Does good side of gambling overcomes its negative side?

[YOSHIE]

In my country there is a song about gambling, the lyrics: "Gambling promises victory, gambling promises to lose" why the fun is always banned, gambling.

Well for that many things that think gambling is fun and with a lot of money, it is common to get distress, negative and positive always haunt gambling addicts, if you win in the game of course positive gambling accompanies you, if you end up in the negative defeat and destruction that you feel.

It means: gambling promises to be positive and gambling promises to be negative, basically the individual himself is assessing these two factors.

[Debonaire217]

In my country there is a song about gambling, the lyrics: "Gambling promises victory, gambling promises to lose" why the fun is always banned, gambling.

It turns out that gambling falls on either side, to win or lose, and couldn't be determined by exact probabilities. I just can't understand the phrase "why the fun is always banned" in here.

Well for that many things that think gambling is fun and with a lot of money, it is common to get distress, negative and positive always haunt gambling addicts, if you win in the game of course positive gambling accompanies you, if you end up in the negative defeat and destruction that you feel.

It means: gambling promises to be positive and gambling promises to be negative, basically the individual himself is assessing these two factors.

In addition, it depends on a person if the effect of gambling will turn out to be positive and negative. There's a clue here, we can actually decide which path we would like to take, either positive or negative, depends on how we perceive our loss or wins. In such a case that we feel that we start on losing too much, we can stop, in that way, we can prevent ourselves to be affected negatively whenever our funds gets all consumed. Or to control positive in such a case that we are winning too much but we are still gambling it and not enjoying the profit that turns out for us to lose what we've won.

[Best Dreams]

The government and the gambling casinos always have precautionary advice to people who are gambling and no good side of gambling can overcome its negative sides, because the side is something we don't want to happen to ourselves to our family and to anyone we knows because can end up your life in big misery.

Agree with you everything is good as well as you are doing it in limit so gambling also has some side effecrs that nerds to be recover by our skulls and making money from it. If gambling is getting you earn more than your expectations then it means you are at good but if its about all lose better stay away from it as its not suitable for you.

[matchi2011]

The government and the gambling casinos always have precautionary advice to people who are gambling and no good side of gambling can overcome its negative sides, because the side is something we don't want to happen to ourselves to our family and to anyone we knows because can end up your life in big misery.

Agree with you everything is good as well as you are doing it in limit so gambling also has some side effecrs that nerds to be recover by our skulls and making money from it. If gambling is getting you earn more than your expectations then it means you are at good but if its about all lose better stay away from it as its not suitable for you.

If you already losing a  lots of money it's time to assess and understand that this venue of activities is not going to bring any good to you, time to move away to avoid losing more money and time. There's a need of seriously taking things to consideration remember that if you are treating this place as a source of your entertainment you should always have a limited budget to use and not to exceed from it.

[peter0425]

.
Because practically, 70% of gamblers lose dailies, which makes the bookmakers even more rich.

i thing it is more even higher up to 85% of gamblers losses everyday and only 10-15% wins but not assuring High winnings because i have been in casino for many years and in my observation it is smaller percent won bigger amount.

.
Until gambling provides proportional profiters to losers, it still has more disadvantages even without listing them.

the question is will this be happen?Nope it wont and never.

[Slow death]

I think no matter how we try to quantify the advantages of gambling, i am not sure it can be more than the negative sides.
Because practically, 70% of gamblers lose dailies, which makes the bookmakers even more rich.

if more than 70% of the people in the gamble world made a profit, then I think the gambling sites would be broke. That is why the disadvantages are more than the advantages and few people are able to profit from gamble. I usually accompany channels from people who have been in the gamble world for a long time and these people give lessons on gamble. interestingly I don't see these people predicting the results of the games and I don't see these people showing how much money they have made over the years. But they sell books and courses. What makes me think that the number of people who really succeeded in the gamble world can be very little

Until gambling provides proportional profiters to losers, it still has more disadvantages even without listing them.

that's why I look at gamble for fun and don't create high expectations

[Gladiator25]

I think some people will still try to playing gambling even if they know the positive and negative side of gambling games. Some of them can control themselves in gambling because their purpose is not for making money. But for some other people, they become addicting because they cannot control themselves and they spend their money to play gambling more and more. As long as we can control ourselves while we are playing gambling, we don't have to worry or afraid.

