WHY THE BLAME ON BOUNTY HUNTERS FOR SHITCOINS?

[Sterbens]

I see no fault in the Hunters for this. But hunters should work on better projects.The people who invest in them get a lot of confidence.The Hunters are partly responsible for that.

Yes. Bounty hunters may not be fully responsible for the dumping of tokens but the fact that bounty hunters aim to promote the project to attract investors, there is also a small part for bounty hunters why to be blamed. This is the reason why bounty hunters should never jump easily promoting a project which they never have researched on or check the background of the team behind the project.

Sometimes those who do that are newbie accounts, they don't check the team's background, so they can be blamed for promoting the scam project, but I'm sure people who have been on this forum for a long time know which bounty they will promote because they always check the project with details.

[Drai]

Some people love to blame the bounty hunters, they are just crypto kid, nothing else. Once I cared about their blames but later I realized they have no proper knowledge of how the crypto market works! Not every bounty hunters are a dumper, rather most of them are holders with good knowledge! 2-3% of total supply can't dump a coin, it's the shitcoin which will dump always. Right now, most of the bounty projects haven't paid their hunters but still, price is dumping, why? Cartesi, Blockburn and so on coins are highly dumped when hunters did not receive their payment!

[arimamib]

Some people love to blame the bounty hunters, they are just crypto kid, nothing else. Once I cared about their blames but later I realized they have no proper knowledge of how the crypto market works! Not every bounty hunters are a dumper, rather most of them are holders with good knowledge! 2-3% of total supply can't dump a coin, it's the shitcoin which will dump always. Right now, most of the bounty projects haven't paid their hunters but still, price is dumping, why? Cartesi, Blockburn and so on coins are highly dumped when hunters did not receive their payment!

indeed there are quite a lot of assumptions that bounty hunters make market prices damaged, but they only sell the work they get. plus more payments are delayed by the developer so I think it's normal for them to make short sales.

[Marble777]

In fact, not all prize hunters sell project tokens after being listed on the stock exchange, but most project teams say prize hunters are the cause. they should also know that investors or project teams hold tokens earlier than prize hunters who get tokens after the project is completed.

[tbterryboy]

People who are blaming bounty hunters just don't know what they are doing, it's me the fault of the bounty hunters that a project failed. Bounty hunters are just like freelancers that are employed for a short time to do a job of promoting a project, and the tokens they get are just their payment, so there is nothing wrong with them selling the tokens they got immediately.

After working for a long time and getting paid, you have the right to do whatever you want with the income you have gotten. If anyone should be blamed , I would say depending on the situation you can blame the investors or the devs. I said the devs, because if they don't do what they are meant to do, the project will fail.

[$anounimus$]

This is a situation where each party puts its position in its place. It is also important to understand if the coins or tokens are good and valuable. Since the campaign started, it is already crowded. just look at the number of participants and how good again the amount and time of distribution according to the following schedule from the first price released. definitely not called SC

One more thing, Mentality.

The owner gives a close picture of the sale value of their tokens so that prize hunters don't rush to sell after the distribution process at a price below the average rate. This keeps things stable and the coins become valuable and large.

[princerepon]

Simple thing, a project carry total of 1%-10% (average) bounty pool. Sometimes we can see 10%-15% (rare). The rest of coins goes for investors, teams, advisors and other sectors (depend on various projects). The main question is how can beat bounty hunters those 80%-90% allocation tokens. Can anyone explain this..? Only.. just only stupid person can blame bounty hunters for project failure. If there is someone responsible for failure project then it's project team management them self who have no experience how to run a crypto project, no one else.

Agree, most of the tokens allocation for the bounty campaign is not more than 5% and not all bounty hunters will sell it immediately because there are many who hold it for a certain period of time. The fall in prices at the exchanger in my opinion because of the trust factor in the developer team and of course I have nothing to do with bounty hunters

There are plenty of ways to control token price. There are hundreds of idea that you can face the bad situation in crypto space. But they just love to give bounty hunters their own blame. Most of projects now days coming for just sale their shit coin for fill their own bag. After token sale they don't develop their project and the final result is project start to die slowly. That project never going to reach success which project's team management stop upgrading project's work. So if someone has to be more careful then it's the team.

[Yamifoud]

After working for a long time and getting paid, you have the right to do whatever you want with the income you have gotten. If anyone should be blamed , I would say depending on the situation you can blame the investors or the devs. I said the devs, because if they don't do what they are meant to do, the project will fail.

And because of that (bolded one), it gives the reason why devs put the blame on them for they actually dump their coins/tokens after they received. But fo course, devs, and the team are supposedly anticipating the possible scenario but unfortunately, they just let that thing happens and don't give any necessary action to help it out. And in the end, all the blames is for bounty hunters who are just holding a few numbers compared to investors who also did the same thing. It sounds like to be unfair, and because I'm also a bounty hunter before.

[Saichoukyushin]

From observation, most people who are bounty hunters are also investors themselves. In any case, the two groups almost have the same interest and that is to maximize profit on their token holdings. It is just two sides of one coin issue. It all depends on the individual involved because we have bounty hunters who hold coins longer than those who invested with their funds. It is about time  people act fair in their comments towards bounty hunters anytime a coin becomes a shit coin. By the way even in recent times, bounty hunting is not as attractive as it used to be, but still people are always quick to put blame on bounty hunters after a failed project meanwhile the tokens received bounty are very meagre to kill a project.

