Post Reporting Being Used As A Form Of Censorship

[TECSHARE]

Yes, I am sure a degenerate such as yourself was very offended and simply wanted to protect the forum from those horribly graphic cartoon pixels sort of resembling a penis. I am sure it had nothing to do with the fact that it was a humorous reply at the expense of one of your ball washing red nosed buddies. Weird... all of a sudden no one seems to think the image is a problem now that it is not in the original thread. Funny how that works.

[EDIT: and now after the fact you report it to pretend like you were just trying to preserve the rules and not censor all along]

[1713272711]

1713272711

[1713272711]

1713272711

[1713272711]

1713272711

[TECSHARE]

What is the excuse for censorship this time?

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Yes, clearly this user is the problem. Not the fact Lauda thinks it is acceptable to run around tagging and flagging people for making predictions they don't like. I am not sure you could possibly get your head any further up Lauda's ass.

Pictures or it didn't happen.

https://i.imgur.com/yd8vf2A.png

This is image was SO GRAPHIC it had to be censored for the good of the Bitcointalk userbase.

Lauda is constantly abusing the trust system, and Nutilduuuh is hoping to earn favors by inserting his head up Lauda's ass as far as possible. The picture speaks for itself.

[moderator's note: replaced NSFW embedded image in quote with URL (the Imgur link)]

[suchmoon]

What is the excuse for censorship this time?

The red rectangular dicks make it non-compliant with Bitcointalk's high artistic standards.

I apologize, I wouldn't have asked for pictures if I had known that a simple flippant remark was going to cause you so much stress. You can stop with the pictures now, I'll take your word for it - you're clearly an ass-head expert.

[TECSHARE]

What is the excuse for censorship this time?

The red rectangular dicks make it non-compliant with Bitcointalk's high artistic standards.

I apologize, I wouldn't have asked for pictures if I had known that a simple flippant remark was going to cause you so much stress. You can stop with the pictures now, I'll take your word for it - you're clearly an ass-head expert.

That is a cutesy way of avoiding admitting your goal was only censorship from the beginning.

[Vod]

That is a cutesy way of avoiding admitting your goal was only censorship from the beginning.

Ever thought some people read the forum at work?

You are such a selfish asshole, Techy.

[suchmoon]

That is a cutesy way of avoiding admitting your goal was only censorship from the beginning.

My goal was to make fun of your theatrical rage against your arch nemesis nutildah but I keep forgetting what a humorless stuck up twit you are. In hindsight it now makes sense that your affliction would lead you to post a dick drawing as a response to "pictures or it didn't happen" so I apologize for pushing you down this path of delinquency. Don't start doing drugs please.

[Quickseller]

Many major social media sites, such as twitter enforce rules in a specific way so that certain groups of users are affected more than others. I hope this is not a road that bitcointalk is going down.

I haven't reviewed the deleted posts by TECHARE that he posted closely, but I would agree that at least some of them did break the forum rules around NSFW posts. Even though I don't know this to be true, I would even stipulate all of TECHARE's posts violated forum rules. However I would caution against going full Gretchen Whitmer on users, especially if they are objectively speaking making a good faith effort to debate, and engage with other forum members. If someone posts a NSFW image, [ img] it out, so it won't display by default. Off topic rules state that for a post to be on topic, it must be related to the OP of a thread, and some people are very good at making the majority of the post be off topic, and a single sentence at the end be related to the OP -- when this happens, and the off topic portion is responded to, without anything in the response being related to the OP, a topic split should be created.

[TECSHARE]

My goal was to make fun of your theatrical rage against your arch nemesis nutildah but I keep forgetting what a humorless stuck up twit you are. In hindsight it now makes sense that your affliction would lead you to post a dick drawing as a response to "pictures or it didn't happen" so I apologize for pushing you down this path of delinquency. Don't start doing drugs please.

My goal was to be able to enjoy a joke, but your little clown clan's obsession with me pretending as if some one will get in trouble at work for a 10 pixel wide ms paint cartoon penis as an excuse to prevent that joke from being made, quite intentionally. Not because it serves the community, but because it serves you and yours because you are a group angry little twats that can't handle a joke at your expense. The only reason these kind of things don't happen to you is I have better things to spend my time on than following you around looking through your toilet bowl for peanuts that "break the rules".

Many major social media sites, such as twitter enforce rules in a specific way so that certain groups of users are affected more than others. I hope this is not a road that bitcointalk is going down.

I haven't reviewed the deleted posts by TECHARE that he posted closely, but I would agree that at least some of them did break the forum rules around NSFW posts. Even though I don't know this to be true, I would even stipulate all of TECHARE's posts violated forum rules. However I would caution against going full Gretchen Whitmer on users, especially if they are objectively speaking making a good faith effort to debate, and engage with other forum members. If someone posts a NSFW image, [ img] it out, so it won't display by default. Off topic rules state that for a post to be on topic, it must be related to the OP of a thread, and some people are very good at making the majority of the post be off topic, and a single sentence at the end be related to the OP -- when this happens, and the off topic portion is responded to, without anything in the response being related to the OP, a topic split should be created.

You don't know what you are talking about in spite of it being right here, but you are perfectly willing to have an opinion. Funny, you are complaining about reports being abused in your own thread simultaneously while dismissing my post. You have become quite the obedient little eunuch ball washer haven't you? Pretty pathetic.

[Vod]

You don't know what you are talking about in spite of it being right here, but you are perfectly willing to have an opinion.

They copy you, and you attack them?

Give it up Techy.

