More trust abuse by marlboroza

[suchmoon]

This person is obviously crazy and should be tagged.

Tagging crazy people just makes them more crazy and even lends some legitimacy to their crazy "abuse" claims. Just let them be crazy.

[TECSHARE]

This person is obviously crazy and should be tagged.

Tagging crazy people just makes them more crazy and even lends some legitimacy to their crazy "abuse" claims. Just let them be crazy.

Why would anyone interpret the behavior of yourself or marlboroza as mobbing or abusive? It is not like these strings of accusations made by all the same people are a repeating pattern any time anyone questions any of your behavior... oh wait.


marlboroza   2020-01-27   Reference   Using trust and moderators to silence people.


Now I am using moderators, to silence people? They are just at my command now are they? It couldn't be that your posts were removed because they broke the rules now would it? Now I am using the trust system to silence people? What?

[suchmoon]

This person is obviously crazy and should be tagged.

Tagging crazy people just makes them more crazy and even lends some legitimacy to their crazy "abuse" claims. Just let them be crazy.

Why would anyone interpret the behavior of yourself or marlboroza as mobbing or abusive?

Beats me.

[TECSHARE]

marlboroza   2019-12-31      troll

How much more clear does it need to be made that certain people are intent on using the trust system as a weapon to silence people who disagree with them?

[Vod]

How much more clear does it need to be made that certain people are intent on using the trust system as a weapon to silence people who disagree with them?

Oh, it is 100% clear who is abusing trust, Techy.   

[marlboroza]

marlboroza   2020-01-27   Reference   Using trust and moderators to silence people.
marlboroza   2020-01-25   Reference   Troll account [...]


How much more clear does it need to be made that certain people are intent on using the trust system as a weapon to silence people who disagree with them?

FTFY. Are you trying to say that because of my factual feedback on your account you can't type? That doesn't make any sense at all.

You are just pissed because your attempt to silence someone who said something you don't like https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5220741.0 fail.

[TECSHARE]

Certain users like marlboroza are intent on using "off topic" reports as a tool to silence any valid criticism against them. I am going to start reposting deleted posts in their appropriate thread so everyone can see exactly just how many off topic posts I have to defend myself from, and just how eager the mods are to delete my defenses, in my own threads, defending myself from these endless wild accusations.

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Why would anyone get the impression mods are bias against them when they aren't even allowed to defend themselves from accusations in a thread they created themselves to discuss it?

Stop shitposting, many posts have been removed from that thread, including my where I pointed you saying "no one cares about proofs of accusation".

As for some other parts of this post, you said:

Since the moderators have determined me defending myself from Vod's accusation in the thread about Nullius's trust system abuse is off topic, even though Vod's accusation is completely what it is based on, I guess I will just post my removed posts from there here since criticism of Vod's behavior always seems to be off topic even when it is very much on topic.

And you quoted conversation between you and TwitchySeal, so you are accusing Vod and TwitchSeal that they are alt accounts. You are crazy. (not to mention that you said you posted PM because someone ignored you then you said it is not true - so you are crazy again.) Just accept that more people are accusing you, it is not Vod only.

Archived for future reference: http://archive.is/wip/HNNqh

Some how I don't find your observations to be very impartial considering your own history of trust system abuse against me.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213992.0

[Vod]

Certain users like marlboroza are intent on using "off topic" reports as a tool to silence any valid criticism against them. I am going to start reposting deleted posts in their appropriate thread so everyone can see exactly just how many off topic posts I have to defend myself from, and just how eager the mods are to delete my defenses, in my own threads, defending myself from these endless wild accusations.

Does FH get a chance to defend himself against your wild accusation?    Nope -  self moderated.    You are asking him to prove his innocence (as you admit you don't have evidence to back the statement up) while complaining the rest of the community has double standards...

There sure are a lot of tools here to silence hypocrites.   :/

[TECSHARE]

Certain users like marlboroza are intent on using "off topic" reports as a tool to silence any valid criticism against them. I am going to start reposting deleted posts in their appropriate thread so everyone can see exactly just how many off topic posts I have to defend myself from, and just how eager the mods are to delete my defenses, in my own threads, defending myself from these endless wild accusations.

Does FH get a chance to defend himself against your wild accusation?    Nope -  self moderated.    You are asking him to prove his innocence (as you admit you don't have evidence to back the statement up) while complaining the rest of the community has double standards...

There sure are a lot of tools here to silence hypocrites.   :/

Yeah you are right, it is most likely you considering most of my removed posts are defending from your wild accusations. Of course is is hard to know for sure because you all operate as a collective when you think you smell blood in the water. Twist though, it is your own.

[Vod]

So, we agree FH does not get to defend himself from your wild accusations. As long as you prevent him, please don't complain if you perceive others preventing you from the same thing.

Pathetic hypocrite.  

[TECSHARE]

So, we agree FH does not get to defend himself from your wild accusations. As long as you prevent him, please don't complain if you perceive others preventing you from the same thing.

Pathetic hypocrite.  

TIL I have the power to silence moderators. You really, REALLY love projection don't you Vod?

[marlboroza]

Archived for record http://archive.is/rgyzs#selection-4343.0-4343.412

Certain users like marlboroza are intent on using "off topic" reports as a tool to silence any valid criticism against them. I am going to start reposting deleted posts in their appropriate thread so everyone can see exactly just how many off topic posts I have to defend myself from, and just how eager the mods are to delete my defenses, in my own threads, defending myself from these endless wild accusations.

