Not all projects are bad

[mahilchii]

I agree that not all the projects are bad but most of them are suppose to be scammers these days, most of the ICOs are not long-lasting nowadays which means the projects fail. Also they want to steal from the Bounty hunter after the work is done, however I would appreciate most of the signature campaign where they pay on weekly basis.

[Valzador]

If you are a developer and you develop a new project and build a good team and after several months of promoting the project you don't met your expectations yet you never give up won't others say bad thing about the project and the teams? This is happening with few good projects in crypto space but many failed to understand, they want their half cake quickly e.g bounty hunters, to say the truth it's not easy to be a developer, not all projects that failed are bad, they might not just meet their expectations

I'm afraid I have to disagree, projects that are good and have realistic ideas and experienced teams in their fields will surely get support from crypto audiences, the problem is that the concept I mentioned earlier is gone, new projects only want to create hype with bad ideas which is packaged as if an innovation.

[carriebee]

I agree that not all the projects are bad but most of them are suppose to be scammers these days, most of the ICOs are not long-lasting nowadays which means the projects fail. Also they want to steal from the Bounty hunter after the work is done, however I would appreciate most of the signature campaign where they pay on weekly basis.

This is the fact that not all projects are bad so in every project we must rely check if it's good before investing. Yes Ico did not last and many users become a victim of this kind of project because it turns out failed. So it is really important to assess first a project before we invest.

[BitTraderCute]

I agree that not all the projects are bad but most of them are suppose to be scammers these days, most of the ICOs are not long-lasting nowadays which means the projects fail. Also they want to steal from the Bounty hunter after the work is done, however I would appreciate most of the signature campaign where they pay on weekly basis.

This is the fact that not all projects are bad so in every project we must rely check if it's good before investing. Yes Ico did not last and many users become a victim of this kind of project because it turns out failed. So it is really important to assess first a project before we invest.

we should not generalize all project have same quality.each developers have their own motive and spirit while announcing new project. and we could take look about their seriousness by analizing how they will pay bounty campaign,serious developers will use bitcoin or ethereum as payament although usually it have small value. its very rare this projects will die, cause no one will dumped free token.

[bitcoinst]

The success of a project is determined by many factors. A huge number of projects with excellent developers failed because these factors were not taken into account, or the project was simply unlucky.
There are three key components: development, marketing, and current market conditions. Unfortunately, any of these gifts can play a trick on the project.

[SquallLeonhart]

If you are a developer and you develop a new project and build a good team and after several months of promoting the project you don't met your expectations yet you never give up won't others say bad thing about the project and the teams? This is happening with few good projects in crypto space but many failed to understand, they want their half cake quickly e.g bounty hunters, to say the truth it's not easy to be a developer, not all projects that failed are bad, they might not just meet their expectations

But, what will be the point of putting all their efforts and dedication when the basic concept of a project is not up to the point of solving some real life problem. All I mean to say is, from the beginning itself they must work hard like they must choose an unique idea for their project but most devs are just imitating what projects are already existing with a few improvements and enhancement and this is the reason investors are simply ignoring such project which will be leading to collapse of all their efforts and time.

I agree all the projects are not bad still I believe all the good projects will not fail. Yes, when a project is based on unique concept and providing some solution for the problem then definitely it will get enough attention from investors and traders so it will be finding its own way to survive in this crypto space.

[CaVO32]

The success of a project is determined by many factors. A huge number of projects with excellent developers failed because these factors were not taken into account, or the project was simply unlucky.
There are three key components: development, marketing, and current market conditions. Unfortunately, any of these gifts can play a trick on the project.

Don't forget the financial capability of the project. without initial funds from the dev's pockets or from private investors, the project is likely to fail. because if they will rely from crowdsourcing, and due to the fact that it is too hard to raise money nowadays, the project might end up not raising their financial targets. and if they didn't, how can they pursue their developments? so even if they have noble idea or good concept, they can't implement it into reality because of the lack of funds. that is the reason why many good projects are abandoned.

[tabas]

It is a fact and truth that it's not easy being a developer. But before committing themselves into a project, they need to think of it as many times as they can. It's not just about the creation but also the commitment that they will dwell while making the project.
The progress should also be monitored and expectations are normal for the fellow investors but if the developers really see that it's not going anywhere, they can admit it despite doing all that they can.

A developer certainly has to think of a good concept first before starting it and being a developer does not seem easy, it must have high insight and also partners to develop more broadly, marketing and products, especially in a project, sometimes with the failure makes developers prustasi and not want to try marketing again in the project they are running.

Marketing and development are two different things.
The developers should focus on the task that they are working with while the marketing, we know the task that they are assigned with. It's a matter of prioritizing and commitment.

[BuNga_cute]

I strongly agree that not all projects that fail are bad. Sometimes the bounty hunter presses the developer to immediately distribute tokens.
Even though the sales of the IEO tokens have not ended, we as bounty hunters should understand that they cannot instant get paid from
IEO projects. Actually the key is in communication between developers and bounty hunters. Each parties must understand each other, and
also developers should be open from the start regarding the distribution of tokens. Hopefully we are can see a lot of successful projects like
2017-2018.

