NAS :: Descendant of NXT 100% PoS|More Exchanges|WinNAS is ready!

[User1397367406]

I have no clue, but i only seen my node forging all the blocks ...
I'm connected to 3 nodes (patapato's and 2 others)
Would be nice to have a way to go to/show the next page of blocks in the block view.

You're probably the only node online with a balance.  

patapato has more stake and should be forging also.

Trading doesn't automaticaly meen that you'll be able to withdraw the NAS from btc38. They may have no connected node/wallet.

[1714000189]

1714000189

[1714000189]

1714000189

[1714000189]

1714000189

[1714000189]

1714000189

[lcharles123]

I have 3 conecteds peers:
cb2.flipflop.mooo.com ... CubieBoard2
99.*.137.145
222.*.62.194

Send-me please.
NAS-VBK9-5ZXA-CJQ8-GEWVU

[lcharles123]

Is there only 1 forger for all blocks, balance of 189967 NAS, he have the same passphrase for NAS and NXT:
http://www.mynxt.info/blockexplorer/details.php?action=ac&ac=12535893487342314141

[tiker]

For now..

If btc38.com didn't require facebook to log in, I'd ask them to fix their NAS withdraws and buy what's left to be the 2nd person forging.

[Kozan]

I think Poloniex problem should be solved somehow. They forced people to withdraw their NAS, and now will everything be lost? Maybe they can rollback, cancel withdrawals and use other blockchain, the one you use?
Also note that there is lot of NAS in dgex accounts. They don't trade NAS now, but it's kept in accounts, I can see NAS balance. All my NAS is on dgex and on the way from POLO to BTER. Both more than 100 million. If I get back all my NAS I'll donate 15 million.

[tiker]

I think Poloniex problem should be solved somehow. They forced people to withdraw their NAS, and now will everything be lost? Maybe they can rollback, cancel withdrawals and use other blockchain, the one you use?
Also note that there is lot of NAS in dgex accounts. They don't trade NAS now, but it's kept in accounts, I can see NAS balance. All my NAS is on dgex and on the way from POLO to BTER. Both more than 100 million. If I get back all my NAS I'll donate 15 million.

If they're forcing people to withdraw their NAS then they must either be connected to a different fork or the API of public nodes.  Before asking them to switch to our fork we should probably find out if they're connected on another fork.  It's possible there's another small group of nodes out there that might be more active.

[unent]

I think Poloniex problem should be solved somehow. They forced people to withdraw their NAS, and now will everything be lost? Maybe they can rollback, cancel withdrawals and use other blockchain, the one you use?
Also note that there is lot of NAS in dgex accounts. They don't trade NAS now, but it's kept in accounts, I can see NAS balance. All my NAS is on dgex and on the way from POLO to BTER. Both more than 100 million. If I get back all my NAS I'll donate 15 million.

If they're forcing people to withdraw their NAS then they must either be connected to a different fork or the API of public nodes.  Before asking them to switch to our fork we should probably find out if they're connected on another fork.  It's possible there's another small group of nodes out there that might be more active.

I tried to withdraw NAS from Poloniex yesterday and withdrawals were frozen for me.

[lovewiki]

I have 3 conecteds peers:
cb2.flipflop.mooo.com ... CubieBoard2
99.*.137.145
222.*.62.194

Send-me please.
NAS-VBK9-5ZXA-CJQ8-GEWVU

Haven't connected to NAS network for quite some time and try to sync to these peers. From what I observe this blockchain does sync properly until Nov 17 last year, then suddenly gets no block found for more than 1.5 months until Jan 7 and then continue. This blockchain seems 'broken' for me.

Anyone knows the same issue found on other fork(s) as well? Could anyone post the peers of other fork(s) so we can compare?

[tiker]

I'm not aware of any other forks right now.  As far as I know, you're seeing the only fork of NAS right now.

As for the 1.5 month quiet period; it's most likely that there were no forging nodes online during that time period.

[lcharles123]

I have 3 conecteds peers:
cb2.flipflop.mooo.com ... CubieBoard2
99.*.137.145
222.*.62.194

Send-me please.
NAS-VBK9-5ZXA-CJQ8-GEWVU

Haven't connected to NAS network for quite some time and try to sync to these peers. From what I observe this blockchain does sync properly until Nov 17 last year, then suddenly gets no block found for more than 1.5 months until Jan 7 and then continue. This blockchain seems 'broken' for me.

