Ree @hacker1001101001 ICO bump account

[marlboroza]

~

So you quoted my post but you didn't read it? Create your own topic to discuss about not related things to this topic.

[1714025920]

1714025920

[1714025920]

1714025920

[1714025920]

1714025920

[1714025920]

1714025920

[1714025920]

1714025920

[1714025920]

1714025920

[nullius]

May I remind everyone this topic isn't discussion about

1) Lauda
2) Nutildah
3) TECSHARE's trust list
4) JollyGood
5) yobit
6) Insert any other deflection

What, I don’t merit a mention?  If trolls aren’t spamming personal attacks about me, then it means that I must be slacking off...

...probably because I keep losing track of this thread.  Because it keeps being derailed by trolls, and I currently have no time to wade through many pages of deflections to see if anything was said about the thread’s subject.  Or by the thread’s subject.  Have marlboroza’s questions been lost in the noise?

The silver lining is that Jay’s posts are always worth a read.  Bookmarked to catch up on later.

Mr. Payed Review, you still didn't address something here, instead of bad attempts of you and your objective standard guild buddies to move this into some other direction, address this:

[JollyGood]

Speaking of lunatics....

I was told by a DT member that he was being excluded by another DT member just because I was on his trust list  

He was given an ultimatum to either exclude me in exchange to be added in his trust list or if he was going keep me included on his trust list he would remain excluded on his.

This is one of the handful of ultimate betrayals because DT rank was never supposed to be used for these types of reasons.

The strange thing was that particular lunatic DT member had never really engaged with me before he was sending PMs to selected DT members campaigning against me.

If you don't trust someone's judgement you can surely exclude them without waiting for them to start [ab]using the trust system.

There was also this lunatic DT1 member who claimed to be including people based on whom they argue with, I wonder how that squares with your valid reasons.

[nullius]

This is worse than “trust abuse”:  It is total corruption of the trust system.

The strange thing was that particular lunatic member DT member had never really engaged with me before he was sending PMs to selected DT members campaigning against me.

I encourage—no, I call upon the recipients of such PMs to publish the PMs in Reputation.  It is whistleblowing.

A person who is engaged in corrupt practices, and sends unsolicited communications in furtherance of corruption, has absolutely zero reasonable expectation of privacy.

The DT system was never supposed to be subject to backroom campaigning—let alone backroom strong-arming, replete with ultimatums demanding that people change their votes or else.  Who knows also what else is going on.  Bribes?  I think that we may safely assume many quid pro quo deals.

I also think that people who engage in backroom DT campaigning, bribes, or coercion of any kind should be administratively blacklisted from DT.  I hope that theymos will consider this.  Of course, for such administrative cleanup to work, the evidence must be brought forth in the same manner as done in Scam Accusations.  When there is evidence of corruption, the people who would police forum scams via DT must be subject to no less a searching public inquiry than any scammer.

I was told by a DT member that he was being excluded by another DT member just because I was on his trust list 

He was given an ultimatum to either exclude me in exchange to be added in his trust list or if he was going keep me included on his trust list he would remain excluded on his.

This is one of the handful of ultimate betrayals because DT rank was never supposed to be used for these types of reasons.

Agreed.


Where are decency and common sense?

The only time that I have ever politely requested in private that another individual change her own trust list, with no significant attempt at persuasion, was when I asked Lauda to remove me from her inclusions list.  (She politely ignored my request.)

The only time that I have ever tried to PM-persuade someone else to make different trust-list decisions was when I was publicly debating the same issue with the same person—and I was not the one who started the parallel PM discussion!

Besides that, um...  I once politely asked someone to confirm my inference of why he had excluded me.  I often express my own opinions of other people, just as I did before democratic DT existed—and without ever directly urging people to change their “votes”.  And I have been generally complaining for months that the trust system is broken—in public and in private.

Where the hell do people get the idea that it be acceptable to issue PM-ultimatums demanding changes in another person’s trust list!?

I promise that if I ever receive such a demand, I will publish it, and I will both red-tag and exclude the person who sent it to me.

It is a backroom demand that you change your vote in a quasi-democratic system.  If that is not textbook corruption, then nothing is!

I urge those who are receiving such demands to think carefully on all that I just said.

For I called it:

Well, I infer that was his purpose in neutering the effect of feedback, and essentially democratizing DT in a convoluted way.

My prediction as to the latter is that it will destroy the trust system.  In the long term, it will put DT under control of those who optimize for gaining control of DT by any means necessary, and devote unbounded time and effort to doing so.  That is a bad criterion.  [...]

Something analogous happened in American history.  [...]  Then rose “political machines” with gangsters, party politics in the worst modern sense, special-interest groups, etc.  They sometimes used outright ballot-stuffing and fraud; similarly, we have circles of alts to Sibyl the system.  Otherwise, they are just expert manipulators of mass opinion [...]

So as for my prediction of unintended consequences.  Intelligent people may argue over this.  The future will show who’s right.

Told you so.  (And after my return to the forum in January, it took me all of 76 hours to figure that out.)

[bonesjonesreturns]

Threatening someone with doxing is also a questionable move:

2. It is not allowed to post someone's dox if it is especially obvious that you're just using the dox as a weapon.

Nobody was threatened with anything here. If I was the one being accused of something like this, my doxx would be dumped within 1 nano seconds in the investigation section and nobody would blink. I chose not to go with this route even when it is people who are defaming me whenever they can. I was considering accepting exclusions just to avoid using the DOX and still keep the flag up to protect people from deception, but thanks I guess I am evil. Sigh.

