ClaimResolverGod (OP)
Copper Member
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 14, 2020, 07:00:34 PM |
|
Claim Resolver. Top early stage contributors will become supreme justices.
The world is missing and needs:
v) verdicts from reputable judges backed by strictly moderated efficient debates.
Most people don't have time do own research, dig information and decide, so
they make rush decisions based on dirty information or impression on surface
and inevitably make mistakes in:
e) elections - without specific concise answers of opponent questions
i) investing - without contested strictly moderated in-depth debates between
promoters and critics
g) legal - without anyone taking responsibility for advise hiding behind
"do your own research"
j) justice - when all courts and lawyers so expensive that they are
avoided rather than used
t) timing - late because research takes too much time
h) hiring - without verified former employer or co-worker complaints
p) purchasing - without easy access to verified complaints
d) dating - without height, weight, health verification and certification
s) scams both online and offline - without verified log of experience from
other people
d) debate that is:
c) cheap and efficient - without cost prohibitive lengthy court process and
expensive lawyers
s) without spam - per-word cost bar divided by reputation metric u/f
m) moderated for efficiency - keeps thread logical, eliminates repetition
and discussion loops
a) anonymous - judge communicates with parties using limited set of possible
messages that helps to protect judge identity against
accidental disclosure
p) private - some words or documents like scanned health certificates are
to be available only to a claim judge or approved participants
o) open public - no more popular vote power madness where uneducated
misinformed crowd forces irrational immoral choices upon others
u) users with valuable permanent reputation that is:
a) anonymous - works without revealing government or communication identity and
therefore cannot be physically reached, pressured or indicted by government
b) boostable by posting bond, which reduces risk of sudden sale of good
reputation account
e) boostable by linking to government ids, phones or other external identities
and reputations
p) person, product, group, company or brand
calculated from number of words involved in:
c) claims
w) winning claims - claims that got favorable verdict
l) lost claims - with unfavorable verdict
f) flips - changed positions, abandoned or deleted claim, message, word or
other debate item
g) guilts - agreed to claims against themself
j) judges
q) qualified - competent in their areas of expertise, visible from reputation
statistics per area tag
b) bar - each judge determines own per-word, per media type and per verdict
price bar for handling claims when submitting a claim customers pick
which judge will handle it depending on judge reputation, qualification
in subject area and price
r) respected - with impeccable reputation that they cherish and grow, which is
derived from number of:
v) verdicts - all verdicts counted by the judge
w) wins against other judges
l) losses to other judges derived from supervisors overrules
f) flips - changed own verdict, excluding automated changes through
verdict dependencies
c) contradictions of verdicts with other judges that are not yet resolved
c) claims
a) anyone who has own ENS name can create, anyone without ENS name can only read
b) without artificial barriers of size, origin, content or laundry list of
necessary multiword and symonym hashtags
t) assign tags from own custom context
g) sensorship resistant - stored on blockchain
n) easy to find through drill down of tags sorted by popularity and grouped
by relevance
j) easy to separate from junk using submitter or judge reputation score filter
d) dependencies - claims can have logical dependency on other claims, so change of
verdict on one claim can affect multiple dependent claims.
Dependency of a verdict upon another claim is established by a judge as
part of claim resolution or approved as independent claim submitted by anyone.
t) tags that are:
v) approved by a judge
u) unique - no wild redundancies of plurals, singulars, misspells, synonyms,
antonyms, generalizations
a) atomic - no multiple words inside
m) mapped - all viable redundancies, relationships and hierarchy are controlled by
judge verdicts for example hierarchy of locality tags or generalizations
r) relevant - grouped in relevance lines within which they are sorted by specificity
p) popular - popularity of a tag is sum of all message sizes involing that tag
i) implied - search or entry of any specific tag implies inclusion of all
generic tags within tag relevance line
m) currency with superior price stability because it is linked to cost of human
labor of reading, understanding, moderating and judging
d) demand - price is backed by demand from plantiffs who buy tokens to pay for
judge services
s) supply - price is capped by supply from judges who sell tokens to get fiat
for living expenses
u) utility - people need judges to resolve problems more than they need
gold and silver
w) wide usability - there are more people who can become judges than people
who own or can produce gold and silver
m) media - it should eventually become trusted decentralized media for
political debates, opinions, law suits
f) funding - crowd funding will never work efficiently with centralized
media controlled by ads without in-depth debates
w) labor market which gives ability to work remotely from anywhere, which:
1) saves the environment from wasteful energy burning commute
2) serves as unemployment insurance providing basic income to those
who cannot find higher income without relying on welfare or warfare
Proposed Claim Resolver fills all these gaps.
Judges communicate with limited set of actions:
agree, disagree, rephrase, expand(details), illustrate, remove duplicate, irrelevant.
Any action may point at a list of fragments from many messages.
All metrics are based on message size, which is determined by number of used words,
excluding articles and 2 letter words.
Messages in claim debates may have additional tags, which contribute to tags popularity.