Anyone knows the same issue found on other fork(s) as well? Could anyone post the peers of other fork(s) so we can compare?

This account forge all blocks for me: NAS-5HZF-TPQ5-GSHF-7GV33
Here is a example of a block, if you want to compare
Block: 258433
Hash: 7115900780532831094
timestamp: 30758915 (3/16/2015 12:08:35 GMT)

Peers:
  funkyvps3.funkymonkey.org   0   32 MB   2 MB   NRS 1.1.3.N1   VPS
  patapato.ddns.net   0   102 MB   3 MB   NRS 1.1.3.N1   Win7-64b
  99.*.137.145   0   91 MB   2 MB   NRS 1.1.3.N1   PC
  cb2.flipflop.mooo.com   986'100   5 MB   3 MB   NRS 1.1.3.N1   CubieBoard2
  222.*.62.194   0   74 MB   1 MB   NRS 1.1.3.N1   www.nascoin.org
  cb2.flipflop.mooo.com   986'100   1 MB   936 KB   NRS 1.1.3.N1   CubieBoard2
  cb2.flipflop.mooo.com   986'100   140 MB   6 MB   NRS 1.1.3.N1   CubieBoard2
  cb2.flipflop.mooo.com   0   120 KB   88 KB   NRS 1.1.3.N1   CubieBoard2
  23.*.44.142   0   4 MB   4 MB   NRS 1.1.3.N1   

[patapato]

I have 3 conecteds peers:
cb2.flipflop.mooo.com ... CubieBoard2
99.*.137.145
222.*.62.194

Send-me please.
NAS-VBK9-5ZXA-CJQ8-GEWVU

Haven't connected to NAS network for quite some time and try to sync to these peers. From what I observe this blockchain does sync properly until Nov 17 last year, then suddenly gets no block found for more than 1.5 months until Jan 7 and then continue. This blockchain seems 'broken' for me.

Anyone knows the same issue found on other fork(s) as well? Could anyone post the peers of other fork(s) so we can compare?

This account forge all blocks for me: NAS-5HZF-TPQ5-GSHF-7GV33
Here is a example of a block, if you want to compare
Block: 258433
Hash: 7115900780532831094
timestamp: 30758915 (3/16/2015 12:08:35 GMT)

Peers:
  funkyvps3.funkymonkey.org   0   32 MB   2 MB   NRS 1.1.3.N1   VPS
  patapato.ddns.net   0   102 MB   3 MB   NRS 1.1.3.N1   Win7-64b
  99.*.137.145   0   91 MB   2 MB   NRS 1.1.3.N1   PC
  cb2.flipflop.mooo.com   986'100   5 MB   3 MB   NRS 1.1.3.N1   CubieBoard2
  222.*.62.194   0   74 MB   1 MB   NRS 1.1.3.N1   www.nascoin.org
  cb2.flipflop.mooo.com   986'100   1 MB   936 KB   NRS 1.1.3.N1   CubieBoard2
  cb2.flipflop.mooo.com   986'100   140 MB   6 MB   NRS 1.1.3.N1   CubieBoard2
  cb2.flipflop.mooo.com   0   120 KB   88 KB   NRS 1.1.3.N1   CubieBoard2
  23.*.44.142   0   4 MB   4 MB   NRS 1.1.3.N1   

I don't understand, as I am also forging all the blocks, but I have quite the same peers than you. So it looks like we have 2 different forks with the same peers, in the same network.

My peers:
  cb2.flipflop.mooo.com 657'400 6 MB 149 MB NRS 1.1.3.N1 CubieBoard2
  funkyvps3.funkymonkey.org 0 3 MB 70 MB NRS 1.1.3.N1 VPS
  flipflop.mooo.com 657'400 11 MB 8 MB NRS 1.1.3.N1 CubieBoard2
  cb2.flipflop.mooo.com 0 230 KB 331 KB NRS 1.1.3.N1 CubieBoard2
  cb2.flipflop.mooo.com 657'400 24 MB 13 MB NRS 1.1.3.N1 CubieBoard2
  99.227.137.145 0 9 MB 284 MB NRS 1.1.3.N1 PC
  cb2.flipflop.mooo.com 657'400 1 MB 1 MB NRS 1.1.3.N1 CubieBoard2
  222.92.62.194 0 1 MB 4 MB NRS 1.1.3.N1 www.nascoin.org
  cb2.flipflop.mooo.com 657'400 5 MB 9 MB NRS 1.1.3.N1 CubieBoard2
  23.95.44.142 0 3 MB 110 MB NRS 1.1.3.N1 PC