Lauda even after my multiple apologies to her

It does not work like that. You can apologize a million times to me, it does not matter. I do not need nor want your apologies. You can not expect forgiveness when you are involved in absolute bullshit like TECSHARE's Guild of Stupidity, send me apologies - yet seize every single opportunity to disagree with me (even when the disagreeing side has an opinion that is worse than the anti-vax club), seize every opportunity to to sneak in something bad about me or about people who share my views or support my flags. This is not remorse, this is not being sorry, this is worse - active deception under pretenses of being remorseful.
I am willing to forgive every single person given enough time (but not forget): This assumes that one shows true remorse via non-acts of evil and acts of good (what this means I leave up to the individual to interpret) or deceive me so well enough that I mistake high-level deception as true remorse.
Update 2: Now that I realize it, I am not even asking you to do anything hacker1001101001. All I am asking you is to stop doing things you already are (see tiny list in previous paragraph). However, do not come back in 1 month and say look I have not done anything for 30 days please remove ratings.

Lol at this scammer lauda.

He is clearly saying i will keep the red tag while you are part of the objective standards guild and disagreeing with me. Very clearly this thread is simply the trust system being used by proven scammers to punish those that dare speak out.

Malboroza is claiming early in this thread " soon i will add a type 1 flag."

This thread is another clear attempt by lauda, malboroza and their new pervy old panting bitch nullius and the very willing scam facilitator for pay nutildah to dig up some possible dirt on hacker0101000101  because he disagreed with lauda the scammer and wants objective standards to ensure the fair treatment of every member here.

This thread needs context. As the old desperate perv nullius says context can be important. Go read his atriz vs alia posts

I would advise hacker to tell the scammer supporter malboroza and the other scammers here to keep their questions for later.
I would say to malboroza i will answer you after you answer my questions on supporting scammers like lauda would lied and shilled for a proven scam until he dumped his bags.

You answer questions first marlboroza then hacker can answer yours.  We will compare who needs excluding and red more urgently.

After reading more through the pages here you no need to longer avoid my questions for clarity of the central purpose of this thread.
You are clearly using it as a tool to garner support for your double standards punishment of hacker10000111

Trying to avoid others bringing context for your given and promised forthcoming punishment of hacker01010 is dishonest.  You are trying to hide and obscure your double standards and your true motivation for raising this issue at this time.

Nullius is a creep. Nobody can take this coward seriously. I am enjoying reading the alia debacle. Nullius is a creepy predator type and since he feels that empathy is disgusting and wrong, that together with obviously a predatory creepy old perv nature is quite a dangerous combo. The reader should investigate this idiot and new female members should be extra cautious. I think his past conduct is actually a cause for concern.

Even possible or probable ico bumping is way below the level of danger posed by this motley crew of scammers, scammer supporters and creepy old cowards pervs who claim empathy is worthy of punishment.

Let me restate. In the context of the others you shelter and support then hacker is a far less danger to the members here based on the evidence here.  I find the timing and the lack of concern for more serious dangers here very telling

Marlboroza spend your energy hunting your scammer friends or alts first like lauda and tman and nutildah. After that you can pretend to want to save the board from.ico bumpers. Also keep an eye on nullius if any young female scammers come along he will perhaps support them too if they just talk-him-off verbally since he is too old for the real thing.
Or maybe he tells them he only enjoys verbal stim until....well it does not bare thinking about

There dear pervo coward nullius you got a mention

The more I read of this thread about hacker0101000101  the more I understand your reluctance to state its purpose malboroza.
Clearly context is very important here whilst you and the other toadies and creeps discuss fair and consistent punishments and even possible paths to " forgiveness "

Carot and stick


This is not to say i would condone ico bumping only that we must place it into full context of other possible dangers here before we decide suitable action and the order of actions. We want to take care of the most serious evils first.

[JollyGood]

Lol at this scammer lauda.

He is clearly saying i will keep the red tag while you are part of the objective standards guild and disagreeing with me. Very clearly this thread is simply the trust system being used by proven scammers to punish those that dare speak out.

Malboroza is claiming early in this thread " soon i will add a type 1 flag."

This thread is another clear attempt by lauda, malboroza and their new pervy old panting bitch nullius and the very willing scam facilitator for pay nutildah to dig up some possible dirt on hacker0101000101  because he disagreed with lauda the scammer and wants objective standards to ensure the fair treatment of every member here.

This thread needs context. As the old desperate perv nullius says context can be important. Go read his atriz vs alia posts

I would advise hacker to tell the scammer supporter malboroza and the other scammers here to keep their questions for later.
I would say to malboroza i will answer you after you answer my questions on supporting scammers like lauda would lied and shilled for a proven scam until he dumped his bags.

You answer questions first marlboroza then hacker can answer yours.  We will compare who needs excluding and red more urgently.

After reading more through the pages here you no need to longer avoid my questions for clarity of the central purpose of this thread.
You are clearly using it as a tool to garner support for your double standards punishment of hacker10000111

Trying to avoid others bringing context for your given and promised forthcoming punishment of hacker01010 is dishonest.  You are trying to hide and obscure your double standards and your true motivation for raising this issue at this time.

Nullius is a creep. Nobody can take this coward seriously. I am enjoying reading the alia debacle. Nullius is a creepy predator type and since he feels that empathy is disgusting and wrong, that together with obviously a predatory creepy old perv nature is quite a dangerous combo. The reader should investigate this idiot and new female members should be extra cautious. I think his past conduct is actually a cause for concern.

Even possible or probable ico bumping is way below the level of danger posed by this motley crew of scammers, scammer supporters and creepy old cowards pervs who claim empathy is worthy of punishment.

Let me restate. In the context of the others you shelter and support then hacker is a far less danger to the members here based on the evidence here.  I find the timing and the lack of concern for more serious dangers here very telling

Marlboroza spend your energy hunting your scammer friends or alts first like lauda and tman and nutildah. After that you can pretend to want to save the board from.ico bumpers. Also keep an eye on nullius if any young female scammers come along he will perhaps support them too if they just talk-him-off verbally since he is too old for the real thing.
Or maybe he tells them he only enjoys verbal stim until....well it does not bare thinking about

There dear pervo coward nullius you got a mention

The more I read of this thread about hacker0101000101  the more I understand your reluctance to state its purpose malboroza.
Clearly context is very important here whilst you and the other toadies and creeps discuss fair and consistent punishments and even possible paths to " forgiveness "

Carot and stick


This is not to say i would condone ico bumping only that we must place it into full context of other possible dangers here before we decide suitable action and the order of actions. We want to take care of the most serious evils first.

