What happened: user johhnyUA gave me red tag for no trust case.
Information about the inadequacy and deceit of this reference I will write below. To begin with, the story of its appearance.


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1097370;dt

The main problems with Johnny began because of my investigations.
There were several cases when I accused users with high ranks in abuse, but he defended them.
Example: Smart man - serial scammer, eventually tagged and banned.
"Last straw" in his turning to madness was the topic (started by johhnyUA) about markiz73 [BAN APPEAL] markiz73 in whose defense he involved a lot of people.
After my investigation, this topic was closed forever.
After that, johhnyUA once again began to insult me. I openly announced that his behavior pattern is similar to another user's behavior pattern proof.
johhnyUA realized that I would investigate him. What could he do in this situation, given that he had nothing against me?
He did not find anything smarter than leaving me a red tag for my disputes with other people and for his fantasies (lies).
A few hours later, I published a topic that johhnyUA is a bounty cheater.

Separately, I want to note that that initial reference from johhnyUA was even funnier than the one that is left now. Additionally, he accused me of supporting Craig Wright, on the grounds that I translated his article. In December of this year, johhnyUA got into DT2 (thanks to the lottery and trolling by some members of the forum, but I do not want to point to them now, as this is a separate topic for discussion). Some users began to make fun of johhnyUA for his inadequate reference and he deleted it. Then he edited it and left again. It is still not relevant. Considering that johhnyUA was DT2 at that moment and he was warned about the unacceptability of his actions, this is a trust abuse.

Once again, the order of events:

By July 27th, questions on Smart Man and markiz73 were closed by me.
On July 29th, I accuse him of botofarming.
In response, he leaves me feedback on the events of May 29th (for some reason, this did not bother him before).
I publish the topic that he is a bounty cheater, it is still July 29th.
In January, he gets into DT2.
The situation becomes dangerous for him and he removes his feedback. Edits and leaves it again.

Given that nothing has fundamentally changed, I leave my tag to johhnyUA for trust abuse.

If anyone is interested in my disputes about bitcoin, shitposting, scammer Crage Wright, scammers in community, etc. then they can read them here here and anywhere on the links. I am ready to answer for every word I say.

I would love to complete this topic now, but since I started I have to write the rest of the "anomalies" with johhnyUA. So:

Maybe he (someday, somehow) will be able to prove that he is not a bounty cheater and maybe he will stop abusing the trust system, but there is another problem: he has mental health problems.. I am not a doctor, but I draw conclusions on his behavior and the opinions of other people.
His "amazing" stories concern not only me, but also many other users:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=623643;dt

Problems with nationalities and nationalism constantly come out of johhnyUA. In Ru local, he writes a lot on this topic (in sections not intended for this). I do not want to drag all this filth and shit here, just a quote:


And finally: theymos want to steal forums money - another story by johhnyUA.

http://archive.md/u6rtd#selection-7201.0-7201.228

http://archive.md/5iRM8#selection-2849.0-2863.291

Once again, the Russians are mentioned in a negative sense (johhnyUA himself is Ukrainian) and it is alleged that theymos wants to steal forum money. And these are "not just assumptions, but conclusions from some suspicious facts".

Conclusion: I tag johhnyUA for trust abuse.
This topic will be my reference about his mental problems. Considering that he will not stop in his "amazing" theories, I may need this reference many more times.

"Yes, you are pretty much allowed to tag anyone you like, for every reason you like  Roll Eyes"
                                                                                               (c) marlboroza, 2019 AD (from here)



My first feedback was left to this "person" before any of his "investigations", for his very bad attitude for trolling people.
Example:
This person like to troll other people, for example he created topic which called Craig Wrigth Satoshi and didn't delete it after my explanation post

But after a few question why i tagged person for supporting of Craig, i changed my feedback. And it's highly accurate in everything in it.
This person, for example, accuses chimk (one of the most honests and trusted members of russian local board) to many times. Here is proof in English, you can read it by yourself:

1. First topic
It's called "Total corruption in Russian local [DT involved!]"

Where he tries to accuse many trusted russian local members in protecting serial scammer (it is his catchphrase   )
After that topic, xtraelv distrasted him for some time.
Here is quotes from this topic:





And of course, chimk (not me, as you see) make a really good posts where he showed all rotten nature of this person, everyone should read this - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5156668.msg52783096#msg52783096

I ll give here a little shot piece of this:

So, as you see, this person is lying

Here is proof from this topic:

My first feedback was earlier than his "investigation" in some hours. Here is proof:
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5169264.msg52014120#msg52014120)

And what he responded to that:

But now he lying (again and again) that my first trust post was after his investigations.

2. Second topic
Whis is called Supporting of shitposting by merit source is it trustworthy?
It's funny topic, because maggot KTC used "broken phone" technique: he translated many quotes out of context with wrong translation.
Here is quotes from it (not from me, from a trusted members of english local):




And again, here is highly merited answer of chimk, where he made two important statements:

First, about trolls in russian local:

And second, which is more important. because this was the same with me - at first i was very polite to KTChampion in disscussions of Bitcoin, but one moment (after tons of trolling and speculating from him) i realized that this is rotten person, bad person with bad intents. And now i'm like me now.


