Chipmixer sponsor dangerous untrustworthy members and Racists and unfair treat?

[NotATether]

~

Dude, nearly all of your posts are about complaining that someone is trust abusing the system. A truly new user doesn't know about these things. This is your first post for reference:

I know red-trusting CH's alts is a popular sport around here but come on... what possible benefit does this red trust bring to the forum?

On the flip side, there are negative consequences, one of which is new threads popping up to complain about it and a forthcoming new alt account, and generally fueling incessant rants against the system.

Suchmoon I believes knows what truth and dare is referring to. It involves mosprognoz and lauda. Both of who she knows are dirty, but is scared of the scammer lauda like many here. Jollygod sure lauda and mozprognoz trying to facilitate a scam and even told the scam to hide with an alt account. Jollygood does not say or do anything to his friends lauda and mosprognoz.

JollyGood and lauda both crying for moderator intervention prevent details being discussed they want people to forget will assist truth and dare.

Next time better to provide some evidence from the start in the thread.

These cry for proof when you accuse them, but feel no obligation when accusing your account or tag it for advertising  what a DT members is promoting himself.

Alt account is fine an speaking the truth with high risk is the intended purpose for alt accounts  

Am I listening to someone's alt? Because it smells like it.

I have learned that when a newbie posts only on meta they are likely someone's alt. (true this isn't meta but most of these topics are about trust abuse which is beyond newbies' realm.)

~

I think this is also someone's alt, each one of their 162 posts is ranting either about the trust system, Lauda, nutildah, or some other senior member...

I have both of these imbeciles on my ignore list now, in accordance to my policy of only putting trolls on my ignore list. When I post on threads like these it's only to out probable alts.


P.S. while I'm here, can anyone else here explain what kind of action the forum staff should take on serial harassers like these? Do they ban people for polluting the forum too much? I think theymos banned Matthew N. Wright when he started trolling like this too (this was after he scammed), didn't he?

[suchmoon]

P.S. while I'm here, can anyone else here explain what kind of action the forum staff should take on serial harassers like these? Do they ban people for polluting the forum too much? I think theymos banned Matthew N. Wright when he started trolling like this too (this was after he scammed), didn't he?

You can try reporting off topic posts. Other than that "Ignore" is the best option. cryptohunter figured that one out and is trying to get around it by creating new accounts, which gets him a few replies but he gets outed (or outs himself) fairly quickly nowadays.

[bonesjonesreturns]

~

Dude, nearly all of your posts are about complaining that someone is trust abusing the system. A truly new user doesn't know about these things. This is your first post for reference:

I know red-trusting CH's alts is a popular sport around here but come on... what possible benefit does this red trust bring to the forum?

On the flip side, there are negative consequences, one of which is new threads popping up to complain about it and a forthcoming new alt account, and generally fueling incessant rants against the system.

Suchmoon I believes knows what truth and dare is referring to. It involves mosprognoz and lauda. Both of who she knows are dirty, but is scared of the scammer lauda like many here. Jollygod sure lauda and mozprognoz trying to facilitate a scam and even told the scam to hide with an alt account. Jollygood does not say or do anything to his friends lauda and mosprognoz.

JollyGood and lauda both crying for moderator intervention prevent details being discussed they want people to forget will assist truth and dare.

Next time better to provide some evidence from the start in the thread.

These cry for proof when you accuse them, but feel no obligation when accusing your account or tag it for advertising  what a DT members is promoting himself.

Alt account is fine an speaking the truth with high risk is the intended purpose for alt accounts  

Am I listening to someone's alt? Because it smells like it.

I have learned that when a newbie posts only on meta they are likely someone's alt. (true this isn't meta but most of these topics are about trust abuse which is beyond newbies' realm.)

~

I think this is also someone's alt, each one of their 162 posts is ranting either about the trust system, Lauda, nutildah, or some other senior member...

I have both of these imbeciles on my ignore list now, in accordance to my policy of only putting trolls on my ignore list. When I post on threads like these it's only to out probable alts.


P.S. while I'm here, can anyone else here explain what kind of action the forum staff should take on serial harassers like these? Do they ban people for polluting the forum too much? I think theymos banned Matthew N. Wright when he started trolling like this too (this was after he scammed), didn't he?

Polluting the forum with what is the truth and robust arguments? That should be a banned?

Thank you for the entertaining idea.
Better idea to delete idiots who goes off topic and avoid tackling the point of the thread.

Stay on topic and understand you can not be in chipmixer yet but you seem almost stupid and corrupt enough to be on the waiting list. Just a little more scammer protecting and supporting with a twist more of shitpoat and you will be there.

Or be like ~suchmoon ignore what he is afraid to answer.