What a waste of time using the unIGNORE on him to read this waffle and then to re-add him to my IGNORE list.

Is this the best they can come up with? They think they are insulting or attacking users that are trying to uphold the morals of this forum but they are just a group of misguided attention seeking users that have ulterior motives.

Just the idea, just the notion that a user such as hacker0101000101 who self-admitted taking payment to post fake information in ICO ANN threads and has thus far an unknown number of alt-accounts could in any way be compared to marlboroza or Lauda (who have given so much to the forum over the years) is absurd.

Sure some of us might not be liked by everybody but when it comes to contributing to this forum in a positive manner, outside that small political group of disgruntled attention seekers, it would be mightily difficult to find anybody (with any serious standing within this forum) who would claim hacker0101000101 is bringing more to this forum than others yet those regular suspect alt-accounts and deeply troubled users continue trying to create animosity here by deliberately closing their eyes to the obvious.

Instead of holding hacker0101000101 to account they continue to deflect attention away from him, they harbour and shelter him, like he does them akin to bosom-buddies just because they have personal vendettas against users such as Lauda and marlboroza.

[hacker1001101001]

What a waste of time using the unIGNORE on him to read this waffle and then to re-add him to my IGNORE list.

Is this the best they can come up with? They think they are insulting or attacking users that are trying to uphold the morals of this forum but they are just a group of misguided attention seeking users that have ulterior motives. [...]

-snip-

[...] Instead of holding hacker0101000101 to account they continue to deflect attention away from him, they harbour and shelter him, like he does them akin to bosom-buddies just because they have personal vendettas against users such as Lauda and marlboroza.

What an dump person you are to waste your time even after knowing you are wasting it at first. You are as dump as not able to utilize the IGNORE feature of the forum in an intended way. Your childish ways of putting it on and off and crawring in every thread with nothing of an matter and vomiting your uncalled wisdom are pretty naive and should be noted by the user's including you in there trust lists and thinking your judgement is vaild ( moderators too should see this deflections ) . BTW, YoBit drama was an nice attention seaker for you with your power hunger. ~JollyGood is the best course of action left for anyone with an right mind as your digging your own hole with flexing your ulterior judgements and motives around the board.

[bonesjonesreturns]

Lol at this scammer lauda.

He is clearly saying i will keep the red tag while you are part of the objective standards guild and disagreeing with me. Very clearly this thread is simply the trust system being used by proven scammers to punish those that dare speak out.

Malboroza is claiming early in this thread " soon i will add a type 1 flag."

This thread is another clear attempt by lauda, malboroza and their new pervy old panting bitch nullius and the very willing scam facilitator for pay nutildah to dig up some possible dirt on hacker0101000101  because he disagreed with lauda the scammer and wants objective standards to ensure the fair treatment of every member here.

This thread needs context. As the old desperate perv nullius says context can be important. Go read his atriz vs alia posts

I would advise hacker to tell the scammer supporter malboroza and the other scammers here to keep their questions for later.
I would say to malboroza i will answer you after you answer my questions on supporting scammers like lauda would lied and shilled for a proven scam until he dumped his bags.

You answer questions first marlboroza then hacker can answer yours.  We will compare who needs excluding and red more urgently.

After reading more through the pages here you no need to longer avoid my questions for clarity of the central purpose of this thread.
You are clearly using it as a tool to garner support for your double standards punishment of hacker10000111

Trying to avoid others bringing context for your given and promised forthcoming punishment of hacker01010 is dishonest.  You are trying to hide and obscure your double standards and your true motivation for raising this issue at this time.

Nullius is a creep. Nobody can take this coward seriously. I am enjoying reading the alia debacle. Nullius is a creepy predator type and since he feels that empathy is disgusting and wrong, that together with obviously a predatory creepy old perv nature is quite a dangerous combo. The reader should investigate this idiot and new female members should be extra cautious. I think his past conduct is actually a cause for concern.

Even possible or probable ico bumping is way below the level of danger posed by this motley crew of scammers, scammer supporters and creepy old cowards pervs who claim empathy is worthy of punishment.

Let me restate. In the context of the others you shelter and support then hacker is a far less danger to the members here based on the evidence here.  I find the timing and the lack of concern for more serious dangers here very telling

Marlboroza spend your energy hunting your scammer friends or alts first like lauda and tman and nutildah. After that you can pretend to want to save the board from.ico bumpers. Also keep an eye on nullius if any young female scammers come along he will perhaps support them too if they just talk-him-off verbally since he is too old for the real thing.
Or maybe he tells them he only enjoys verbal stim until....well it does not bare thinking about

There dear pervo coward nullius you got a mention

The more I read of this thread about hacker0101000101  the more I understand your reluctance to state its purpose malboroza.
Clearly context is very important here whilst you and the other toadies and creeps discuss fair and consistent punishments and even possible paths to " forgiveness "

Carot and stick


This is not to say i would condone ico bumping only that we must place it into full context of other possible dangers here before we decide suitable action and the order of actions. We want to take care of the most serious evils first.

What a waste of time using the unIGNORE on him to read this waffle and then to re-add him to my IGNORE list.

Is this the best they can come up with? They think they are insulting or attacking users that are trying to uphold the morals of this forum but they are just a group of misguided attention seeking users that have ulterior motives.

Just the idea, just the notion that a user such as hacker0101000101 who self-admitted taking payment to post fake information in ICO ANN threads and has thus far an unknown number of alt-accounts could in any way be compared to marlboroza or Lauda (who have given so much to the forum over the years) is absurd.