[TECSHARE]

The only reason these kind of things don't happen to you is I have better things to spend my time on than following you around looking through your toilet bowl for peanuts that "break the rules".

LOL. No you don't. If a mod doesn't delete the post you reported, you open a thread about it. When mods delete posts of yours, you open a thread about it. When the starter of a self-moderated thread deletes your post, you open a thread about it. You quite obviously have nothing better to do, and you never stop obsessing over the most trivial of matters.

Yes, because that is the result of selective enforcement, and the whole point of exploiting it. It is indistinguishable from the usual arbitrary and selective enforcement of the rules and facilitating the abuse of the reporting systems as a tool for censorship.

[Vod]

The only reason these kind of things don't happen to you is I have better things to spend my time on than following you around looking through your toilet bowl for peanuts that "break the rules".

LOL. No you don't. If a mod doesn't delete the post you reported, you open a thread about it. When mods delete posts of yours, you open a thread about it. When the starter of a self-moderated thread deletes your post, you open a thread about it. You quite obviously have nothing better to do, and you never stop obsessing over the most trivial of matters.

Yes, because that is the result of selective enforcement, and the whole point of exploiting it. It is indistinguishable from the usual arbitrary and selective enforcement of the rules and facilitating the abuse of the reporting systems as a tool for censorship.

So then I'll ask you again - why have you wasted a decade of your life here?  It's because you are a troll.

[TECSHARE]

So then I'll ask you again - why have you wasted a decade of your life here?  It's because you are a troll.

Let me know when you learn how to count to ten Vod.

[Vod]

So then I'll ask you again - why have you wasted a decade of your life here?  It's because you are a troll.

Let me know when you learn how to count to ten Vod.

Why have you wasted a decade of your life here?

You've done nothing but complain.   Any non-mentally-ill person would have moved on long ago.

[suchmoon]

My goal was to make fun of your theatrical rage against your arch nemesis nutildah but I keep forgetting what a humorless stuck up twit you are. In hindsight it now makes sense that your affliction would lead you to post a dick drawing as a response to "pictures or it didn't happen" so I apologize for pushing you down this path of delinquency. Don't start doing drugs please.

My goal was to be able to enjoy a joke, but your little clown clan's obsession with me pretending as if some one will get in trouble at work for a 10 pixel wide ms paint cartoon penis as an excuse to prevent that joke from being made, quite intentionally. Not because it serves the community, but because it serves you and yours because you are a group angry little twats that can't handle a joke at your expense. The only reason these kind of things don't happen to you is I have better things to spend my time on than following you around looking through your toilet bowl for peanuts that "break the rules".

Oh come on, some of the shit you say is genuinely funny. Don't let the clown car to discourage you from pursuing a career as a comedian. But you might want to switch from dick drawings to something post-middle-school and read the fucking forum rules, how hard can it be...

[TECSHARE]

Oh come on, some of the shit you say is genuinely funny. Don't let the clown car to discourage you from pursuing a career as a comedian. But you might want to switch from dick drawings to something post-middle-school and read the fucking forum rules, how hard can it be...

Don't you worry about that. I just think it is pretty pathetic all the dirty little con games you all pull out of your ass because you can't handle a joke.

[Foxpup]

Don't you worry about that. I just think it is pretty pathetic all the dirty little con games you all pull out of your ass because you can't handle a joke.

We can handle jokes just fine. You just have to post said jokes in accordance with the rules, as I explained earlier. Don't make me post my own dick drawings just to prove it can be done. (Not that it would prove anything in your mind, since I'm sure you'll attribute my ability to get away with posting dick drawings to some sort of moderation conspiracy rather than my compliance with the rules, but whatever.)

[TECSHARE]

Don't you worry about that. I just think it is pretty pathetic all the dirty little con games you all pull out of your ass because you can't handle a joke.

We can handle jokes just fine. You just have to post said jokes in accordance with the rules, as I explained earlier. Don't make me post my own dick drawings just to prove it can be done. (Not that it would prove anything in your mind, since I'm sure you'll attribute my ability to get away with posting dick drawings to some sort of moderation conspiracy rather than my compliance with the rules, but whatever.)

Weird... this one got reported and removed in spite of being censored... Funny how that works.

https://i.imgur.com/yd8vf2A.png

[Foxpup]

Weird... this one got reported and removed in spite of being censored... Funny how that works.

I know you have a hard time understanding how censorship works, so let me help you out by explaining that it works better when you actually cover everyone's nipples and anogenital regions completely. Don't worry, I'm sure you'll get it right eventually.

[TECSHARE]

Weird... this one got reported and removed in spite of being censored... Funny how that works.

I know you have a hard time understanding how censorship works, so let me help you out by explaining that it works better when you actually cover everyone's nipples and anogenital regions completely. Don't worry, I'm sure you'll get it right eventually.

Tell me some more about how this is supposed to protect people at work. This isn't about protecting people at work. This isn't about the rules. This is about how you can use the rules to as a tool to antagonize people who say things you don't like and have it removed. You are a petty little totalitarian and so is the mod who enables you.

[TECSHARE]

Tell me some more about how this is supposed to protect people at work. This isn't about protecting people at work. This isn't about the rules. This is about how you can use the rules to as a tool to antagonize people who say things you don't like and have it removed. You are a petty little totalitarian and so is the mod who enables you.

Believing you are somehow one ounce less of a puss than anybody involved in the removal of your post is some magically wishful thinking. Get over it, snowflake.

That really hits home hard from some one who couldn't handle opposing political views and manifested an obsession with me that bled into all of the other workings of the forum I am involved in.