Those negatives and positive side of gambling is just a reminder for all the gamble players. I know that all the gamblers know these two sides and still playing. I agree that we should regulate ourselves even though it has a positive sides. We have the saying that "too much is bad for everything". Just have a control on yourself when playing gamble.

[imstillthebest]

I think some people will still try to playing gambling even if they know the positive and negative side of gambling games. Some of them can control themselves in gambling because their purpose is not for making money. But for some other people, they become addicting because they cannot control themselves and they spend their money to play gambling more and more. As long as we can control ourselves while we are playing gambling, we don't have to worry or afraid.

Those negatives and positive side of gambling is just a reminder for all the gamble players. I know that all the gamblers know these two sides and still playing. I agree that we should regulate ourselves even though it has a positive sides. We have the saying that "too much is bad for everything". Just have a control on yourself when playing gamble.

too much positive side is bad ? when you win too much , i dont think its bad but its good because you have alot of money and you can recover your losses .

 other positive effect of gambling are having fun , make friends , etc but too much of some of this positive effects isnt really good anymore like for example when your enjoying too much , you can now forget your obligations on your family and on your house holds  . so yeah control is all .

[LogitechMouse]

In my country there is a song about gambling, the lyrics: "Gambling promises victory, gambling promises to lose" why the fun is always banned, gambling.

Gambling is like a coin that has 2 sides.

This can be applied to gambling too that it can give you profit (other side of the coin) and it can give you losses (other side of the coin). Unfortunately, most of the gamblers often experiencing the other side of it which is losses for some reasons so for me, I don't see any reason to overcome the bad side by the good side.

Because practically, 70% of gamblers lose dailies, which makes the bookmakers even more rich.

Probably more than what you said. I don't see anybody who became successful just because of gambling because most of them are ending up losing their money on it.

[bitcoinst]

I think no matter how we try to quantify the advantages of gambling, i am not sure it can be more than the negative sides.
Because practically, 70% of gamblers lose dailies, which makes the bookmakers even more rich.

Until gambling provides proportional profiters to losers, it still has more disadvantages even without listing them.

I think that the answer to this question will primarily depend on the point of view from which we will look at it.
After all, the brain of addicted people is inclined to seek confirmation of the positive factors of their addiction, while a person without addiction can objectively see more negative factors than his dependent friend.

[Russlenat]

Because practically, 70% of gamblers lose dailies, which makes the bookmakers even more rich.

Bookmakers does not take your bet, they only facilitate your bet, they make money from juice so their income would rely on the volume of gamblers and the amount of money entering in sportsbook. it goes like this, when one wins, the other will lose, the winning bettor will usually get 90% only while the 10% will be for the book makers, that's how they make money.

[smyslov]

Bookmakers does not take your bet, they only facilitate your bet, they make money from juice so their income would rely on the volume of gamblers and the amount of money entering in sportsbook. it goes like this, when one wins, the other will lose, the winning bettor will usually get 90% only while the 10% will be for the book makers, that's how they make money.

With 90% losing a bet I don't think there are advantages of bad sides to good sides, the good sides is when you are gambling free of risk, and you can only do that if you are playing within your means and just for entertainment, any more than that it can be considered as high risk and takes away all the good sides of gambling.

[blockman]

This kind of dilemma makes our heads difficult to choose.
You either want to be positive because it's beneficial or you'll hate it but will choose the negative sides because you're always losing. We can't define each situation when you ask this kind of tricky question.

[South Park]

I think no matter how we try to quantify the advantages of gambling, i am not sure it can be more than the negative sides.
Because practically, 70% of gamblers lose dailies, which makes the bookmakers even more rich.

Until gambling provides proportional profiters to losers, it still has more disadvantages even without listing them.

This depends entirely on your point of view, if you are trying to obtain profits from gambling and we know the majority of gamblers are long term losers then regardless of any positive side that gambling may have it is probably not enough for the ones that have that goal in mind, but if you are aware that it is almost impossible to obtain profits when you gamble and your goal is only to have fun or something similar then the positive side of gambling can be good enough as long as you can maintain your losses as small as possible.

[l3pox]

I think no matter how we try to quantify the advantages of gambling, i am not sure it can be more than the negative sides.
Because practically, 70% of gamblers lose dailies, which makes the bookmakers even more rich.

Until gambling provides proportional profiters to losers, it still has more disadvantages even without listing them.