Sure some of us might not be liked by everybody but when it comes to contributing to this forum in a positive manner, outside that small political group of disgruntled attention seekers, it would be mightily difficult to find anybody (with any serious standing within this forum) who would claim hacker0101000101 is bringing more to this forum than others yet those regular suspect alt-accounts and deeply troubled users continue trying to create animosity here by deliberately closing their eyes to the obvious.

Instead of holding hacker0101000101 to account they continue to deflect attention away from him, they harbour and shelter him, like he does them akin to bosom-buddies just because they have personal vendettas against users such as Lauda and marlboroza.

What part of lauda is a proven scammer  did you miss? Tried to prevent a 2000 000 000 usd compensation airdrop and lying defending and pumping a scam. Remain silent noob peasant fake scam hunter coward.

Jollygood is a fake scam hunter.  He busted some scam and went crying about them making some comeback here. Then mozprognoz laudas alt or bitch tried to help this " scam " jolly good said he busted  get back on the forum and get to work again

Mozprognoz said the scam would need to work with ....yep perhaps lauda for a fee and he advised them to set up under an alt

Jollygood knows all of that but that weak ass scammer supporting fake scam hunter didnt say anything to them. He let that silde or was he in on this? Bust scams that can only return if they get a cut? Hmmm

Jolly good also went around slapping yobit sig spammer with red trust but when it was pointed out he was not punishing dt working with yobit he ran away.

Jolly good fake scam hunter or scammer partner?

Seems you also missed the part where marlboroza is a nothing burger scammer supporter and fake scam hunter like you  are..

Fake scam hunter  = lets the top level scammers go free but cleans out their scamming competition from lower levels or maybe busts them so they have to work with his team for fee to be allowed to operate on this forum

Suchmoon knows this but keeps quiet until mozprognoz calls her names

I have no idea why jayjuangee is giving merit to your post.  It makes him appear a liar now. Said he was not interested in examining irrefutable evidence about lauda scamming becaue he only cares about talking about bitcoin

Now willing to support a post that conflicts with that evidence he says he is not interested in

This looks very strange. How about some research before making excuses not to read it?

Let me say again.  I am more than willing to compare lauda, nutildah and tmans documented wrong doing and compare to hacker0101010 then discuss fair and consistent punishment. You dont want that right?

You dont want any context for the punishment you are pushing??

This lies of me trying to distract from hacker01001 is typical scammer tactics.

They are trying to distract from my challenge to find suitable and consistent punishment because they want to protect their scamming pals and push double standards.

Stop being scared of me scammer supporters.

Let's talk all about hacker0101000101 punishment now .... no derailing. Let's discuss fair and consistent punishment by analysing your real standards not the bogus crap about you wanting to protect the forum

You want to control the forum so you can milk it dry.

Sig spammers and scammers.  Not interested in protecting this forum at all
Milking it for every satoshi they can.

[nullius]

Stop being scared of me scammer supporters.

That needed a Cats and Coffee [C&C] warning.

Add “scared” to the list of words misunderstood and misused by members who also do not know the meanings of the words “objective”, “standards”, “guild”, “testimonium”, “libertas”, “iustitia”...  Actually, I think that it would be easier to list the words that they do know.  Anyway...

JollyGood, you yellow bastard.

Sig spammers and scammers.  Not interested in protecting this forum at all
Milking it for every satoshi they can.

New theory:  The gang of sigspamming fake scamfighters has a few alt/shill/whatever accounts post without paid signatures, because our unlimited rapacity and greed for money money money makes us—um, I’m not sure how to conclude this one.  Surely, it is a brilliant strategy for “milking it for every satoshi”.

Unless you allege that my PGP fingerprint and Latin motto are paying me?  (It is real Latin, a quote from Seneca—not Bitch Latin.)

What part of lauda is a proven scammer  did you miss?

Scamming, and proof thereof.

There dear pervo coward nullius you got a mention

Lovely, just lovely.  Thanks.

Jolly good also went around slapping yobit sig spammer with red trust but when it was pointed out he was not punishing dt working with yobit he ran away.

Setting aside the grossly dishonest mischaracterization within the four corners of that quote, you missed the part where the thorough documentation by JollyGood and others made me realize that it was time for me to step up and announce that I myself would tag said DT1 member first.  The Yobit campaign was then shut down almost immediately; and I was kicked off DT almost immediately, due to another DT1 who suddenly found a shallow pretext for very vocally excluding me within about two hours of vehemently arguing against me in the Yobit thread.  Somehow, I doubt that all these events were purely coincidental.

For obvious reasons, I had considered creating my Yobit thread under an alt, and simply calling on DT members to do the right thing.  I did not do so, because I thought that it was important to take a stand on that issue with the reputation and credibility that I had built in my name—and most importantly, to lead by example in announcing my intent to tag a DT1 member before tagging members of his campaign, damn the consequences to myself.  Although I think that there are sometimes legitimate reasons for using an alt account to address potentially explosive controversies (e.g., scam_detector in the alia case), I am not like you, Mr “bonesjonesreturns”.

Anyway, that is irrelevant here except insofar as it rather contradicts your above-quoted mischaracterization of me as a “coward”; and I wanted to take the opportunity to commend JollyGood for his yeoman’s work in the Yobit case.

Now, let us please refocus the thread to its subject:

Mr. Payed Review, you still didn't address something here, instead of bad attempts of you and your objective standard guild buddies to move this into some other direction, address this:

[nullius]

May I remind everyone this topic isn't discussion about
1) Lauda
2) Nutildah
3) TECSHARE's trust list
4) JollyGood
5) yobit
6) Insert any other deflection

Moderators are useless. 

https://bitcointalk.org/modlog.php

• Delete reply: Re: Ree @hacker1001101001 ICO bump account in topic #5213922 by member #101872

I rarely complain about moderation; but in this case, I must point out that moderation is not only useless, but counterproductive if a complaint about the permitted level of off-topic trolling and thread derailment is deleted, while the off-trolling itself proceeds unabated, and the thread is repeatedly derailed.

