread of accusations against me, Awaklara, and Rozak. https://ninjastic.space/topic/5390709

and another coincidence is that thread was created after I published a catch of several accounts with Senior Member and Full Member ratings.
just my assumption, that the account is someone who is offended by my actions.

Happy to hear you with this clarification, I created this warning and I hope all participants would be careful to join his fake campaign tomorrow.