[Ziskinberg]

If all projects are bad, there would be no altcoins now, the truth is, most of the projects are bad so the altcoins market are heavily affected by that reality.
Actually if investors will be more matured, we can prevent investing on bad projects because we are already knowledgeable in choosing a legit one.

The most amazing thing is that now it is very difficult to understand which projects will be really good and will bring big profits. if now I open a coinmarketcap and see coins there that conducted bounty campaign 2 years ago, and now they cost very good money, I am surprised because I did not participate and 2 years ago I think that this is scam projects

Let's just say I am lucky as I have participated in different bounty in the last 2 years, especially during the bull run, I was so active and I made  good earning on that time, but I also did a wrong decision which is holding some of them because I believe it will rise in the long run, but it is almost worthless now.

I would say that it's all about the market condition, maybe when we will be back in time where people are aggressive in investing again, we might enjoy good reward in bounty again as we will see more projects that will be successful.

[cahbagus555]

If you are a developer and you develop a new project and build a good team and after several months of promoting the project you don't met your expectations yet you never give up won't others say bad thing about the project and the teams? This is happening with few good projects in crypto space but many failed to understand, they want their half cake quickly e.g bounty hunters, to say the truth it's not easy to be a developer, not all projects that failed are bad, they might not just meet their expectations

Agree that not all projects are bad and there are also many developer teams that are dedicated to the projects they are working on in accordance with the roadmap that has been made. The problem with many good projects is the volume of transactions and investors tend to be interested in investing in projects that are liquid in the market

[Partonomy]

I guess that's what we can say about most of altcoins start. People tend to criticize when they don't know much about a project. Change is not comfortable for anybody but I guess we just have to be patient for people to adopt and inform those who don't have a complete understanding of a project.

[JeotQ]

It's not just easy to be a developer that's what I want people to know, sometimes you have to be in others shoe to really understand what they are going through, we worked for new projects and all we hope for is our payments, not bad but there is always more that meet the eye

[Rodeo02]

It's not just easy to be a developer that's what I want people to know, sometimes you have to be in others shoe to really understand what they are going through, we worked for new projects and all we hope for is our payments, not bad but there is always more that meet the eye

So you mean the fund raised you recieve is just a payment for a developer?

Not a good mindset you are making an ICO and offering a product to investors that's why they are investing because they see the potential of the coin. If you think its just a payment then how will you develop a project?

[istiak2277]

Also not every bounty hunter are same. Some people really like to do some research about the project before joining it and try to do his best to maximize the promotion. Yes, it's not every project is bad and sometimes a good project failed. But it's not because of bad marketing its just market conditions and timing that causes this problem.

[Wildwest]

I really agree what you say but some of us would rather assess to the downside of a project because it is often a victim in fraudulent projects and to bounce back it takes time, as well as from many projects today just Some of the projects that pay bounty hunters, then this is our very thing, for the Dev and team who manages a project respect time that we have spent to promote your project.

[julius caesar]

If you are a developer and you develop a new project and build a good team and after several months of promoting the project you don't met your expectations yet you never give up won't others say bad thing about the project and the teams? This is happening with few good projects in crypto space but many failed to understand, they want their half cake quickly e.g bounty hunters, to say the truth it's not easy to be a developer, not all projects that failed are bad, they might not just meet their expectations

Being a developer of a coin is hard since you will be having a hard time to produce a quality coin and be able to control the volume and the price of it. We just need to analyze every projects that we are going to invest to so that you will be able to avoid the failed projects of it.

[trauchot]

There is such a thing that it may take many years to create a good project and of course a lot of money, but not all developers are ready to develop their project for several years and many want to just make money and then just abandon their project, unfortunately there are more and more such projects.

[lienfaye]

Many projects started as good but end up failing. But it doesnt mean its a scam project, maybe due to lack of support from investors or not reaching the soft cap the team cant continue anymore the project. The dev is responsible for this but its inevitable to fail thats why its a must to have a good plan and solid team before starting to build a project that will be useful and can attract the investors. Sometimes expecting too much is not good for the part of bounty hunters because this scenario can happen even how good the project is.

[Google+]

Many projects started as good but end up failing. But it doesnt mean its a scam project, maybe due to lack of support from investors or not reaching the soft cap the team cant continue anymore the project. The dev is responsible for this but its inevitable to fail thats why its a must to have a good plan and solid team before starting to build a project that will be useful and can attract the investors. Sometimes expecting too much is not good for the part of bounty hunters because this scenario can happen even how good the project is.

although like that, there are still many ICO or IEO projects that currently cannot guarantee profit because usually the developer does not support the price of the token or coin at the exchange so that many are disappointed and many lose, whereas for projects that work with bounty hunters, it will provide positive and negative sides, the positive side of the project will quickly spread while the negative side when the distribution of payments to bounty campaign participants, the price at the exchange may fall because the bounty hunters will exchange their work and make prices go down.