Who own bpip.org?

[teeGUMES]

actually he is part of our team in the future, you all should know and not cover your own face.
don't corner him, even some of you have been part of us before.

Thats great you're a team and all but please answer what benefit to the community you are providing by sitting on names of companies/websites/providers that are not part of your team?

You will know it all after someone around you says it here.
see and watch hot.

Thank you, I will eagerly watch the Scam Accusations board for more mention of your team hot.

[1713578705]

1713578705

[1713578705]

1713578705

[1713578705]

1713578705

[suchmoon]

actually he is part of our team in the future, you all should know and not cover your own face.
don't corner him, even some of you have been part of us before.

What is it, a team of squatters? Please come up with your own name(s) for your team and/or its members. I'm guessing this account is not affiliated with Facebook either.

[JollyGood]

I never understood the concept of name squatting to be anything other than for those responsible for doing it to either make mischief or for them to be looking for a way to make money by selling those squatted names to people they could associate with. Why else would people do it?

actually he is part of our team in the future, you all should know and not cover your own face.
don't corner him, even some of you have been part of us before.

What is it, a team of squatters? Please come up with your own name(s) for your team and/or its members. I'm guessing this account is not affiliated with Facebook either.

[Little Mouse]

A neutral tag indicating the account having no affiliation with the real bpip.org would be an wise idea. On other side it's noting of an high risk though.

If the account posted in meta, bitcoin discussion, he can gain the trust that he is from bpip project. I wouldn not doubt even if I did not see him in altcoin discussion. In that case, I would be the fool to trust him. I am sure that I would not be the only one. That's why a negative tag is more correct here. He was clearly an impersonator and it could bring a great loss to someone.

Not a huge risk but it'd be quite bad to have this dingleberry start asking for donations or something.

May be he has already asked or may be not but if he would use a bitcoin address in his profile, someone would send donation to that address too by knowing that it is original bpip account.

[fortunecrypto]

Impersonators deserve negative feedback. It is hard to see any other option unless there are exceptional circumstances. I see nothing exceptional here that could justify anything else therefore I have left negative tag too.

Never in the history of this forum have impersonators received neutral ratings for trying to defraud somebody else.

So many scams comes from impersonating the administrators of projects, and the telegram channels are full of people imitating the developers of a certain to scam newbies, he has a bad intentional from the start by creating a brand that he is not part of it, it's good that he has a negative so people will know and be warn.

[ChuckBuck]

actually he is part of our team in the future, you all should know and not cover your own face.
don't corner him, even some of you have been part of us before.

Ahaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.... It means organized fraud  So, what will your team do or provide to this forum? It must be something related to BPIP, a few factors related to the display, huh? Maybe recognition score? LoL  You should get another negative feedback with content: cheating with the team 

[Vod]

For full disclosure, I began working with Vod as a designer starting around April of 2018. A lot of work was put in from Vod to create and develop BPIP from the beginning, which I think began sometime in 2016? (Vod can correct me if I'm wrong here!). A lot of work has been put in by all, including suchmoon and myself.. which, for me, has made it a fun project to work on, as it has become a team effort and has consistently been improved upon.. not to mention the community support & suggestions/bug reports, which keeps our to-do lists active and opens up additional room for improvements, on top of the planned improvements already slated!

It was fun, and I missed it when I started on my new project.  I'm still finding little bits of BPIP info everywhere on my computer.  You and SM were so great in teaching me concepts and although I never did learn CSS, I know enough to contract out for it!  To think if I had never been hacked we prob might not have ever started working together, and the project would have died in Feb 2019. 

Working with machine learning is not as fun as compiling stats of a cutthroat forum though.  And my new domain name is not a sweet sounding unique abbreviation, so I don't expect it will be targeted like this.

@bpip.org - you've reached the top 30 least trusted since I drooped the bottom limit of -9999.  Unless your plan is to associate those letters with dishonesty, you should probably just abandon the account.

[The Cryptovator]

actually he is part of our team in the future, you all should know and not cover your own face.
don't corner him, even some of you have been part of us before.

So your team just choose username from most popular website? And what is your team goal to choose such as username which would mislead newbies? If your intention is build account and sell it later than it's not gonna happen anymore since both of you already marked as a impersonator. Can you please describe more about who have been part of your team and how?

[Bpip.org]

@Vod - I am proud of this https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=leasttrusted
wait till rank 1 and replace game-protect then i will leave by mentioning some MOD, BM which is really my second face and it's getting hotter like corona virus 


little mouse angle for first attention 
several other mice began to enter the black box 
@fb for further attention and there will be some spiders that will start working 
watch 

[Foxpup]

wait till rank 1 and replace game-protect

Bad news: BPIP caps negative trust at -2,097,152 and users with equal trust are sorted by registration date, so even if you hit the cap you'll still only be number 2 because you registered later. The only way you'll ever be number 1 is if the cap is removed and you can beat game-protect's actual trust score of -2,199,023,255,552. Good luck.

[dragonvslinux]

Well, I think that's probably enough tags either way. What I don't understand is why out of 13 DT negs, only 8 supply reference, the other 5 failed at doing so.
Foxpup, ibminer, suchmoon and marlboroza: why no reference to this thread to make the claim more credible? Are we just supposed to take your word for it?
Vod: Why not use a reference of the project you created, to confirm without a shadow of a doubt that the user is not affiliated with the project you founded?
Call it off-topic, but I'd consider the account sufficiently negged, so I'm moving onto the discussing the quality of these negs, that overall doesn't appear reliable from trusted members as you'd hope or expect. Overall, only 2/3 of DT members supplied references. I think the argument that it's unnecessary to provide a reference due to the number of references by other DT members isn't a real argument. Imagine a future where only a few of these 13 DT members are still DT in years or decades to come.

[suchmoon]

Are we just supposed to take your word for it?

Yes. It is precisely my word (and ibminer's, and Vod's) that others should rely on in this case. A reference wouldn't make my rating more credible.

Having said that, it probably wouldn't hurt either so I added a link to my post.

[JollyGood]

Very hard to argue with that view, leaving negative trust at least might have some impact on the scam attempts by impersonators who use Telegram or other tools to try to steal from people. The user that tried to impersonate as BPIP obviously had ulterior motives so I am glad he has been heavily tagged in red trust.

So many scams comes from impersonating the administrators of projects, and the telegram channels are full of people imitating the developers of a certain to scam newbies, he has a bad intentional from the start by creating a brand that he is not part of it, it's good that he has a negative so people will know and be warn.

[dragonvslinux]

Are we just supposed to take your word for it?

Yes. It is precisely my word (and ibminer's, and Vod's) that others should rely on in this case. A reference wouldn't make my rating more credible.

Having said that, it probably wouldn't hurt either so I added a link to my post.

Excellent! Now everyone who reads your feedback will understand why your opinion is one of he most relevant ones