BESTCHANGE.COM PAYING SCAMMER SUPPORTERS LIKE MEMBER examplens TO PREVENT VALID

[bonesjonesreturns]

BESTCHANGE.COM is paying a scammers like member  examplens to protect and support scammers.

It seems scammer protector examplens is trying to null valid warnings to honest members that are based upon incontrovertible proof of scamming and attempts to deceive and scam investors.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5249969.0

See the flag there to see which scammer protectors and facilitators are getting paid of this forum.
Anyone opposing that flag based on incontrovertible proof of scamming is a willing and deliberate scam facilitator.

He must be excluded from default trust and tagged and flagged.

Members can not be permitted to prevent scammer warnings to honest members.

Gradually all of these scammer supporters must be tagged and flagged.

Supporting scammers and preventing honest members receiving warnings is dangerous behaviour and BESTCHANGE.COM should not be paying scammer supporters to support scams.

Examplens is also a trust abuser.

Flag, tag and exclude this piece of scamming dirt.

I would suggest the project stops sponsoring this kind of scammer supporting asap.

I can then change the thread to an accurate description. 

[1714998121]

1714998121

[1714998121]

1714998121

[1714998121]

1714998121

[Pffrt]

Where's the connection between trust abuser, scammer with advertising? If bestchange thinks that paying examplens is worthy for them, I see no reason of creating this thread. If you think bestchange doesn't know what you said above and would exclude examplens for this, you would rather PM bestchange.

[bonesjonesreturns]

Where's the connection between trust abuser, scammer with advertising? If bestchange thinks that paying examplens is worthy for them, I see no reason of creating this thread. If you think bestchange doesn't know what you said above and would exclude examplens for this, you would rather PM bestchange.

Nope everything will remain transparent

Scammer supporters attempting to null flags based on incontrovertible evidence of scamming are dangerous and must not be paid

I see another scammer supporter they are paying to support scammers trying to null this flag also

BESTCHANGE.COM seem to be paying lots of scammer supporters.

More to come. Please reach out to BESTCHANGE.COM to alert them to this.

They must take a care not to sponsor scammers.

If BESTCHANGE.COM thinks it is best for them to sponsor scammer facilitators that is fine let them continue.

[Pffrt]

More to come. Please reach out to BESTCHANGE.COM to alert them to this.
.....
If BESTCHANGE.COM thinks it is best for them to sponsor scammer facilitators that is fine let them continue.

You can alert them yourself by sending a PM, why this thread which is again linked to another thread? If bestchange wouldn't think that, they would definitely not include him in the campaign at the first place. Everything is going fine from their side, why would you create unnecessary drama?

[bonesjonesreturns]

More to come. Please reach out to BESTCHANGE.COM to alert them to this.
.....
If BESTCHANGE.COM thinks it is best for them to sponsor scammer facilitators that is fine let them continue.

You can alert them yourself by sending a PM, why this thread which is again linked to another thread? If bestchange wouldn't think that, they would definitely not include him in the campaign at the first place. Everything is going fine from their side, why would you create unnecessary drama?

Please do not seek to conflate undeniable evidence of scamming supporting and scamming with drama

BESTCHANGE.COM can soon remedy this by removing scammers or scammer supporters working being paid by them

Drama? Are you now stating that creating warnings based on undeniable evidence of scamming or scammer supporting is drama?


I have noticed BESTCHANGE.COM are spending the scammer supporting member talkstar this will require another thread later when I am less busy.

Each scammer supporter must have their own dedicated thread.

[Best_Change]

Hi bonesjonesreturns!

Almost every forum user participates in some signature campaign the goal of which is to spread information about the company.
According to our campaign rules, the participant can be excluded if they receive a legitimate negative trust. At this moment we see no grounds to consider forum members exemplens and TalkStar as scammers. We are not in favor of hasty accusations.

[JeromeTash]

bonesjonesreturns a.k.a Cryptohunter, everything you post these days is pretty much a big joke and delusional. What has bestchange got to do with your hate/issues with Examplens 

It's like trying to accuse Nike just because one of their top sponsored athletes Cristiano Ronaldo was arrested for DUI. No wonder that's why members no longer take your pleas seriously.