[JollyGood]

The following three users have been added to my IGNORE list again because it is impossible to try to the engage with any of them in a civilised manner. They are utter and complete imbeciles that are deluded:

bonesjonesreturns
truth or dare
Vispilio

[bonesjonesreturns]

The following three users have been added to my IGNORE list again because it is impossible to try to the engage with any of them in a civilised manner. They are utter and complete imbeciles that are deluded:

bonesjonesreturns
truth or dare
Vispilio

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5229023.0

This one is best for debating JollyGood coward scam hunting. He can only punish not DT members who work with scams. If you are DT or may be influential for sigs, campaign manager or popular JollyGood will not mention if you will work with scams. Even scams he become crazy about himself.

He is not accepted on chipmixer so we don't need to discuss JollyGood on this thread.

Here we will debate the trust abusers and scammer supporting dangerous members and proven racists that chipmixer sponsors.

[suzanne5223]

Stop worrying about you or your friends not being able to get into a campaign, and figure out why you cannot get in. Crying about it will not get you in.

Well said and one thing I learnt in life is to make peace with oneself by accepting defeat which will make ones to work towards the betterment of himself rather than making false/lame excuses.
With that been, I'm sure every member of this forum except the Jr member and newbies understand the criteria that the Chipmixer campaign manager wanted.

[bonesjonesreturns]

Stop worrying about you or your friends not being able to get into a campaign, and figure out why you cannot get in. Crying about it will not get you in.

Well said and one thing I learnt in life is to make peace with oneself by accepting defeat which will make ones to work towards the betterment of himself rather than making false/lame excuses.
With that been, I'm sure every member of this forum except the Jr member and newbies understand the criteria that the Chipmixer campaign manager wanted.

Spoken like an experienced loser. Thank you, now please not more sig spamming off topic stupidity and tackle my specific points that are supported by irrefutable evidence.
Blanket statement from ass licking chipmixer dreamers as nauseating.
Do you wish to pick a specific point and attempt to make successful refutation?
Go suck off campaign manager in PM not here suzy

[Timelord2067]

You can add to the list this gem from one of the current ChipMixer Signature Campaign participants:

Archive [1a], [1b]

...you become payed whore and ignorant prick because of few dollars.

Fucking disgrace. ...

Basically, marlboroza is saying it is okay for him to swear and abuse others while receiving $5-$6 per post from ChipMixer but others aren't allowed to post in topics of their choice for a tenth of (per week) of what he gets paid for his just one abusive post.

There is the disgrace.

[bonesjonesreturns]

You can add to the list this gem from one of the current ChipMixer Signature Campaign participants:

Archive [1a], [1b]

...you become payed whore and ignorant prick because of few dollars.

Fucking disgrace. ...

Basically, marlboroza is saying it is okay for him to swear and abuse others while receiving $5-$6 per post from ChipMixer but others aren't allowed to post in topics of their choice for a tenth of (per week) of what he gets paid for his just one abusive post.

There is the disgrace.

I believe you have given red to a member previously for calling malboroza out as a scammer supporting piece of shit.  Wake up to these people they are corrupt self serving scum

It seems chipmixer is paying this member to protect and support scamming by trying to label whistleblowers and trolls

Will I ever get to retire this picture?

He needs to present specific examples of the "trolling" or that makes him a liar and troll.

He appears to be a scammer supporter.
I support chipmixer but they must not pay scammers and scammer supporters.

I will wear their sig if i can donate all of my earnings to good causes on the forum
Those earning money and keeping it for themselves should be replaced by less selfish individuals.

Get rid of scammers and scammer supporters from your pay roll.

[Timelord2067]

I believe you have given red to a member previously for calling malboroza out as a scammer supporting piece of shit.  

Proof, or it never happened.

It seems chipmixer is paying this member to protect and support scamming by trying to label whistleblowers and trolls

chipmixer certainly has inadvertently brought a motley crew together.

[bonesjonesreturns]

I believe you have given red to a member previously for calling malboroza out as a scammer supporting piece of shit.  

Proof, or it never happened.

It seems chipmixer is paying this member to protect and support scamming by trying to label whistleblowers and trolls

chipmixer certainly has inadvertently brought a motley crew together.

I seem to recall either toaa or ch was calling malboroza out and you gave them red for swearing at malboroza.
If you say it was for something else i will not dispute this now. When I observed it and read the reference  that was the conclusion i had drawn. The reference does include some other scammer sympathizers getting whipped on the same post so it may have been for criticizing one of those.  Marlboroza appeared to be the primary recipient of the lashing.


Eventually it will become evident that chipmixer inadvertently is motivating and sponsoring some serious scammers and is the core driving force behind a lot of the double standards and 2 tier system that these below average posters need to leverage so they may take these top paying sig spots.