Supervisors hierarchy:
All judges are part of supervisors and subordinates hierarchy.
Supervisors hire, teach and manage subordinate judges and also resolve decision
conflicts if subordinates cannot resolve themselves.
Supervisor may add or remove subordinates at own discretion. Upon removal, all
claims that were handled by removed subordinate become responsibility of supervisor
and who may selectively reassign to other subordinates.
Duplicates and contradictions:
Someone may always submit a claim that already exists and get a different verdict
from a different judge. Such verdict contradictions will eventually be discovered
by someone and then, upon discovery, resolved by moving up through tree of
supervisors up until common supervisor who has two subordinates with contradicting
verdicts. However such contradiction may be resolved earlier, without reaching the
common root, if lower level supervisor decides to overrule subordinate verdict
without moving case up to his supervisor.
Continuity:
Any verdict does not prevent further communication if one side believes they can
convince the judge to change the verdict. Debate over verdict never ends, it can
always be questioned or overruled. It is never final.
Both sides may keep presenting additional evidence.
Income:
Supervisors make income by taking % of income from their subordinates which they
negotiate before hiring. Supervisor will record job offer by entering public
transaction with subordinate ENS name and % of income. Subordinate accepts the
offer by agreeing to that % of income sharing through public transaction.
Any judge, subordinate or supervisor, can generate income by handling claims
through debates and verdicts. For every word in every message, including claim text
itself, claim judge receives amount of tokens defined in j/c cost bar for words,
scanned images, sound and verdict separately.
Early stage contributors:
Top 28 contributors will become supreme justices under God's supervision and will
share 1% of their income with God(myself).
Contributions are non-refundable. Contribution value is measured in number of ETH
or BTC transfered to one of published below ETH and BTC addresses.
Top 14 ETH contributors compete only with other ETH contributors.
Top 14 BTC contributors compete only with other BTC contributors.
Competition of top contributors ends on system launch.
In order to start using the system, ETH contributors need to have own ENS names.
BTC contributors will have to provide ETH address with own ENS names.
There is no deadline for creating own ETH account with ENS name.
Such accounts will be authorized via tx from contributor account that contains ENS
name to give power to. Contributor cannot reassign power to another ENS name
after initial assignment.
Unlike regular subordinates, supreme justices may never be removed from their
positions. The only penalty for their possible bad work is lower labor costs due
to customers dissatisfaction or loss of reputation score from God's overrules.
God can hire up to 3 additional removable supreme justices with negotiable profit %
sharing that is not lower than 1%.
Five ETH addresses to contribute, pick any one you like, it does not matter which:
0x0E7DF3c24ADCd456bc2829Db1134991D05C3Cd3B
0x5D34B1f476B0312cdE7c4ec6632d7a0D1c035A04
0xd9227Ae3583CBacE66ABC57C9b9E26ae0C138b2e
0xe7b703c1B44a1A32Ed926e39E61FCDC5250C1e35
0xEF36Be2fF03aBA49F058313C1A9650617109DcbA
Five BTC addresses to contribute, pick any one you like, it does not matter which:
1BWqwhGjfwiLrGoc1RcVuD2b1C6qiqZTC8
1GdjonQarpa8BpDhYVXL6a8H9GRahi9EDC
14hgtDZe6LAoDGzCHi3yRwaAqYUDXagPv7
1MoDk2sCxpwuza6Uk1gmy366ff4SwpHoEg
1KtDDsvri9kz4Rc4gvWQFq6bdLFjB5qrBo
Implementaion:
It will be implemented on Ethereum blockchain utilizing ENS names for user names and
Ethereum transactions for all control and communication messages.
Ownership of ENS name gives permission to act on the system, so ENS transfer to
another account allows to use different key to access the system by the same person.
Public benefits of the proposed solution:
- saves billions of wealth that is lost in online searching
- saves people from psychological disorders derived from spending too much of their
life sitting in online social systems
- pushes all other wasteful, sensored or irresponsible media out of business
- replaces all online forum specialists who like to say "consult professional" or
"do your own research"
- a place where someone who gives answers takes responsibility for them by betting
own reputation and risking to be overruled
- fix world imperfections quickly - any verdict will have good supporting
documentation ready for submission to BBB or lawsuit
- efficient public debate can open up previously forbidden relationships, solve
political problems, strengthen democracy around the world, reduce influence of
fake news, ads, spam and hacking
Answers to possible critique:
q) selling an account - nothing prevents a justice or a judge from giving account
access keys to somebody else without publicly selling or transfering ENS name.
a) reputation damage metrics j/l from making bad verdicts will eventually kill
profits of malicious buyer
q) selling bad verdict
a) long term reputation damage j/l caused by other judges opposing verdict will
outweigh profits of a corrupt judge
Stage:
I am looking for partners who can advise me how to organize ICO, marketing and
find developers for the project. Developers will further advise regarding best
technical ways of implementation, hosting and start implementation as soon as
early stage funds become available.
|