I respectfully request that moderators reconsider this policy going forward, delete future posts which are blatantly off-topic or self-evidently attempt to drive the thread off-topic—and don’t delete posts that reasonably criticize a moderation policy that permits trolling.

Thank you.

I also request that moderators and administrators consider a rule against scatological content.  It makes this thread unpleasant to read, for normal human beings who do not wish to see pictures of poop.  So-called “NSFW” images are categorically forbidden, even tasteful images that would not disgust anybody who is not generally disgusted by the human body or by sexuality.  By comparison, why should TEChSHARE, with his disturbing coprophilic fixations, be permitted to turn this thread into a sewer of literal shitposts that are obviously intended to shock and disgust with graphic imagery?

Not deleted by moderators who deleted Lauda’s opinion that “Moderators are useless.  ”:

~

I KNEW IT! You ate a Payday bar back in April 3rd of 2016! These peanut fragments submitted as exhibit #2 prove it! Just wait until I start counting them!



I am so hot on your trail I can feel it!

(If an appropriate rule is set, then I will edit this post to add spaces and break up the image bbcode.  I may do that anyway, after a day or two.  Meanwhile, I think that I need to drive the point home here.  Sorry.)

Deleted by moderators who don’t delete pictures of poop, and don’t delete repetitive offtopic rants about users who are not the subject of this thread:
http://loyce.club/archive/posts/5421/54210084.html

Unanswered Questions

In my last post on page 12 of this thread, I backlinked marlboroza’s unanswered questions to hacker1001101001 from page 10—in which marlboroza was quoting his own question from page 9.

Whilst skimming past the off-topic trolling, I had somehow completely missed another important, on-topic post by marlboroza from page 11, which I believe deserves to be here on page 12 (with highlighting added by me).  I didn’t realize that OP had quoted Lauda’s deleted post, until I wrote the above and had reconstructed the quote myself.

May I remind everyone this topic isn't discussion about
1) Lauda
2) Nutildah
3) TECSHARE's trust list
4) JollyGood
5) yobit
6) Insert any other deflection

Moderators are useless. 

And, off topic conversation continues. Just look at this waste of sperm:

possible ico bumping

"possible"   

1051 characters, I ignored all spam and off topic parts of last post and there is exactly 17 on topic characters. I am not sure from where are all these shitposts and conspiracy theories coming from, but last time I checked, this is what is in topic:

What do you mean it is not your reddit account and you have nothing to do with ICO bumping service?

That is important part. And first reply was:

I was not involved in any type of paid posting promotion rather was just filling my signature campaigns post requirements.

That is also most important part. Hacker lied several times and denied everything then he was exposed then he confessed. After deeper study of hacker's address, there is unignorable number of transactions going to and from various bump accounts, now some users like TECSHARE and bonesjonesreturns are trying to bury my discovery in the sea of off topic deflective shitposts.


Why is TECSHARE trying to deflect this topic, "ico payed review sevice" is fraud business, there is significant number of users who are fighting against these fraud services and I don't see him doing this in any other topic (this is for example one topic about the same subject https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5238597.0, which is, bump service, nah, you won't see tecshare there) 

I also think that two of marlboroza’s substantive posts from page 9 deserve to be here on page 12.  They have not been answered other than with evasiveness by hacker1001101001 (more evasiveness), whereafter they were buried by his off-topic troll buddies.

[— snip by nullius —]
Ok, back to topic.

For those of you judging geniunely, none of the account listed out by marlboroza are my alts. I already posted about me being in that business some time back, same indicates and defines those ETH transactions.

But you said you were payed and here is you paying someone:

From hacker to 0xf4e98bac953ee81ee3438aa97bda0ccfe63c95e5

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x24329e495e0f96362c4a64594b186829d277003e661388264cc62b905dbc6792
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x6ad7fc0c28bc67c1c462c2b809d7f96005f133b25a89dcd20b72d63509015743
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x7a42f3c2e7cb43b6beb7b3de03b5bd71e9cfca2ab8915305cff69d916e6c14db
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x9ee327d6749c902be1fe63e05052567ddf1326e80f28a8dbff42e2714226ad15
https://etherscan.io/tx/0xb670d5d1a7e79421744c74731bcfa36c55c688e449f88ba8f1086ae3d79d68b9

#JOIN

Bitcointalk username: salita23
Forum rank: jr member
Posts count:  34
ETH address: 0xf4E98bAC953Ee81Ee3438aA97BDA0cCfE63C95E5

Interesting address (https://etherscan.io/address/0xf4e98bac953ee81ee3438aa97bda0ccfe63c95e5). So, red marked address is hacker's address:



Transactions TO green marked addy (0x9d1e86f60308a24b0a017eaa0918066d8fb9a7f5) can be found in hacker's transactions:

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x12eb3157346ef9b814f68a186c2f899886be3d36a942386f9234140ec7f526ae
https://etherscan.io/tx/0xa051c04e9baa9bc65c7824c49f21c3f976cf95185636fba54ec5ef52734ff01d
https://etherscan.io/tx/0xa9a0bfbdfb0f63deabf03549c5fd989a4d575743237b4332969a18775abe93e6
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x7bb2aad7eb8fb1f7d80cfa85e9e99122a26836fb14f361b3ac519890f27110d5
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x6f8deff8b46ff20dead3bf2af1792966c743c87c4e94a323f51025ba22be5a4d
https://etherscan.io/tx/0xb7e0535a7718bc5c6b80d183b46d59fef518e86aa58649f968683da0129779ff