So, as you see, this person is manipulating facts and loves dirty tactics

---

About this:

I wrote it while i was in very bad mood (and little drunk), and marlboroza wrote something bitter about bob123's feedback in my trust. And i wrote him a PM where accuses his grandfather.
Some hours after, (before even his feedback) i understood that i've done very bad things, because i stepped back from one of my life rules: "don't do to others what you don't want to receive by yourself"

I tried to write PM to him with apologies, but was added to blacklist   Soooooooooo, to make my soul clean, i resend apologies to myself (i know, really weird)

So, marlboroza, i want to apologies before your grandfather. And I am pleased that now i have such opportunity. Now my soul is really clean  

---

About "bounty cheating". It's another false accusation, but bob123 tagged me. After he didn't want to recall his feedback due to ordinary logic, i showed him personal correspondence of me and my friend in Telegram. He removed his feedback and here his quote:

---

About Theymos: this is my personal assumption (this maggot created another out-of-context quote, and show me in a weird light). My post was like this

And this his quote was explanation why i think so. ( i don't checked it, maybe it's poorly translated as with quotes in topic Supporting of shitposting by merit source is it trustworthy?, so, here in link for my message in russian, check it by yourself - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5105163.msg53274734#msg53274734)

---

Conclusion and few words after:

So, i don't know what to add to all this. If you think, that this behavior is trustworthy (to lie, to accuse trusted and honest members, to try to make a carrier through bodies (meaning "идти чepeз гoлoвы/идти пo тpyпaм" famous catchphrase in russian) then distrast me and be happy of your life. I'm not afraid of that. I know here some good persons, i communicate with them and trying to get knowledge about cryptocurrencies.

And you can see, how difference our way of acting: this maggot is reaally full of butthurt about my feedback, and can't stay calm. Just creating more drama.
While i don't fucking care about mine red feedback from bob123 (after two-four days of butthurt of course. But now i'm like a japanesse lake with flowers, calm and unshakable). Because i'm here not for trust wars and i'm not interested in getting "power to rule them all"


All my life i living as honest person, and i hate three thing in people: lying, manipulating, hypocrizy. All this three things is in KTChampion. So, it's obvious that i don't like him. And will never change. I will keep tagging liars, cryptohaters and trolls. This is my view of life, tho.

This was respond, i will not feed a troll so think all this by yours brain. I'm out (maybe i will answer to some questions of normal users, but i'm not sure

Looks like we need a notary to make signed & apostilled translation. Though I doubt that even this would be helpful. He won't recognize it anyway.

Yep, it is correct, take a look:

It is allowed, but please don't just blindly use my words to justify your actions whenever it suits you. Anyway, apology accepted.
He did mention that he tried to send me PM and IIRC I ignored him immediately after PM so he might be telling the truth. You still have to say why do you think this is trust abuse, you indeed accused some members without any proof, while I personally wouldn't send (in most cases) feedback for this, other users might and will do it.

---

Side note, your signature, personal text and avatar are contradicting each other.

This is a forum where free speech is allowed, isn’t it? I have openly expressed my accusations and am ready to discuss any of them. But I did not leave red tags only on the basis of my opinion. Leaving red tags not related to trust cases is an abuse if you are in DT.


Thank you for your responsiveness. The translation is good.
There is one inaccuracy:


In the second sentence there is no "Я" - "I". There, this word is missing because it is assumed that theymos wants to steal the money from the forum, but not Joni.

Have most of you guys forgot the lessening of the guidelines post the introduction of the flag system? Yes, you can now leave negatives for many more things (and no, it isn't abuse/misuse like it was before - to a lesser extent now). It is the flag system that's for scams nowadays, and the trust system for more "opinionated-things".

Completely agreed.

---

These walls of text aren't helping.

Thank you for your opinion. I agree with you and this is not a complete list of things that scammers whom I investigated or their friends accuse me of.
Naturally, these feedback do not seriously bother me, but I was forced to make this post as a single place for all references - since troll Joni writes nonsense here and there.


This is a completed stage. He lose all his discussions with me. That is why he left feedback "in favor" of third parties (who themselves did not leave me any feedbacks, and I did not leave any feedbacks to them).

Judging by a specific message from johhnyUA, he doesn't trust KTChampions feedbacks. For such cases, the option (~) exists.

What beautiful words, however, Joni again is hypocritical 


As we see, Joni loves to lie, but does not like to answer for his words.


Now back to the questions that Johny for some reason ignores:

1.) Joni hurt his psyche on a national issue. He's a nationalist and pours this shit in Ru local.


2.) According to Joni theymos wants to steal forum money.


After madnessteat verified the translation, it’s hard to give up his words, so Joni simply ignores this question. What an honest man