By the way, in my client/server NAS-5HZF-TPQ5-GSHF-7GV33 has his last transaction on 06/10/2014. But he was forging on the same fork as me (NAS-H5AW-7J9F-7VCY-DJ8NB) on 20/02, this is block history on that date:
...
233218 20/02/2015 11:19:33 0 0 0 NAS-H5AW-7J9F-7VCY-DJ8NB 0 B 25874 %
233217 20/02/2015 11:17:34 0 0 0 NAS-5HZF-TPQ5-GSHF-7GV33 0 B 13046 %
...

But I have to say that on 20/02/15 I copied the blockchain of User1397367406. My previous blockchain was not synchronizing since many days ago.

[patapato]

About exchanges, there has been just 4 exchanges trading NAS:
    Poloniex, DGEX, Bter and BTC38. [/li][/list]

It is clear that DGEX is not running a node now.

It is clear for me that BTC38 has no running a node, as it has not withdraw or deposit option (it trades smoke called NAS, not real NAS).

About the two other, some people sent NAS from Poloniex to Bter without success (Kozan, Mr.Dux, ...), and it happened at least since September 19 2014. So, the two greatest exchanges was in different fork at least since then.

Recently User1397367406 said:

I know for sure that Polionex does not run a node/wallet right now.

I'm in doubt that Bter is running a node also.

[tiker]

I don't understand, as I am also forging all the blocks, but I have quite the same peers than you. So it looks like we have 2 different forks with the same peers, in the same network.

My peers:
  cb2.flipflop.mooo.com 657'400 6 MB 149 MB NRS 1.1.3.N1 CubieBoard2
  funkyvps3.funkymonkey.org 0 3 MB 70 MB NRS 1.1.3.N1 VPS
  flipflop.mooo.com 657'400 11 MB 8 MB NRS 1.1.3.N1 CubieBoard2
  cb2.flipflop.mooo.com 0 230 KB 331 KB NRS 1.1.3.N1 CubieBoard2
  cb2.flipflop.mooo.com 657'400 24 MB 13 MB NRS 1.1.3.N1 CubieBoard2
  99.227.137.145 0 9 MB 284 MB NRS 1.1.3.N1 PC
  cb2.flipflop.mooo.com 657'400 1 MB 1 MB NRS 1.1.3.N1 CubieBoard2
  222.92.62.194 0 1 MB 4 MB NRS 1.1.3.N1 www.nascoin.org
  cb2.flipflop.mooo.com 657'400 5 MB 9 MB NRS 1.1.3.N1 CubieBoard2
  23.95.44.142 0 3 MB 110 MB NRS 1.1.3.N1 PC

By the way, in my client/server NAS-5HZF-TPQ5-GSHF-7GV33 has his last transaction on 06/10/2014. But he was forging on the same fork as me (NAS-H5AW-7J9F-7VCY-DJ8NB) on 20/02, this is block history on that date:
...
233218 20/02/2015 11:19:33 0 0 0 NAS-H5AW-7J9F-7VCY-DJ8NB 0 B 25874 %
233217 20/02/2015 11:17:34 0 0 0 NAS-5HZF-TPQ5-GSHF-7GV33 0 B 13046 %
...

But I have to say that on 20/02/15 I copied the blockchain of User1397367406. My previous blockchain was not synchronizing since many days ago.

I'm thinking you some how ended up on your own fork.  Both of my nodes show NAS-5HZF-TPQ5-GSHF-7GV33 as the one forging all of the blocks.  This means my nodes agree with lcharles123's node.  Both of my nodes were started clean downloading the block chain from the peers on the network.

Chances are, your forging node and the other forging node at some point stopped talking to each other and both started forging your own threads.  When things merged back (more than 1440 blocks later) the two forging nodes couldn't rewrite history since it's too far back so you continued on your own chains while the rest of the nodes agree with chain from the other node.

I'd say take a look at the previous messages about missing transactions, period of silence (no blocks) from Nov. to Jan. and if you're node has the same missing information, scrap it and join ours.