Please elaborate your post, how is reporting off topic reply to moderator "more trust abuse by marlboroza"? I am glad that someone has reported that off topic reply and moderator removed it, but it is far away from silencing anyone, trust abuse or whatever it is in this topic.

I didn't report it, you posting this in this thread is just another example of your trolling.

[TwitchySeal]

Certain users like marlboroza are intent on using "off topic" reports as a tool to silence any valid criticism against them. I am going to start reposting deleted posts in their appropriate thread

Sounds like effective reporting on marlborozas part.  Why not just try and make the posts in the appropriate thread right off the bat?  Then even if marlboroza reports them, you'll feel less abused/unhappy because they won't get removed.

[JollyGood]

Not just that but alt-accounts are jumping to aid his petty little mind games too, it is getting very silly now. The only sensible conclusion is thread was created for the purpose of doing nothing apart from gaining attention for his own self-gratification. I still do pity him somewhat but it is very thin now.

Techshare is sounding more and more Like cryptocunter. Abuse abuse, teams etc etc

[TECSHARE]

Not just that but alt-accounts are jumping to aid his petty little mind games too, it is getting very silly now. The only sensible conclusion is thread was created for the purpose of doing nothing apart from gaining attention for his own self-gratification. I still do pity him somewhat but it is very thin now.

Techshare is sounding more and more Like cryptocunter. Abuse abuse, teams etc etc

You fellows here to get ahead of something?


marlboroza   2020-02-28      "Interfering with investigations, posting lots of lies, trolls, deflects, http://archive.is/wip/7ygI5, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226886.0, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5214377.0 user is highly deceptive. "


At what point does this community acknowledge I am under a coordinated attack by trust system abusers? If you think they will just quit when they are done with me, you are a moron. Time to stop being jellyfish and speak as one.

Now the fact that I want any say in how the trust system is run is being used as "evidence" to support a negative rating. Do they have to tattoo it on your face before you will admit what is going on?

[marlboroza]

~

I followed principles of your objective guild and acted accordingly!

It is not trust abuse according to you!

Stop harassing me now!

[truth or dare]

~

I followed principles of your objective guild and acted accordingly!

It is not trust abuse according to you!

Stop harassing me now!

Did you present irrefutable evidence of the lies you claim TS has posted?

The references don't seem to make these Clear?

Are you claiming incorrect information was presented that you can prove is incorrect or all of this plus you can prove TS also knew it was incorrect and deliberately attempted to persuade others it was true?

This is not just a difference of opinion is it?

Are you lying about applying the guilds objective standards ? I find it hard to believe you have irrefutable evidence of scamming or strong compelling evidence of attempting to scam or setting up a scam.

You don't seriously expect anyone to believe TS engaged in direct financial wrongdoing?

I think there must be some misunderstanding on your part?  This looks like some flagrant and ruthless red tag abuse that lauda The scammer would pull. Not a more sensible member like you marlboroza.

I will hear you side of things. It may not be abuse but rather a language barrier?

[JollyGood]

marlboroza ask yourself - are these imbeciles really worth engaging with until they reform their character? I currently do not have either of them on IGNORE but just might have to do it if they keep going the way they are.

~

I followed principles of your objective guild and acted accordingly!

It is not trust abuse according to you!

Stop harassing me now!

[truth or dare]

marlboroza ask yourself - are these imbeciles really worth engaging with until they reform their character? I currently do not have either of them on IGNORE but just might have to do it if they keep going the way they are.

~

I followed principles of your objective guild and acted accordingly!

It is not trust abuse according to you!

Stop harassing me now!

Asking for evidence for claims that form the basis of red tags is going the "wrong way" ?

Senior members lose nothing when newbies run from them. Debunk members statements and arguments that you are unhappy with, or simply accept you have been defeated. You should do so graciously, while being thankful for time they spent educating you.

[marlboroza]

marlboroza ask yourself - are these imbeciles really worth engaging with until they reform their character? I currently do not have either of them on IGNORE but just might have to do it if they keep going the way they are.

I have this fake newbie account on ignore (I can only guess that they probably wrote text wall asking for evidence and probably some crap about objective standards), but I can't put this tard tecschare on ignore when he accuses me of doing something I didn't do over and over again! I am done with placing neutural on tecs's wall, however, I might link everything in thread I started, remove all neutrals and leave one negative.

I am under a coordinated attack by trust system abusers?

Lunatic, tries to create some kind of club and lists some users which he doesn't like then he creates conspiracy theory that this imaginary group is conspiring against him.

If you think they will just quit when they are done with me, you are a moron.

Done with you? Quit what exactly? What the fuck are you talking about   I strongly suggest you to visit DOCTOR, you maybe have brain tumor and I just saved your life.


"Some one doesn't like humorous critical observations being made about them so they abuse the reporting system to have them removed" - Tecshare (archived http://archive.is/07bbz#selection-9817.24-9843.9)

This topic is about "my trust abuse", and that post was  just under my post, TECSHARE certainly accused me of "abusing reporting system", not it is only off topic reply, tecshare is directly trying to hurt me by posting false information. It is defamation, a one big LIE.



I did not report this post either, stop harassing me @tecshare!
reporting off topic lie btw, I don't want to tag you for defamation but I will strongly suggest you to restrain yourself of posting lies and off topic replies.