For what I wanted it has been a very useful list to use and give some approximation to the idea of "well known" users and get a quick overview of the signature campaigns usage.
What do you think would make for a better subset of users to try? I initially thought of using bpip's most merited list for instance.
Not sure if I'm missing something here or not but why some of the campaign participants have their signatures identified as 1 or 2?
- CHIPMIXER1 & CHIPMIXER2
- BITCASINO.IO-1 & BITCASINO.IO-2
- SMARTMIXER.IO & SMARTMIXER.IO-2
- BITSLER & BITSLER2
It means the signature checksums do not match even if they seem to be from the same campaign. I could have used any naming or numbering, it just needs to be different to show it is "technically" not the exact same signature.
how many well known members are participating in those and which ones are the most popular.
I hope your thread do not create drama in the future, I already see the title of the future drama: " DT Members Vs signature Campaigns "
Gosh no, I hate drama! And it is not as if the signatures were being "worn in secret" lol
I’m pretty sure this is related to the signature design they are using. For example, ChipMixer has a signature code for Sr. Members and one for Hero/Legendary.
DarkStar has the normal one (Sr.) which has no dark background, so he is ChipMixer2. While Loyce has the one with the dark background, thus ChipMixer1.
Right! But some differences are WAY subtler than in chipmixer case that can be seen at first glance.
Go Chipmixer! That's basically the relevance. They have the best campaign and recruit the finest members from the forum, and I'm not being biased or anything (LOLLY-LOL).
And hey, there are a lot of good members in the Yobit campaign, too. It's unfortunate that there aren't as many campaigns these days and that good members have to settle for that one, but whatever. The forum as a whole is probably better off with fewer campaigns anyway, but good posters deserve a spot in good campaigns, and it's too bad there aren't more spots in Chipmixer. You just have to get a little bit lucky on top of being a quality poster and at least somewhat trusted.
It's not a really a surprise but it is clear how chipmixer is the most popular amongst the "higher ranked" members. I see it is also the best paid campaign with a big difference.
Competition in this case makes that only the best posters have a good chance to be eligible.
That was also my initial thought but it appears it's only relevant for ChipMixer signatures [other campaigns have inaccurate numbers]:
- Same signatures but different numbers...
I need to check that in more detail but, even if both signatures were visually identical there must be ANY diference, because the checksums do not match.
I have noticed that some signatures that are not being recognised it is because they include a variable affiliate link (or something like that).
Will look into it.
With the help of "Ctrl + F", i guess no signature & don't join signature campaign (i assume Unknown means they use their own signature) are most popular option among DT members
Yes, most frequent options are:
- Custom signature: Addresses, personal websites/projects, personal comments, bitcointalk signatures, rare airdrops/bounties/icos (+ some false negatives): 186/352
- No signature at all: 88/352
- Chipmixer: 29/352