Their "trustworthyness" is gamed and manipulated between them hence why they circle the wagons when members uncover irrefutable scamming by one of the scam gang. They know their individual safety is dependent upon each.

Darkstar must by now be fully aware of their actions. He is reluctant to comment or shrinks away from public debate over his employees conduct. This reflects very poorly upon him. If he thought they were entirely innocent then why not demonstrate this via public debate and analysis.

[Timelord2067]

Archive [1a], [1b]

I seem to recall either toaa or ch was calling malboroza out and you gave them red for swearing at malboroza.

I'll say again:

I believe you have given red to a member previously for calling malboroza out as a scammer supporting piece of shit. 

Proof, or it never happened.

Here's what I wrote:

The-One-Above-All's trust feedback wall:



...and...

cryptohunter's Trust Feedback Wall:




Here are the three links:

• https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5138419.0
• https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106712.msg49714728#msg49714728
• http://archive.fo/RDVrH#selection-4277.0-4353.108

If you look at the second and third links (which are archives BTW) cryptohunter is attacking marlboroza and in essence I have defended marlboroza by giving cryptohunter negative feedback trust BECAUSE of that post.

Here is what @cryptohunter wrote about @marlboroza

Good members like Moronbozo who have never achieved anything or made any original thought provoking posts of any real value, yet that seek to red trust honest members that uncovered huge scams and fought many times alone against all manner of scam promoting scum like lauda and huge black woman. Red trusting them for some pathetic scare quotes bullshit. These fools are the "good " members apparently.

I seem to recall either toaa or ch was calling malboroza out...

Do you even know who you are fighting, or why?

[bonesjonesreturns]

Archive [1a], [1b]

I seem to recall either toaa or ch was calling malboroza out and you gave them red for swearing at malboroza.

I'll say again:

I believe you have given red to a member previously for calling malboroza out as a scammer supporting piece of shit.  

Proof, or it never happened.

Here's what I wrote:

The-One-Above-All's trust feedback wall:



...and...

cryptohunter's Trust Feedback Wall:




Here are the three links:

• https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5138419.0
• https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106712.msg49714728#msg49714728
• http://archive.fo/RDVrH#selection-4277.0-4353.108

If you look at the second and third links (which are archives BTW) cryptohunter is attacking marlboroza and in essence I have defended marlboroza by giving cryptohunter negative feedback trust BECAUSE of that post.

Here is what @cryptohunter wrote about @marlboroza

Good members like Moronbozo who have never achieved anything or made any original thought provoking posts of any real value, yet that seek to red trust honest members that uncovered huge scams and fought many times alone against all manner of scam promoting scum like lauda and huge black woman. Red trusting them for some pathetic scare quotes bullshit. These fools are the "good " members apparently.

I seem to recall either toaa or ch was calling malboroza out...

Do you even know who you are fighting, or why?

That seems to support exactly what I said.

He is correctly pointing out marlboroza is a scammer supporting non achieving loser. Which he is. You left red trust for someone telling the truth about malboroza.

There is no person I am fighting. I am pushing for fair and transparent standards that ensure all members are treated equally.
The end of double standards.  

Perhaps calling out means something different to you  that is where the confusion is.  

Malboroza seems to be a prime lauda supporter and pusher of double standards.

[Stedsm]

That seems to support exactly what I said.

He is correctly pointing out marlboroza is a scammer supporting non achieving loser. Which he is. You left red trust for someone telling the truth about malboroza.

There is no person I am fighting. I am pushing for fair and transparent standards that ensure all members are treated equally.
The end of double standards.  

Perhaps calling out means something different to you  that is where the confusion is.  

Malboroza seems to be a prime lauda supporter and pusher of double standards.

I'm just taking your comment here as I've got some interesting questions to ask you.

What are you up to? Is it that you're not fine with the people here who are advertising Chipmixer signature? It's been 3 years (if not less) for them with these members and I've also been a member of it for around 2 years and never had such issues, nor am I so badly dissatisfied like you. And you're only pointing out Marlboroza which makes it clear that you don't have issues with ^the rest of the Chipmixer army^?

I've seen the case with Marlboroza where I think there was no foul play done from their end (I'm not supporting anyone but speaking what I understood after investigating about the deep truth to the best of my knowledge).

I don't get this Lauda part, that even if someone likes/supports any member on the forum that you don't like, what makes you feel so bad that you just write it out and call out someone for their following deeds? Also don't understand the "double standards" part, can you explain what exactly it is in your views?

[bonesjonesreturns]

That seems to support exactly what I said.