And as for purple marked address (0x7523b772bdb993fe7eec2dd03e97564753710854, https://etherscan.io/address/0x7523b772bdb993fe7eec2dd03e97564753710854), it has only one transaction from hacker but:



Each address has more transactions FROM hacker:

https://etherscan.io/address/0x89e4c4454bf048edf2536bb6387c2760dd429e8e
https://etherscan.io/txs?a=0xd6ae5106df28742e8729b13d5497b07c0ee9f0c3
https://etherscan.io/txs?a=0x391fbb990900cccac5fa7e96f01211cc93ce2840&p=2  [1]
https://etherscan.io/address/0xf4e98bac953ee81ee3438aa97bda0ccfe63c95e5
https://etherscan.io/txs?a=0x4ff4b05829785e012a2df60eefcbda7e6b1d3f49
https://etherscan.io/txs?a=0x6446df84035f8083191ce2a27c76d4b5f5c11c10
https://etherscan.io/txs?a=0xf9960f024fa69014dfcccc4dc63222295856e091
https://etherscan.io/txs?a=0x4ed83e973c3e50cfbe483398ab17e347ebd244ce&p=2
https://etherscan.io/txs?a=0x0c0369267e791283651899acf23636535d955019
https://etherscan.io/txs?a=0x9d1e86f60308a24b0a017eaa0918066d8fb9a7f5

(CTRL+F hacker addy 0x15ba9083b4c96421827ae85d7a7d211f5862fcde)


I am so lazy to look into this deeper, one of addresses previously mentioned [1] was used by account farhan28 (who is banned btw https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=farhan28 and looking at posts it is just another payed ico bump account)

##PROOF OF AUTHENTICATION##
Bitcointalk Username:farhan28
Telegram Username : @farhan2894
Campaign :Twitter
Spreadsheet # : #1555
Ethereum Wallet Address : 0x391FBB990900cCcac5fa7E96F01211cC93cE2840

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4405290.msg43396614#msg43396614

There is one transaction from hacker https://etherscan.io/tx/0x7d8f5884c950f8cf66f310a08cb755dc6f7285956c3f4acea6094688e96beae8 and 3 transactions from this addy 0x9d1e86f60308a24b0a017eaa0918066d8fb9a7f5

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x56248063d9406ad46267b9bd021e88a191daebdefed0951d274ca74ae8489367
https://etherscan.io/tx/0xc8f3d40471890811ef3263994ff3da59665b01cf3b644538f3770b0aa20d3651
https://etherscan.io/tx/0xc61f9e17262e7c8a12036feaca7e0f4c6b7fbc5fa3bb318ce6d56f6b61b92c4d

(scroll UP, I have already marked it as green in screenshot above)

Further, that ico bump account farhan28 received so many payments from this address 0x5af75bf78984f3e22cfcccb52bf62f529bcb440b (ctrl+f here again https://etherscan.io/txs?a=0x391fbb990900cccac5fa7e96f01211cc93ce2840) and I previously mentioned that address on first page of this topic, just after hacker denied everything.
I understand that bump whore accounts are receiving money from bump services, but account hacker has large number of transactions TO such accounts, and, as he is giving his best to deflect this topic I have no other reason than to believe hacker is behind one of such service or he was filling addresses of alt accounts while receiving money from bump service. I am not sure, but I would place my bet on "behind bump".

For another example, from hacker to this addy 0x390ae66ef2f7424619d092f3ada3c9592a572b42  https://etherscan.io/tx/0x6f763f2299c380c413343a0ee5cff9e74fb01838b8bcc9e8e161e61435aa2ba9

#JOIN

Bitcointalk username: olumyd
Forum rank: Full Member
Posts count:  700
ETH address: 0x390aE66ef2f7424619d092f3ADa3c9592A572b42

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3142918.msg32494700#msg32494700

Except it is shitposting account https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1066312;sa=showPosts;start=1080, account was used to bump various ICO's (randomly selected: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1066312;sa=showPosts;start=1080 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1066312;sa=showPosts;start=1160) Sintez, sintez, dafak is sintez??

Actually, dafak happened with sintez ICO? (https://sintez.global)

I figured that not-my-account Mysterious01 bump-shilled for sintez many times  (http://archive.is/kFmw6). I wonder how much funds this "Server Not Found" has collected.

Beyond Good and Evil

More to the point, even assuming arguendo that I am the most “evil” person on this forum in the world (and Lauda is #3—sorry, kitty, Hitler is still #2; try harder), what has this to do with the bad doings by hacker1001101001 that are evidenced in this thread?

I really like the thought of that assuming arguendo part and attempting to rank such levels of evil on a world-wide scale including living and presumably dead people in such competition.

But, the second part of that proposition is that you are correct, you presumptively evil bastard.  Your admitted (even if merely hypothetical, but I know that you are really admitting something deep down on the inside) level of evil is not even relevant to this thread.  You could be like the worst level of evil, and hacker might be evil like a mouse and even the most minimal level of evil, but the thread is not talking about either you or even that other pointed out evil cat one.  It is about little intsie winsie teenie weenie evil of hacker, to the extent any evil exists in hacker.... I am not even going to presume any evil in hacker personally, even if he may have been mean to me one time, but the topic of this thread happens to be about hacker and perhaps whether any evil actually exists therein.

QFT—and with the brief note that whatever I may or may not be admitting “deep down on the inside”, I do not merely admit, but proudly proclaim that I am “evil” in exactly the sense described by Nietzsche in Beyond Good and Evil and The Genealogy of Morals.  I would like to elaborate on that, but an extended discussion is off-topic. :-)  Also, sorry, ENOTIME now. :-(

[bonesjonesreturns]

All of my posts are on topic and relevant to hacker0101000101 and the punishment malboroza is giving , promising to give and advocating other to give hacker0101000101

They are true, independently verifiable comparisons that should be used to ascertain the correct fair and consistent punishment and a gair and complete rebuttal to malborozas double standards financially motivated one sided witch hunt

Lol Talking of actual yellow bastards look at nullius the cowardly old perv scammer supporter writing books that i can sum up.much more concisely

×××××××××××××××
I am too cowardly to try to debunk the clear evidence of laudas scamming on the thread that bonesjonesreturns provided for me. The rebuttal I presented in my cowardly self modded thread where i was too scared to allow bonesjones to tear my cowardly pervy old apart was hilarious and demonstrates that im a wind bag full of fluff and pretense of being smart.

