<...>
You seem to have crossed linkage on
hatshepsut93’s profile (links to a thread and not a profile).
Regarding the 2 merits in the StartedWith column on @Iasenko’s list, that is due to:
<…> Note: sometimes, we will see a "startedwith" that seems inconsistent. For example, @tranthidung displays 1 merit for this column. What happened in this case (and a few others) is that the profile is merited between the moment the forum generates the merit.txt file, and I scrape the profile data (the TXs + airdrop do not add up to the merit on the profile, and thus startedwith has a non-expected value). It’s just a tiny hiccup, that does not affect too many profiles.<…>
Even on this week’s listing you still have a StartedWith of 1 (see
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mD6cdsQNJ8dauTL-XLi8I0oDG5WBl0z0NeKzXTByNyw/edit#gid=1547785466). You’ve got the bad (
) habit of being merited on Friday mornings, and that causes this (slight) disadjustment in the algorithm.
<…> It is wrong for my case too. I remembered that I started with 0 merit (not 1) when merit system kicked in.<…>
Same goes for your case. This week, you have a StartedWith value of 0 in the above link. The InitialRank should be correct though, since I take into account these discrepancies.