[BPIP] Bitcointalk Public Information Project [Back in Action]

[Vod]

Any chance you can add a "hover" or a decimal point to the reputation score?   

[1713478708]

1713478708

[1713478708]

1713478708

[1713478708]

1713478708

[1713478708]

1713478708

[suchmoon]

Bumping my slightly edited quote for attention
Betwong noticed it too.

Just an acknowledgement that I'm not ignoring this

I'm done with extension work for now so I'll try to knock a few website changes off the TODO list within the next few weeks... this might be one of those.

Any chance you can add a "hover" or a decimal point to the reputation score?   

You mean the recognition score? Possible I guess.

[Betwrong]

Hello, everyone!

Firstly, I want to apologize if it was suggested already, and, secondly, I don't know if it's technically possible, or, maybe, very difficult to implement, and you, guys, are doing amazing job already, and I love BPIP as it is today. It is very helpful in many ways. Thank you for your hard work!

What would be interesting, imo, is to have the ability to see the list of top merit earners in particular sections and Child Boards of bitcointalk.

For example, to me personally, it is very interesting to know who are the top merit earners in the Gambling section, but I'm sure, others can be interested in such stats for Development & Technical Discussion, Mining, Economics etc.

From what I know, @LoyceV is the specialist in the field, but, again, I don't know how difficult it can be, and if it is possible at all, and, also, how many people besides me are interested in this kind of stats.

Thank you.

[LoyceV]

I found this in another topic:

(BPIP wording could be changed).

And I agree Can the wording on DefaultTrust Change Log be changed from "nutildah distrusts RaltcoinsB" to "nutildah distrusts RaltcoinsB's judgement"?
I did something similar for my Trust list viewer going from "LoyceMobile Trusts:" to "LoyceMobile Trusts these users' judgement:"

It helps with this:

Don't confuse your Trust list with feedback
Trust feedback: leave feedback to people you trust or don't trust. Or leave neutral comments.
Trust list: a list of people who's judgement on others you trust (username) or don't trust (~username).

[Csmiami]

I think I've found something off....

User Hellmouth42 shows as DT1 in Bpip, but DT2 on verey Loyce data (DT overview and trust list viewer)

[LoyceV]

User Hellmouth42 shows as DT1 in Bpip, but DT2 on verey Loyce data (DT overview and trust list viewer)

BPIP beats me on update speed:

Theymos reshuffled DT1 last night.

Added:
    35. Sr. Member Hellmouth42 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (325 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

[icopress]

BPIP beats me on update speed:

In the morning after the weekly update ^[loyce.club], the data does not have time to update, regardless of whether I use the site directly [loyce.club/trust/] or go to the site using an extension [loyce.club/profile.html?id=]. I still have to use a workaround, namely bpip.org [Trust List: / LoyceV trust list viewer for:], this path leads to the already updated data, with the only difference that there is no list of weeks in the title.

p.s. I would be grateful if someone could tell me the update interval of the data displayed on BPIP (Largest profile on Bitcointalk, Pages that have been parsed).

[LoyceV]

In the morning after the weekly update ^[loyce.club], the data does not have time to update, regardless of whether I use the site directly [loyce.club/trust/] or go to the site using an extension [loyce.club/profile.html?id=].

Even though this is in the wrong topic, I'd like to answer this: the first link is updated when I post it here. If your browser doesn't show it, it may need a hard refresh. The second link has some problems caching, and I don't know how to fix that. It doesn't always update if you visited the same userID before, but if you load the page in a private window it updates just fine.

[Vod]

p.s. I would be grateful if someone could tell me the update interval of the data displayed on BPIP (Largest profile on Bitcointalk, Pages that have been parsed).

I originally programmed those numbers to be real time, but they could be cached now by the BPIP team.

Edit:  I would just update the database record directly, adding 1 to the pages parsed.   Then due to a SQL query error right after my stroke, it reset to 0 when it was around 20 million.  I wanted to calculate the original number, but I never did.   The actual pages parsed is closer to 95 million.

(I no longer run update queries on live data, thank blockchain!  lol)

[suchmoon]

The second link has some problems caching, and I don't know how to fix that. It doesn't always update if you visited the same userID before, but if you load the page in a private window it updates just fine.