This depends entirely on your point of view, if you are trying to obtain profits from gambling and we know the majority of gamblers are long term losers then regardless of any positive side that gambling may have it is probably not enough for the ones that have that goal in mind, but if you are aware that it is almost impossible to obtain profits when you gamble and your goal is only to have fun or something similar then the positive side of gambling can be good enough as long as you can maintain your losses as small as possible.

yes, if you're only doing it for fun and not for profit and supposing you're not addicited to it then the gambling expense would come as a "fun expense", let's say simmilar to going to the theatre or going to the park, with the difference that going to watch a play will add to your life in a more meaningfull way.

if we generalize, overview would mostly be negative
 but of course, it's a distribution and there are people who will take something good out of it.

[KTChampions]

Because practically, 70% of gamblers lose dailies, which makes the bookmakers even more rich.

Bookmakers does not take your bet, they only facilitate your bet, they make money from juice so their income would rely on the volume of gamblers and the amount of money entering in sportsbook. it goes like this, when one wins, the other will lose, the winning bettor will usually get 90% only while the 10% will be for the book makers, that's how they make money.

This is exactly so in theory. But in practice, for some reason, bookmakers hate plus players. And in various ways they struggle with them - they cut the limits of bets and even ban. How can you explain this?
I’m always looking for an answer to this question but no one can clearly explain it.

[virasog]

Because practically, 70% of gamblers lose dailies, which makes the bookmakers even more rich.

Bookmakers does not take your bet, they only facilitate your bet, they make money from juice so their income would rely on the volume of gamblers and the amount of money entering in sportsbook. it goes like this, when one wins, the other will lose, the winning bettor will usually get 90% only while the 10% will be for the book makers, that's how they make money.

This is exactly so in theory. But in practice, for some reason, bookmakers hate plus players. And in various ways they struggle with them - they cut the limits of bets and even ban. How can you explain this?
I’m always looking for an answer to this question but no one can clearly explain it.

Bookmakers are not so innocent as they look like to be. They are the ones who make the most of the money on the bets. Even the bigger bookies buy the teams and players and make the deal with team so that the stronger team loses and all the bet money goes in the pocket of bookies.

[Golftech]

I think no matter how we try to quantify the advantages of gambling, i am not sure it can be more than the negative sides.
Because practically, 70% of gamblers lose dailies, which makes the bookmakers even more rich.

Until gambling provides proportional profiters to losers, it still has more disadvantages even without listing them.

This depends entirely on your point of view, if you are trying to obtain profits from gambling and we know the majority of gamblers are long term losers then regardless of any positive side that gambling may have it is probably not enough for the ones that have that goal in mind, but if you are aware that it is almost impossible to obtain profits when you gamble and your goal is only to have fun or something similar then the positive side of gambling can be good enough as long as you can maintain your losses as small as possible.

Indeed, because even you try all the best that you can the possibilities of losing your bets still present, there's no such words as continues winning unless you are doing illegal things while you are playing. Though there are people who can manifest and win they are just in numbers against those people who
are losing and getting addicted to this kind of entertainment.

[hahay]

This kind of dilemma makes our heads difficult to choose.
You either want to be positive because it's beneficial or you'll hate it but will choose the negative sides because you're always losing. We can't define each situation when you ask this kind of tricky question.

This is not an option because there is no way we will choose something negative. Indeed, we cannot determine the situation every time we gamble but if you only gamble when in a good mood and also only gamble with money that can be eliminated, then at least you will gamble with the positive side even though the results are not always good, but with these efforts at least it will makes you have control and will be aware of the time to stop when negative results are obtained.

[TopT3ns]

This kind of dilemma makes our heads difficult to choose.
You either want to be positive because it's beneficial or you'll hate it but will choose the negative sides because you're always losing. We can't define each situation when you ask this kind of tricky question.

This is not an option because there is no way we will choose something negative. Indeed, we cannot determine the situation every time we gamble but if you only gamble when in a good mood and also only gamble with money that can be eliminated, then at least you will gamble with the positive side even though the results are not always good, but with these efforts at least it will makes you have control and will be aware of the time to stop when negative results are obtained.

As far as I know from gambling, no one can provide a positive side, where gambling is a bad place that puts many people at risk, so you better be able to be careful when you want to gamble, at least you should be able to prepare yourself between losses with large amount or fortunately no one can provide a guarantee.