He is correctly pointing out marlboroza is a scammer supporting non achieving loser. Which he is. You left red trust for someone telling the truth about malboroza.

There is no person I am fighting. I am pushing for fair and transparent standards that ensure all members are treated equally.
The end of double standards.  

Perhaps calling out means something different to you  that is where the confusion is.  

Malboroza seems to be a prime lauda supporter and pusher of double standards.

I'm just taking your comment here as I've got some interesting questions to ask you.

What are you up to? Is it that you're not fine with the people here who are advertising Chipmixer signature? It's been 3 years (if not less) for them with these members and I've also been a member of it for around 2 years and never had such issues, nor am I so badly dissatisfied like you. And you're only pointing out Marlboroza which makes it clear that you don't have issues with ^the rest of the Chipmixer army^?

I've seen the case with Marlboroza where I think there was no foul play done from their end (I'm not supporting anyone but speaking what I understood after investigating about the deep truth to the best of my knowledge).

I don't get this Lauda part, that even if someone likes/supports any member on the forum that you don't like, what makes you feel so bad that you just write it out and call out someone for their following deeds? Also don't understand the "double standards" part, can you explain what exactly it is in your views?

I have no issues with chipmixer.  I have volunteered to wear chipmixer and all earnings are donated directly to good causes.

What if a member is supporting and protecting a proven scammer?
What if members try to trust abuse whistleblowing on scammers?

Why did you leave chipmixer?

[Stedsm]

I have no issues with chipmixer.  I have volunteered to wear chipmixer and all earnings are donated to good causes and never come near me.

Earnings? Wait! What?
Volunteering for Chipmixer pays off? I've never heard about that ever?!?  
How did you earn through them at first? Donation is far another subject, but how did you earn from Chipmixer? Were you a member of the campaign? Wait, your account rank isn't allowed to participate in their campaign, this means you're posting from your alt because you need to have an account with Sr. Member or above rank to be able to participate in Chipmixer campaign.

What if a member is supporting and protecting a proven scammer?
What if members try to trust abuser whistleblowing on scammers?

I'd only ask you one thing here:
"Any firm evidence please?"
Are you butthurt because you're someone with a higher rank yet not a DT but seeing DTs supporting him due to the fact that in their views, that ^whistleblower^ is the right person to go with?

Why did you leave chipmixer?

Do you think anybody is a fool to leave such a privileged campaign? I got removed just like some other members because I believe that DS has got enough reasons to keep / remove anyone in / from the campaign and I always respect their personality as well as their decisions.

[bonesjonesreturns]

I have no issues with chipmixer.  I have volunteered to wear chipmixer and all earnings are donated to good causes and never come near me.

Earnings? Wait! What?
Volunteering for Chipmixer pays off? I've never heard about that ever?!?  
How did you earn through them at first? Donation is far another subject, but how did you earn from Chipmixer? Were you a member of the campaign? Wait, your account rank isn't allowed to participate in their campaign, this means you're posting from your alt because you need to have an account with Sr. Member or above rank to be able to participate in Chipmixer campaign.

What if a member is supporting and protecting a proven scammer?
What if members try to trust abuser whistleblowing on scammers?

I'd only ask you one thing here:
"Any firm evidence please?"
Are you butthurt because you're someone with a higher rank yet not a DT but seeing DTs supporting him due to the fact that in their views, that ^whistleblower^ is the right person to go with?

Why did you leave chipmixer?

Do you think anybody is a fool to leave such a privileged campaign? I got removed just like some other members because I believe that DS has got enough reasons to keep / remove anyone in / from the campaign and I always respect their personality as well as their decisions.

Let's take it one step at a time.

I have not worked with chipmixer previously.

[Timelord2067]

Perhaps calling out means something different to you  that is where the confusion is.  

Perhaps.

Malboroza seems to be a prime lauda supporter and pusher of double standards.

That much is true.

[Stedsm]

Let's take it one step at a time.

This means you've got no evidence but you're trying to throw mud over somebody's personality just because "you felt that they are doing something wrong", you felt.

I have not worked with chipmixer previously.

Watch your own words, mate. I believe it's you only who said this? :

I have no issues with chipmixer.  I have volunteered to wear chipmixer and all earnings are donated directly to good causes.

--snip--

[johhnyUA]

Eh, i remember times when Chipmixer was just a campaign for lazy nerds which couldn't find worthy ICO bounty (some of them could awarded you with 1 btc for a month with shitty signature) . But now, after ico's death there too much drama about this signature campaign.

Guys, calm down, even 1200 dollars per month doesn't worth to drown your own reputation and honour (like what happened with many turkish members). There a lot now free courses of programming. Better find one which will fit you the best and then you will get much more (in time)