You can try changing the fetch request like this:

Code:

  function get_info_from_file(url) {
    return fetch(url, { cache: "no-cache" })

You can also try "reload" and "no-store" cache options if the above doesn't work for some reason.

[LoyceV]

The second link has some problems caching, and I don't know how to fix that. It doesn't always update if you visited the same userID before, but if you load the page in a private window it updates just fine.

You can try changing the fetch request like this:

Code:

 function get_info_from_file(url) {
    return fetch(url, { cache: "no-cache" })

Do I leave out the "re"? See:

Code:

           function get_info_from_file(url, re) {
                  return fetch(url)

Does that also mean I'll have to create a new function for this, so only the Trust list doesn't get cached? All others (like usernames) shouldn't be reloaded each time.

[suchmoon]

Do I leave out the "re"? See:

No, sorry, I was looking at the wrong version. The "re" should stay there.

Does that also mean I'll have to create a new function for this, so only the Trust list doesn't get cached? All others (like usernames) shouldn't be reloaded each time.

"no-cache" verifies if the file has been updated (probably with a "HEAD" request) so it doesn't download it every time. But if you want to avoid even the verification for the requests that don't need it, you can do this instead of creating a new function:

Code:

    function get_info_from_file(url, re, cache) {
        return fetch(url, { cache: cache || "default" })

And then call it like this for the trust list only (add a third parameter with "no-cache" value):

Code:

        get_info_from_file(trustlist_version_link, new RegExp("^" + user_id + ":(.*)$", "m"), "no-cache")

Other requests will use the default if you don't pass anything for the cache parameter.

[icopress]

Even though this is in the wrong topic, I'd like to answer this: the first link is updated when I post it here. If your browser doesn't show it, it may need a hard refresh. The second link has some problems caching, and I don't know how to fix that. It doesn't always update if you visited the same userID before, but if you load the page in a private window it updates just fine.

It seemed to me that the message would be appropriate since you previously touched on a similar topic, as well as the fact that this also applies to BPIP....
+ Everything works fine only after you post the update information to the thread ... As far as browsers are concerned, I tried several options and the result was the same. I don't have much of a problem with this anyway, as the workaround works just fine (BPIP).

I originally programmed those numbers to be real time, but they could be cached now by the BPIP team.

Thanks for the answer, I hope suchmoon or ibminer will clarify how things are with this at the moment...

[ibminer]

I originally programmed those numbers to be real time, but they could be cached now by the BPIP team.

Thanks for the answer, I hope suchmoon or ibminer will clarify how things are with this at the moment...

Nothing has changed here. It is still pulling this info (counts) directly from the related DB tables that the parsers write to.

[LoyceV]

But if you want to avoid even the verification for the requests that don't need it, you can do this instead of creating a new function:

Thanks, see https://loyce.club/profile.html?id=459836 I'll see tomorrow if it updates correctly.

That still leaves the question: can I credit you on profile.html for all the work you did?

[Timelord2067]

What's the Onion URL for bpip?

suchmoon regularly tells people they should be using Tor Browser (ironically it doesn't support BPiP) but I can't find any mention of an Onion address in this thread for the site.

[LoyceV]

What's the Onion URL for bpip?

What would that improve? bpip.org works on Tor, and the only risk I've seen doesn't worry me for BPIP:

At least one Tor exit node serves chipmixer.com as plain-text stripping SSL encryption and replacing deposit address with their own.

[Vod]

suchmoon regularly tells people they should be using Tor Browser (ironically it doesn't support BPiP) but I can't find any mention of an Onion address in this thread for the site.

At least Tor is being blamed for not supporting BPIP, and not the other away around. 

Do you think a read-only stats website needs Tor?

[Timelord2067]

At least Tor is being blamed for not supporting BPIP, and not the other away around. 

Do you think a read-only stats website needs Tor?

I suppose I could rehash the merits of a person wanting privacy while online, but given you've raised a fair point, all I can answer is at least now if someone else asks they can be pointed to this discussion.

[icopress]

As far as I understand, this bulk reset was due to a username change? ^[VIP]

- TradeFortress 🥳 Happy 2021 ➫ TradeFortress 🌝 BTC to $117k (CoinLenders / Inputs.io / CoinChat etc.)

Trust list for: TradeFortress 🥳 Happy 2021 (Trust: !!!:  +4 / =0 / -9) (27 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)