On my nodes, I see your account NAS-H5AW-7J9F-7VCY-DJ8NB has 22'000'670.0038 NAS with the last transactions of:
Date   Type   Amount   Fee   Account
21/02/2015 16:06:15   Ordinary payment      10   1   NAS-H5AW-7J9F-7VCY-DJ8NB
20/02/2015 05:22:52   Alias assignment      0   1   NAS-MRCC-2YLS-8M54-3CMAJ
24/06/2014 15:30:34   Ordinary payment      21'900'009.0038   1   NAS-H5AW-7J9F-7VCY-DJ8NB
24/06/2014 03:43:38   Ordinary payment      11   1   NAS-QNSP-RHXF-R4JB-B2SL5
24/06/2014 03:37:23   Alias assignment      0   1   NAS-MRCC-2YLS-8M54-3CMAJ
23/06/2014 20:46:04   Ordinary payment      100'000   1   NAS-H5AW-7J9F-7VCY-DJ8NB

Is this right?  If so, switching to our chain won't cost you anything.

If User1397367406 is still watching this thread, who do you see as the current forger of the blocks (since patapato's chain started with your download last month)?

[User1397367406]

I don't understand, as I am also forging all the blocks, but I have quite the same peers than you. So it looks like we have 2 different forks with the same peers, in the same network.

... cut ...

By the way, in my client/server NAS-5HZF-TPQ5-GSHF-7GV33 has his last transaction on 06/10/2014. But he was forging on the same fork as me (NAS-H5AW-7J9F-7VCY-DJ8NB) on 20/02, this is block history on that date:
...
233218 20/02/2015 11:19:33 0 0 0 NAS-H5AW-7J9F-7VCY-DJ8NB 0 B 25874 %
233217 20/02/2015 11:17:34 0 0 0 NAS-5HZF-TPQ5-GSHF-7GV33 0 B 13046 %
...

But I have to say that on 20/02/15 I copied the blockchain of User1397367406. My previous blockchain was not synchronizing since many days ago.

I'm thinking you some how ended up on your own fork.  Both of my nodes show NAS-5HZF-TPQ5-GSHF-7GV33 as the one forging all of the blocks.  This means my nodes agree with lcharles123's node.  Both of my nodes were started clean downloading the block chain from the peers on the network.

Chances are, your forging node and the other forging node at some point stopped talking to each other and both started forging your own threads.  When things merged back (more than 1440 blocks later) the two forging nodes couldn't rewrite history since it's too far back so you continued on your own chains while the rest of the nodes agree with chain from the other node.

I'd say take a look at the previous messages about missing transactions, period of silence (no blocks) from Nov. to Jan. and if you're node has the same missing information, scrap it and join ours.

... cut ...

Is this right?  If so, switching to our chain won't cost you anything.

If User1397367406 is still watching this thread, who do you see as the current forger of the blocks (since patapato's chain started with your download last month)?

There are at least 2 forks: patapato and mine ( NAS-5HZF-TPQ5-GSHF-7GV33 / 5802728473452724205 )
Last transaction on 06/10/2014 on my account is what i have here.

I was forging some time on the same chain as patapato (NAS-H5AW-7J9F-7VCY-DJ8NB) some time ago (saw him forging most of the blocks), can't tell exactly when it was ...
Is there a better way to look at the (forged) block than the client in a browser?

<< If User1397367406 is still watching this thread, who do you see as the current forger of the blocks (since patapato's chain started with your download last month)?
I see my node forging all the blocks, as far as i can tell from the little Blocks history.
I also tried to sync a new client with the network and ended up with the same blockchain as now (my node wasn't running at that time).
I have no clue, yet, as why i'm not able to stay on the same chain as patapato.
By the way, i'm on a daily disconnect/re-connect with IP change: should be at 09:00 UTC.
Should enable more logging on client/server to see whats going on there ...
May be it's a hallmark thing or a mutual ignore/Connection refused ...

As to the remarke from lcharles123:
<< Haven't connected to NAS network for quite some time and try to sync to these peers. From what I observe this blockchain does sync properly until Nov 17 last year, then suddenly gets no block found for more than 1.5 months until Jan 7 and then continue. This blockchain seems 'broken' for me.
Well i'd had to stop forging some time in November ( if i remember correctly there where only max 1-2 other nodes present), as i started the server again, in mid/end december it took me a while longer to sync to the network again. I think at that period there was maybe only 1 node left, if any.
If anybody has a better chain i'm willing to take it

<< About the two other, some people sent NAS from Poloniex to Bter without success (Kozan, Mr.Dux, ...), and it happened at least since September 19 2014. So, the two greatest exchanges was in different fork at least since then.
I know for sure that Poloniex doesn't run a server right now. Last time i messaged them they told me that they'll be willing to re-sync there node.
At least the person i spoke to saied that i'll pass the message to there team ...
I have also an open transaction from Poloniex to my wallet.