I want to beg admins to prevent a fair and consistent comparison for hacker0101000101s punishment that us scammer supporters want to punish for speaking up against us.
××××××××××××××

That saved you a lot of nauseating work reading through his pompous pretentious fluff


Now lets start tackling the fair and consistent punishment for hacker0101000101 in the context of malborozas treatment of his proven scammer and scammer facilitating friends. Keep in mind that in the alia scam it seems these very same characters became embroiled lauda atriz tman nullius ? Hmmm when reading through that SCAM it seems they could have all been on on this.

Hacker0101000101? Marlboroza is pushing the red tag and trust exclusion as his valid and credible opinion?

But is malborozas purported opinion on hacker01001011consistent with the punishments for possibly financially high risk behaviors??

I.mean malboroza has already passed judgement and handed out punishment on hacker0101000101  right?

Therefore the purpose of this thread is to demonstrate to others this is the correct consistent and fair punishment that he believes is appropriate and that others should also.

Lets see if malboroza is telling the truth and also advocating fair and consistent punishment

Lauda and nullius are crying to mods to prevent fair open public appraisal. Wimps and weasels

Keep crying scammers and scammer supporters. If these posts are removed then meta will need a debate over this

When punishment is being advocated then it must be permitted to publically analyse and examine if the punishment is fair and consisten

The double standards scammer supporters can fuck off. Cry into your wank pillow nullius as alia says that is all you have now lol.

If it were strictly presentation of evidence to establish it took place fair enough. Now it has on many occasions and by malboroza himself turned into i will give x punishment and others have discussed their reasoning for punishment.

Punishment must be fair and consistent.  Stop trying to prevent malborozas double standards and motivations for the punishment he is advocating and trying to garner support for.

The cowardly old perv nullius crying for help lol. Shut up old man you fluff and trying to sound smart is nauseating   waffling on bla bla bla

You try too hard to sound smart with no substance. Like a replica Ferrari with some 100hp engine and old Ford parts falling off as you turn the ghetto blaster on your lap to max. Sitting there at the lights looking smug believing others can't see the dangerous contraption for what it really is. Take the coke can off of your exhaust pipe and turn you crappy annoying music down loser.

Blathering impotent old perv scammer supporter.  

Now back to discussing the punishment marlboroza has given hacker0101000101 the punishment he claims he will give hacker0101000101  and the punishment he is advocating other members give hacker0101000101  and analysing how consistent and fair this is in the context of his treatment of other scammers aka his friends and his possible real motives for his double standards treatment of hacker0101000101?

This is NOT an investigative thread malboroza already decided, punished and premised further punishment.

This is a punishment deciding thread.  No doubt reading through it.

Now nullius you can go and correct all my spelling errors thanks old pervy scammer supporter self important gobshite with zero achievements.

[marlboroza]

From hacker's address to this address 0x3c31c531d6772723c749dbfff6a547bc02726763



https://etherscan.io/tx/0xd19a39f9f00c3e93cd64bedc590708fafa89383a9412dd9d15afbab673b03466

I couldn't find who is behind this address, yet again, someone from this address received some tokens from GMAT (https://etherscan.io/address/0x3c31c531d6772723c749dbfff6a547bc02726763#tokentxns):



I checked GMAT's bounty campaign topic and there is spreadsheet! https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bq0ZPWIMEksvfa6ZuCWkBkjFReqZLx-D5ts_eJIk4Fg/edit#gid=1284949262 (http://archive.is/3J6Au , http://web.archive.org/web/20200414171941/https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bq0ZPWIMEksvfa6ZuCWkBkjFReqZLx-D5ts_eJIk4Fg/edit)





Amount of token match. Account behind that address appears to be beveryu778.

You will never guess what I have found 

Tadaam! It is just another payed bump account:



Also check dates, seems this account bumped various ICO's not so long time ago, or, should I say, not so long time ago prior to creation of this topic (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=406354;sa=showPosts, archived http://archive.is/JijLv).

------------------------------------

Account under that spambie account (#3 on spreadsheet and account is registered to signature bounty just 11 minutes after account beveryu778, check spreadsheet picture above), Theizestooke is giving me headache. Address from that spreadsheet is 0xF5Ee2C70Dee2BB05c375297c080D768A460d8BE0. Account received exactly the same amount ETH at the same time from hacker https://etherscan.io/tx/0xc7962f6fd30377517929beec878d57db5c1dba6651bf26a796dcfcd7449c069b , to visualize it:



Amount of tokens in that address match with numbers from spreadsheet. Theizestooke is another bump account, as You can see from post history (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1200481;sa=showPosts):



There is archived version of this account's post history dated 1 year ago http://archive.is/Gp2Mw so someone else must have investigated this account as well.

Misc: this is only account which included hacker to their trust network at one point:



http://loyce.club/trust/2019-01-25_Fri_22.33h/1021758.html

--------------------------------------

Third address from picture above (the one with 3 transactions), 0x5b041663dc1bdfdacb00d36d851b6baa5dc93bd7 (transaction), well, You can find that account in the same spreadsheet under #13, it is account swordking:



(received bounty tokens https://etherscan.io/address/0x5b041663dc1bdfdacb00d36d851b6baa5dc93bd7#tokentxns)

Swordking is another bump account, as You can see (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=150734;sa=showPosts , http://archive.is/JijLv), also check dates:



There must be perfectly valid explanation for all this bump.

