Affiliater- Plagiarized Whitepaper

[Rikafip]

What happened: Affiliater  copied content from several older ones, Affiliate Coin and Goldrium.

Affiliater Ann: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5217749.0
Archive:  https://archive.md/E39Sh

Website:  https://affiliater.tech/#
Archive:  https://archive.ph/9jlco

Whitepaper:  https://affiliater.tech/assets/files/white-paper.pdf
Archive:  https://archive.ph/z7Op4



Affiliater                                                                       
       

         


Affiliate Coin
https://www.affiliatecoin.io/white-paper.pdf





Affiliater



Goldrium
https://goldrium.com/GOLDRIUM_WhitePaper.pdf



Having good ratings on ICO tracking sites  is not a sign of legit project, but even that is fake in their case, as they are not listed there at all

[1714834202]

1714834202

[1714834202]

1714834202

[1714834202]

1714834202

[1714834202]

1714834202

[1714834202]

1714834202

[Theb]

Having good ratings on ICO tracking sites  is not a sign of legit project, but even that is fake in their case, as they are not listed there at all

Definitely not, most of these ICO rating platforms accepts payments under the name "Premium Listing" so you'll definitely see a biased rating on these kinds of ICOs, you won't really see a good and honest rating on any kind of service that accepts payments to grade and list them. I have put a negative trust as well but I think the best thing to do is to put a flag on him so will you do the honors on doing it? I'll support it right away.

[Raflesia]

Having good ratings on ICO tracking sites  is not a sign of legit project, but even that is fake in their case, as they are not listed there at all

Definitely not, most of these ICO rating platforms accepts payments under the name "Premium Listing" so you'll definitely see a biased rating on these kinds of ICOs, you won't really see a good and honest rating on any kind of service that accepts payments to grade and list them. I have put a negative trust as well but I think the best thing to do is to put a flag on him so will you do the honors on doing it? I'll support it right away.

ICO ratings can be paid whenever they want so that the projects they run get a good ICO rating.
I will no longer believe in the ranking of these sites because in my opinion it is less accurate and can be manipulated for the money so many investors are trapped here.
Scamer must be exterminated.

[Rikafip]

Having good ratings on ICO tracking sites  is not a sign of legit project, but even that is fake in their case, as they are not listed there at all

Definitely not, most of these ICO rating platforms accepts payments under the name "Premium Listing" so you'll definitely see a biased rating on these kinds of ICOs, you won't really see a good and honest rating on any kind of service that accepts payments to grade and list them. I have put a negative trust as well but I think the best thing to do is to put a flag on him so will you do the honors on doing it? I'll support it right away.

Yep, those ICO tracking sites are part of the problem, with scammy exchanges and  scammy teams. Even pure  scams manage to pass KYC on some of them, let alone to have high rating.
Affiliater team went step further and even faked listing on those sites. It just shows how lazy they are.

Flag type 1  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1250

[Stalker22]

From: https://affiliater.tech/


From: https://www.facebook.com/pg/AffiliaterICO/about/

We are a business called Bitcorea run by solo Korean. It promotes affiliate links for a variety of financial instruments trading platforms.

We're a bit contradictory, aren't we? 

[Theb]

Yep, those ICO tracking sites are part of the problem, with scammy exchanges and  scammy teams. Even pure  scams manage to pass KYC on some of them, let alone to have high rating.
Affiliater team went step further and even faked listing on those sites. It just shows how lazy they are.

Flag type 1  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1250

I'm not even sure if they are really doing some kind of KYC process for their ICO team since I have seen it in past scam accusations where they passed the KYC process yet when our scam hunters here do a little bit of reverse image search they will see that some or at least one of their team are fake, if they are doing a KYC process for their ICO listings they are really doing a bad job for it. This is one of the reasons why you can't trust their ratings as data and opinions might be hugely inaccurate.

P.S.
Supported the flag, thank you for putting it up.

[Rikafip]

I'm not even sure if they are really doing some kind of KYC process for their ICO team since I have seen it in past scam accusations where they passed the KYC process yet when our scam hunters here do a little bit of reverse image search they will see that some or at least one of their team are fake, if they are doing a KYC process for their ICO listings they are really doing a bad job for it. This is one of the reasons why you can't trust their ratings as data and opinions might be hugely inaccurate.

That's true, so many times scammers passed KYC on those tracking sites, and in the end their identities were proven to be fake. For me they are basically accomplices to those scammers, and instead inform people, what they do is misinform. And even making nice profit out of it.
Bitcointalk forum proved to be so much better in the assessment  whether some project is legit or not, and it is the only place i look when I hear about some potentially good crypto project.