My current peers list:

Code:

  patapato.ddns.net	0	157 MB	19 MB	NRS 1.1.3.N1	Win7-64b
  cb2.flipflop.mooo.com	0	4 MB	5 MB	NRS 1.1.3.N1	PC
  funkyvps3.funkymonkey.org	0	16 MB	22 MB	NRS 1.1.3.N1	VPS
  99.227.137.145	0	19 MB	28 MB	NRS 1.1.3.N1	PC
  222.92.62.194	0	287 KB	2 MB	NRS 1.1.3.N1	www.nascoin.org
  cb2.flipflop.mooo.com	1'314'800	16 MB	17 MB	NRS 1.1.3.N1	CubieBoard2
  cb2.flipflop.mooo.com	1'314'800	10 MB	13 MB	NRS 1.1.3.N1	CubieBoard2
  222.92.62.194	0	266 KB	2 MB	NRS 1.1.3.N1	www.nascoin.org
  23.95.44.142	0	8 MB	11 MB	NRS 1.1.3.N1	PC

[tiker]

So we're all on the same chain as you (User1397367406) then.  The nightly disconnects means that we have no one forging on our chain over night.

Patapato's node has drifted off our chain some how.  It sounds like Patapato's node is the only node that's on that fork.  All of the other nodes agree that User1397367406's blocks are correct.

If Patapato reset's their node and downloads the blockchain from the rest of us, Patapato should then be forging or fighting with User1397367406's node to forge blocks during the day, and gets all of the blocks during the night when User1397367406 is offline.

The node "funkyvps3.funkymonkey.org" is a new VPS node I setup last week.  I added my desktop as a well known peer for the chain to download and it downloaded the chain just fine matching my desktop's node.

Patapato:  If you do decide to reset your block chain, add "funkyvps3.funkymonkey.org" to your well known peers list.  You should be on the same chain as the rest of us then.

[Jamil.Kamil]

To get  NAS exchange im very important so ..?

[User1397367406]

So we're all on the same chain as you (User1397367406) then.  The nightly disconnects means that we have no one forging on our chain over night.

Patapato's node has drifted off our chain some how.  It sounds like Patapato's node is the only node that's on that fork.  All of the other nodes agree that User1397367406's blocks are correct.

If Patapato reset's their node and downloads the blockchain from the rest of us, Patapato should then be forging or fighting with User1397367406's node to forge blocks during the day, and gets all of the blocks during the night when User1397367406 is offline.

The node "funkyvps3.funkymonkey.org" is a new VPS node I setup last week.  I added my desktop as a well known peer for the chain to download and it downloaded the chain just fine matching my desktop's node.

Patapato:  If you do decide to reset your block chain, add "funkyvps3.funkymonkey.org" to your well known peers list.  You should be on the same chain as the rest of us then.

I disconnect every day at 09:00 AM UTC for 05-10 min in order to reconnect and prevent auto-disconnect from provider.
The DNS update should start after 5 min max and the propagation should take the longest part.

[tiker]

I disconnect every day at 09:00 AM UTC for 05-10 min in order to reconnect and prevent auto-disconnect from provider.
The DNS update should start after 5 min max and the propagation should take the longest part.

I see, ok.  So for about 15 minutes each day there's no forging until Patapato resets or someone else finds some way to gain some NAS and starts forging. 

To get  NAS exchange im very important so ..?

Not sure if I understand this correctly but to get an exchange we first need to agree on the correct fork.  Then we need to be sure there's no other forks out there that we are not aware of which might be better forks than our own.

Then we might be able to convince an exchange to resync their node with our chain to re-enable NAS trading or just hand them a public API node such as funkyvps3.funkymonkey.org:7873 to use.

[microbial]

nas is best rapper alive! 

[patapato]

I don't understand, as I am also forging all the blocks, but I have quite the same peers than you. So it looks like we have 2 different forks with the same peers, in the same network.