[marlboroza]

In addition to my previous post, first account I mentioned used this telegram (check spreadsheet):

Vickywaghmare

Now, this is funny (both posts are archived):

#Proof of Authentication
Campaign: Signature
Your Bitcointalk Account Link:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2288171
Your @telegram username: @Vickywaghmare

Anish02 is another bump account, as You can see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2288171;sa=showPosts (http://archive.is/AWF76)

#JOIN

Signature and Avatar campaign

Bitcointalk url: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1216263;sa=statPanel

Telegram url: https://t.me/Vickywaghmare

Lol! player1001101001! Of course, it is another ICO bump account (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1216263;sa=showPosts;start=140 http://archive.is/wti0Y)

ICO BUMP UNITED:

Absolutely true, developers are going as per the roadmap and very soon everyone can see the brighter side of the project. So have some patience because developers will keep their development continuous.

This is the only way we can do for now. We have to wait for the team developer to complete this platform and make this one a good and a worthy project here in crypto space. And hopefully, it will be successful and have a good function in earning profits.

The team is consistently putting efforts in the project and sooner they will complete the development of the platform. So until that we will keep our support continues towards the project.

When it comes to developing, the team behind the project has been consistent since from the beginning. As per the time passes the support of the community is getting bigger and stronger.

Lolz:


(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4855053.msg49336697#msg49336697 , http://archive.is/tqgQk)

Why the fuck are all these ICO bump accounts connected to hacker?

[suchmoon]

player1001101001

I bet he just forgot to mention it. I think it's genuinely possible to forget some of the sockpuppets when you have so many.

[marlboroza]

player1001101001

I bet he just forgot to mention it. I think it's genuinely possible to forget some of the sockpuppets when you have so many.

I know!

To me it is just an impersonator

[JollyGood]

If I were a betting man I would place my last cent on hacker0101000101 not directly answering the questions regarding more and more of these alt-accounts or sock-puppets accounts connected to him because his buddies will come here to defend him by using that old trick called deflection again.

I noticed the positive trust Mr "pay me and I will bump your ICO thread with fake information and I have plenty of alt-accounts to help" left for me a few months ago was deleted, probably after I pulled him up on his scratch-my-back-and-I-will-scratch-yours relationship with some very questionable individuals after he was exposed as receiving money to bump ICO ANN threads. After he had his chance to own up to all his ill-doings he decided to hide whatever he could and step by step thanks to excellent investigative efforts by marlboroza it all started unravelling.

When he eventually does post here, let us all see what his excuse will be for failing to mention another set of alt-accounts connected to him.

~snip~

Why the fuck are all these ICO bump accounts connected to hacker?

[TECSHARE]

If I were a betting man I would place my last cent on hacker0101000101 not directly answering the questions regarding more and more of these alt-accounts or sock-puppets accounts connected to him because his buddies will come here to defend him by using that old trick called deflection again.

I noticed the positive trust Mr "pay me and I will bump your ICO thread with fake information and I have plenty of alt-accounts to help" left for me a few months ago was deleted, probably after I pulled him up on his scratch-my-back-and-I-will-scratch-yours relationship with some very questionable individuals after he was exposed as receiving money to bump ICO ANN threads. After he had his chance to own up to all his ill-doings he decided to hide whatever he could and step by step thanks to excellent investigative efforts by marlboroza it all started unravelling.

When he eventually does post here, let us all see what his excuse will be for failing to mention another set of alt-accounts connected to him.

~snip~

Why the fuck are all these ICO bump accounts connected to hacker?

Why the fuck would he respond to you, no matter what happened? You baboons aren't interested in doing anything but dishing out retribution for those that dare criticize you or your clown gang buddies. So much fraud going on here, but day after day after day you are here crying about this guy as if he just stole The Declaration of Independence. There is a good reason I call you all clowns, because you are a joke.

[Lauda]

player1001101001

I bet he just forgot to mention it. I think it's genuinely possible to forget some of the sockpuppets when you have so many.

I know!

To me it is just an impersonator

Can we get a summary list of all accounts involved? Will make it easier to make something like this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5238497.msg54219192#msg54219192.

[marlboroza]

Can we get a summary list of all accounts involved? Will make it easier to make something like this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5238497.msg54219192#msg54219192.

I might do it on weekend, but if anyone has time and will, please do.

Why the fuck would he respond to you, no matter what happened? You baboons aren't interested in doing anything but dishing out retribution for those that dare criticize you or your clown gang buddies. So much fraud going on here, but day after day after day you are here crying about this guy as if he just stole The Declaration of Independence. There is a good reason I call you all clowns, because you are a joke.

Hello, shill. There are at least 40 accounts mentioned here. Instead doing your usual text spin:

retribution
criticize
clown gang
buddies
clowns

please read.
On side note, here is another good topic for you to do "retribution for calling out clown car buddies" thingy https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5112217.0. There are so many users you don't like there, so  why don't you do the same crap there instead of doing it here?

You can even discuss with bump service about their own contradictions:

Users: [...] Have been abusing Bitcointalk Trust system by giving negative trust reviews, not because of scam, but because they simply do not agree with that I have been doing.

Giving fake reviews is a scam.

You two will perfectly fit together

[hacker1001101001]

Why the fuck are all these ICO bump accounts connected to hacker?

I am repeating my clear explanation to this here. ( Could be my last time )

Yes, I was involved in bumping business and I even had many other users working around me. I am obligate to not reveal anything insider from it and it is even unethical for me to comment about others accounts and there address transactions with one of my address regarding such type of service. But I am not involved in any such type of further activities from this accounts as I don't control any of them. I would also like to assure everyone here that I am not involved in bumping now and not willing to facilitate it in future.

Sorry, but I am out of this attacks and repeating my answers again so, I feel I had enough of your dump Questions/Answer sessions.