how to revive a dead thread (the sneaky way)

[eli113]

i was away and busy.

clicking 'show unread posts blah blah' found https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5177939.0

i was reading random posts and i noticed something was feeling wrong.

not a bad thread, a typo in the title excusable enough , small but ok starting post , good flow/content by the way.

--

To our beloved Admin and Moderators :

there are two innocent low quality posts making 60 and 50 days jumps. /revivals/

post numbers 275 and 285.

is it ethical and/or legit for us users to revive threads like that , my question.

thanks in advance , and delete this post asap if i made something wrong , i am partly human still you know.
or correct my catchy title.

[1714737774]

1714737774

[1714737774]

1714737774

[1714737774]

1714737774

[1714737774]

1714737774

[1714737774]

1714737774

[1714737774]

1714737774

[UserU]

i was away and busy.

clicking 'show unread posts blah blah' found https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5177939.0

i was reading random posts and i noticed something was feeling wrong.

not a bad thread, a typo in the title excusable enough , small but ok starting post , good flow/content by the way.

--

To our beloved Admin and Moderators :

there are two innocent low quality posts making 60 and 50 days jumps. /revivals/

post numbers 275 and 285.

is it ethical and/or legit for us users to revive threads like that , my question.

thanks in advance , and delete this post asap if i made something wrong , i am partly human still you know.
or correct my catchy title.

Those posts are reportable, assuming that the OP's questions/ concerns were addressed prior. But to be fair, it's fairly common to see such things especially from the signature campaigners just to fulfill their post quotas.

Heck, I still see dead projects necro-ed from time to time.

[webtricks]

Such posts were easily identifiable earlier and I myself reported when someone bumped such megathreads with shit post. But due to YoBit wave, it becomes really difficult to identify such posts as 10-15 new shit posts get posted after bump post in just few hours.

Good thing is Yobit Signature campaign is ending on 27th so forum will be back to normal routine once again.

[UserU]

Such posts were easily identifiable earlier and I myself reported when someone bumped such megathreads with shit post. But due to YoBit wave, it becomes really difficult to identify such posts as 10-15 new shit posts get posted after bump post in just few hours.

Good thing is Yobit Signature campaign is ending on 27th so forum will be back to normal routine once again.

YoBit has decided to give up promoting on Bitcointalk, I guess?

[webtricks]

Such posts were easily identifiable earlier and I myself reported when someone bumped such megathreads with shit post. But due to YoBit wave, it becomes really difficult to identify such posts as 10-15 new shit posts get posted after bump post in just few hours.

Good thing is Yobit Signature campaign is ending on 27th so forum will be back to normal routine once again.

YoBit has decided to give up promoting on Bitcointalk, I guess?

Yes. They have over 150K members on CryptoTalk now. Agenda Achieved

The only reason why they created cryptotalk and ran signature campaign here is to promote their investbox and IEOs. But they faced huge retaliation when they tried to promote investBox here. So, since they have 150K+ members on cryptotalk now, they will run investbox and IEO campaigns there instead of wasting money here anymore.