My peers:
  cb2.flipflop.mooo.com 657'400 6 MB 149 MB NRS 1.1.3.N1 CubieBoard2
  funkyvps3.funkymonkey.org 0 3 MB 70 MB NRS 1.1.3.N1 VPS
  flipflop.mooo.com 657'400 11 MB 8 MB NRS 1.1.3.N1 CubieBoard2
  cb2.flipflop.mooo.com 0 230 KB 331 KB NRS 1.1.3.N1 CubieBoard2
  cb2.flipflop.mooo.com 657'400 24 MB 13 MB NRS 1.1.3.N1 CubieBoard2
  99.227.137.145 0 9 MB 284 MB NRS 1.1.3.N1 PC
  cb2.flipflop.mooo.com 657'400 1 MB 1 MB NRS 1.1.3.N1 CubieBoard2
  222.92.62.194 0 1 MB 4 MB NRS 1.1.3.N1 www.nascoin.org
  cb2.flipflop.mooo.com 657'400 5 MB 9 MB NRS 1.1.3.N1 CubieBoard2
  23.95.44.142 0 3 MB 110 MB NRS 1.1.3.N1 PC

By the way, in my client/server NAS-5HZF-TPQ5-GSHF-7GV33 has his last transaction on 06/10/2014. But he was forging on the same fork as me (NAS-H5AW-7J9F-7VCY-DJ8NB) on 20/02, this is block history on that date:
...
233218 20/02/2015 11:19:33 0 0 0 NAS-H5AW-7J9F-7VCY-DJ8NB 0 B 25874 %
233217 20/02/2015 11:17:34 0 0 0 NAS-5HZF-TPQ5-GSHF-7GV33 0 B 13046 %
...

But I have to say that on 20/02/15 I copied the blockchain of User1397367406. My previous blockchain was not synchronizing since many days ago.

I'm thinking you some how ended up on your own fork.  Both of my nodes show NAS-5HZF-TPQ5-GSHF-7GV33 as the one forging all of the blocks.  This means my nodes agree with lcharles123's node.  Both of my nodes were started clean downloading the block chain from the peers on the network.

Chances are, your forging node and the other forging node at some point stopped talking to each other and both started forging your own threads.  When things merged back (more than 1440 blocks later) the two forging nodes couldn't rewrite history since it's too far back so you continued on your own chains while the rest of the nodes agree with chain from the other node.

I'd say take a look at the previous messages about missing transactions, period of silence (no blocks) from Nov. to Jan. and if you're node has the same missing information, scrap it and join ours.

On my nodes, I see your account NAS-H5AW-7J9F-7VCY-DJ8NB has 22'000'670.0038 NAS with the last transactions of:
Date   Type   Amount   Fee   Account
21/02/2015 16:06:15   Ordinary payment      10   1   NAS-H5AW-7J9F-7VCY-DJ8NB
20/02/2015 05:22:52   Alias assignment      0   1   NAS-MRCC-2YLS-8M54-3CMAJ
24/06/2014 15:30:34   Ordinary payment      21'900'009.0038   1   NAS-H5AW-7J9F-7VCY-DJ8NB
24/06/2014 03:43:38   Ordinary payment      11   1   NAS-QNSP-RHXF-R4JB-B2SL5
24/06/2014 03:37:23   Alias assignment      0   1   NAS-MRCC-2YLS-8M54-3CMAJ
23/06/2014 20:46:04   Ordinary payment      100'000   1   NAS-H5AW-7J9F-7VCY-DJ8NB

Is this right?  If so, switching to our chain won't cost you anything.

If User1397367406 is still watching this thread, who do you see as the current forger of the blocks (since patapato's chain started with your download last month)?

I have all that transactions, but I have one more transaction 15842066818581290243, that is when I sent 20 NAS to lcharles123:
20/02/2015 11:20:45 Ordinary payment   20 1 NAS-VBK9-5ZXA-CJQ8-GEWVU 1440+

lcharles123 didn't received it, and you don't have it on your chain (the same chain as him), but I later received 10 NAS from a friend (also to test the chain) and it is on both chains, yours and mine, as well as my alias assignment (2 minutes later of my unsuccessful sending, as my time is GMT+1 in winter, yours is GMT-5, I see).

I agree with reseting my node, I don't want to be on my own isolated chain :-) , and now it seems to be enough synchronized nodes, so I'm going to stop my node now, then I will try to synchronize with majority.

I was forging some time on the same chain as patapato (NAS-H5AW-7J9F-7VCY-DJ8NB) some time ago (saw him forging most of the blocks), can't tell exactly when it was ...

I was not forging all the time, and there was times that I stopped my node. In that situation the network was too weak, as it was only you and me as nodes verifying blocks, so a fork was very probable.