It was often happen they are just always blaming the bounty hunter or airdropper when the price of the coin dump on the first place bounty hunter was just practical unlike any other when they have value then they will store it and didn't sell and when there is no value then they will be a crying baby because of bounty or airdropper why the price drop so down.

[tunapa]

Projects blaming bounty hunters for price dump are finding ways to shift their weakness to that as a cover up. Its been a while  projects heap blame on hunter probably because bounty hasn't been going well and we are many are not paying instantly.

[Kelvinid]

Projects blaming bounty hunters for price dump are finding ways to shift their weakness to that as a cover up. Its been a while  projects heap blame on hunter probably because bounty hasn't been going well and we are many are not paying instantly.

I don't think it was a cover because, in reality, bounty holders will actually sell and possible to dump their token/coins once they receive. The only thing that it makes harsh is that bounty hunters never care about helping for the project to succeed, they only just promoting and that's the only help they'll give. It is then wondering why they put blame into them, besides, the future of a certain project doesn't rely upon the bounty hunters but it should be in the owner and its developers.

[Gab20]

I see no fault in the Hunters for this. But hunters should work on better projects.The people who invest in them get a lot of confidence.The Hunters are partly responsible for that.

Investors should not also depend on bounty hunters to do research for the. That will help in promoting projects does not mean we are 100% right in making the perfect decision.
Most of the times, there are just few projects we can be sure of. If a bounty hunter is participating in five projects at the sea time, just one among the five might be showing some level of seriousness and sign of good future.

[Genemind]

I wonder why bounty hunters are blamed for shitcoins. They are promoting the project, which means a portion of the sale came from the effort of bounty hunters. Not to mention bounty hunters blamed for dumping, where a small portion of the supply is allocated as a bounty pool. Majority of the total supply is from the early investors and the team itself which I think are those who dump first for profit.

[HunterUnchained]

Because it's always easier to blame someone else and never take responsibility. Sometimes I wonder what these projects think about bounty hunters. This is exactly why it becomes difficult for them to reward bounty hunter's efforts even though they may have failed in their own responsibilities of building a better and attractive project. They blame the hunters because it's easier to do so and since no one speaks for the hunters, they are always easier to target.

[retnoanjani]

Because it's always easier to blame someone else and never take responsibility. Sometimes I wonder what these projects think about bounty hunters. This is exactly why it becomes difficult for them to reward bounty hunter's efforts even though they may have failed in their own responsibilities of building a better and attractive project. They blame the hunters because it's easier to do so and since no one speaks for the hunters, they are always easier to target.

Like playing victims so that irresponsible dev can escape the various accusations of a failed project. It is unfortunate, even the current bounty allocation is relatively small, when such a small allocation can destroy the market price it means that it can be concluded that there is a wrong strategy from the dev, they should have anticipated it because they dared to hold a bounty. If dev is not ready to face the risk, wouldn't it be better not to hold the bounty?

[EdenDice]

I think it's easy to blame hunters, so some over smart noob guy doest that. You should ignore those crypto kiddies because they don't have good sense! Bounty hunters a major part in crypto, this is the cheapest way to promote startup project, that's it. We do promotions for you, we get paid and we spend it. Why so serious against bounty hunters? They should blame on their idea!

[Valzador]

I think it's easy to blame hunters, so some over smart noob guy doest that. You should ignore those crypto kiddies because they don't have good sense! Bounty hunters a major part in crypto, this is the cheapest way to promote startup project, that's it. We do promotions for you, we get paid and we spend it. Why so serious against bounty hunters? They should blame on their idea!

Bounty hunters will certainly not want to do promotions for shit projects. The problem is they cannot distinguish quality projects from those that are not quality. We should not blame them. I think the forum moderators can filter out the altcoin discussion section before a thread is published the moderators or the team judges the quality of the project, if it's not like that then I'm sure there will be more garbage projects that will make this forum dirty.

[travwill]

Believe me, if the project at the start has a low capitalization on the worthless exchange, then the coins of the bounty hunters will be quite enough to drop the price by 50-70%,
which will infuriate investors and they will begin to swear on hunters. But here the problem is for developers who could not correctly choose the exchange and bring the coin to the market.

[pandanaran]

I agree with your options above and I also completely dislike the reason why the project or coin died because of the bounty hunter? as we know that prize hunters do not hold large amounts of coins while they think that coins become dead by prize hunters who sell their tokens. I don't think that's right. the project will continue to grow depending on the performance of the project team itself.

[bluebit25]

Believe me, if the project at the start has a low capitalization on the worthless exchange, then the coins of the bounty hunters will be quite enough to drop the price by 50-70%,
which will infuriate investors and they will begin to swear on hunters. But here the problem is for developers who could not correctly choose the exchange and bring the coin to the market.

Even bounty tokens can cause price collapse many times if their project has no volume. I have seen a few projects with a bounty budget of only $ 10-20k, but it makes the price fall 3 times compared to the original price. Obviously it all depends on the project and its volume